References
- Adamic, L. A., & Glance, N. (2005). The political blogosphere and the 2004 US election: Divided they blog. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Link Discovery, Chicago, Illinois, US. s 36–43.
- Axelrod, R. (1997). The dissemination of culture: A model with local convergence and global polarization. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41(2), 203–226. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002797041002001
- Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on facebook. Science, 348(6239), 1130–1132. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1160
- Bakshy, E., Rosenn, I., Marlow, C., & Adamic, L. (2012). The role of social networks in information diffusion. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference of the World Wide Web, Lyon, France. 519–528.
- Banos, A. (2012). Network effects in Schelling’s model of segregation: New evidence from agent-based simulation. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 39(2), 393–405. doi:https://doi.org/10.1068/b37068
- Barbera, P. (2015a). Birds of the same feather tweet together: Bayesian ideal point estimation using twitter data. Political Analysis, 23(1), 76–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpu011
- Barbera, P. (2015b). How social media reduces mass political polarization. Evidence from Germany, Spain, and the U.S. In Proceedings of APSA Conference, 46, San Francisco.
- Barbera, P., Jost, J. T., Nagler, J., Tucker, J. A., & Bonneau, R. (2015). Tweeting from left to right: Is online political communication more than an echo chamber? Psychological Science, 26(10), 1531–1542. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615594620
- Barmpalias, G., Elwes, R., & Lewis-Pye, A. (2016). Unperturbed Schelling segregation in two or three dimensions. Journal of Statistical Physics, 164(6), 1460–1487. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-016-1589-6
- Barmpalias, G., Elwes, R., & Lewis-Pye, A. (2018). Digital morphogenesis via Schelling segregation. Nonlinearity, 31(4), 1593–1638. doi:https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6544/aaa493
- Boxell, L., Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2017). Greater internet use is not associated with faster growth in political polarization among US demographic groups. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(3), 201706588.
- Brandt, C., Immorlica, N., Kamath, G., & Kleinberg, R. (2012). An analysis of one-dimensional Schelling segregation. In Proceedings of the forty-fourth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, New York, US. (pp. 789–804).
- Bright, J. (2018). Explaining the emergence of political fragmentation on social media: The role of ideology and extremism. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 23(1), 17–33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmx002
- Chitra, U., & Musco, C. (2019). Understanding filter bubbles and polarization in social networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.08772. 1–18.
- Cho, J. (2003). Beyond a access: The digital divide and internet uses and gratifications. IT & Society, 1(4), 46–72.
- Clark, W. A. V., & Fossett, M. (2008). Understanding the social context of the Schelling segregation model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(11), 4109–4114. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0708155105
- Conover, M., Ratkiewicz, J., Francisco, M., Goncalves, B., Menczer, F., & Flammini, A. (2011). Political polarization on Twitter. ICWSM, 133(26), 89–96.
- Dall’Asta, L., Castellano, C., & Marsili, M. (2008). Statistical physics of the Schelling model of segregation. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2008(7), 7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/07/L07002
- Deffuant, G., Neau, D., Amblard, F., & Weisbuch, G. (2000). Mixing beliefs among interacting agents. Advances in Complex Systems, 3(1n04), 87–98. doi:https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219525900000078
- Dubois, E., & Blank, G. (2018). The echo chamber is overstated: The moderating effect of political interest and diverse media. Information Communication and Society, 21(5), 729–745. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1428656
- Friedkin, N. E., & Johnsen, E. C. (1999). Social influence networks and opinion change. Advances in Group Processes, 16(1999), pp. 1–29.
- Gauvin, L., Vannimenus, J., & Nadal, J. P. (2009). Phase diagram of a Schelling segregation model. European Physical Journal B, 70(2), 293–304. doi:https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2009-00234-0
- Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2011). Ideological segregation online and offline. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(4), 1799–1839. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjr044
- Gracia-Lazaro, C., Floria, L. M., & Moreno, Y. (2011). Selective advantage of tolerant cultural traits in the Axelrod-Schelling model. Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 83(5), 1–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.83.056103
- Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/225469
- Granovetter, M., & Soong, R. (1988). Threshold models of diversity: Chinese restaurants, residential segregation, and the spiral of silence. Sociological Methodology, 18, 69–104. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/271045
- Guerra, B., Poncela, J., Gomez-Gardenes, J., Latora, V., & Moreno, Y. (2010). Dynamical organization towards consensus in the Axelrod model on complex networks. Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 81, 5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.81.056105
- Hazan, A., & Randon-Furling, J. (2013). A Schelling model with switching agents: Decreasing segregation via random allocation and social mobility. European Physical Journal B, 86(10), 1–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2013-31142-1
- Henry, A. D., Pralat, P., & Zhang, C.-Q. (2011). Emergence of segregation in evolving social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(21), 8605–8610. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1014486108
- Hollander, B. A. (2008). Tuning out or tuning elsewhere? Partisanship, polarization, and media migration from 1998 to 2006. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 85(1), 23–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900808500103
- Immorlica, N., Kleinbergt, R., Lucier, B., & Zadomighaddam, M. (2017). Exponential segregation in a two-dimensional Schelling model with tolerant individuals. In Proceedings of the twenty-eighth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on discrete algorithms (pp. 984–993). Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. Barcelona, Spain.
- Iñiguez, G., Török, J., Yasseri, T., Kaski, K., & Kertész, J. (2014). Modeling social dynamics in a collaborative environment. EPJ Data Science, 3(1), 7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-014-0007-z
- Iwanaga, S., & Namatame, A. (2013). Collective behavior in Cascade and Schelling model. Procedia Computer Science, 24, 217–226. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.10.045
- Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. S. (2009). Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 19–39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x
- Lanchier, N., & Scarlatos, S. (2013). Fixation in the one-dimensional Axelrod model. Annals of Applied Probability, 23(6), 2538–2559. doi:https://doi.org/10.1214/12-AAP910
- Lazarsfeld, P., & Merton, R. (1954). Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. Freedom and Control in Modern Society, 18(1), 18–66.
- Marin, A. (2012). Don’t mention it: Why people don’t share job information, When They Do, and Why It matters. Social Networks, 34(2), 181–192. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2011.11.002
- McPherson, M., Smith-lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415–444. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
- Newman, M. E. (2006). Modularity and community structure in networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(23), 8577–8582. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0601602103
- Nikolov, D., Oliveira, D. F., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2015). Measuring online social bubbles. PeerJournal Computer Science, 1, e38. doi:https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.38
- Pancs, R., Vriend, N. J., Mary, Q., & Equilibria, M. N. (2007). Schelling’s spatial proximity model of segregation. Journal of Public Economics, 91(1–2), 1–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2006.03.008
- Rodriguez, A. H., & Moreno, Y. (2010). Effects of mass media action on the Axelrod model with social influence. Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 82(1), 1–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.82.016111
- Rosengren, K. E. (1974). Uses and gratifications: A paradigm outlined. The Uses of Mass Communications: Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research, 3, 269–286.
- Sasahara, K., Chen, W., Peng, H., Ciampaglia, G. L., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2019). On the inevitability of online echo chambers. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.03919.
- Schelling, T. C. (1971). Dynamic models of segregation. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1(2), 143–186. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.1971.9989794
- Sirbu, A., Pedreschi, D., Giannotti, F., & Kertesz, J. (2019). Algorithmic bias amplifies opinion fragmentation and polarization: A bounded confidence model. PLoS ONE, 14(3), 1–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213246
- Stauffer, D., & Solomon, S. (2007). Ising, Schelling and self-organising segregation. European Physical Journal B, 57(4), 473–479. doi:https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2007-00181-8
- Sunstein, C. R. (2017). #Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton, US: Princeton University Press.
- Torok, J., Iniguez, G., Yasseri, T., Miguel, M., Kaski, K., & Kertesz, J. (2013). Opinions, conflicts, and consensus: Modelling social dynamics in a collaborative environment. Physical Review Letters, 110.
- Tucker, J. A., Guess, A., Barbera, P., Vaccari, C., Siegel, A., Sanovich, S., … Nyhan, B. (2018). Social media, political polarization, and political disinformation: A review of the scientific literature. SSRN, 1–95.
- Vaccari, C., Valeriani, A., Barbera, P., Jost, J. T., Nagler, J., & Tucker, J. A. (2016). Of echo chambers and contrarian clubs: Exposure to political disagreement among German and Italian users of Twitter. Social Media and Society, 2, 3.
- Van Alstyne, M., & Brynjolfsson, E. (2005). Global village or cyber- balkans? Modeling and measuring the integration of electronic communities. Management Science, 51(6), 851–868. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0363
- Vinkovic, D., & Kirman, A. (2006). A physical analogue of the Schelling model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(51), 19261–19265. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0609371103
- Yardi, S., & Boyd, D. (2010). Dynamic debates: An analysis of group polarization over time on Twitter. Bulletin of science. Technology & Society, 30(5), 316–327.
- Zhang, J. (2004). A dynamic model of residential segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 28(3), 147–170. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00222500490480202