Building, not burning bridges in research: Insider/outsider dilemmas and engaging with the bridge community

References

• Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. (1987). Membership roles in field research. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. (2017). Living a feminist life. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, L., & Taylor, J. D. (2010). Standing out while fitting in: Serious leisure identities and aligning actions among skydivers and gun collectors. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 39(1), 34–59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241609343291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, H. (1967). Whose side are we on? Social Problems, 14(3), 239–247. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1967.14.3.03a00010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchmann, C., & Dalton, B. (2002). Interpersonal influences and educational aspirations in 12 countries: The importance of institutional context. Sociology of Education, 75(2), 99–122. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/3090287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bochner, A., & Ellis, C. (2002). Ethnographically speaking. AltaMira.
   Google Scholar
• Breeze, M. (2013). Analysing ‘seriousness’ in roller derby: Speaking critically with the serious leisure perspective. Sociological Research Online, 18(4), 237–249. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.3236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brkljačić, T., Lučić, L., & Sucic, I. (2017). Well-being, motives and experiences in live and online game settings: Case of contract bridge. International Journal of Gaming and Computer-Mediated Simulations, 9(4), 19–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4018/IJGCMS.2017100102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campus, D. (2013). Women political leaders and the media. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Clingerman, E. (2007). An insider/outsider team approach in research with migrant farmworker women. Family & Community Health, 30(1 Suppl), S75–S84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/00003727-200701001-00010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean, J. (2017). Doing reflexivity: An introduction. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deem, R. (1999). How to get out of the ghetto? Strategies for research on gender and leisure for the twenty-first century. Leisure Studies, 18(3), 161–177. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/026143699374907
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, S. J. (2010). Enlightened sexism: The seductive message that feminism's work is done. Times Books/Henry Holt & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Dupuis, S. L. (1999). Naked truths: Towards a reflexive methodology in leisure research. Leisure Sciences, 21(1), 43–64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/014904099273282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwyer, C., & Buckle, J. (2009). The space between: On being an insider-outsider in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(1), 54–63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800105
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, C., & Bochner, A. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.) Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 733–768). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, C., Adams, T., & Bochner, A. (2011). Autoethnography: An overview. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(1), 10. Available at http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1589/3095
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, C., & Kalleberg, A. (2006). Fighting for time: The shifting boundaries of work and social life. Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, E., & Punch, S. (2016, June 13). Gender inequalities and the sociology of bridge [Paper presentation]. Centre for Research on Families and Relationships Conference, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, M. L., Smith, L., & Worthington, K. (2008). Fitting the methodology with the research: An exploration of narrative, self-study and auto-ethnography. Studying Teacher Education, 4(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17425960801976321
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, K., & Gibson, H. (2013). An integrative review of women, gender, and leisure: Increasing complexities. Journal of Leisure Research, 45(2), 115–135. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18666/jlr-2013-v45-i2-3008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemingway, J. L., & Parr, M. G. W. (2000). Leisure research and leisure practice: Three perspectives on constructing the research-practice relation. Leisure Sciences, 22(3), 139–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt, N. L. (2001). Beyond technical reflection: Demonstrating the modification of teaching behaviors using three levels of reflection. Avante, 7(2), 66–76.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard, G., Backett-Milburn, K., & Kemmer, D. (2001). Working with emotion: Issues for the researcher in fieldwork and teamwork. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 4(2), 119–137. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570116992
   Google Scholar
• Humphreys, M. (2005). Getting personal: Reflexivity and autoethnographic vignettes. Qualitative Inquiry, 11(6), 840–860. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800404269425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, C. W., & Kivel, B. (2007). Gender, sexuality and queer theory in sport. In C. C. Aitchison (Ed.), Sport and gender identities: Masculinities, femininities, and sexualities (pp. 93–105). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kian, E. M. (2007). Gender in sports writing by the print media: An exploratory examination of writers’ experiences and attitudes. The SMART Journal, 4(1), 4–26.
   Google Scholar
• Kloß, S. T. (2017). Sexual(ized) harassment and ethnographic fieldwork: A silenced aspect of social research. Ethnography, 18(3), 396–414. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138116641958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, J. L., & Giuliano, T. A. (2003). Blood, sweat, and jeers: The impact of the media's heterosexist portrayals on perceptions of male and female athletes. Journal of Sport Behavior, 26(3), 272–284.
   Google Scholar
• Lall, J. (2016). Sexism in bridge. Bridge Winners Blogsite. https://bridgewinners.com/article/view/sexism-in-bridge/
   Google Scholar
• Lindsey, L. (2016). Gender roles: A sociological perspective. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Maton, K. (2003). Reflexivity, relationism and research: Pierre Bourdieu and the epistemic conditions of social scientific knowledge. Space and Culture, 6(1), 52–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331202238962
   Google Scholar
• McNabb, R., & Wass, V. (1997). Male-female salary differentials in British universities. Oxford Economic Papers, 49(3), 328–390. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a028612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parry, D. C. (2005). Women's leisure as resistance to pronatalist ideology. Journal of Leisure Research, 37(2), 133–151. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2005.11950047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parry, D. C., & Fullagar, S. (2013). Feminist leisure research in the contemporary era: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Leisure Research, 45(5), 571–582. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18666/jlr-2013-v45-i5-4363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, C. (2016). Ethnicity, gender, deprivation and low educational attainment in England: Political arithmetic, ideological stances and the deficient society. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 11(2), 160–183. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197916648282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Punch, S. (2012). Hidden struggles of fieldwork: Exploring the role and use of field diaries. Emotion, Space and Society, 5(2), 86–93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2010.09.005
   Google Scholar
• Punch, S., Russell, Z., & Cairns, B. (2020). (Per)forming identity in the mind-sport bridge: Self, partnership and community. International Review for the Sociology of Sport. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690220959648
   Google Scholar
• Punch, S., & Snellgrove, M. L. (2020). Playing your life: Developing strategies and managing impressions in the game of bridge. Sociological Research Online. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780420973043
   Google Scholar
• Savigny, H. (2020). Cultural sexism: The politics of feminist rage in the #MeToo era. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, D. (1991). A narrative analysis of a declining social world: The case of contract bridge. Play and Culture, 4(1), 11–23.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, D., & Godbey, G. (1992). An analysis of adult play groups: Social versus serious participation in contract bridge. Leisure Sciences, 14(1), 47–67. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01490409209513156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Settelmaier, E., & Taylor, P. (2002, January). Using autobiography to map an interpretive researchers’ sensitivities toward her subject(s) [Paper presentation]. Meeting of the Australasian Science Education Research Association, Queensland, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, S. M. (2000). If our research is relevant, why is nobody listening? Journal of Leisure Research, 32(1), 147–151. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2000.11949905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snellgrove, M. L. (2019). Taking bridge seriously. Discover Society. https://discoversociety.org/2019/12/04/taking-bridge-seriously/
   Google Scholar
• Snellgrove, M. L., & Punch, S. (2021, June 28–July 1). Between seeing and unseeing: Managing familiarity and strangeness in research contexts [Paper presentation]. 4th International Bridge Conference, Bridging Academia, Policy and Practice, University of Stirling, United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• Trolan, E. J. (2013). The impact of the media on gender inequality within sport. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 91, 215–227. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.420
   Google Scholar
• Yerkes, M. A., Roeters, A., & Baxter, J. (2020). Gender differences in the quality of leisure: A cross-national comparison. Community, Work & Family, 23(4), 367–384. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2018.1528968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar