Enhancing the Interpretation of Stated Choice Analysis Through the Application of a Verbal Protocol Assessment

References

• Anderson, D., & Louviere, J. (1993). Factors affecting user choice of National Forest recreation sites. (Final report to North Central Forest Experiment Station Laramie, WY: The University of Wyoming, Department of Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, J. (1998). Reflections on stated preference: Theory and practice. In J. Ortu Zar, D. Hensher, and S. Jara-Di Az (Eds.), Travel Behaviour Research: Updating the State of Play (pp. 105–121). Oxford: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K., & Simon, H. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Green, P., Tull, C., & Albaum, G. (1988). Research for marketing decisions. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hammitt, W., & Cole, D. (1998). Wildland recreation: Ecology and management (2ndEd.). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Hanemann, W. (1984). Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 66, 332–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, S., & Manning, R. (2001). Solitude versus access: A study of tradeoffs in outdoor recreation using indifference curve analysis. Leisure Sciences, 23, 179–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, S., & Manning, R. (2002). Tradeoffs among social, resource and management attributes of the Denali Wilderness experience: A contextual approach to normative research. Leisure Sciences, 24, 297–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, S., & Manning, R. (2003). Research to inform management of wilderness camping at Isle Royale National Park: Part II—prescriptive research. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 21(3), 43–56.
   Google Scholar
• Lindberg, K., Dellaert, B., & Romer Rassing, C. (1999). Resident tradeoffs: A choice modeling approach. Annals of Tourism Research, 26, 554–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louviere, J., Hensher, D., & Swait, J. (2000). Stated choice methods: Analysis and application. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press
   Google Scholar
• Louviere, J., Louviere, C., Anderson, D., & Woodworth, G. (1986). Choices among parks and forest preserves by Chicago Area Users: A study of the effects of managerially relevant park attributes on choice. (Final report to North Central Forest Experiment Station). Iowa City, LA: University of Iowa, Department of Geography.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, R. (1999a). Crowding and carrying capacity in outdoor recreation: From normative standards to standards of quality. In E. L. Jackson and T. L. Burton (Editors), Leisure studies: prospects for The twenty-first century (pp. 323–334). State College, PA: Venture Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, R. (1999b). Studies in outdoor recreation. Oregon: Oregon State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, R. (2003). What to do about crowding and solitude in parks and wilderness? A reply to Stewart and Cole. Journal of Leisure Research, 35, 107–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, R., Morrissey, J., & Lawson, S. (2005). What's behind the numbers? Qualitative insights into normative research in outdoor recreation. Leisure Sciences 27(3): 205–224.
   Google Scholar
• McClelland, G., Schulze, W., Lazo, J., Waldman, D., Doyle, J., Elliot, S., & Irwin, J. (1992). Methods for measuring non-use values: A contingent valuation study of groundwater cleanup. Boulder: Center for Economic Analysis, University of Colorado at Boulder.
   Google Scholar
• McFadden, D. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In P. Zarembka (Ed.), Frontiers in econometrics (pp. 105–142). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Morey, E., Buchanan, T., & Waldman, D. (2002). Estimating the benefits and costs to mountain bikers of changes in trail characteristics, access fees, and site closures: choice experiments and benefits transfer. Journal of Environmental Management, 64, 411–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh, H. (2001). Revisiting importance-performance analysis. Tourism Management, 22, 617–627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opaluch, J., Swallow, S., Weaver, T., Wessells, C., & Wichelns, D. (1993). Evaluating impacts from noxious facilities: Including public preferences in current siting mechanisms, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 24, 41–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roggenbuck, J., Williams, D., & Watson, A. (1993). Defining acceptable conditions in wilderness. Environmental Management, 17, 187–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schkade, D., & Payne, J. (1994). How people respond to contingent valuation questions: A verbal protocol analysis of willingness to pay for an environmental regulation, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 26, 88–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlapfer, F., Schmitt, M. & Roschewitz, A. (2004). Stated preferences with and without external value cues. Paper Presented at 13th annual European Association of Environmental and Resource Economics Conference, Budapest, Hungary.
   Google Scholar
• Seidman, I. (1998). Interviewing as qualitative research; A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Svenson, O. (1989). Eliciting and analyzing verbal protocols in process studies of judgment and decision making. In H. Montgomery and O. Svenson (Editors). Process and structure in human decision making, (pp. 65–81). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Vining, J., & Fishwick, L. (1991). An exploratory study of outdoor recreation site choices. Journal of Leisure Research, 23, 114–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wildert, S. (1998). Stated preference studies: The design affects the results. In J. Ortu Zar, D. Hensher, and S. Jara-Di Az (Eds.), Travel behaviour research: Updating the state of play (pp. 105–121). Oxford: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar