Is It Possible to Prepare the Second Component of a Movement Before the First One?

References

• Christina, R. W. (1970). Minimum visual feedback processing time for amendment of an incorrect movement. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 31, 991–994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitts, P. M. (1954). The information complexity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 103–112.
   Google Scholar
• Gibb, C. B. (1965). Probability learning in step-input tracking. British Journal of Psychology, 56, 233–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glencross, D. J. (1972). Latency and response complexity. Journal of Motor Behavior, 4, 251–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, D., & Kelso, J. A. S. (1980). Are movements prepared in parts? Not under compatible (naturalized) conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 475–495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, F. M., & Rogers, D. E. (1960). Increased response latency for complicated movements and a “memory drum” theory of neuromotor reactions. Research Quarterly, 31, 448–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keele, S. W. (1968). Movement control in skilled motor performance. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 387–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keele, S. W., & Posner, M. I. (1968). Processing visual feedback in rapid movements, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 155–158.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klapp, S. T. (1977). Response programming, as assessed by reaction time, does not establish commands for particular muscles. Journal of Motor Behavior, 9, 301–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klapp, S. T., & Wyatt, E. P. (1976). Motor programming within a sequence of responses. Journal of Motor Behavior, 8, 19–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larish, D. D., & Frekany, G. A. (1985). Planning and preparing expected and unexpected movements: Reexamining the relationships of arm, direction, and extent of movement. Journal of Motor Behavior, 17, 168–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lashley, K. S. (1917). The accuracy of movement in the absence of excitation from the moving organ. American Journal of Physiology 43, 169–194.
   Google Scholar
• Lashley, K. S. (1951). The problem of serial order in behavior. In L. A. Jeffress (Ed.), Cerebral mechanisms in behavior. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, T. D., Elliott, D., & Carnahan, H. (1987). The preparation of actions and parameters of action: A fixed or variable process? Acta Psychologica, 66, 83–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, J. A. (1958). Partial advance information in a choice reaction task. British Journal of Psychology, 49, 89–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. O. (1982). Discrete versus continuous stage models of human information processing: In search of partial output. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 273–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. O. (1985). A hand advantage in preparation of simple keypress responses: Reply to Reeve and Proctor (1984). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 221–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. O. (1987). Evidence of preliminary response preparation from a divided attention task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 425–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickerson, R. S., & Burnham, D. W. (1969). Response times with non-aging foreperiods. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 79, 452–457.
   Google Scholar
• Proctor, R. W., & Reeve, T. G. (1988). The acquisition of task-specific productions and modifications of declarative representations in spatial-precuing tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 182–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, T. G., & Proctor, R. W. (1984). On the advance preparation of discrete finger responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 541–553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, T. G., & Proctor, R. W. (1985). Nonmotoric translation processes in the preparation of discrete finger responses: A rebuttal of Miller's (1985) analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 234–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, D. A. (1980). Human movement initiation: Specification of arm, direction, and extent. Journal of Psychology: General, 109, 444–474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, D. A. (1983). The movement precuing technique: Assumptions, applications, and extensions. In R. A. Magill (Ed.), Memory and control of action (pp. 231— 274). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, D. A. (1985). Motor programming; A review and scheduling theory. In H. Heuer, U. Kleinbeck, & K.-M. Schmidt (Eds.), Motor behavior: Programming, control, and acquisition (pp. 1–33). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, D. A., Inhoff, A. W., & Gordon, A. M. (1984). Choosing between movement sequences: A hierarchical editor model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 372–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheridan, M. R. (1984). Planning and controlling simple movements. In M. M. Smyth & A. M. Wing (Ed.), The psychology of human movement (pp. 47–81). London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, S., Monsell, S., Knoll, R. L., & Wright, C. E. (1978). The latency and duration of rapid movement sequences. Comparison of speech and typewriting. In G. E. Stelmach (Ed.), Information processing in motor control and learning (pp. 117–152). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winer, B. J. (1971). Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar