Knowledge of Results do not Affect Self-Efficacy and Skill Acquisition on an Anticipatory Timing Task

References

• Abbas, Z. A., & North, J. S. (2018). Good-vs. poor-trial feedback in motor learning: The role of self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation across levels of task difficulty. Learning and Instruction, 55, 105–112. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badami, R., VaezMousavi, M., Wulf, G., & Namazizadeh, M. (2011). Feedback after good versus poor trials affects intrinsic motivation. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 82(2), 360–364. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2011.10599765
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahmani, M., Wulf, G., Ghadiri, F., Karimi, S., & Lewthwaite, R. (2017). Enhancing performance expectancies through visual illusions facilitates motor learning in children. Human Movement Science, 55, 1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2017.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (pp.71–81). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307–337). Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bastos, F. H., Tani, G., Drews, R., Riek, S., & Marinovic, W. (2018). Do we know what we need? Preference for feedback about accurate performances does not benefit sensorimotor learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(8), 1294–1302. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000529
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilodeau, E. A., & Bilodeau, I. M. (1958). Variable frequency of knowledge of results and the learning of a simple skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55(4), 379–383. doi: 10.1037/h0043214
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buchanan, J. J., & Wang, C. (2012). Overcoming the guidance effect in motor skill learning: Feedback all the time can be beneficial. Experimental Brain Research, 219(2), 305–320. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3092-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bund, A., & Wiemeyer, J. (2004). Self-controlled learning of a complex motor skill: Effects of the learner’s preferences on performance and self-efficacy. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 47, 215–236.
   Google Scholar
• Butki, B. D., & Hoffman, S. J. (2003). Effects of reducing frequency of intrinsic knowledge of results on the learning of a motor skill. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 97(2), 569–580. doi: 10.2466/pms.2003.97.2.569
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cañal-Bruland, R., van der Meer, Y., & Moerman, J. (2016). Can visual illusions be used to facilitate sport skill learning? Journal of Motor Behavior, 48(5), 285–389. doi: 10.1080/00222895.2015.1113916
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauvel, G., Wulf, G., & Maquestiaux, F. (2015). Visual illusions can facilitate sport skill learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(3), 717–721. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0744-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiviacowsky, S. (2014). Self-controlled practice: Autonomy protects perceptions of competence and enhances motor learning. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 15(5), 505–510. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiviacowsky, S., Campos, T., & Domingues, M. R. (2010). Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances learning in persons with Parkinson's disease. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 226. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiviacowsky, S., & Drews, R. (2016). Temporal-comparative feedback affects motor learning. Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 4(2), 208–218. doi: 10.1123/jmld.2015-0034
   Google Scholar
• Chiviacowsky, S., & Wulf, G. (2002). Self-controlled feedback: Does it enhance learning because performers get feedback when they need it?. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 73(4), 408–415. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2002.10609040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiviacowsky, S., & Wulf, G. (2005). Self-controlled feedback is effective if it is based on the learner's performance. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 76(1), 42–48. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2005.10599260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiviacowsky, S., Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2012). Self-controlled learning: The importance of protecting perceptions of competence. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 458. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiviacowsky, S., Wulf, G., Machado, C., & Rydberg, N. (2012). Self-controlled feedback enhances learning in adults with Down syndrome. Rev Bras Fisioter, 16(3), 191–196. doi: 10.1590/s1413-35552012005000019
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eaton, J. W., Bateman, D., Hauberg, S., & Wehbring, R. (2015). GNU Octave 4.0. 0.
   Google Scholar
• Escarti, A., & Guzman, J. F. (1999). Effects of feedback on self-efficacy, performance, and choice in an athletic task. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 11(1), 83–96. doi: 10.1080/10413209908402952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feltz, D. L. (1992). Understanding motivation in sport: A self-efficacy perspective. In G. C. Roberts (Ed.), Motivation in sport and exercise (pp. 93–105). Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Ishikura, T. (2008). Reduced relative frequency of knowledge of results without visual feedback in learning a golf-putting task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 106(1), 225–233. doi: 10.2466/pms.106.1.225-233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaefer, A., Chiviacowsky, S., Meira Jr, C. D. M., & Tani, G. (2014). Self-controlled practice enhances motor learning in introverts and extroverts. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 85(2), 226–233. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2014.893051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleiner M., Brainard D., & Pelli, D.G. (2007). What’s new in Psychtoolbox-3? Perception, 36, 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemos, A., Wulf, G., Lewthwaite, R., & Chiviacowsky, S. (2017). Autonomy support enhances performance expectancies, positive affect, and motor learning. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 31, 28–34. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2017.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewthwaite, R., & Wulf, G. (2012). Motor learning through a motivational lens. In N. J. Hodges & A. M. Williams (Eds.), Skill acquisition in sport: Research, theory & practice (2nd ed., pp. 173–191). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Magill, R. A., Chamberlin, C. J., & Hall, K. G. (1991). Verbal knowledge of results as redundant information for learning an anticipation timing skill. Human Movement Science, 10(4), 485–507. doi: 10.1016/0167-9457(91)90016-Q
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marinovic, W., Tresilian, J. R., de Rugy, A., Sidhu, S., & Riek, S. (2014). Corticospinal modulation induced by sounds depends on action preparedness. Journal of Physiology (Lond.), 592(1), 153–169. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2013.254581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques, P. G., & Corrêa, U. C. (2016). The effect of learner's control of self-observation strategies on learning of front crawl. Acta Psychologica, 164, 151–156. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.01.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques, P. G., Alves Thon, R., Espanhol, J., Tani, G., & Corrêa, U. C. (2017). The intermediate learner’s choice of self-as-a-model strategies and the eight-session practice in learning of the front crawl swim. Kinesiology, 49(1), 57–64. doi: 10.26582/k.49.1.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, K. M. (1986). Constraints on the development of coordination. In M. G. Wade & H.T.A. Whiting (Eds.), Motor development in children: Aspect of coordination and control (pp. 341–360). Nijhof Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Pacheco, M. M., & Newell, K. M. (2018). Search strategies in practice: Influence of information and task constraints. Acta Psychologica, 182, 9–20. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.11.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascua, L. A. M., Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2015). Additive benefits of external focus and enhanced performance expectancy for motor learning. J Sports Sci, 33(1), 58–66. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2014.922693
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667–686. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Reeve, T. G., Dornier, L. A., & Weeks, D. J. (1990). Precision of knowledge of results: Consideration of the accuracy requirements imposed by the task. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 61(3), 284–290. doi: 10.1080/02701367.1990.10608693
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saemi, E., Porter, J. M., Ghotbi-Varzaneh, A., Zarghami, M., & Maleki, F. (2012). Knowledge of results after relatively good trials enhances self-efficacy and motor learning. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13(4), 378–382. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2011.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmoni, A. W., Schmidt, R. A., & Walter, C. B. (1984). Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 355–386. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.355
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanli, E. A., Patterson, J. T., Bray, S. R., & Lee, T. D. (2013). Understanding self-controlled motor learning protocols through the self-determination theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 611. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00611
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schorer, J., Cañal-Bruland, R., & Cobley, S. (2010). Frequency of knowledge of results does not influence perceptual learning and retention in novices. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 41(2), 107–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. A. (1991). Frequent augmented feedback can degrade learning: Evidence and interpretations. In J. Requin & G. E. Stelmach (Eds.), Tutorials in Motor Neuroscience (pp. 59–75). Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Ste-Marie, D. M., Carter, M. J., Law, B., Vertes, K., & Smith, V. (2016). Self-controlled learning benefits: Exploring contributions of self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation via path analysis. Journal of Sports Sciences, 34(17), 1650–1656. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2015.1130236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ste-Marie, D. M., Vertes, K. A., Law, B., & Rymal, A. M. (2013). Learner-controlled self-observation is advantageous for motor skill acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 556. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00556
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Swinnen, S. P. (1996). Information feedback for motor skill learning: A review. In H. N. Zelaznik (Ed.), Advances in motor learning and control (pp. 37–66). Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Swinnen, S. P., Schmidt, R. A., Nicholson, D. E., & Shapiro, D. C. (1990). Information feedback for skill acquisition: Instantaneous knowledge of results degrades learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(4), 706–716. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.16.4.706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winstein, C. J., & Schmidt, R. A. (1990). Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(4), 677–691. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.16.4.677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, D. L., Smith-Munyon, V. L., & Sidaway, B. (1997). How close is too close for precise knowledge of results? Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 68(2), 172–176. doi: 10.1080/02701367.1997.10607994
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulf, G., Chiviacowsky, S., & Cardozo, P. L. (2014). Additive benefits of autonomy support and enhanced expectancies for motor learning. Human Movement Science, 37, 12–20. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2014.06.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulf, G., Chiviacowsky, S., & Drews, R. (2015). External focus and autonomy support: Two important factors in motor learning have additive benefits. Human Movement Science, 40, 176–184. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2014.11.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulf, G., Lee, T. D., & Schmidt, R. A. (1994). Reducing knowledge of results about relative versus absolute timing: Differential effects on learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 26(4), 362–369. doi: 10.1080/00222895.1994.9941692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2016). Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(5), 1382–1414. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0999-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulf, G., & Schmidt, R. A. (1989). The learning of generalized motor programs: Reducing the relative frequency of knowledge of results enhances memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(4), 748–757. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.15.4.748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulf, G., & Shea, C. H. (2002). Principles derived from the study of simple skills do not generalize to complex skill learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(2), 185–211. doi: 10.3758/bf03196276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulf, G., & Shea, C.H. (2004). Understanding the role of augmented feedback: The good, the bad and the ugly. In A. M. Williams & N. J. Hodges (Eds.), Skill acquisition in sport: Research, theory and practice (pp. 121–144). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wulf, G., Shea, C. H., & Matschiner, S. (1998). Frequent feedback enhances complex motor skill learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 30(2), 180–192. doi: 10.1080/00222899809601335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar