Distributional Aspects of Some Statistics in Weighted Social Networks

REFERENCES

• Bandyopadhyay, S., Rao, A. R. & Sinha, B. K. (2010). Models for social networks with statistical applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Basu, D. (1958). On sampling with and without replacement. Sankhya, Series A, 20, 287–294.
   Google Scholar
• Burt, R. S. (1976). Positions in networks. Social Forces, 55, 93–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carolan, B. & Natriello, G. (2006). Strong ties, weak ties: Relational dimensions of learning settings. New York, NY: EdLab, Teachers College, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, J. & Holton, D. H. (1995). A first look at graph theory. New Delhi, India: Allied Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, R. (1988). Theoretical sociology. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. (1966). The division of labour in society (pp. 129–132). New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feller, W. (1960). An introduction to probability theory and its applications (Vol. 1). Bombay, India: Asia Publication House.
   Google Scholar
• Flament, C. (1963). Applications of graph theory to group structure. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Goswami, R. & Basu, D. (2011). Influence of information networks on farmer's decision-making in West Bengal. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education, 11(20), 50–58.
   Google Scholar
• Gouldner, A. V. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hage, P. & Harary, F. (1983). Structural models in anthropology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harary, F., Norman, R. Z. & Cartwright, D. (1965). Structural models: An introduction to the theory of directed graphs. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Jana, R. (2005). Statistical and graph theoretic analysis of social networks of rural farmers in different agricultural activities (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Burdwan University, Burdwan, India.
   Google Scholar
• Jana, R. (2011a). Importance of weighted social networks in diffusion of agricultural innovations: An empirical study. In A. K. Mukherjee & M. Sen (Eds.), Proceedings of the UGC Sponsored National Level Conference, Sociology in the 21st century: The first decade (pp. 93–101). Barrackpore, India: Barrackpore Rastraguru Surendranath College and Sociological Association of West Bengal.
   Google Scholar
• Jana, R. (2011b). Means and variances of some statistics in simple social network with given out-degrees. Calcutta Statistical Association Bulletin, 63(249–252), 359–369.
   Google Scholar
• Krackhradt, D. (1992). A caveat on the use of the quadratic assignment procedure. Journal of Quantitative Anthropology, 3, 279–296.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, D. Z. & Cross, R. (2004). The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science, 50, 1477–1490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, N. (2002). Building a network theory of social capital. In K. S. Cook N. Lin & R. S. Burt (Eds.), Social capital: Theory and research (pp. 3–30). New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Marsden, P. V. (1989). Methods of characterization of role structures in network analysis. In L. C. Freeman D. R. White & A. K. Romney (Eds.), Research methods in social network analysis (pp. 489–530). Fairfax, VA: George Mason University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, A. C. (1975). On becoming a participant-observer. In A. Beteille & T. N. Madan (Eds.), Encounter and experience (pp. 40–41). Delhi, India: Vikas Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, A. R. (1995). Reciprocity in marital and social networks: Illustration with Indian data. Human Biology, 67, 887–904.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, A. R. (2003, November–December). Lecture notes: Graphical and probabilistic models. Workshop on network analysis with applications to social sciences, organized at Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata, India.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, A. R. & Bandyopadhyay, S. (1987). Measures of reciprocity in a social network. Sankhya, Series A, 49, 141–188.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, A. R. & Rao, S. B. (1992). Measuring reciprocity in weighted social networks. Sankhya, 54, 349–355.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, W. D. (1989). The NEGOPY analysis program. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Communication, Simon Fraser University.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, F. S. (1976). Discrete mathematical models. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Skvoretz, J. & Agneessens, F. (2007). Reciprocity, multiplexity, and exchange measures. Quality and Quantity, 41, 341–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivas, M. N. (1952). Religion and society among the Coorghs of South India. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Srinivas, M. N. & Beteille, A. (1964). Networks in Indian social structure. Man, 122, 165–168.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, W. & Ghosal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 464–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman, S. & Faust, K. (1999). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, K. H. (Ed.). (1964). The sociology of Georg Simmel. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar