Structural cohesion and embeddedness in two-mode networks

References

• Alba, R. D. (1973). A graph-theoretic definition of a sociometric clique. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 3, 113–126. doi:10.1080/0022250X.1973.9989826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonacich, P. F. (1991). Simultaneous group and individual centralities. Social Networks, 13, 155–168. doi:10.1016/0378-8733(91)90018-O
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P. (2009). 2-Mode concepts in social network analysis. In R. A. Myers (Ed.), Encyclopedia of complexity and system science (pp. 8279–8291). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P., & Everett, M. G. (1997). Network analysis of 2-mode data. Social Networks, 19, 243–269. doi:10.1016/S0378-8733(96)00301-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiger, R. L. (1974). The duality of persons and groups. Social Forces, 53, 181–190. doi:10.1093/sf/53.2.181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burchard, J. K., & Cornwell, B. (2018). Structural holes and bridging in two-mode networks. Social Networks, 55, 11–20. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2018.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, A., Gardner, B. B., & Gardner, M. R. (1941). Deep South: A social anthropological study of caste and class. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. (1984). The division of labor in society. (W. D. Halls, Trans.). New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Festinger, L., Stanley, S., & Back, K. (1950). Social pressures in informal groups: A study of human factors in housing. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Field, S., Frank, K. A., Schiller, K., Riegle-Crumb, C., & Muller, C. (2006). Identifying positions from affiliation networks: Preserving the duality of people and events. Social Networks, 28, 97–123. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2005.04.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, K. A. (1995). Identifying cohesive subgroups. Social Networks, 17, 27–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harary, F. (1969). Graph theory. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Keister, L. A., & Cornwell, B. (2008). The development of influence hierarchy among community elites: The role of visible and obscure status characteristics in the emergence of elite social hierarchies. Sociological Analysis, 2, 5–27.
   Google Scholar
• Latapy, M., Magnien, C., & Del Vecchio, N. (2008). Basic notions for the analysis of large two-mode networks. Social Networks, 30, 31–48. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2007.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson, J. M., & Smith-Lovin, L. (1987). Homophily in voluntary organizations: Status distance and the composition of Face-to-Face Groups. American Sociological Re- View, 52, 370–379. doi:10.2307/2095356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menger, K. (1927). Zur Allgemeinen Kurventheorie. Fundamenta Mathematicae, 10, 96–115. doi:10.4064/fm-10-1-96-115
   Google Scholar
• Mills, C. W. (1956). The power elite. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mizruchi, M. S. (1992). The structure of corporate political action. Cambridge, MA and London, England: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moody, J., & White, D. R. (2003). Structural cohesion and embeddedness: A hierarchical concept of groups. American Sociological Review, 68, 103–127. doi:10.2307/3088904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, C. A. I., & Roberts, K. H. (1977). Task group structure, communication and effectiveness in three organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 674–681. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.62.6.674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opsahl, T. (2013). Triadic closure in two-mode networks: Redefining the global and local clustering coefficients. Social Networks, 35, 159–167. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2011.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popielarz, P. A. (1999). Voluntary association: A multilevel analysis of gender segregation in voluntary organizations. Gender and Society, 13, 234–250. doi:10.1177/089124399013002005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidman, S. (1983). Network structure and minimum degree. Social Networks, 5, 269–287. doi:10.1016/0378-8733(83)90028-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidman, S., & Foster, B. (1978). A graph-theoretic generalization of the clique concept. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 6, 139–154. doi:10.1080/0022250X.1978.9989883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmel, G., & Wolff, K. H. (1950). The sociology of Georg Simmel. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sinkovitz, R., Moddy, J., Oztan, B., & White, D. (2017). Fast determination of structurally cohesive subgroups in large networks. Journal of Computational Science, 17, 62–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrents, J., & Ferraro, F. (2016). Structural cohesion: Visualization and heuristics for fast computation. Journal of Social Structure, 16.
   Google Scholar
• Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1946). The protestant sects and the spirit of capitalism. In (H.H. Gerth & C. W. Mills, Trans.), From Max Weber (302–322). New York, NY:Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. (G. Roth & C. Wittich, Eds.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yamokoski, A., & Dubrow, J. K. (2008). How do elites define influence? Personality and respect as sources of social power. Sociological Focus, 41, 319–336. doi:10.1080/00380237.2008.10571337
   Google Scholar