Influence of Practice Schedule on Testing Schema Theory Predictions in Adults

References

• Battig, W. F. (1966). Facilitation and interference. In E. A. Bilodeau (Ed.), Acquisition of skill (pp. 215–244). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Battig, W. F. (1972). Intratask interference as a source of facilitation in transfer and retention. In R. F. Thompson & J. F. Voss (Eds.), Topics in learning and performance (pp. 131–159). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Battig, W. F. (1979). The flexibility of human memory. In L.S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Levels of processing in human memory (pp. 23–44). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Battig, W. F., & Shea, J. B. (1980). Levels of processing of verbal materials: An overview. In P. Klavora & J. Flowers (Eds.), Motor learning and biomechanical factors in sport(pp. 24–33). Toronto: University of Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, A. M., & Rikli, R. (1983). Observational learning and practice variability. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 54, 1–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, L. M., & Wiegand, R. L. (1979). Motor schema formation and retention in young children: A test of Schmidt's schema theory. Journal of Motor Behavior, 11, 247–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catalano, J. F., & Kleiner, B. M. (1984). Distant transfer in coincident timing as a function of variability of practice. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 58, 851–856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Rey, P., Wughalter, E. H., & Whitehurst, M. (1982). The effects of contextual interference on females with varied experience in open sport skills. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 53, 108–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, B., & McCabe, J. (1977). Variability of practice in a pursuit tracking task: A test of schema theory. In B. A. Kerr (Ed.), Human performance and behaviour. Proceedings of the 9th Annual Symposium of the Canadian Society for Psychomotor Learning and Sport Psychology (pp. 81–90). Calgary: University of Calgary.
   Google Scholar
• Husak, W. S., & Reeve, T. G. (1979). Novel response production as a function of variability and amount of practice. Research Quarterly, 50, 215–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R., & McCabe, J. (1982). Schema theory: A test of the hypothesis, variation in practice. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 55, 231–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelso, J. A. S., & Norman, P. E. (1978). Motor schema formation in children. Developmental Psychology, 14, 153–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langley, D. J., & Zelaznik, H. N. (1984). The acquisition of time properties associated with a sequential motor skill. Journal of Motor Behavior, 16, 275–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, T. D., & Magill, R. A. (1983). The locus of contextual interference in motor skill acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 9, 730–746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, T. D., & Magill, R. A. (in press). Can forgetting facilitate skill acquisition? In D. Goodman, R. B. Wilberg & I. Franks (Eds.), Differing perspectives in motor learning and control. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Magill, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (1984). Contextual interference effects in motor skill acquisition: Interference or elaboration benefit? Paper presented at the Olympic Scientific Congress, Eugene, Oregon, July.
   Google Scholar
• McCracken, H. D., & Stelmach, G. E. (1977). A test of the schema theory of discrete motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 9, 193–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moxley, S. E. (1979). Schema: The variability of practice hypothesis. Journal of Motor Behavior, 11, 65–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, K. M., & Shapiro, D. C. (1976). Variability of practice and transfer of training: Some evidence toward a schema view of motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 8, 233–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pease, D. G., & Rupnow, A. A. (1983). Effects of varying force production in practice schedules of children learning a discrete motor task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 57, 275–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pigott, R. E., & Shapiro, D. C. (1984). Motor schema: The structure of the variability session. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 55, 41–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porretta, D. L. (1982). Motor schema formation by EMR boys. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 87, 164–172.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Quinn, J. T., Jr., & Sherwood, D. E. (1983). Time requirements of changes in program and parameter variables in rapid ongoing movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 15, 163–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmoni, A. W., & McIlwain, J. S. (1980). Practice variability and response sequencing. In P. Klavora & J. Flowers (Eds.), Motor learning and biomechanical factors in sport(pp. 299–306). Toronto: University of Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Salmoni, A. W., Schmidt, R. A., & Walter, C. B. (1984). Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 355–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. A. (1976). The schema as a solution to some persistent problems in motor learning theory. In G. E. Stlemach (Ed.), Motor control: Issues and trends (pp. 41–65). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, D. C., & Schmidt, R. A. (1982). The schema theory: Recent evidence and developmental implications. In J. A. S. Kelso & J. E. Clark (Eds.), The development of movement control and co-ordination (pp. 113–150). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Shea, J. B., & Morgan, R. L. (1979). Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 179–187.
   Google Scholar
• Shea, J. B., & Zimny, S. T. (1983). Context effects in memory and learning movement information. In R. A. Magill (Ed.), Memory and control of action (pp. 345–366). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Wrisberg, C. A., & McLean, E. (1984). Training for the production of novel timing movements: Contextual considerations. Psychological Research, 46, 169–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wrisberg, C. A., & Mead, B. J. (1981). Anticipation of coincidence in children: A test of schema theory. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 52, 599–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wrisberg, C. A., & Mead, B. J. (1983). Developing coincident timing skill in children: A comparison of training methods. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 54, 67–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wrisberg, C. A., & Ragsdale, M. R. (1979). Further tests of Schmidt's schema rule theory: Development of a schema rule for a coincident timing task. Journal of Motor Behavior, 11, 159–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelaznik, H. N. (1977). Transfer in rapid timing tasks: An examination of the role of variability in practice. In R. W. Christina & D. M. Landers (Eds.), Psychology of motor behavior and sport—1976 (pp. 36–43). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Zelaznik, H. N., Shapiro, D. C., & Newell, K. M. (1978). On the structure of motor recognition memory. Journal of Motor Behavior, 10, 313–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar