Role of Constant, Random and Blocked Practice in an Electromyography-Based Oral Motor Learning Task

REFERENCES

• Adams, S. G., & Page, A. D. (2000). Effects of selected practice and feedback variables on speech motor learning. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 8(4), 215–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, S. G., Page, A. D., & Jog, M. (2002). Summary feedback schedules and speech motor learning in Parkinson's disease. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 10(4), 215–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballard, K. J., Granier, J. P., & Robin, D. A. (2000). Understanding the nature of apraxia of speech: Theory, analysis, and treatment. Aphasiology, 14, 969–995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballard, K., Robin, D., & Folkins, J. (2003). An integrative model of speech motor control: A response to Ziegler. Aphasiology, 17(1), 37–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bangert, M., Wiedemann, A., & Jabusch, H.-C. (2014). Effects of variability of practice in music: A pilot study on fast goal-directed movements in pianists. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnette, J. J. (2006). [PDF document]. Effect Size and Measures of Association. Retrieved http://www.eval.org/summerinstitute/06SIHandouts/SI06.Barnette.TR2.Online.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bislick, L. P., Weir, P. C., Spencer, K., Kendall, D., & Yorkston, K. M. (2012). Do principles of motor learning enhance retention and transfer of speech skills? A systematic review. Aphasiology, 26(5), 709–728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bortoli, L., Robazza, C., Durigon, V., & Carra, C. (1992). Effects of contextual interference on learning technical sports skills. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 75(2), 555–562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, D. A., Aertsen, A., Wolpert, D. M., & Mehring, C. (2009). Learning optimal adaptation strategies in unpredictable motor tasks. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(20), 6472–6478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breslin, G., Hodges, N. J., Steenson, A., & Williams, A. M. (2012). Constant or variable practice: Recreating the especial skill effect. Acta Psychologica, 140(2), 154–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S., Laird, A. R., Pfordresher, P. Q., Thelen, S. M., Turkeltaub, P., & Liotti, M. (2009). The somatotopy of speech: Phonation and articulation in the human motor cortex. Brain and Cognition, 70(1), 31–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S., Ngan, E., & Liotti, M. (2007). A larynx area in the human motor cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 18(4), 837–845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaisanguanthum, K. S., Shen, H. H., & Sabes, P. N. (2014). Motor variability arises from a slow random walk in neural state. Journal of Neuroscience, 34(36), 12071–12080.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Luca, C. J., Kuznetsov, M., Gilmore, L. D., & Roy, S. H. (2012). Inter-electrode spacing of surface EMG sensors: Reduction of crosstalk contamination during voluntary contractions. Journal of Biomechanics, 45(3), 555–561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhawale, A. K., Smith, M. A., & Ölveczky, B. P. (2017). The Role of Variability in Motor Learning. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 40, 479–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorfberger, S., Adi-Japha, E., & Karni, A. (2009). Sex differences in motor performance and motor learning in children and adolescents: An increasing male advantage in motor learning and consolidation phase gains. Behavioural Brain Research, 198(1), 165–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• dos Santos, J. J., Bastos, F. H., de Oliveira Souza, T., & Corrêa, U. C. (2014). Contextual Interference Effect Depends on the Amount of Time Separating Acquisition and Testing. Advances in Physical Education, 4(02), 102–109.
   Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrest, K. (2002). Are oral-motor exercises useful in the treatment of phonological/articulatory disorders?. Seminars in Speech and Language, 23(1), 15–26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fox, C., Ebersbach, G., Ramig, L., & Sapir, S. (2012). LSVT LOUD and LSVT BIG: Behavioral Treatment Programs for Speech and Body Movement in Parkinson Disease. Parkinson's Disease, 2012, 391946.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, S., Wolpert, D. M., & Franklin, D. W. (2012). Visuomotor feedback gains upregulate during the learning of novel dynamics. Journal of Neurophysiology, 108(2), 467–478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman, S. E., Maas, E., Caligiuri, M. P., Wulf, G., & Robin, D. A. (2007). Internal versus external: Oral-motor performance as a function of attentional focus. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(1), 131–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, I. B., Hancock, A. B., Schulz, G., & Bamdad, M. J. (2010). Using principles of motor learning to treat apraxia of speech after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 18(1), 13–34.
   Google Scholar
• Goedert, K. M., & Miller, J. (2008). Spacing practice sessions across days earlier rather than later in training improves performance of a visuomotor skill. Experimental Brain Research, 189(2), 189–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goode, S., & Magill, R. A. (1986). Contextual interference effects in learning three badminton serves. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 57(4), 308–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guadagnoli, M. A., & Lee, T. D. (2004). Challenge point: A framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36(2), 212–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hageman, C. F., Robin, D. A., Moon, J. B., & Folkins, J. W. (1994). Oral motor tracking in normal and apraxic speakers. Clinical Aphasiology, 22, 219–229.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, K. G., Domingues, D. A., & Cavazos, R. (1994). Contextual interference effects with skilled baseball players. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 78(3), 835–841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. A. Hancock & N. Meshkati & (Eds.), Human Mental Workload (pp. 139–184), North-Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Heather, C. M. (2003). Neuromuscular Treatments for Speech and Swallowing: A Tutorial. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 12, 400–15.
   Google Scholar
• Hula, S. N. A., Robin, D. A., Maas, E., Ballard, K. J., & Schmidt, R. A. (2008). Effects of feedback frequency and timing on acquisition, retention, and transfer of speech skills in acquired apraxia of speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51(5), 1088–1113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, K., & Croot, K. (2016). The effect of blocked, random and mixed practice schedules on speech motor learning of tongue twisters in unimpaired speakers. Motor Control, 20(4), 350–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaipa, R. (2016). Is there an interaction between task complexity and practice variability in speech-motor learning? Annals of Neurosciences, 23(3), 134–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaipa, R., Jones, R., & Robb, M. (2016). Are individuals with Parkinson's disease capable of speech-motor learning? – A preliminary evaluation. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, 28, 141–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaipa, R., Robb, M., & Jones, R. (2017). The Effectiveness of constant, variable, random, and blocked practice in speech-motor learning. Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 5(1), 103–125.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, W. F., Carter, G. C., & Levitt, J. S. (2007). Treating buccofacial apraxia using augmented kinematic feedback. Aphasiology, 21(12), 1230–1247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keetch, K. M., Schmidt, R. A., Lee, T. D., & Young, D. E. (2005). Especial skills: Their emergence with massive amounts of practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(5), 970.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, G. J., Li, Y., Weiss, L. W., & Relyea, G. E. (2006). Contextual interference effect on acquisition and retention of pistol-shooting skills. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 103(1), 241–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent, R. D. (2015). Nonspeech oral movements and oral motor disorders: A narrative review. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 24(4), 763–789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, I. S., LaPointe, L. L., & Stierwalt, J. A. G. (2012). The effect of feedback and practice on the acquisition of novel speech behaviors. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21(2), 89–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knock, T. R., Ballard, K. J., Robin, D. A., & Schmidt, R. A. (2000). Influence of order of stimulus presentation on speech motor learning: A principled approach to treatment for apraxia of speech. Aphasiology, 14(5–6), 653–668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A., & Moore, N. (2014). A survey of the usage of nonspeech oral motor exercises by speech and language therapists in the Republic of Ireland. Journal of Clinical Speech and Language Studies, 21, 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Lof, G. L., & Watson, M. M. (2008). A nationwide survey of nonspeech oral motor exercise use: Implications for evidence-based practice. Language, speech, and hearing services in schools, 39(3), 392–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas, E., & Farinella, K. A. (2012). Random versus blocked practice in treatment for childhood apraxia of speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55(2), 561–578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas, E., Butalla, C. E., & Farinella, K. A. (2012). Feedback frequency in treatment for childhood apraxia of speech. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21(3), 239–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas, E., Robin, D. A., Austermann Hula, S. N., Freedman, S. E., Wulf, G., Ballard, K. J., & Schmidt, R. A. (2008). Principles of motor learning in treatment of motor speech disorders. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17(3), 277–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madill, C., Sheard, C., & Heard, R. (2010). Differentiated vocal tract control and the reliability of interpretations of nasendoscopic assessment. Journal of Voice, 24(3), 337–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manley, H., Dayan, P., & Diedrichsen, J. (2014). When money is not enough: Awareness, success, and variability in motor learning. PloS One, 9(1), e86580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCauley, R. J., Strand, E., Lof, G. L., Schooling, T., & Frymark, T. (2009). Evidence-based systematic review: Effects of nonspeech oral motor exercises on speech. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18(4), 343–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil, M. R., & Kent, R. D. (1990). Motoric characteristics of adult aphasic and apraxic speakers. In G. E. Hammond (Ed.), Cerebral control of speech and limb movements (pp. 349–386). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• McNeil, M. R., Katz, W. F., Fossett, T. R., Garst, D. M., Szuminsky, N. J., Carter, G., & Lim, K. Y. (2010). Effects of online augmented kinematic and perceptual feedback on treatment of speech movements in apraxia of speech. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopedica, 62(3), 127–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil, M. R., Weismer, G., Adams, S., & Mulligan, M. (1990). Oral structure nonspeech motor control in normal dysarthric, and apraxic speakers: Isometric force and static position control. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 33, 255–268.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meeuwsen, H. J. (1987). Spacing of repetitions and contextual interference effects in motor skill learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge.
   Google Scholar
• Meldrum, D., Cahalane, E., Keogan, F., & Hardiman, O. (2003). Maximum voluntary isometric contraction: Investigation of reliability and learning effect. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Other Motor Neuron Disorders, 4(1), 36–44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Namasivayam, A. K., Pukonen, M., Goshulak, D., Hard, J., Rudzicz, F., Rietveld, T., & Lieshout, P. (2015). Treatment intensity and childhood apraxia of speech. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 50(4), 529–546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osu, R., Franklin, D. W., Kato, H., Gomi, H., Domen, K., Yoshioka, T., & Kawato, M. (2002). Short-and long-term changes in joint co-contraction associated with motor learning as revealed from surface EMG. Journal of Neurophysiology, 88(2), 991–1004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston, J. L., & Leaman, M. (2014). Ultrasound visual feedback for acquired apraxia of speech: A case report. Aphasiology, 28(3), 278–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rendell, M. A., Masters, R. S., Farrow, D., & Morris, T. (2010). An implicit basis for the retention benefits of random practice. Journal of Motor Behavior, 43(1), 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robin, D. A., Jacks, A., Hageman, C., Clark, H. M., & Woodworth, G. (2008). Visuomotor tracking abilities of speakers with apraxia of speech or conduction aphasia. Brain and Language, 106(2), 98–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruscello, D. M. (2008). Nonspeech oral motor treatment issues related to children with developmental speech sound disorders. Language, speech, and hearing services in schools, 39(3), 380–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmons, S. (1995). Muscle. In P. L. Williams (Ed), Gray's anatomy: The anatomical basis of medicine and surgery (pp. 737–900). Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
   Google Scholar
• Scheiner, L. R., Sadagopan, N., & Sherwood, D. E. (2014). Effects of blocked versus random practice on speech motor skill acquisition and retention. Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 2(2), 29–36.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. A. (1988). Motor control and learning. A Behavioral Emphasis. (2nd ed). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R., & Lee, T. (2013). Motor Learning and performance: From Principles to Applications (5th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinematics.
   Google Scholar
• Shea, C. H., Kohl, R., & Indermill, C. (1990). Contextual interference: Contributions of practice. Acta Psychologica, 73(2), 145–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea, J. B., & Morgan, R. L. (1979). Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5(2), 179.
   Google Scholar
• Skelton, S. L., & Hagopian, A. L. (2014). Using randomized variable practice in the treatment of childhood apraxia of speech. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 23(4), 599–611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Square-Storer, P. A., Roy, E. A., & Hogg, S. C. (1990). The dissociation of aphasia from apraxia of speech, ideomotor limb, and buccofacial apraxia. In G.E. Hammond (Ed.), Cerebral control of speech and limb movements (pp. 451–476).. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Steinhauer, K., & Grayhack, J. P. (2000). The role of knowledge of results in performance and learning of a voice motor task. Journal of Voice, 14(2), 137–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, R. M., & Kaipa, R. (2015). The use of non-speech oral-motor exercises among Indian speech-language pathologists to treat speech disorders: An online survey. South African Journal of Communication Disorders, 62(1), 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Travlos, A. K. (2010). Specificity and variability of practice, and contextual interference in acquisition and transfer of an underhand volleyball serve. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 110(1), 298–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Beers, R. J., Haggard, P., & Wolpert, D. M. (2004). The role of execution noise in movement variability. Journal of Neurophysiology, 91(2), 1050–1063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wambaugh, J., Nessler, C., Wright, S., Mauszycki, S., & DeLong, C. (2016). Sound production treatment for acquired apraxia of speech: Effects of blocked and random practice on multisyllabic word production. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18(5), 450–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, A. W., Whitehill, T. L., Ma, E. P., & Masters, R. (2013). Effects of practice schedules on speech motor learning. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15(5), 511–523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, A. Y., Ma, E. P., & Yiu, E. M. (2011). Effects of practice variability on learning of relaxed phonation in vocally hyperfunctional speakers. Journal of Voice, 25(3), e103–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, H. G., Miyamoto, Y. R., Castro, L. N. G., Ölveczky, B. P., & Smith, M. A. (2014). Temporal structure of motor variability is dynamically regulated and predicts motor learning ability. Nature Neuroscience, 17(2), 312–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yiu, E. M., Verdolini, K., & Chow, L. P. (2005). Electromyographic study of motor learning for a voice production task. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48(6), 1254–1268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar