Number of Encounters and Experience Quality in Grand Canyon Backcountry: Consistently Negative and Weak Relationships

References

• Becker, R., Jubenville, A., & Burnett, G. (1984). Fact and judgment in the search for social carrying capacity. Leisure Sciences, 6, 475–486.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, D., & Witt, P. (1970). Sources of behavioral variance during leisure time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 352–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burch, W. (1981). The ecology of metaphor—spacing regularities for humans and other primates in urban an wildland habitats. Leisure Sciences, 4, 213–231.
   Google Scholar
• Burch, W. (1984). Much ado about nothing—some reflections on the wider and wilder implications of social carrying capacity. Leisure Sciences, 6, 487–496.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, D., Watson, A., Hall, X, & Spildie, D. (1997). High-use destinations in wilderness: Social and biophysical impacts, visitor responses, and management options. Research Paper INT-RP-496. Ogden, UT: USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station.
   Google Scholar
• DePaulo, B., Kashy, D., Kirkendol, S., Wyer, M., & Epstein, J. (1996). Lying in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 487–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ditton, R., Graefe, A., & Fedler, A. (1981). Recreational satisfaction at Buffalo National River: Some measure concerns. Some Recent Products of River Recreation Research (pp. 9–17). General Technical Report NC-63. USDA Forest Service, North Central Experiment Station.
   Google Scholar
• Driver, B., Tinsley, H., & Manfredo, M. (1991). The paragraphs about leisure and recreation experience preference scales: Results from two inventories designed to assess the breadth of the perceived psychological benefits of leisure. In B. Driver, P. Brown, & G. Peterson, (Eds.) Benefits of Leisure (pp. 263–286). State College, PA: Venture Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, T. & Shelby, B. (1996). Who cares about encounters? Differences between those with and without norms. Leisure Sciences, 18, 7–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammitt, W. & Rutlin, W. (1995). Use encounter standards and curves for achieved privacy in wilderness. Leisure Sciences, 17, 245–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heberlein, T. (1977). Density, crowding, and satisfaction. Proceedings: River recreation management and research symposium (pp. 67–76). General Technical Report NC-28. USDA Forest Service, North Central Experiment Station.
   Google Scholar
• Herrick, T. & McDonald, C. (1992). Factors affecting overall satisfaction with a river recreation experience. Environmental Management, 16, 243–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, D., Kashy, D., & Bolger, N. (1997). Data analysis In social psychology. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.) Handbook of Social Psychology, Fourth Edition (pp. 233–265). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Kenny, D. (1987). Statistics for the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Boston, MA: Little, Brown, & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Kuss, F., Graefe, A., & Vaske, J. (1990). Visitor Impact Management: A review of research. Washington, D.C.: National Parks and Conservation Association.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, R. (1977). Alone with others: The paradox of privacy in wilderness. Leisure Sciences, 1, 3–19.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, R. (1980). Use patterns and visitor characteristics, attitudes, and preferences in nine wilderness and other roadless areas. Research Paper INT-253. Ogden, UT: USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, R. (1985). Diversity in democracy: Expanding the recreation opportunity spectrum. Leisure Sciences, 7, 377–399.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, R. (1999). Studies in Outdoor Recreation: Search and Research for Satisfaction, Second Edition. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, R., Lime, D., Freimund, W., & Pitt, D. (1996). Crowding norms at frontcountry sites: A visual approach to setting standards of quality. Leisure Sciences, 18, 39–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schomaker, J. & Knopf, R. (1982). Generalizability of a measure of visitor satisfaction with outdoor recreation. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6, 173–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelby, B. (1980). Crowding models for backcountry recreation. Land Economics, 56, 43–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelby, B., & Heberlein, T. (1986). Carrying Capacity in Recreation Settings. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shelby, B., Vaske, J., & Heberlein, T. (1989). Comparative analysis of crowding in multiple locations: Results from fifteen years of research. Leisure Sciences, 11, 269–291.
   Google Scholar
• Shelby, B., Vaske, J., & Donnelly, M. (1996). Norms, standards, and natural resources. Leisure Sciences, 18, 103–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stankey, G. (1973). Visitor perception of wilderness recreation carrying capacity. Research Paper INT-142. Ogden, UT: USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, W. & Cole, D. (1999). In search of situational effects in outdoor recreation: Different methods, different results. Leisure Sciences, 21, 269–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagar, A. (1964). The carrying capacity of wild lands for recreation. Forest Science Monograph 7. Washington, D.C.: Society of American Foresters.
   Google Scholar
• Wagar, A. (1974). Recreational carrying capacity reconsider. Journal of Forestry, 72, 274–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, P. (1981). Perceived crowding and attitudes toward limiting use in backcountry recreation areas. Leisure Sciences, 4, 419–426.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, D. (1988). Great expectations and the limits of satisfaction: A review of recreation and consumer satisfaction research. Outdoor Recreation Benchmark: Proceedings of the National Outdoor Recreation Forum (p. 422–438). General Technical Report SE-52. Asheville, NC: USDA Forest Service, Southeastern Experiment Station.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, D., Roggenbuck, J., Patterson, M., & Watson, A. (1992). The variability of user-based social impact standards for wilderness management. Forest Science, 38, 738–756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar