An Examination of the Contextual Interference Effect and the Errorless Learning Model during Motor Learning

REFERENCES

• Abdoli, B., Farsi, A. R., & Ramezanzade, H. (2011). Comparison effect of learning implicit and explicit learning with different levels of cognitive load on learning task coincidence anticipation timing. Motor Behavior, 3(9), 29–44.
   Google Scholar
• Barreiros, J., Figueiredo, T., & Godinho, M. (2007). The contextual interference effect in applied settings. European Physical Education Review, 13(2), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X07076876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battig, W. F. (1979). The flexibility of human memory. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Levels of processing in human memory (pp. 23–44). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bjork, R. A. (1998). Assessing our own competence: Heuristics and illusions. In D. Gopher & A. Koriat (Eds.), Attention and performance XVII. Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application (pp. 435–459) MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bootsma, J. M., Caljouw, S. R., Veldman, M. P., Maurits, N. M., Rothwell, J. C., & Hortobágyi, T. (2021). Neural correlates of motor skill learning are dependent on both age and task difficulty. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 13, 115. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2021.643132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bootsma, J. M., Hortobágyi, T., Rothwell, J. C., & Caljouw, S. R. (2018). The role of task difficulty in learning a visuomotor skill. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 50(9), 1842–1849. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000001635
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, F. (1998). A theoretical and empirical review of the contextual interference effect and the learning of motor skills. Quest, 50(3), 266–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.1998.10484285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, F. (2004). Contextual interference: A meta-analytic study. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 99(1), 116–126. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.99.1.116-126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, F. (2008). The contextual interference effect and sport skills. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 106(2), 461–472. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.106.2.461-472
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breslin, G., Hodges, N. J., Steenson, A., & Williams, A. M. (2012). Constant or variable practice: Recreating the especial skill effect. Acta Psychologica, 140(2), 154–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadbent, D. P., Causer, J., Williams, A. M., & Ford, P. R. (2017). The role of error processing in the contextual interference effect during the training of perceptual-cognitive skills. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 43(7), 1329–1342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buszard, T., Reid, M., Krause, L., Kovalchik, S., & Farrow, D. (2017). Quantifying Contextual Interference and its effect on skill transfer in skilled youth tennis players. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1931. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01931
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capio, C. M., Sit, C. H., Abernethy, B., & Masters, R. S. (2012). The possible benefits of reduced errors in the motor skills acquisition of children. Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy, Rehabilitation, Therapy & Technology, 4(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-2555-4-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Capio, C., Poolton, J., Sit, C., Holmstrom, M., & Masters, R. (2013). Reducing errors benefits the field-based learning of a fundamental movement skill in children. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 23(2), 181–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauvel, G., Maquestiaux, F., Hartley, A. A., Joubert, S., Didierjean, A., & Masters, R. (2012). Age effects shrink when motor learning is predominantly supported by nondeclarative, automatic memory processes: Evidence from golf putting. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006), 65(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2011.588714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christina, R. W., & Bjork, R. A. (1991). Optimizing long-term retention and transfer. In: Druckman, D., Bjork, R.A. (Eds.), In the mind’s eye: Enhancing human performance (pp. 23–56). National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, E. S., Schmitt, P. J., & Grafton, S. T. (2007). Neural substrates of contextual interference during motor learning support a model of active preparation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(11), 1854–1871. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.11.1854
   Google Scholar
• Farrow, D., & Buszard, T. (2017). Exploring the applicability of the contextual interference effect in sport practice. Progress in Brain Research, 234, 69–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitts, P. M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47(6), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0055392
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goldberg, D. P., & Hillier, V. F. (1979). A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire. Psychological Medicine, 9(1), 139–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guadagnoli, M. A., & Lee, T. D. (2004). Challenge point: A framework for conceptualizing the effect of various practice conditions in motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36(2), 212–224. https://doi.org/10.3200/JMBR.36.2.212-224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, K. G., Domingues, D. A., & Cavazos, R. (1994). Contextual interference effects with skilled baseball players. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 78(3 Pt 1), 835–841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardwick, R. M., Rottschy, C., Miall, R. C., & Eickhoff, S. B. (2013). A quantitative meta-analysis and review of motor learning in the human brain. NeuroImage, 67, 283–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzfeld, D. J., & Shadmehr, R. (2014). Motor variability is not noise, but grist for the learning mill. Nature Neuroscience, 17(2), 149–150. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3633
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodges, N. J., & Lohse, K. R. (2022). An extended challenge-based framework for practice design in sports coaching. Journal of Sports Sciences, 40(7), 754–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2021.2015917
   Google Scholar
• Holroyd, C. B., Yeung, N., Coles, M., & Cohen, J. D. (2005). A mechanism for error detection in speeded response time tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134(2), 163–191. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.134.2.163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kal, E. C., Van Der Kamp, J., & Houdijk, H. (2013). External attentional focus enhances movement automatization: A comprehensive test of the constrained action hypothesis. Human Movement Science, 32(4), 527–539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keetch, K. M., Schmidt, R. A., Lee, T. D., & Young, D. E. (2005). Especial skills: their emergence with massive amounts of practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 31(5), 970–978.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koehn, J. D., Dickinson, J., & Goodman, D. (2008). Cognitive demands of error processing. Psychological Reports, 102(2), 532–538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, W. K., Masters, R. S., & Maxwell, J. P. (2010). Cognitive demands of error processing associated with preparation and execution of a motor skill. Consciousness and Cognition, 19(4), 1058–1061. [Database] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2008.11.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, W. K., Maxwell, J. P., & Masters, R. (2009). Analogy versus explicit learning of a modified basketball shooting task: Performance and kinematic outcomes. Journal of Sports Sciences, 27(2), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410802448764
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, T. D., & Magill, R. A. (1985). Can forgetting facilitate skill acquisition?. In Advances in psychology. (Vol. 27, pp. 3–22) North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, T. D. (2012). Contextual interference: Generalizability and limitations. In N. J. Hodges & A. M. Williams (Ed.), Skill acquisition in sport: Research, theory and practice. (pp. 79–93) Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, T. D., & Simon, D. A. (2004). Contextual interference. In A. M. Williams & N. J. Hodges (Eds.), Skill acquisition in sport: Research, theory, and practice. (pp. 29–44) Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, C. H., Fisher, B. E., Winstein, C. J., Wu, A. D., & Gordon, J. (2008). Contextual interference effect: Elaborative processing or forgetting—reconstruction? A post hoc analysis of transcranial magnetic stimulation—induced effects on motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 40(6), 578–586. https://doi.org/10.3200/JMBR.40.6.578-586
   Google Scholar
• Magill, R. A., & Hall, K. G. (1990). A review of the contextual interference effect in motor skill acquisition. Human Movement Science, 9(3-5), 241–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9457(90)90005-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marteniuk, R. G. (1976). Cognitive information processes in motor short-term memory and movement production. In Motor control. (pp. 175–186) Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Masters, R. S. W., & Maxwell, J. P. (2004). Implicit motor learning, reinvestment and movement disruption: What you don’t know won’t hurt you. In A. M. Williams & N. J. Hodges (Eds.), Skill Acquisition in Sport: Research, Theory and Practice. (pp. 207–228) Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Masters, R., Poolton, J. M., Maxwell, J. P., & Raab, M. (2008). Implicit motor learning and complex decision making in time-constrained environments. Journal of Motor Behavior, 40(1), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.3200/JMBR.40.1.71-80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. P., Masters, R., Kerr, E., & Weedon, E. (2001). The implicit benefit of learning without errors. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 1049–1068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. P., Masters, R., & Eves, F. F. (2000). From novice to no knowhow: A longitudinal study of implicit motor learning. Journal of Sports Sciences, 18(2), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/026404100365180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. P., Masters, R., & Eves, F. F. (2003). The role of working memory in motor learning and performance. Consciousness and Cognition, 12(3), 376–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1053-8100(03)00005-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonnell, M. D., Stocks, N. G., Pearce, C. E., & Abbott, D. (2006). Optimal information transmission in nonlinear arrays through suprathreshold stochastic resonance. Physics Letters A, 352(3), 183–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2005.11.068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poolton, J. M., Masters, R., & Maxwell, J. P. (2005). The relationship between initial errorless learning conditions and subsequent performance. Human Movement Science, 24(3), 362–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2005.06.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poolton, J. M., Maxwell, J. P., Masters, R., & Raab, M. (2006). Benefits of an external focus of attention: Common coding or conscious processing? Journal of Sports Sciences, 24(1), 89–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prather, D. C. (1971). Trial-and-error versus errorless learning: Training, transfer, and stress. The American Journal of Psychology, 84(3), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.2307/1420469
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rendell, M. A., Masters, R., & Farrow, D. (2009). The paradoxical role of cognitive effort in contextual interference and implicit motor learning. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 40, 636–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rendell, M. A., Masters, R., Farrow, D., & Morris, T. (2011). An implicit basis for the retention benefits of random practice. Journal of Motor Behavior, 43(1), 1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schöllhorn, W. I. (2016). Invited commentary: differential learning is different from contextual interference learning. Human Movement Science, 47, 240–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2015.11.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schollhorn, W. I., Michelbrink, M., Beckmann, H., Trockel, M., Sechelmann, M., & Davids, K. (2006). Does noise provide a basis for the unification of motor learning theories? International Journal of Sport Psychology, 37, 34–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekiya, H., Magill, R. A., & Anderson, D. I. (1996). The Contextual interference effect in parameter modifications of the same generalized motor program. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 67(1), 59–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea, J. B., & Morgan, R. L. (1979). Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention and transfer of a motor skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Human Learning and Memory, 5(2), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.5.2.179
   Google Scholar
• Shea, J. B., & Zimny, S. T. (1983). Context effects in memory and learning movement information. In R. A. Magill (Ed.). Memory and control of action (pp. 345–366). North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Slifkin, A. B., & Newell, K. M. (1999). Noise, information transmission, and force variability. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 25(3), 837–851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tse, A., Wong, T., & Masters, R. (2017). Examining motor learning in older adults using analogy instruction. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 28, 78–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2016.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, D. L., Verwey, W., Buchanen, J., Chen, J., Rhee, J., & Immink, M. (2016). Consolidating behavioral and neurophysiologic findings to explain the influence of contextual interference during motor sequence learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0887-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wrisberg, C. A., & Liu, Z. (1991). The effect of contextual variety on the practice, retention, and transfer of an applied motor skill. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 62(4), 406–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1991.10607541
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, H. G., Miyamoto, Y. R., Castro, L. N. G., Ölveczky, B. P., & Smith, M. A. (2014). Temporal structure of motor variability is dynamically regulated and predicts motor learning ability. Nature Neuroscience, 17(2), 312–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar