Effects of Spatial and Motor Demands in Handwriting

References

• Chedru, F., & Geschwind, N. (1972). Writing disturbances in acute confusiona! states. Neuropsychologia, 10, 343–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, A. W. (1982). Spelling and writing (and reading, and speaking). In A. W. Ellis (Ed.), Normality and pathology in cognitive functions (pp. 113–146). London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, A. W. (1985). Modelling the writing process. In G. Denes, C. Semenza, P. Bisiacchi, & E. Andreewsky (Eds.), Perspectives in cognitive neuropsychology. London: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, A. W., Young, A. W., & Flude, B. M. (1987). Afferent dysgraphia in a patient and in normal subjects. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 4, 465–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Galen, G. P. (in press). Phonological and motoric demands in handwriting: Evidence for discrete transmission of information. Acta Psychologica.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Galen, G. P., Meulenbroek, R. G. J., & Hylkema, H. (1986). On the simultaneous processing of words, letters and strokes in handwriting: Evidence for a mixed linear and parallel model. In H. S. R. Kao, G.P. van Galen, & R. Hoosain (Eds.), Graphonomics: Contemporary research in handwriting (pp. 5–20). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Galen, G. P. van, & Plaats, R. E. van der (1984, July). The concurrent retrieval and execution of handwritten letters during continuous handwriting tasks. Paper presented to the Motor Skills Research Exchange, Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Glencross, D. J. (1973). Response complexity and the latency of different movement patterns. Journal of Motor Behavior, 5, 95–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glencross, D. J. (1976). The latency of aiming movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 8, 27–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrington, D. L., & Haaland, K. Y. (1987). Programming sequences of hand postures. Journal of Motor Behavior, 19, 77–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, F. M. (1980). Use of simple reaction time in motor programming studies: A reply to Klapp, Wyatt, & Lingo. Journal of Motor Behavior, 12, 163–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, F. M., & Rogers, D. E. (1960). Increased response latency for complicated movements and a “memory drum” theory of neuromotor reaction. Research Quarterly, 31, 448–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulstijn, W., & van Galen, G. P. (1983). Programming in handwriting: Reaction time and movement time as a function of sequence length. Acta Psychologica, 54, 23–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kao, H. S. R. (1983). Progressive, motion variability in handwriting tasks. Acta Psychologica, 54, 149–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kao, H. S. R., Hong, M. P., & Wah, L. P. (1986). Handwriting pressure: Effects of task complexity, control mode and orthographic differences. In H. S. R. Kao, G.P. van Galen, & R. Hoosain (Eds.), Graphonomics: Contemporary research in handwriting (pp. 46–66). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Keele, S. W. (1981). Behavioral analysis of movement. In V. B. Brooks (Ed.), Handbook of physiology: Sec. 1. The nervous system: Vol. II. Motor Control, Pt. 2 (pp. 1391–1414). Baltimore: American Physiological Society.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, B. (1979). Is reaction time different for long and short durations in simple and choice conditions. Journal of Motor Behavior, 11, 269–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klapp, S. T. (1980). The memory drum theory after twenty years: Comments on Henry's note. Journal of Motor Behavior, 12, 169–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klapp, S. T. (1981). Motor programming is not the only process which can influence RT: Some thoughts on the Marteniuk and MacKenzie analysis. Journal of Motor Behavior, 13, 320–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klapp, S. T., Abbott, J., Coffman, K., Greim, D., Snider, R., & Young, F. (1979). Simple and choice reaction time methods in the study of motor programming. Journal of Motor Behavior, 11, 91–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klapp, S. T., & Wyatt, E. P. (1976). Motor programming within a sequence of responses. Journal of Motor Behavior, 8, 19–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagasse, P. P., & Hayes, K. C. (1973). Premotor and motor reaction time as a function of movement extent. Journal of Motor Behavior, 5, 25–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laszlo, J. I., & Livesey, J. P. (1977). Task complexity, accuracy, and reaction time. Journal of Motor Behavior, 9, 171–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maarse, F. J., Janssen, H. J. J., and Dexel, F. (1988). A special pen for an XY tablet. In F. J. Maarse, L. J. M. Mulder, W. P. B. Sjouw, & A. E. Akkerman (Eds.), Computers in psychology: Methods, instrumentation, and psychodiagnostics (pp. 133–139). Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
   Google Scholar
• Margolin, D. I. (1984). The neuropsychology of writing and spelling: Semantic, phonological, motor, and perceptual processes. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 36a, 459–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marteniuk, R. G., & MacKenzie, C. L. (1981). Methods in the study of motor programming: Is it just a matter of simple vs. choice reaction time ? A comment on Klapp et al. (1979). Journal of Motor Behavior, 13, 313–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, D. E., Abrams, R. A., Kornblum, S., Wright, C. E., & Smith, J. E. K. (1988). Optimality in human motor performance: Ideal control of rapid aimed movements. Psychological Review, 95, 340–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostry, D. J. (1980). Execution-time movement control. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior (pp. 457–468). Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, J. T., Schmidt, R. A., Zelaznik, H. N., Hawkins, B., & McFarquhar, R. (1980). Target-size influences on reaction time with movement time controlled. Journal of Motor Behavior, 12, 239–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schomaker, L. R. B., Thomassen, A. J. W.M., & Teulings, H. L. (1989). A computational model of cursive handwriting. In R. Plamondon, C. Y. Suen, & M. L. Simner (Eds.), Computer recognition and human production of handwriting. London: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Semjen, A., & Garcia-Colera, A. (1986). Planning and timing of fingertapping sequences with a stressed element. Journal of Motor Behavior, 18, 287–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stelmach, G. E., & Teulings, H. (1983). Response characteristics of prepared and restructured handwriting. Acta Psychologica, 54, 51–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, S., Monsell, S., Knoll, R. L., & Wright, C. E. (1978). The latency and duration of rapid movement sequences: Comparisons of speech and typewriting. In G. E. Stelmach (Ed.), Information processing in motor control and learning (pp. 117–152). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, S., Wright, C. E., Knoll, R. L., & Monsell, S. (1980). Motor programs in rapid speech: Additional evidence. In R. A. Cole (Ed.), Perception and production of fluent speech (pp. 507–534). Fourteenth annual Carnegie symposium on cognition. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Teulings, H. L., Mullins, P. A., & Stelmach, G. E. (1986). The elementary units of programming in handwriting. In H. S. R. Kao, G.P. van Galen, & R. Hoosain (Eds.), Graphonomics: Contemporary research in handwriting (pp. 21–32). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Teulings, H.L., Thomassen, A. J. W.M., & van Galen, G. P. (1983). Preparation of partly precued handwriting movements: The size of movement units in handwriting. Acta Psychologica, 54, 165–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teulings, H. L., Thomassen, A. J. W.M., & van Galen, G. P. (1986). Invariants in hand-writing: The information contained in a motor program. In H. S. R. Kao, G.P. van Galen, & R. Hoosain (Eds.), Graphonomics: Contemporary research in handwriting (pp. 305–315). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Viviani, P., & Terzuolo, C. (1983). The organization of movement in handwriting and typing. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production Vol. II (pp. 103–146). London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, L. R. T. (1971). Refractoriness of an extended movement to directional change. Journal of Motor Behavior, 3, 289–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar