520
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
RESEARCH ARTICLES

Examining the Preferred Self-Controlled KR Schedules of Learners and Peers During Motor Skill Learning

, &
Pages 527-534 | Received 16 Jun 2014, Accepted 09 Feb 2015, Published online: 20 Apr 2015

REFERENCES

  • Aiken, C. A., Fairbrother, J.T., & Post, P. G. (2012). The effects of self-controlled video feedback on the learning of the basketball set shot. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 338. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00338
  • Amorose, A., & Horn, T. (2000). Intrinsic motivation: Relationships with collegiate athletes’ gender, scholarship status, and perceptions of their coaches’ behavior. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 22, 63–84.
  • Badami, R., VaezMousavi, M., Wulf, G., & Namazizadeh, M. (2011). Feedback after good versus poor trials affects intrinsic motivation. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 82, 360–364.
  • Bjerrum, A. S., Eika, B., Charles, P., & Hilberg, O. (2014). Dyad practice is efficient practice: A randomised bronchoscopy simulation study. Medical Education, 48, 705–712.
  • Carter, M. J., & Patterson, J. T. (2012). Self-controlled knowledge of results: Age-related differences in motor learning, strategies, and error detection. Human Movement Science, 31, 1459–1472.
  • Chiviacowsky, S. (2014). Self-controlled practice: Autonomy protects perceptions of competence and enhances motor learning. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 15, 505–510.
  • Chiviacowsky, S., & Wulf, G. (2002). Self-controlled feedback: Does it enhance learning because performers get feedback when they need it? Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 73, 408–415.
  • Chiviacowsky, S., & Wulf, G. (2005). Self-controlled feedback is effective if it is based on the learner's performance. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 76, 42–48.
  • Chiviacowsky, S., & Wulf, G. (2007). Feedback after good trials enhances learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 78(2), 40–47.
  • Chiviacowsky, S., Wulf, G., de Medeiros, F., Kaefer, A., & Tani, G. (2008). Learning benefits of self-controlled knowledge of results in 10-year-old children. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 79, 405–410.
  • Chiviacowsky, S., Wulf, G., Machado, C., & Rydberg, N. (2012). Self-controlled feedback enhances learning in adults with Down syndrome. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, 16, 191–196.
  • Chiviacowsky, S., Wulf, G., Wally, R., & Borges, T. (2009). Knowledge of results after good trials enhances learning in older adults. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 80, 663–668.
  • Goldschmid, B., & Goldschmid, M. L. (1976). Peer teaching in higher education: A review. Higher Education, 5, 9–33.
  • Granados, C., & Wulf, G. (2007). Enhancing motor learning through dyad practice. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 78, 197–203.
  • Hansen, S., Pfeiffer, J., & Patterson, J. T. (2011). Self-control of feedback during motor learning: Accounting for the absolute amount of feedback using a yoked group with self-control over feedback. Journal of Motor Behavior, 43, 113–119.
  • Janelle, C. M., Barba, D. A., Frehlich, S. G., Tennant, L. K., & Cauraugh, J. H. (1997). Maximizing performance feedback effectiveness through videotape replay and a self-controlled learning environment. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 68, 269–279.
  • Janelle, C. M., Kim, J., & Singer, R. N. (1995). Subject-controlled performance feedback and learning of a closed motor skill. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 81, 627–634.
  • Krych, A. J., March, C. N., Bryan, R. E., Peak, B. J., Pawlina, W., & Carmichael, S. W. (2005). Students teaching students in a gross anatomy laboratory. Clinical Anatomy, 18, 296–301.
  • Lewthwaite, R., & Wulf, G. (2010). Social-comparative feedback affects motor skill learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 738–749.
  • Lewthwaite, R., & Wulf, G. (2012). Motor learning through a motivational lens. In N. J. Hodges & A. M. Williams (Eds.), Skill acquisition in sport: Research, theory & practice (2nd ed.). London, England: Routledge.
  • Patterson, J. T., & Carter, M. (2010). Learner regulated knowledge of results during the acquisition of multiple timing goals. Human Movement Science, 29, 214–227.
  • Sanli, E., Patterson, J. T., Bray, S. R., & Lee, T. D. (2013). Understanding self-controlled motor learning protocols through the self-determination theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1–17.
  • Shanks, D., Brydges, R., den Brok, W., Nair, P., & Hatala, R. (2013). Are two heads better than one? Comparing dyad and self-regulated learning in simulation training. Medical Education, 47, 1215–1222.
  • Shea, C., Wulf, G., & Whitacre, C. (1999). Enhancing training efficiency and effectiveness through the use of dyad training. Journal of Motor Behavior, 31, 119–125.
  • Shebilskem, W., Regian, J., Arthur, W., & Jordan, J. (1992). A dyadic protocol for training complex skills. The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 34, 369–374.
  • Wulf, G., & Shea, C. H. (2004). Understanding the role of augmented feedback: The good, the bad and the ugly. In A. M. Williams & N. J. Hodges (Eds.), Skill acquisition in sport: Research, theory and practice (pp. 121–144). New York, NY: Routledge.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.