Examining the Effects of Hypothetical Modifications in Permitting Procedures and River Conditions on Whitewater Boating Behavior

References

• Adamowicz, W., Swait, J., Boxall, P., Louviere, J., & Williams, M. (1997). Perceptions versus objective measures of environmental quality in combined revealed and stated preference models of environmental valuation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 32, 65–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Autoweek (1996). Breaking down driving costs by mile and by year. Autoweek (April 1), 9.
   Google Scholar
• Bengston, D. N., & Fan, D. P. (2002). The recreational fee demonstration program on the national forests: An updated analysis of public attitudes and beliefs, 1996–2001. (Research Paper, NC-340). Forest Service, North Central Research Station.
   Google Scholar
• Bowker, J. M., English, B. K., & Donovan, J. A. (1996). Toward a value for guided rafting on southern rivers. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 28, 423–432.
   Google Scholar
• Bockstael, N. E., & McConnell, K. E. (1991). Public goods as characteristics of non-market commodities. Economic Journal, 103, 1244–1257.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K, (1998). Regression analysis of count-data. NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Champ, P. A., & Bishop, R. C. (1996). Evidence on the accuracy of expenditures reported in recreational surveys. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 21, 150–159.
   Google Scholar
• Chase, L. C., Lee, D. R., Schulze, W. D. Schulze, & Anderson, D. J. (1998). Ecotourism demand and differential pricing of national park acess in Costa Rica. Land Economics, 74, 466–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Englin, J., & Cameron, T. A. (1996). Augmenting travel cost models with contingent behavior data. Environmental and Resource Economics, 7, 133–147.
   Google Scholar
• Grijalva, T. C., Berrens, R. P., Bohara, A. K., & Shaw, W. D. (2002). Testing the validity of contingent behavior trip responses. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84, 401–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellerstein, D., Woo, D., McCollum, & Donnelly, D. (1993). ZIPFIP: A zip and fips database. Washington D.C.: USDA, Economic Research Service, Resources and Technology Division, 1301 New York Ave. NW, Room 438.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, D. (2003). Problem solving and hypothesis testing using economic experiments. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 35, 337–347.
   Google Scholar
• Kakoyannis, C., & Stankey, G. H. (2002). Assessing and evaluation recreation uses of water resources: Implications for an integrated management framework. (General Technical Report, PNW-GTR-536). Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, P. (1996). A guide to econometrics. (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• King, G., Tomz, M., & Wittenberg, J. (2000). Making the most of statistical analyses: improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 341–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerkvliet, J., & Nowell, C. (1999). Heterogeneous visitors and the spatial limits of travel cost model. Journal of Leisure Research, 31, 404–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loomis, J. B. (1993). An investigation into the reliability of intended visitation behavior. Environmental and Resource Economics, 3, 183–191.
   Google Scholar
• Mendelsohn, R., Matzkin, R., Peterson, G., & Rosenthal, D. (1994). Using conditional utility models for measuring welfare (Research Note RM-527.) USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, R. L., & Driver, B. (2005). Introduction to outdoor recreation: Providing and managing natural resource based opportunities. Appendix A, Recreation Experience Preference Scales (pp. 315–320) State College, PA: Venture Publishing, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, R. L., & Siderelis, C. (2003). Use and economic importance of the West Branch of the Farmington River. Final Report. Washington D.C.: American Rivers, Inc. and Park Planning and Special Studies and Rivers, Trails and Conservation Assistance Programs of the National Park Service.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, G. R. & Wilson, A. J. (1997). Incidental and joint consumption in recreation demand. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 26, 107–115.
   Google Scholar
• Siderelis, C., Moore, R., & Lee, J. (2000). Incorporating users' perceptions of site quality in a recreation travel cost model. Journal of Leisure Research, 32, 406–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, K. V. & Kaoru, Y. (1986). Modeling recreation demand within a random utility framework. Economics Letters, 22, 395–399.
   Google Scholar
• Stata Corporation (2003). Stata statistical software. Release 8.0. College Station, TX: Stata Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• USDA Forest Service (2002). Chattooga Wild and Scenic River. Columbia, SC: Sumter National Forest. Available at: http://www.fs.fed.us/r8/fms/rec/Chattooga.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, J. C., Haab, T. C., & Huang, J. (2000). Measuring recreation benefits of quality improvements with revealed and stated behavior data. Resource and Energy Economics, 22, 339–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolridge, J. M. (2000). Introductory econometric: A modem approach. US: Thomson Learning, South-Western College Publishing.
   Google Scholar