Residential relocation dynamics: A microeconomic model based on agents’ socioeconomic change and learning

References

• Aarts, H., Verplanken, B., & Knippenberg, A. (1998). Predicting behavior from actions in the past: Repeated decision making or a matter of habit? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(15), 1355–1374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso, W. (1964). Location and land use. Toward a general theory of land rent. In Location and land use. Toward a general theory of land rent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard. University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anas, A. (1982). Residential location markets and urban transportation: Economic theory, econometrics, and policy analysis with discrete choice models. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. R., & Milson, R. (1989). Human memory: An adaptive perspective. Psychological Review, 96(4), 703–719. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benenson, I. (1998). Multi-agent simulations of residential dynamics in the city. Computers Environment and Urban Systems, 22(1), 25–42. doi:10.1016/S0198-9715(98)00017-9
   Google Scholar
• Camerer, C. (1998). Bounded rationality in individual decision making. Experimental Economics, 1(2), 163–183. doi:10.1023/A:1009944326196
   Google Scholar
• Cantillo, V., Ortúzar, J. D. D., & Williams, H. C. (2007). Modeling discrete choices in the presence of inertia and serial correlation. Transportation Science, 41(2), 195–205. doi:10.1287/trsc.1060.0178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C., Chen, J., & Timmermans, H. (2009). Historical deposition influence in residential location decisions: A distance-based GEV model for spatial correlation. Environment and Planning A, 41(11), 2760–2777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C., & Lin, H. (2011). Decomposing residential self-selection via a life-course perspective. Environment and Planning A, 43(11), 2608–2625. doi:10.1068/a43571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, W. A., Huang, Y., & Withers, S. (2003). Does commuting distance matter?: Commuting tolerance and residential change. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 33(2), 199–221. doi:10.1016/S0166-0462(02)00012-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Palma, A., & Lefevre, C. (1983). Individual decision‐making in dynamic collective systems. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 9(2), 103–124. doi:10.1080/0022250X.1983.9989936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dendoncker, N., Rounsevell, M., & Bogaert, P. (2007). Spatial analysis and modelling of land use distributions in Belgium. Computers Environment and Urban Systems, 31(2), 188–205. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2006.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellickson, B. (1981). An alternative test of the hedonic theory of housing markets. Journal of Urban Economics, 9(1), 56–79. doi:10.1016/0094-1190(81)90048-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eluru, N., Sener, I., Bhat, C., Pendyala, R., & Axhausen, K. (2009). Understanding residential mobility: Joint model of the reason for residential relocation and stay duration. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, (2133), 64–74. doi:10.3141/2133-07
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ettema, D. (2011). A multi-agent model of urban processes: Modelling relocation processes and price setting in housing markets. Computers Environment and Urban Systems, 35(1), 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2010.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feitosa, F. F., Le, Q. B., & Vlek, P. L. (2011). Multi-agent simulator for urban segregation (MASUS): A tool to explore alternatives for promoting inclusive cities. Computers Environment and Urban Systems, 35(2), 104–115. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2010.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filatova, T. (2015). Empirical agent-based land market: Integrating adaptive economic behavior in urban land-use models. Computers Environment and Urban Systems, 54, 397–413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florez, M. (1998). Accesibilidad, calidad urbana y grupos socioeconómicos en el patrón de localización residencial. El caso de Caracas. ( Tesis doctoral). Universidad Politécnica de Cataluña, Escuela de Ingenieros de Caminos, Barcelona, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Fossett, M. (2006). Including preference and social distance dynamics in multi-factor theories of segregation. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 30(3–4), 289–298. doi:10.1080/00222500500544151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fossett, M. (2011). Generative models of segregation: Investigating model-generated patterns of residential segregation by ethnicity and socioeconomic status. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 35(1–3), 114–145. doi:10.1080/0022250X.2010.532367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geurs, K., Montis, A., & Reggiani, A. (2015). Recent advances and applications in accessibility modelling. Computers Environment and Urban Systems, 49, 82–85. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2014.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grauwin, S., Goffette-Nagot, F., & Jensen, P. (2012). Dynamic models of residential segregation: An analytical solution. Journal of Public Economics, 96(1–2), 124–141. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.08.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunderson, L. H., & Holling, C. S. (2002). Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, J. Y., & Bhat, C. R. (2007). Operationalizing the concept of neighborhood: Application to residential location choice analysis. Journal of Transport Geography, 15(1), 31–45. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2005.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habib, M., & Miller, E. (2009). Reference-dependent residential location choice model within a relocation context. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2133(2133), 92–99. doi:10.3141/2133-10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huff, J. O., & Clark, W. A. (1978). Cumulative stress and cumulative inertia: A behavioral model of the decision to move. Environment and Planning A, 10(10), 1101–1119. doi:10.1068/a101101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin, E. G. (2010). New directions for urban economic models of land use change: Incorporating spatial dynamics and heterogeneity. Journal of Regional Science, 50(1), 65–91. doi:10.1111/jors.2010.50.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jara-Díaz, S. R., & Martínez, F. J. (1999). On the specification of indirect utility and willingness to pay for discrete residential location models. Journal of Regional Science, 39(4), 675–688. doi:10.1111/0022-4146.00155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennan, J., & Walker, J. R. (2011). The effect of expected income on individual migration decisions. Econometrica, 79(1), 211–251. doi:10.3982/ECTA4657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, B. H., & Waddell, P. (2010). Residential mobility and location choice: A nested logit model with sampling of alternatives. Transportation, 37(4), 587–601. doi:10.1007/s11116-010-9270-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, P., & Tu, Y. (2011). Behaviors on intra-urban residential mobility: A review and implications to the future research. IRES working paper Series. National University of Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• López-Ospina, H. A., Martínez, F., & Cortés, C. (2016). Microeconomic model of residential location incorporating life cycle and social expectations. Computers Environment and Urban Systems, 55, 33–43. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2015.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louviere, J., & Timmermans, H. (1990). Hierarchical information integration applied to residential choice behavior. Geographical Analysis, 22(2), 127–144. doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.1990.tb00200.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez, F. (1995). Access: The transport-land use economic link. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 29(6), 45–47. doi:10.1016/0191-2615(95)00014-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez, F., Aguila, F., & Hurtubia, R. (2009). The constrained multinomial logit: A semi-compensatory choice model. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 43(3), 365–377. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2008.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez, F., & Araya, C. (2000). Transport and land-use benefits under location externalities. Environment and Planning A, 32(9), 1611–1624. doi:10.1068/a32131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez, F., & Hurtubia, R. (2006). Dynamic model for the simulation of equilibrium status in the land use market. Networks and Spatial Economics, 6(1), 55–73. doi:10.1007/s11067-006-7685-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez, F. J. (1992). The bid-choice land-use model: An integrated economic framework. Environment and Planning A, 24(6), 871–885. doi:10.1068/a240871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez, F. J., & Henríquez, R. (2007). A random bidding and supply land use equilibrium model. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 41(6), 632–651. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2006.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadden, D. (1978). Modelling the choice of residential location. In A. Karlqvist, L. Lundqvist, F. Snickars, & J. Weibull (Eds.), Spatial interaction theory and planning models (Studies in regional science and urban economics) (pp. 75–96). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: North-Holland Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Milani, F. (2007). Expectations, learning and macroeconomic persistence. Journal of Monetary Economics, 54(7), 2065–2082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, E. J. (1996). Microsimulation and activity-based forecasting. In Texas Transportation Institute, (Eds.), Activity-Based Travel Forecasting Conference, Washington, DC, June 2–5, 151–172.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, E. J., & Haroun, A. (2000, July). A microsimulation model of residential housing markets. In 9th International Association for Travel Behaviour Research Conference, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia, (pp. 2–5).
   Google Scholar
• Miller, E. J., Hunt, J. D., Abraham, J. E., & Salvini, P. A. (2004). Microsimulating urban systems. Computers Environment and Urban Systems, 28(1–2), 9–44. doi:10.1016/S0198-9715(02)00044-3
   Google Scholar
• Nijkamp, P., Van Wissen, L., & Rima, A. (1993). A household life cycle model for residential relocation behaviour. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 27(1), 35–53. doi:10.1016/0038-0121(93)90027-G
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, A. O. (2009). Schelling′ s model revisited: Residential sorting with competitive bidding for land. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 39(4), 397–408. doi:10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2009.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Páez, A., Scott, D. M., & Morency, C. (2012). Measuring accessibility: Positive and normative implementations of various accessibility indicators. Journal of Transport Geography, 25, 141–153. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.03.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, D. C., & Filatova, T. (2008). A conceptual design for a bilateral agent-based land market with heterogeneous economic agents. Computers Environment and Urban Systems, 32(6), 454–463. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2008.09.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raju, K. A., Sikdar, P. K., & Dhingra, S. L. (1998). Micro-simulation of residential location choice and its variation. Computers Environment and Urban Systems, 22(3), 203–218. doi:10.1016/S0198-9715(98)00043-X
   Google Scholar
• Ritchey, P. N. (1976). Explanations of migration. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 363–404. doi:10.1146/annurev.so.02.080176.002051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi, P. H. (1955). Why families move: A study in the social psychology of urban residential mobility. Glencoe, MN: Free Press University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Rust, J. (1994). Structural estimation of Markov decision processes. Handbook of Econometrics, 4(4), 3081–3143.
   Google Scholar
• Salvini, P., & Miller, E. J. (2005). ILUTE: An operational prototype of a comprehensive microsimulation model of urban systems. Networks and Spatial Economics, 5(2), 217–234. doi:10.1007/s11067-005-2630-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schinnar, A. P., & Stewman, S. (1978). A class of Markov models of social mobility with duration memory patterns. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 6(1), 61–86. doi:10.1080/0022250X.1978.9989881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommers, D. G., & Rowell, K. R. (1992). Factors differentiating elderly residential movers and nonmovers. Population Research and Policy Review, 11(3), 249–262. doi:10.1007/BF00124940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugden, R. (2003). Reference-dependent subjective expected utility. Journal of Economic Theory, 111(2), 172–191. doi:10.1016/S0022-0531(03)00082-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 1039–1061. doi:10.2307/2937956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verplanken, B., & Van Knippenberg, A. (1998). Predicting behavior from actions in the past: Repeated decision making or a matter of habit. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(15), 1355–1374. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01681.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, J. L., & Li, J. (2007). Latent lifestyle preferences and household location decisions. Journal of Geographical Systems, 9(1), 77–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. (2013). Beyond preference: Modelling segregation under regulation. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 54, 388–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willms, J. D., & Paterson, L. (1995). A multilevel model for community segregation*. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 20(1), 23–40. doi:10.1080/0022250X.1995.9990150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J. (2004). A dynamic model of residential segregation. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 28(3), 147–170. doi:10.1080/00222500490480202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J. (2011). Tipping and residential segregation: A unified schelling model. Journal of Regional Science, 51(1), 167–193. doi:10.1111/jors.2011.51.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar