Do User Fees Exclude Low-income People from Resource-based Recreation?

References

• Bates, N. (1999). Paying to play: The future of recreation fees. Parks and Recreation, 34(7), 47–52.
   Google Scholar
• Caro, R. (1975). The Power Broker. New York: Harcourt Brace and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Cassidy, J. (1995, October 16). Who killed the middle class? The New Yorker, 113–124.
   Google Scholar
• Cassidy, J. (1999, January 25). No satisfaction. The New Yorker, 88–92.
   Google Scholar
• Chase, A. (1987). Playing God in Yellowstone. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Clawson, M., & Knetsch, J. L. (1966). Economics of outdoor recreation. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crompton, J., & Lamb, C. (1986). Marketing government and social services. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Economist urges financial restraint. (1998, December 31). Burlington (VT) Free Press, p. IB.
   Google Scholar
• Farmer, T. (1998). Signpost: Ante up. Backpacker 26,(8) 16.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, R. (1999). Luxury fever. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• General Accounting Office. (1998). Recreation fees: demonstration fee program successful but could be improved (GAO/RCED-99-7). Washington, DC: General Accounting Office.
   Google Scholar
• Hanscom, G. (2000, February 14). Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona. High Country News 32(3), 10.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, C., & Driver, B. (1987). Recreation user fees: I. pros and cons. foumal of Forestry 55(5), 25–29.
   Google Scholar
• Hurst, C. (1998). Social inequality. Boston, MAAllyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Krannich, R., Eisenhauer, B., Field, D., Pratt, C., & Luloff, A. (1999). Implications of the National Park Service Recreation Fee Demonstration Program for park operation and management: Perceptions of NPA managers, foumal of Park and Recreation Administration, 17(3), 35–52.
   Google Scholar
• LaPage, W. (1994). Self-funding state parks, the New Hampshire experience. Parks, 4(2), 22–27
   Google Scholar
• Leal, D., & Fretwell, H. (1997). Users must pay to save our national parks. Consumers Research 80(8), 16–19, 24.
   Google Scholar
• Leuschner, W. A., Cook, P. S., Roggenbuck, J. W., & Oderwald, R. G. (1987). A comparative analysis for wilderness user fee policy, foumal of leisure Research, 79101–114.
   Google Scholar
• Marger, M. (1999). Social inequality: Patterns and processes. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• McCarville, R. E. (1996). The importance of price last paid in developing price expectations for public leisure services. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration 14(4), 52–64.
   Google Scholar
• McCarville, R. E., & Crompton, J. L. (1987). An empirical investigation of the influence of information on reference prices for public swimming pools, foumal of Leisure Research 19, 223–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishel, L., & Bernstein, J. (1993). The state of working America, 1992–1993. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R. C. & Carson, R. T. (1989). Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent value method. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
   Google Scholar
• More, T. (1999). A functionalist approach to user fees, foumal of Leisure Research 31(3). (in press).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• More, T. (2000). Reconceiving recreation policy in an era of growing social inequality. In G. Kyle (Ed.)., Proceedings of the 1999 Northeast Recreation Research Symposium (pp. 415–419). Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-269. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station.
   Google Scholar
• Morton, P. (1997). Sustaining recreation resources on southern Appalachian national forests. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration 14(2), 121–208.
   Google Scholar
• Phillip, S. (1999). Are we welcome?: African American racial acceptance in leisure activities and the importance given to children's leisure. Journal of Leisure Research 31(4), 385–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiling, S., Cheng, H., & Trott, C. (1992). Measuring the discriminatory impact associated with higher recreational fees. Leisure Sciences 14(2), 121–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiling, S., McCarville, R., & White, C. (1994). Demand and marketing study at Army Corps of Engineers Day-Use Areas. Vicksburg, MS: Waterways Experiment Station.
   Google Scholar
• Richter, J. & Christensen, N. (1999). Appropriate fees for wilderness day use: Pricing decisions for recreation on public land. Journal of Leisure Research 31(3), 269–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, D., Loomis, J., & Peterson, G. (1984). Pricing for efficiency and revenue in public recreation areas. Journal of Leisure Research 16, 195–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, L. (1994). Families on the fault line: America's working class. New York: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, I., & Budrick, M. (1999). Displacement as a response to the federal recreation fee program. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration 17(3), 76–84.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, H., & Louviere, J. (1999). Stated choice models for predicting the impact of user fees at public recreation sites. Journal of Leisure Research 31(3), 300–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shultz, J., McAvoy, L., & Dustin, D. (1988). What are we in business for? Parks and Recreation 23(1), 52.
   Google Scholar
• U. S. Bureau of the Census. (1996). A brief look at postwar U. S. income inequality. (Current population reports P60-191, 4 p.). Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• U. S. Bureau of the Census. (2000a). Income 1998. Online: http://www.census.gov/hhes/in-come/income98/in98med.html.
   Google Scholar
• U. S. Bureau of the Census. (2000b). 1950 to 1998 annual time series of state population estimates by race and Hispanic origin. Online: http://www.census.gov/population/estimates/state/srh/srhus98.txt.
   Google Scholar
• Vaux, H. (1975). The distribution of income among wilderness users. Journal of Leisure Research 7(1), 29–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, D., Vogt, C., & Vitters, J. (1999). Structural equation modeling of users' response to wilderness recreation fees. Journal of Leisure Research 31(3), 245–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, R, Palucki, L., & Burkhardt, R. (1999). Anticipated responses to a fee program: The key is trust. Journal of Leisure Research 31(3), 207–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar