800
Views
32
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Gender Identity, Leisure Identity, and Leisure Participation

&
Pages 353-378 | Published online: 13 Dec 2017

References

  • Aitchison, C. (2001). Gender and leisure research: The “codification of knowledge.” Leisure Sciences, 21(1), 1–19.
  • Anderson, E. (2005). In the game: Gay athletes and the cult of masculinity. Albany, NY: State University of New York.
  • Baldwin, C. K., & Norris, P. A. (1999). Exploring the dimensions of serious leisure: “Love me—love my dog!” Journal of Leisure Research, 31(1), 1–17.
  • Bartels, D. J. (1997). An examination of the primary emotions of anger and sadness in marriage within the context of identity theory. Unpublished MA, Washington State University, Pullman. WA.
  • Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex-typing. Psychological Review, 88, 354–364.
  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.
  • Bentler, P. M., & Bonnet, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in the analysis of covariance structure. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606.
  • Birrell, S., & Theberge, N. (1994). Ideological control of women in sport. In D. M. Duncan & S. R. Guthrie (Eds.), Women and sport: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 341–359). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
  • Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
  • Bryson, L. (1987). Sport and the maintenance of masculine hegemony. Women's Studies International Forum, 10(4), 49–360.
  • Buchanan, T. (1985). Commitment and leisure behavior: A theoretical perspective. Leisure Sciences, 7(4), 401–420.
  • Burke, P. J. (1980). The self: Measurement implications from a symbolic interactionist perspective. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 18–29.
  • Burke, P. J. (1989a). Academic identity and race differences in educational aspirations. Social Science Research, 18, 136–150.
  • Burke, P. J. (1989b). Gender identity, sex, and school performance. Social Psychology Quarterly, 52, 159–169.
  • Burke, P. J. (1991). Identity process and social stress. American Sociological Review, 56(6), 836–849.
  • Burke, P. J. (1996). Social identities and psychosocial stress. In H. B. Kaplan (Ed.), Psychological stress: Perspectives on structure, theory, life course, and methods (Vol. 141–174). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
  • Burke, P. J. (2003). Relationships among multiple identities. In P. J. Burke, T. J. Owens, R. T. Serpe & P. A. Thoits (Eds.), Advances in identity theory and research (pp. 195–214). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
  • Burke, P. J., & Hoetler, J. W. (1988). Identity and sex-race differences in educational and occupational aspirations formation. Social Science Research, 17, 29–47.
  • Burke, P. J., & Reitzes, D. C. (1981).The link between identity and role performance. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44(2), 83–92.
  • Burke, P. J., & Reitzes, D. C. (1991).An identity theory approach to commitment. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54(3), 239–251.
  • Burke, P. J., & Stets, J. E. (1999). Trust and commitment in an identity verification context. Social Psychology Quarterly, 62, 347–366.
  • Burke, P. J., & Stets, J. E. (2009). Identity theory: Oxford University Press, USA.
  • Burke, P. J., Stets, J. E., & Pirog-Good, M. A. (1988). Gender identity, self esteem, and physical and sexual abuse in dating relationships. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51, 272–285.
  • Burke, P. J., & Tully, J. C. (1977). The measurement of role identity. Social Forces, 55(4), 181–197.
  • Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Byrne, B. M. (2000). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Cahn, S. K. (1994). Coming on strong: Gender and sexuality in twentieth-century women's sports. New York: Free.
  • Callero, P. L. (1985). Role-identity salience. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 203–215.
  • Cast, A. D. (2003). Identities and behavior. In P. J. Burke, T. J. Owens, R. T. Serpe & P. A. Thoits (Eds.), Advances in identity theory and research (pp. 41–53). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
  • Cast, A. D., & Burke, P. J. (2002). A theory of self-esteem. Social Forces, 80(3), 10411068.
  • Chambers, D. (1986). The constraints of work and domestic schedules on women's leisure. Leisure Studies, 5, 309–325.
  • Charng, H., Piliavin, J. A., & Callero, P. L. (1988).Role identity and reasoned action in the prediction of repeated behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51(4), 330–317.
  • Cieslak, T. J., Fink, J. S., & Pastore, D. L. (2005). Measuring the athletic identity construct: Scale development and validation. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 27(Suppl.), S48.
  • Colley, A., Nash, J., O'Donnel, L., & Restorick, L. (1987).Attitudes of the female sex-role and sex-typing of physical activities. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 8, 19–29.
  • Colley, A., Roberts, N., & Chipps, A. (1985).Sex-role identity, personality, and participation in team and individual sports by males and females. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 16, 103–112.
  • Coser, L. (1974). Greedy institutions. New York: Free Press.
  • Crouch, D. (1993). Commitment, enthusiasms and creativity in the world of allotment holding. World Leisure and Recreation, 35(1), 19–22.
  • Cszima, K. A., Wittig, A. F., & Schurr, K. T. (1988). Sports stereotypes and gender. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 10(1), 62–74.
  • Culp, R. H. (1998). Adolescent girls and outdoor recreation: A case study examining constraints and effective programming. Journal of Leisure Research, 30(3), 356–379.
  • Deem, R., (1986). All work and no play? The sociology of women and leisure. Milton Keynes, England: Open University Press.
  • Derksen, L. & Gartrell, J. (1993). The social context of recycling. American Sociological Review, 58, 434–442
  • Foote, N. N. (1951). Identification as the basis for a theory of motivation. American Sociological Review, 26, 14–21.
  • Francis, L. E. (2003). Feeling good, feeling well: Identity, emotion, and health. In P. J. Burke, T. J. Owens, R. T. Serpe & P. A. Thoits (Eds.), Advances in identity theory and research (pp. 123–134). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
  • Freysinger, V. J., & Flannery, D. (1992). Women's leisure: Affiliation, self-determination, empowerment, and resistance? Society and Leisure/Loisir et Societe, 15(1), 303–322.
  • Gahwiler, P., & Havitz, M. E. (1998). Toward a relational understanding of leisure social worlds, involvement, psychological commitment, and behavioral loyalty. Leisure Sciences, 20, 1–23.
  • Gecas, V. (1982). The self-concept. Annual Review of Sociology, 8, 1–32.
  • Gecas, V., & Burke, P. J. (1995). Self and identity. In K. Cook, G. A. Fine, & J. S. House (Eds.), Sociological perspectives on social psychology (pp. 41–67). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Gibson, H., Willming, C., & Holdnak, A. (2002). “We're Gators…not just Gator fans”: Serious leisure and University of Florida football. Journal of Leisure Research, 34(4), 397–425.
  • Goode, W. J. (1960). A theory of role strain. American Sociological Review, 25, 483–496.
  • Green, E., & Hebron, S. (1988). Leisure and male partners In E. Wimbush & M. Talbot (Eds.), Relative freedoms (pp. 37–47). Milton Keynes, England: Open University Press.
  • Green, E., Hebron, S., & Woodward, D. (1987).Women, leisure and social control. In J. Hanmer & M. Maynard. (Eds.), Women, violence and social control (pp. 75–92). London: Macmillan.
  • Griffin, C. (1981). Young women and leisure. In J. Horne, D. Jary, & A. Tomlinson (Eds.), Leisure and social control (pp. 113–122). Sussey: Brighton Polytechnic.
  • Haggard, L. M., & Williams, D. R. (1992). Identity affirmation through leisure activities: Leisure symbols of the self. Journal of Leisure Research, 24(1), 1–18.
  • Hall, R. J., Snell, A. F., & Foust, M. S. (1999). Item parceling strategies in SEM: Investigating the subtle effects of unmodeled secondary constructs. Organizational Research Methods, 2(3), 233–256.
  • Hargreaves, J. (1986). Where's the virtue? Where's the grace? A discussion of the social production of gender relations in and through sport. Theory, Culture and Society, 3, 109–119.
  • Hau, K. T., & Marsh, H. W. (2004). The use of item parcels in structural equation modeling: Nonnormal data and small sample sizes. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 57(2), 327–351.
  • Havitz, M. E., & Dimanche, F. (1990). Proposition for guiding the empirical test of the involvement construct in recreational and tourist contexts Leisure Sciences, 12(2), 179–196.
  • Heise, D. R. (1979). Understanding events: Affect and the construction of social action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Henderson, K. A. (1991). The contribution of feminism to an understanding of leisure constraints. Journal of Leisure Research, 23(4), 363–377.
  • Henderson, K. A. (1994).Broadening an understanding of women, gender, and leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 25(1), 1–7.
  • Henderson, K. A., & Bialeschki, M. D. (1991).A sense of entitlement to leisure as constraint and empowerment for women. Leisure Sciences, 13, 51–65.
  • Henderson, K. A., & Bialeschki, M. D. (1993).Exploring an expanded model of women's leisure constraints. Journal of Applied Recreation Research, 18, 229–252.
  • Henderson, K. A., Bialeschki, M. D., Shaw, S. M., & Freysinger, V. J. (1996). Many Voices: Historical Perspectives on Women's Leisure. In Both Gains and Gaps: Feminist Perspectives on Women's Leisure (pp. 27–70). State College, PA: Venture.
  • Henderson, K. A., & Hickerson, B. D. (2007). Women and leisure: Premises and performances uncovered in an integrated review. Journal of Leisure Research, 39, 591–610.
  • Henderson, K. A., Stalnaker, D., & Taylor, G. (1988).The relationship between barriers to recreation and gender-role personality traits for women. Journal of Leisure Research, 20, 69–80.
  • Hoelter, J. W. (1986). The relationship between specific and global evaluations of the self: A comparison of several models. Social Psychology Quarterly, 49, 129141.
  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76–99). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication
  • Iwasaki, Y., & Havitz, M. E. (1998). A path analytic model of relationships between involvement, psychological commitment, and loyalty. Journal of Leisure Research, 30, 256–280.
  • Iwasaki, Y., & Havitz, M. E. (2004). Examining relationships between leisure involvement, psychological commitment and loyalty to recreation agency. Journal of Leisure Research, 36, 45–72.
  • Jackson, E. L. (2005). Leisure constraints research: overview of a developing theme in leisure studies. In E. L. Jackson (Ed.), Constraints to leisure (pp. 3–22). State College: Venture.
  • Jackson, E. L., & Henderson, K. A. (1995).Gender-based analysis of leisure constraints. Leisure Sciences, 17, 31–51.
  • James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.
  • Jun, J., & Kyle, G. T. (2011a). The effect of identity conflict/facilitation on the experience of constraints to leisure and constraint negotiation. Journal of Leisure Research, 43(2), 176–204.
  • Jun, J., & Kyle, G. T. (2011b). Understanding the role of identity in the constraint negotiation process. Leisure Sciences, 33(4), 309–331
  • Kane, M. J. (1990). Female involvement in physical recreation: Gender role as a constraint. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 61(1), 52–56.
  • Kellert, S. (1985). Bird-watching in America. Leisure Sciences, 7, 343–360.
  • Kenny, D. A. (2003).Measuring goodness of fit. In Structural equation modeling. Retrieved May 1st, 2004, from http://users.rcn.com/dakenny/fit.htm
  • Kim, S. S., Scott, D., & Crompton, J. (1997). An exploration of the relationships among social psychological involvement, behavioral involvement, commitment and future intentions in the context of birdwatching. Journal of Leisure Research, 29(3), 320–341.
  • Kimmel, M. S., & Messner, M. A. (1998). Men's lives (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Koivula, N. (1995). Rating of gender appropriateness of sports participation: Effects of gender based schematic processing. Sex Roles, 33, 543–547.
  • Koivula, N. (2001). Perceived characteristics of sports categorized as gender-neutral, feminine and masculine. Journal of Sport Behavior, 24(4), 377–393.
  • Kyle, G. T., Absher, J., Norman, W., Hammitt, W., & Jodice, L. (2007).A modified involvement scale. Leisure Studies, 26(4), 399–427.
  • Kyle, G. T., Mowen, A. J., Absher, J. D., & Havitz, M. E. (2006). Commitment to public leisure service providers: A conceptual and psychometric analysis. Journal of Leisure Research, 38, 78–103.
  • Laverie, D. A., & Arnett, D. B. (2000). Factors affecting fan attendance: the influence of identity. Journal of Leisure Research, 32(2), 225–246.
  • Mannell, R. C., & Kleiber, D. A. (1997). A social psychology of leisure. State College, PA: Venture.
  • Marsh, H. W., Hau, K., Balla, J. R., & Grayson, D. (1998). Is more ever too much? The number of indicators per factor in confirmatory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33(2), 181–220.
  • Matteo, S. (1986). The effect of sex and gender-schematic processing on sport participation. Sex Roles, 15, 417–432.
  • McCallister, S. G., Blinde, E. M., & Phillips, J. M. (2003). Prospects for change in a new millennium: Gender beliefs of young girls in sport and physical activity. Women in Sport and Physical Activity Journal, 12(2), 83–110.
  • McGinnis, L. P., & Gentry, J. W. (2006). Getting past the red tees: Constraints women face in golf and strategies to help them stay. Journal of Sport Management, 20(2), 218–247.
  • Merton, R. K. (1957). Social theory and social structure. Glencoe, IL: Free Press of Glencoe.
  • Messner, M. A. (1998). Politics of masculinities: Men in movements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Messner, M. A. (2002). Taking the field: Women, men and sports. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Messner, M. A., & Sabo, D. (1990). Toward a critical feminist reappraisal of sport, men, and the gender order. In M. A. Messner & D. Sabo (Eds.), Sport, men, and the gender order: Critical feminist perspectives (pp. 1–15). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
  • Metheny, E. (1965). Connotations of movement in sport and dance. Dubuque, IA: W. C. Brown.
  • Mittelstaedt, R. (1995). Reenacting the American Civil War: A unique form of serious leisure for adults. World Leisure and Recreation, 37(1), 23–27.
  • Morawski, J. G. (1987). The troubled quest for masculinity, femininity, and androgyny. In P. Shaver & C. Hendrick (Eds.), Review of personality and social psychology: Vol. 7. Sex and gender. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
  • Postow, B. C. (1980). Women and masculine sports. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, VII, 51–58.
  • Pritchard, M. P., Havitz, M. E., & Howard, D. R. (1999). Analyzing the commitment-loyalty link in service contexts. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(3), 333–348
  • Pritchard, M. P., Howard, D. R., & Havitz, M. E. (1992). Loyalty measurement: A critical examination and theoretical extension. Leisure Sciences, 14(2), 155–164.
  • Ross, S. R., & Shinew, K. J. (2008). Perspectives of women college athletes on sport and gender. Sex Roles, 58, 40–57.
  • Samdahl, D. M. (1988). A symbolic interactionist model of leisure: Theory and empirical support. Leisure Sciences, 10(1), 27–39.
  • Scott, D., & Godbey, G. (1992). An analysis of adult playgroups: Social versus serious participation in contract bridge. Leisure Sciences, 14, 47–67.
  • Scott, D., & Godbey, G. (1994).Recreation specialization in the social world of contract bridge. Journal of Leisure Research, 26, 275–295.
  • Scott, D., & Shafer, C. S. (2001). Recreational specialization: A critical look at the construct. Journal of Leisure Research, 33(3), 319–343.
  • Shamir, B. (1988). Commitment and leisure. Sociological Perspectives, 31(2), 238–258.
  • Shamir, B. (1992). Some correlates of leisure identity salience: Three exploratory studies. Journal of Leisure Research, 24(4), 301–323.
  • Shaw, S. M. (1985). Gender and leisure: Inequality in the distribution of leisure time. Journal of Leisure Research, 17(4), 266–282.
  • Shaw, S. M. (1994). Gender, leisure and constraint: Towards a framework for the analysis of women's leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 26(1), 8–22.
  • Shaw, S. M. (2001). Conceptualizing resistance: Women's leisure as political practice. Journal of Leisure Research, 33(2), 18–201.
  • Shaw, S. M., & Henderson, K. A. (2005). Gender analysis and leisure constraints: An uneasy alliance. In E. L. Jackson (Ed.), Constraints to leisure (pp. 23–34). State College: Venture.
  • Shaw, S. M., Kleiber, D. A., & Caldwell, L. L. (1995). Leisure and identity formation in male and female adolescents: A preliminary examination. Journal of Leisure Research, 27(3), 245–263.
  • Smith-Lovin, L. (1995). The sociology of affect and emotion. In K. S. Cook, G. A. Fine & J. S. House (Eds.), Sociological perspectives on social psychology. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Snyder, E. E., & Spreitzer, E. (1983).Change and variation in social acceptance of female participation. Journal of Sport Behavior, 6, 3–8.
  • Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates and antecedents. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
  • Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1980). Masculine instrumentality and feminine expressiveness: Their relationships with sex role attitudes and behaviors. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5, 147–163.
  • Stebbins, R. A. (1979). Amateurs: On the margin between work and leisure. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications.
  • Stebbins, R. A. (1982). Serious leisure: A conceptual statement. Pacific Sociological Review, 25(2), 251–272.
  • Steiger, J. H., & Lind, J. C. (1980). Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Psychometric Society Annual Meeting, Iowa City, IA.
  • Stets, J. E. (1995). Role identities and person identities: Gender identity, mastery identity, and controlling one's partner. Sociological Perspectives, 38, 129–150.
  • Stets, J. E. (1997). Status and identity in marital interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60, 185–217.
  • Stets, J. E. (2003). Justice, emotion, and identity theory. In P. J. Burke, T. J. Owens, R. T. Serpe & P. A. Thoits (Eds.), Advances in identity theory and research (pp. 105–122). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
  • Stets, J. E. (2006). Identity theory. In P. J. Burke (Ed.). Contemporary social psychological theories (pp. 88–110). Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
  • Stets, J. E., & Biga, C. F. (2003). Bringing identity theory into environmental sociology. Sociological Theory, 21(4), 398–423.
  • Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (1996).Gender, control and interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59(3), 193–220.
  • Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2000). Femininity/masculinity. In E. F. Borgatta & R. J. V. Montgomery (Eds.), Encyclopedia of sociology (pp. 997–1005). New York, NY: Macmillan.
  • Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2003).A sociological approach to self and identity. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Stets, J. E., & Tsushima, T. M. (1999). Identity theory, emotions and mental health. Paper presented at the Presented at the annual meetings of the American Sociological Association.
  • Stryker, S. (1968). Identity salience and role performance: The relevance of symbolic interaction theory for family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 30(4), 558–564.
  • Stryker, S. (1980). Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version. Menlo Park: Benjamin Cummings.
  • Stryker, S., & Burke, P. J. (2000).The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(4), 284–297.
  • Stryker, S., & Serpe, R. T. (1982). Commitment, identity salience, and role behavior: Theory and research example. In W. Ickes & R. Kidd (Eds.), Personality, roles, and social behavior (pp. 199–218). New York: Spring-Verlag.
  • Thoits, P. A. (1983). Multiple identities and psychological well-being: A reformulation and test of the social isolation hypothesis. American Sociological Review, 48, 174–187.
  • Thoits, P. A. (1992). Identity structures and psychological well-being: Gender and marital status comparisons. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55(3), 236–256.
  • Thoits, P. A. (2003). Personal agency in the accumulation of multiple role-identities. In P. J. Burke, T. J. Owens, R. T. Serpe & P. A. Thoits (Eds.), Advances in identity theory and research (pp. 179–194). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
  • Wearing, B. M. (1990). Beyond the ideology of motherhood: Leisure as resistance. Journal of Sociology, 26, 36–58
  • Wearing, B. M. (1992). Leisure and women's identity in late adolescence. Society and Leisure/Loisir et Societe, 15, 325–345.
  • Weinstein, M. D., Smith, D. S., & Wiesenthal, D. L. (1995). Masculinity and hockey violence. Sex Roles, 33, 831–847.
  • Weitz, S. (1977). Sex roles: Biological, psychological and social foundations. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Wiley, C. G. T., Shaw, S. M., & Havitz, M. E. (2000). Men's and women's involvement in sports: An examination of the gendered aspects of leisure involvement. Leisure Sciences, 22, 19–31.
  • Williams, L. J., & O'Boyle, E. H. Jr. (2008). Measurement models for linking latent variables and indicators: A review of human resource management research using parcels. Human Resource Management Review, 18, 233–242.
  • Wimbush, E., & Talbot, M. (1988). Relative freedoms: Women and leisure. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
  • Yoder, G. (1997). A model for commodity intensive serious leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 29, 407–429.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.