Reaction Time Methods in the Study of Motor Programming

References

• Gelfand, I. M., & Tsetlin, M. L, & Shik, M. L. (1971). Mathematical modeling of mechanisms of the central nervous system. In I. Gelfand, V. Gurfinkel, S. Fomin, & M. Tsetlin (Eds.), Models of the structural-functional organization of certain biological systems (pp. 329–345). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ghez, C., & Vicario, D. (1978). The control of rapid limb movement in the cat. II. Scaling of isometric force adjustments. Experimental Brain Research, 33, 191–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, D., & Kelso, J. A. S. (1980). Are movements prepared in parts? Not under compatible (naturalized) conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 475–495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reaction Time Methods Hick, W. E. (1952). On the rate of gain of information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4, 11–26.
   Google Scholar
• Kelso, J. A. S. (Ed.) (1982). Human motor behavior: An introduction. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kelso, J. A. S., Holt, K. G., Rubin, P., & Kugler, P. N. (1981). Patterns of human interlimb coordination emerge from the properties of non-linear oscillators. Journal of Motor Behavior, 13, 226–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, B. (1978). Task factors that influence selection and preparation for voluntary movements. In G. E. Stelmach (Ed.), Information processing in motor control and learning (pp. 55–69). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, B. (1979). Is reaction time different for long and short response duration in simple and choice conditions? Journal of Motor Behavior, 11, 269–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klapp, S. T. (1977a). Response programming as assessed by reaction time, does not establish commands for particular muscles. Journal of Motor Behavior, 9, 301–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klapp, S. T. (1977b). Reaction time analysis of programmed control. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 5, 231–253.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klapp, S. T. (1978). The problem may be more difficult to solve than it appears: A reply to Zelaznik. Journal of Motor Behavior, 10, 81–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klapp, S. T. (1980). The memory drum theory after twenty years: comments on Henry's note. Journal of Motor Behavior, 12, 169–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klapp, S. T., & Griem, D. M. (1981). Technical considerations regarding the short (dit)— long (dah) key press paradigm. Journal of Motor Behavior, 13, 1–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klapp, S. T., & Rodriguez, G. (1982). Programming time as a function of response duration: A replication of “dit-dah” without possible guessing artifacts. Journal of Motor Behavior, 14, 46–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klapp, S. T., & Wyatt, E. P. (1976). Motor programming within a sequence of responses. Journal of Motor Behavior, 8, 19–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klapp, S. T., Wyatt, E. P., & Lingo, W. M. (1974). Response programming in simple and choice reactions. Journal of Motor Behavior, 6, 263–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornblum, S. (1965). Response competition and/or inhibition in two-choice reaction time. Psychonomic Science, 2, 55–56.
   Google Scholar
• Kugler, P. N., Kelso, J. A. S., & Turvey, M. T. (1982). On the control and coordination of naturally developing systems. In J. A. S. Kelso & J. E. Clark (Eds.), The development of movement control and coordination (pp. 5–78). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Larish, D. D., & Frekany, G. A. (1985). Response preparation of expected and unexpected movements: Reexamining the relationship of arm, direction, and extent of movement. Journal of Motor Behavior, 17, 168–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland, J. L. (1979). On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. Psychological Review, 86, 287–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. (1982). Discrete versus continuous stage models of human information processing: In search of partial output. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 273–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I. (1978). Chronometric explorations of mind. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, D. A. (1980). Human movement initiation: Specification of era, direction and extent. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 444–474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, D. A. (1983). The movement precuing technique: Assumptions, applications, and extensions. In R. A. Magill (Ed.), Memory and control in motor behavior (pp. 231–274). Amsterdam: North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, D. A., & Kornblum, S. (1982). A priming method for investigating the selection of motor responses. Acta Psychologica, 51, 223–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, A. F. (1980). Stage analysis of reaction processes. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior (pp. 331–354). Amsterdam: North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. A. (1980). Past and future issues in motor programming. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 51, 122–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. A. (1982). Motor learning and control: A behavioral emphasis. Champaign, II: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Schweickert, R. (1978). A critical path generalization of the additive factor method: Analysis of a stroop task. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 18, 105–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, D. C. (1977). A preliminary attempt to determine the duration of a motor program. In D. M. Landers & R. W. Christina (Eds.), Psychology of motor behavior and sport, vol. I (pp. 17–24). Champaign, II: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, D. C. (1978). On the learning of generalized motor programs. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, D. C., Zernicke, R. I., Gregor, R. J., & Diestal, J. D. (1981). Evidence for generalized motor programs using gait pattern analysis. Journal of Motor Behavior, 13, 33–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparrow, W. A. (1983). The efficiency of skilled performance. Journal of Motor Behavior, 1983, 15, 237–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E., & Pachella, R. G. (1977). Encoding, stimulus-response compatibility and stages of processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 411–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, S., Monsell, S., Knoll, R. L., & Wright, C. E. (1978). The latency and duration of rapid movement sequences: Comparisons of speech and typewriting. In G. E. Stelmach (Ed.), Information processing in motor control and learning (pp. 118–152). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Teichner, W. H., & Krebs, M. J. (1972). Laws of simple reaction time. Psychological Review, 79, 344–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelaznik, H. N. (1978). Precueing response factors in choice reaction time: A word of caution. Journal of Motor Behavior, 10, 77–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelaznik, H. N. (1981). The effects of force and direction uncertainty on choice reaction time in an isometric force production task. Journal of Motor Behavior, 13, 18–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelaznik, H. N., & Larish, D. D. (in press). Precuing and complexity paradigms in the examination of motor programming: What has been learned? Experimental Brain Research Supplement.
   Google Scholar
• Zelaznik, H. N, Shapiro, D. C., & Carter, M. C. (1982). The specification of digit and duration during motor programming: A new method of precueing. Journal of Motor Behavior, 14, 57–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar