Anticipated Responses to a Fee Program: The Key is Trust

References

• Allen, J. P., & Turner, E. (1992). Where diversity reigns. Diversity in America (pp. 30–33). Freeville, New York: East Hill Printers.
   Google Scholar
• Asquith, J. L. (1990). The Effects of Group Size and Composition on the Outcome of Focus Group Sessions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Claremont Graduate School.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, R. H., Berrier, D., & Barker, G. D. (1985). Entrance fees & visitation levels. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 3(1), 28–31.
   Google Scholar
• Binkley, C. S., & Mendelsohn, R. O. (1987). Recreation user fees. II. An economic analysis. Journal of Forestry, 8(5), 31–35.
   Google Scholar
• Bogle, T., Havitz, M., & Dimanche, F. (1992). Sector biases in adults' recreation fitness facility selections. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 10(3), 49–74.
   Google Scholar
• Cornell, S. (1996). The variable ties that bind: Content and circumstance in ethnic processes. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 19(2), 265–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crompton, J. L. (1981, March). How to find the price that's right. Parks & Recreation, 16(3), 32–39, 64
   Google Scholar
• Cvetkovich, G. T., & Winter, P. L. (1998). Community Reactions to Water Quality Problems in the Colville National Forest: Final Report. Unpublished manuscript, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA.
   Google Scholar
• Earle, T. C., & Cvetkovich, G. T. (1995). Social Trust: Toward a Cosmopolitan Society. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Herek, G. M., & Glunt, E. K. (1993). Public attitudes toward AIDS-related issues in the United States. In J. B. Pryor and G. D. Reeder (Eds.) The Social Psychology of HIV Infection (pp. 229–261), Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawerence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, D. R., & Selin, S. W. (1987). A method for establishing consumer price tolerance levels for public recreation services. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 5(3), 48–59.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, G. N., & Manfredo, M. J. (1991). An attitudinal based model of pricing for recreation services. Journal of Leisure Research, 23(1), 37–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knodel, J. (1993). The design and analysis of focus group studies: A practical approach. In D. L. Morgan (Ed.) Successful Focus Groups: Advancing the State of the Art (pp. 35–50). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. A. (1998). Analyzing & Reporting Focus Group Results. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Leuschner, W. A., Cook, P. S., Roggenbuck, J. W., & Oderwald, R. G. (1987). A comparative analysis for wilderness user fee policy. Journal of Leisure Research, 19(2), 101–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lime, D. W., & Lewis, M. S. (1997). Reactions of campers and interest group representatives to a proposed camping use fee in the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness: Results of a 1997 study. (On-line). Available: http://www.gis.umn.edu/snf/news/feerpt.html.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, R. E., Callinan, E. A., Echelberger, H. E., Koenemann, E. J., & McEwen, D. N. (1984). Differential fees: Raising revenue, distributing demand. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 2(1), 20–38.
   Google Scholar
• McCarville, R. E. (1991). An empirical investigation of the influence of cost information on willingness to pay for public aerobics classes. Leisure Sciences, 13, 85–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarville, R. E. (1995). Pricing for public leisure services: An ethical dilemma? Journal of Applied Recreation Research, 20(2), 95–108.
   Google Scholar
• McCarville, R. E. (1996). The importance of price last paid in developing price expectations for a public leisure service. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 14(4), 52–64.
   Google Scholar
• McCarville, R. (1998). Overview and comments on the fee-based presentations, 7th International Symposium on Society and Resource Management. (On-line) Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/research/rvur/wilderness//recreation_fees.htm.
   Google Scholar
• McCarville, R. E., & Crompton, J. L. (1987). An empirical investigation of the influence of information on reference prices for public swimming pools. Journal of Leisure Research, 19(3), 223–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarville, R. E., Reiling, S. D., & White, C. M. (1996). The role of fairness in users' assessments of first-time fee for a public recreation service. Leisure Sciences, 18, 61–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L. (1998). Planning Focus Groups. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. (2nd Edition). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, R. G., Covello, V. T., & McCallum, D. B. (1997). The determinants of trust and credibility in environmental risk communication: An empirical study. Risk Analysis, 17(1), 43–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiling, S. D., Criner, G. K., & Oltmanns, S. E. (1988). The influence of information on users' attitudes toward campground user fees. Journal of Leisure Research, 20(3), 208–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiling, S. D., Cheng, H. T., & Trott, C. (1992). Measuring the discriminatory impact associated with higher recreational fees. Leisure Sciences, 14(2), 121–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, P. (1997). Public perception of risk. Environmental Health, 59, 22–23, 54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson, S. (1989). A test of peak load pricing on senior citizen recreationists: A case study of Steamboat Lake State Park. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 7(1), 58–68.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnik, B. G., & Fidel, L. S. (1989). Using Multivariate Statistics. (2nd Ed.). New York: Harper Collins Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Terrell, T. (1998). Recreation user fees on public lands: A manager's perspective on implementing the recreation fee demo program on public lands. (Online). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/research/rvur/wilderness//recreation_fees.htm.
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of the Interior & United States Department of Agriculture. (1998). Recreational Fee Demonstration Program: Progress Report to Congress. Volume I-Overview and Summary, on-line: http://www.fs.fed.us/recreation/recfee.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, B., Knodel, J., & Sittitrai, W. (1993). Focus groups and surveys as complementary research methods. In D. L. Morgan (Ed.) Successful Focus Groups: Advancing the State of the Art (pp. 118–136). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar