References
- Anson, J. G. Memory-drum theory: Alternative tests and explanations for the complexity effects on simple reaction time. Journal of Motor Behavior, 1982, 3, 228–246.
- Brown, J. S., & Slater-Hammel, A. T. Discrete movements in the horizontal plane as a function of their length and direction. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1949, 39, 84–95.
- Christina, R. W., Lambert, P. J., Fischman, M. G, & Anson, J. C. Hand position as a variable determining the accuracy of aiming movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1982, 8, 341–348.
- Glencross, D. J. Latency and response complexity. Journal of Motor Behavior, 1972, 4, 241–256.
- Glencross, D. J. Response complexity and latency of different movement patterns. Journal of Motor Behavior, 1973, 5, 95–104.
- Henry, F. M. Stimulus complexity, movement complexity, age, and sex in relation to reaction latency and speed in limb movements. Research Quarterly, 1961, 32, 353–356.
- Henry, F. M. Use of simple reaction time in motor programming studies: A reply to Klapp, Wyatt, & Lingo. Journal of Motor Behavior, 1980, 12, 237–242.
- Henry, F. M. The evolution of the memory drum theory of neuromotor reaction. In G. A. Brooks (Ed.), Perspectives on the academic discipline of physical education. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1981.
- Henry, F. M., & Rogers, D. E. Increased response latency for complicated movements and a “memory drum” theory of neuromotor reaction. Research Quarterly, 1960, 31, 448–458.
- Jeannerod, M. Input-output relations in goal-directed actions. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1981, 4, 628–629.
- Kerr, B. Task factors that influence the selection and preparation for voluntary movements. In G. E. Stelmach (Ed.), Information processing in motor control and learning. New York: Academic Press, 1978.
- Klapp, S. T. Reaction time analysis of programmed control. In R. Hutton (Ed.), Exercise and sports sciences reviews. Santa Barbara, Calif.: Journal Publishing Affiliates, 1978.
- Klapp, S. T. Motor programming is not the only process which can influence RT: Some thoughts on the Marteniuk and MacKenzie analysis. Journal of Motor Behavior, 1981, 13, 320–328.
- Lagasse, P. P., & Hayes, K. C. Premotor and motor reaction time as a function of movement extent. Journal of Motor Behavior, 1973 5, 25–32.
- Marteniuk, R. G., & MacKenzie, C. L. Methods in the study of motor programming: Is it just a matter of simple vs. choice reaction time? A comment on Klapp et al. (1979). Journal of Motor Behavior, 1981, 13, 313–319.
- Norrie, M. L. Practice effects on reaction latency for simple and complex movements. Research Quarterly, 1967, 38, 79–85.
- Norrie, M. L. Effects of movement complexity on choice reaction and movement times. Research Quarterly, 1974, 45, 154–161.
- Quinn, J. T., Schmidt, R. A., Zelaznik, H. W., Hawkins, R., & McFarquhar, R. Target-size influences on reaction time with movement time controlled. Journal of Behavior, 1980, 12, 239–261.
- Schmidt, R. A., & Russell, D. G. Movement velocity and movement time as determiners of the degree of preprogramming in simple movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972, 96, 315–320.
- Sternberg, S., Monsell, S., Knoll, R. L, & Wright, C. E. The latency and duration of rapid movement sequences: Comparisons of speech and typewriting. In G. E. Stelmach (Ed.), Information processing in motor control and learning. New York: Academic Press, 1978.
- Sternberg, S., Wright, C. E., Knoll, R. L., & Monsell, S. Motor programs in rapid speech: Additional evidence. In R.A. Cole (Ed.), Perception and production of fluent speech. Hillside, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1980.