1,284
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Computer science meets digital leisure: Multiple perspectives on social media and eSport collaborations

, , &

References

  • Aboelela, S. W., Larson, E., Bakken, S., Carrasquillo, O., Formicola, A., Glied, S. A., … Gebbie, K. M. (2007). Defining interdisciplinary research: Conclusions from a critical review of the literature. Health Services Research, 42(1p1), 329–346. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00621.x
  • Anders, A. D., & Lester, J. N. (2015). Lessons from interdisciplinary qualitative research: Learning to work against a single story. Qualitative Research, 15(6), 738–754. doi:10.1177/1468794114557994
  • Antunovic, D., & Linden, A. D. (2015). Disrupting dominant discourses: #HERESPROOF of interest in women's sports. Feminist Media Studies, 15(1), 157–159. doi:10.1080/14680777.2015.987426
  • Armstrong, C. G., Delia, E. B., & Giardana, M. D. (2016). Embracing the social in social media: An analysis of the social media marketing strategies of the Los Angeles Kings. Communication & Sport, 4(2), 145–165. doi:10.1177/2167479514532914
  • Beaver, D. (2001). Reflections on scientific collaboration (and its study): Past, present and future. Scientometrics, 52(3), 365–377.
  • Berbary, L. A., & Boles, J. C. (2014). Eight points for reflection: Revisiting scaffolding for improvisational humanist qualitative inquiry. Leisure Sciences, 36(5), 401–419. doi:10.1080/01490400.2014.912169
  • Berdychevsky, L., & Nimrod, G. (2016). Sex as leisure in later life: A netnographic approach. Leisure Sciences, 39(3), 224–243. doi:10.1080/01490400.2016.1189368
  • Blaszka, M., Burch, L. M., Frederick, E. L., Clavio, G., & Walsh, P. (2012). #WorldSeries: An empirical examination of a Twitter hashtag during a major sporting event. International Journal of Sport Communication, 5(4), 435–453. doi:10.1123/ijsc.5.4.435
  • Buhler, A., & Nufer, G. (2012). Relationship marketing in sports. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
  • Bundon, A. (2017). The web and digital qualitative methods: Researching online and researching the online in sport and exercise studies. In B. Smith & A. C. Sparkes (Eds.), Routledge handbook of qualitative research in sport and exercise (pp. 355–367). London, UK: Routledge.
  • Carayol, N., & Thi, T. U. N. (2005). Why do academic scientists engage in interdisciplinary research? Research Evaluation, 14(1), 70–79. doi:10.3152/147154405781776355
  • Chao, L. L. (2017). “You must construct additional pylons”: Building a better framework for eSports governance. Fordham Law Review, 86(2), 737–765.
  • Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Sydney, NSW, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
  • Doherty, A. (2012). “It takes a village:” Interdisciplinary research for sport management. Journal of Sport Management, 26(1), 1–10. doi:10.1123/jsm.27.1.1
  • Eden, A. H. (2007). Three paradigms of computer science. Minds and Machines, 17, 135–167. doi:10.1007/s11023-007-9060-8
  • Fagen, K. (2018). Full benefits, 6-figure salaries, 401Ks and nutritionists – 2 professionals reveal what it’s really like to be paid to play video games for a living. Business Insider. Retrieved from https://www.businessinsider.com/what-its-like-to-play-in-the-overwatch-league-2018-4
  • Filo, K., Lock, D., & Karg, A. (2015). Sport and sport media research: A review. Sport Management Review, 18(2), 166–181. doi:10.1016/j.smr.2014.11.001
  • Funk, D. C. (2017). Introducing a sport experience design (SX) framework for sport consumer behaviour research. Sport Management Review, 20(2), 145–158. doi:10.1016/j.smr.2016.11.006
  • Funk, D. C., Pizzo, A. D., & Baker, B. J. (2018). eSport management: Embracing eSport education and research opportunities. Sport Management Review, 21(1), 7–13. doi:10.1016/j.smr.2017.07.008
  • Gibbs, C., O’Reilly, N., & Brunette, M. (2014). Professional team sport and Twitter: Gratifications sought and obtained by followers. International Journal of Sport Communication, 7(2), 188–213. doi:10.1123/IJSC.2014-0005
  • Goulding, T. (2016). The most tweeted about topic for 2016 has been revealed. The Independent. Retrieved from https://www.independent.co.uk/news/twitter-most-tweeted-moments-2016-donald-trump-brexit-black-lives-matter-rio-a7466236.html
  • Grimwood, B. S. R. (2015). Participatory action research: Democratizing knowledge for social justice. In C. W. Johnson & D. C. Parry (Eds.), Fostering social justice through qualitative inquiry: A methodological guide (pp. 217–250). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Hallmann, K., & Giel, T. (2018). eSports – Competitive sports or recreational activity? Sport Management Review, 21(1), 14–20. doi:10.1016/j.smr.2017.07.011
  • Havitz, M. E., & Mannell, R. C. (2005). Ending involvement, situational involvement, and flow in leisure and non-leisure activities. Journal of Leisure Research, 37(2), 152–177. doi:10.1080/00222216.2005.11950048
  • Highfield, T., Harrington, S., & Bruns, A. (2013). Twitter as a technology for audiencing and fandom: The #Eurovision phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society, 16(3), 315–339. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.756053
  • Hoeber, L., Shaw, S., & Rowe, K. (2018). Twitter’s paradoxes: A feminist critical discourse analysis of women’s professional cycling tweets. Paper presented at the North American Society for Sport Management conference, Halifax, NS.
  • Hoeber, O., Hoeber, L., Snelgrove, R., & Wood, L. (2017). Interactively producing purposive samples for qualitative research using exploratory search. In M. Koolen, J. Kamps, T. Bogers, N. Belkin, D. Kelly, & E. Yilmaz (Eds.), Proceedings of the workshop on supporting complex search tasks (pp. 19–21). Oslo, Norway: CHIIR 2017 Workshop on Supporting Complex Search Tasks. Retrieved from http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1798/paper4.pdf
  • Hoeber, O., Snelgrove, R., Hoeber, L., & Wood, L. (2017). A systematic methodology for preserving the whole in large-scale qualitative-temporal research. Journal of Sport Management, 31(4), 387–400. doi:10.1123/jsm.2016-0278
  • Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1–18. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00917-1
  • Kim, Y. K., & Trail, G. (2011). A conceptual framework for understanding relationships between sport consumers and sport organizations: A relationship quality approach. Journal of Sport Management, 25(1), 57–69. doi:10.1123/jsm.25.1.57
  • Layland, E. K., Stone, G. A., Mueller, J. T., & Camilla, C. J. (2018). Injustice in mobile leisure: A conceptual exploration of Pokémon Go. Leisure Sciences, 40(4), 288–306. doi:10.1080/01490400.2018.1426064
  • Lopez, K. J., Muldoon, M. L., & McKeown, J. K. L. (2018). One day of #Feminism: Twitter as a complex digital arena for wielding, shielding, and trolling talk on feminism. Leisure Sciences. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/01490400.2018.1448022
  • Lupton, D. (2015). Digital sociology. London, UK: Routledge.
  • Madrigal, R. (2003). Investigating an evolving leisure experience: Antecedents and consequences of spectator affect during a live sporting event. Journal of Leisure Research, 35(1), 23–48. doi:10.18666/jlr-2003-v35-i1-609
  • Mahony, D. F. (2008). No one can whistle a symphony: Working together for sport management’s future. Journal of Sport Management, 22(1), 1–10. doi:10.1123/jsm.22.1.1
  • Mair, H. (2006). The potential of interdisciplinarity for leisure research. Leisure Sciences, 28(2), 197–202. doi:10.1080/01490400500484099
  • McCarthy, J., Rowley, J., Ashworth, C. J., & Pioch, E. (2014). Managing brand presence through social media: The case of UK football clubs. Internet Research, 24(2), 181–204. doi:10.1108/IntR-08-2012-0154
  • McGillivray, D. (2014). Digital cultures, acceleration and mega sporting event narratives. Leisure Studies, 33, 247–266.
  • Melin, G. (2000). Pragmatism and self-organization: Research collaboration on the individual level. Research Policy, 29(1), 31–40. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00031-1
  • Mulcahy, C. M. (2015). Evocative inquiry: Saving the world, one story at a time. In C. W. Johnson & D. C. Parry (Eds.), Fostering social justice through qualitative inquiry: A methodological guide. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Mulkerin, T. (2016). eSports has a racism problem. Business Insider. Retrieved from https://www.businessinsider.com/the-esports-racism-problem-2016-5
  • Nimrod, G. (2009). Seniors' online communities: A quantitative content analysis. The Gerontologist, 50(3), 382–392. doi:10.1093/geront/gnp141
  • Nimrod, G. (2014). The benefits of and constraints to participation in seniors’ online communities. Leisure Studies, 33(3), 247–266. doi:10.1080/02614367.2012.697697
  • Nimrod, G. (2015). The hierarchy of mobile phone incorporation among older users. Mobile Media & Communication, 4, 149–168. doi:10.1177/2050157915617336
  • Nimrod, G. (2017). Older audiences in the digital media environment. Information, Communication & Society, 20, 233–249. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2016.1164740
  • Nimrod, G., & Adoni, H. (2012). Conceptualizing e-leisure. Society and Leisure, 1, 31–56. doi:10.1080/07053436.2012.10707834
  • Parry, D. C., Johnson, C. W., & Stewart, W. (2013). Leisure research for social justice: A response to Henderson. Leisure Sciences, 35(1), 81–87. doi:10.1080/01490400.2013.739906
  • Popp, B., & Woratschek, H. (2016). Introducing branded communities in sport for building strong brand relations in social media. Sport Management Review, 19(2), 183–197. doi:10.1016/j.smr.2015.06.001
  • Rascher, D. A., & Solmes, J. P. G. (2007). Do fans want close contests? A test of the uncertainty outcome hypothesis in the National Basketball Association. International Journal of Sport Finance, 2, 130–141.
  • Saddlemyer, J. (2017). eSports: a new type of spectator sport. Needle. Retrieved from http://needlestrategy.com/2017/11/28/esports/
  • Schultz, C. S., & McKeown, J. K. L. (2018). Introduction to the special issue: Toward ‘digital leisure studies’. Leisure Sciences, 40(4), 223–238. doi:10.1080/01490400.2018.1441768
  • Seo, Y., & Jung, S.-U. (2016). Beyond solitary play in computer games: The social practices of eSports. Journal of Consumer Culture, 16(3), 635–655. doi:10.1177/1469540514553711
  • Shneiderman, B. (2016). The new ABCs of research: Achieving breakthrough collaborations. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Silk, M., Millington, B., Rich, E., & Bush, A. (2016). (Re-)thinking digital leisure. Leisure Studies, 35(6), 712–723. doi:10.1080/02614367.2016.1240223
  • Snelgrove, R. (2017). Advancing paradigmatic consistency and distinction in leisure studies: from epistemology to method. Annals of Leisure Research, 20(2), 131–136. doi:10.1080/11745398.2017.1287579
  • Spracklen, K. (2015). Digital leisure, the internet and popular culture. London, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
  • Stavros, C., Meng, M. D., Westberg, K., & Farrelly, F. (2014). Understanding fan motivation for interacting on social media. Sport Management Review, 17(4), 455–469. doi:10.1016/j.smr.2013.11.004
  • Tasi, C.-W., Lai, C.-F., Chao, H.-C., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2015). Big data analytics: A survey. Journal of Big Data, 2(Article 21), 1–32.
  • Taylor, N., Jenson, J., & de Castell, S. (2009). Cheerleaders/booth babes/Halo hoes: pro-gaming, gender and jobs for the boys. Digital Creativity, 20(4), 239–252. doi:10.1080/14626260903290323
  • Thorsteinsdóttir, O. H. (2000). External research collaboration in two small science systems. Scientometrics, 49(1), 145–160.
  • Toffoletti, K., & Thorpe, H. (2018). Female athletes’ self-representation on social media: A feminist analysis of neoliberal marketing strategies in “economies of visibility”. Feminism & Psychology, 28(1), 11–31. doi:10.1177/0959353517726705
  • Trussell, D. E., Paterson, S., Hebblethwaite, S., Xing, T. M. K., & Evans, M. (2017). Negotiating the complexities and risks of interdisciplinary qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–10.
  • van Rijnsoever, F. J., & Hessels, L. K. (2011). Factors associated with disciplinary and interdisciplinary research collaboration. Research Policy, 40(3), 463–472. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.11.001
  • Waters, R. D., Burke, K. A., Jackson, Z. H., & Buning, J. D. (2011). Using stewardship to cultivate fandom online: Comparing how National Football Teams use their web sites and Facebook to engage their fans. International Journal of Sport Communication, 4(2), 163–177. doi:10.1123/ijsc.4.2.163
  • Yan, G., Pegoraro, A., & Watanabe, N. M. (2018). Student-athletes’ organization of activism at the University of Missouri: Resource mobilization on Twitter. Journal of Sport Management, 32(1), 24–37. doi:10.1123/jsm.2017-0031
  • Zampolini, P. (2018). Where are the women in eSports? CMF Trends. Retrieved from https://trends.cmf-fmc.ca/where-are-the-women-in-esp

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.