141
Views
37
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The Effects of Place Attachment, Hypothetical Site Modifications and Use Levels on Recreation Behavior

, &
Pages 621-640 | Published online: 13 Dec 2017

References

  • Adamowicz, W., Swait, J., Boxall, P., Louvier, J., & Williams, M. (1997). Perceptions versus objective measures of environmental quality in combined revealed and stated preference models of environmental valuation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 32, 65–84.
  • American Automobile Association. (2009, January 20). 2007 Your driving costs. Retrieved January 20, 2009, from http://www.aaaexchange.com/main/Default.asp?CategoryID=16&SubCategoryID=76&ContentID=353.
  • Anderson, D. H., & Fulton, D. C. (2008). Experience preferences as mediators of the wildlife related recreation participation: Place attachment relationship. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 13, 73–88.
  • Breakwell, G. M. (1992). Social psychology of identity and the self concept. Guildford, United Kingdom: Surrey University Press.
  • Bricker, K. S., & Kerstetter, D. L. (2000). Level of specialization and place attachment: An exploratory study of whitewater recreationists. Leisure Sciences, 22(4), 233–257.
  • Budruk, M., Wilhelm Stanis, S. A., Schneider, I. E., & Heisey, J. J. (2008). Crowding and experience-use history: A study of the moderating effect of place attachment among water-based recreationists. Environmental Management, 41(4), 528–537.
  • Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (1998). Regression analysis of count data. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
  • Chase, L. C., Lee, D. R., Schulze, W. D., & Anderson, D. J. (1998). Ecotourism demand and differential pricing of national park access in Costa Rica. Land Economics, 74(4), 466–482.
  • Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
  • Driver, B. L., & Bruns, D. (2008). Implementing OFM on public nature-based recreation and related amenity resources. In B. L. Driver (Ed.), Managing to optimize the beneficial outcomes of recreation (pp. 39–74). State College, PA: Venture.
  • Eisenhauer, B. W., Krannich, R. S., & Blahna, D. J. (2000). Attachments to special places on public lands: An analysis of activities, reason for attachments, and community connections. Society & Natural Resources, 13(5), 421–441.
  • Eiswerth, M. E., Englin, J., Fadali, E., & Shaw, W. D. (2000). The value of water levels in water-based recreation: A pooled revealed preference/contingent behavior model. Water Resources Research, 36(4), 1079–1086.
  • Eiswerth, M. E., Kashian, R. D., & Skidmore, M. (2008). Examining angler behavior using contingent behavior modeling: A case study of water quality change at a Wisconsin lake. Water Resources Research, 44(11), W11426.
  • Englin, J., & Cameron, T. A. (1996). Augmenting travel cost models with contingent behavior data. Environmental and Resource Economics, 7, 133–147.
  • Hailu, G., Boxall, P. C., & McFarlane, B. L. (2005). The influence of place attachment on recreation demand. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26(4), 581–598.
  • Hammitt, W. E., Backlund, E. A., & Bixler, R. D. (2006). Place bonding for recreation places: Conceptual and empirical development. Leisure Studies, 25, 17–41.
  • Hammitt, W. E., Kyle, G. T., & Oh, C. (2009). Comparison of place bonding models in recreation resource management. Journal of Leisure Research, 41(1), 57–72.
  • Hardin, J. W., & Hilbe, J. M. (2002). Generalized estimating equations. London: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
  • Hellerstein, D., Woo, D., McCollum, D., & Donnelly, D. (1993). ZIPFIP: A zip and fips database. Washington, DC: USDA, Economic Research Service-Resources and Technology Division.
  • Hidalgo, M. C., & Hernández, B. (2001). Place attachment: Conceptual and empirical questions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(3), 273–281.
  • Hilbe, J. M. (2007). Negative binomial regression. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hunt, L. M. (2008). Examining spatial state dependence and place attachment within a recreational fishing site choice model. Journal of Leisure Research, 40, 110–127.
  • Ittelson, W. H., Franck, K. A., & O'Hanlon, T. J. (1976). The nature of environmental experience. In S. Wapner, S. Cohen, & B. Kaplan (Eds.), Experiencing the environment (pp. 187–206). New York: Plenum.
  • Jeon, Y., & Herriges, J. A. (2010). Convergent validity of contingent behavior responses in models of recreation demand. Environmental and Resource Economics, 45, 223–250.
  • Jorgensen, B., & Stedman, R. (2001). Sense of place as an attitude: Lakeshore owners' attitude toward their properties. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 233–248.
  • Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. NY: Guilford Press.
  • Kyle, G., Graefe, A., & Manning, R. (2005). Testing the dimensionality of place attachment in recreational settings. Environment & Behavior, 37(2), 153–177.
  • Layman, R. C., Boyce, J. R., & Criddle, K. (1996). Economic valuation of a chinook salmon sport fishery of the Gulkana River, Alaska, under current and alternative management plans. Land Economics, 72, 113–128.
  • Long, J. S., & Freese, J. (2006). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata (2nd ed.). College Station, TX: Stata Press.
  • Loomis, J. B. (2002). Quantifying recreation use values from removing dams and restoring free-flowing rivers: A contingent behavior travel cost demand model for the Lower Snake River. Water Resources Research, 38(6), 1066.
  • Loomis, J. B., & Richardson, R. B. (2006). An external validity test of intended behavior: Comparing revealed preferences and intended visitation in response to climate change. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 49(4), 621–630.
  • Low, S. M., & Altman, I. (1992). Place attachment: A conceptual inquiry. In I. Altman, & S. M. Low (Eds.), Place attachment (pp. 1–12). New York: Plenum.
  • McCool, S. F., & Martin, S. R. (1994). Community attachment and attitudes toward tourism development. Journal of Travel Research, Winter, 29–34.
  • Mendelsohn, R., Matzkin, R., Peterson, G., & Rosenthal, D. (1994). Using conditional utility models for measuring welfare. (Research Note RM-527.) USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, 1–4.
  • Moore, R. L., & Graefe, A. R. (1994). Attachments to recreation settings: The case of rail-trail users. Leisure Sciences, 16(1), 17–31.
  • Morey, E. R., & Breffle, W. S. (2006). Valuing a change in a fishing site without collecting characteristics data on all fishing sites: A complete but minimal model. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 88, 150–161.
  • Morey, E. R., Rowe, R. D., & Watson, M. (1993). A repeated nested-logit model of Atlantic salmon fishing. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 75, 578–592.
  • Parsons, G. R., Jakus, P. M., & Tomasi, T. (1999). A comparison of welfare estimates from four models for linking seasonal recreation trips to multinomial logit models of site choice. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 38, 143–157.
  • Proshansky, H. M., Fabian, A. K., & Kaminoff, R. (1983). Place-identity: Physical world socialization of the self. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3, 57–83.
  • Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Psychology Press.
  • Siderelis, C., & Moore, R. L. (1998). Recreation demand and the influence of site preference variables. Journal of Leisure Research, 30(3), 301–318.
  • Siderelis, C., & Moore, R. L. (2006). Examining the effects of hypothetical modifications in permitting procedures and river conditions on whitewater boating behavior. Journal of Leisure Research, 38(4), 558–574.
  • Siderelis, C., Moore, R., & Lee, J. (2000). Incorporating users' perceptions of site quality in a recreation travel cost model. Journal of Leisure Research, 32(4), 406–414.
  • Starbuck, C. M., Berrens, R. P., & McKee, M. (2006). Simulating changes in forest recreation demand and associated economic impacts due to fire and fuels management activities. Forest Policy and Economics, 8(1), 52–66.
  • Tuan, Y. F. (1980). Rootedness versus sense of place. Landscape, 24, 3–8.
  • Ward, F. A., & Beal, D. (2000). Valuing nature with travel cost models: A manual. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publ. Ltd.
  • Whitehead, J. C., Haab, T. C., & Huang, J. (2000). Measuring recreation benefits of quality improvements with revealed and stated behavior data. Resource and Energy Economics, 22, 339–354.
  • Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, 16 U.S.C. 1271–1287. (1968).
  • Williams, D. R., Patterson, M. E., Roggenbuck, J. W., & Watson, A. E. (1992). Beyond the commodity metaphor: examining emotional and symbolic attachment to place. Leisure Sciences, 14(1), 29–46.
  • Williams, D. R., & Roggenbuck, J. W. (1989, October). Measuring place attachment: Some preliminary results. Paper presented at the Symposium on Outdoor Recreation Planning and Management, National Recreation and Park Association Research Symposium on Leisure Research, San Antonio, TX.
  • Williams, D. R., & Stewart, W. (1998). Sense of place: An elusive concept that is finding a home in ecosystem management. Journal of Forestry, 96, 18–23.
  • Williams, D. R., & Vaske, J. (2003). The measurement of place attachment: validity and generalizability of a psychometric approach. Forest Science, 49, 830–840.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.