109
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Updating of Implicit Adaptation Processes through Erroneous Numeric Feedback

&
Pages 475-492 | Received 12 Sep 2022, Accepted 19 Jun 2023, Published online: 13 Jul 2023

References

  • Adams, J. A. (1978). Theoretical issues for knowledge of results. In G. Stelmach (Ed.), Information processing in motor control and learning (pp. 229–240). Academic Press.
  • Adams, J. A. (1987). Historical review and appraisal of research on the learning, retention, and transfer of human motor skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101(1), 41–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.101.1.41
  • Albers, C., & Lakens, D. (2018). When power analyses based on pilot data are biased: Inaccurate effect size estimators and follow-up bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 74(October 2017), 187–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.09.004
  • Albert, S. T., Jang, J., Modchalingam, S.,’t Hart, M., Henriques, D., Lerner, G., Della-Maggiore, V., Haith, A. M., Krakauer, J. W., & Shadmehr, R. (2022). Competition between parallel sensorimotor learning systems. eLife, 11, 1–81. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65361
  • Ayala, M. N., & Henriques, D. Y. P. (2021). Differential contributions of implicit and explicit learning mechanisms to various contextual cues in dual adaptation. Plos One, 16(7), e0253948. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253948
  • Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
  • Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
  • Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. M., & Walker, S. C. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
  • Benson, B. L., Anguera, J. A., & Seidler, R. D. (2011). A spatial explicit strategy reduces error but interferes with sensorimotor adaptation. Journal of Neurophysiology, 105(6), 2843–2851. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00002.2011
  • Bernier, P. M., Chua, R., & Franks, I. M. (2005). Is proprioception calibrated during visually guided movements? Experimental Brain Research, 167(2), 292–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-0063-5
  • Bond, K. M., & Taylor, J. A. (2015). Flexible explicit but rigid implicit learning in a visuomotor adaptation task. Journal of Neurophysiology, 113(10), 3836–3849. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00009.2015
  • Brudner, S. N., Kethidi, N., Graeupner, D., Ivry, R. B., & Taylor, J. A. (2016). Delayed feedback during sensorimotor learning selectively disrupts adaptation but not strategy use. Journal of Neurophysiology, 115(3), 1499–1511. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00066.2015
  • Buekers, M. J., Magill, R. A., & Hall, K. G (1992). The effect of erroneous knowledge of results on skill acquisition when augmented information is redundant. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 44(1), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749208401285
  • Butcher, P. A., & Taylor, J. A. (2018). Decomposition of a sensory prediction error signal for visuomotor adaptation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 44(2), 176–194. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000440
  • Diedrichsen, J., White, O., Newman, D., & Lally, N. (2010). Use-dependent and error-based learning of motor behaviors. The Journal of Neuroscience : The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 30(15), 5159–5166. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5406-09.2010
  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
  • Gaffin-Cahn, E., Hudson, T. E., & Landy, M. S. (2019). Did I do that? Detecting a perturbation to visual feedback in a reaching task. Journal of Vision, 19(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1167/19.1.5
  • Hadjiosif, A., Krakauer, J., & Haith, A. (2020). Did we get sensorimotor adaptation wrong? Implicit adaptation as direct policy updating rather than forward-model-based learning. BioRxiv, 1–29.
  • Heirani Moghaddam, S., Chua, R., & Cressman, E. K. (2021). Assessing and defining explicit processes in visuomotor adaptation. Experimental Brain Research, 239(7), 2025–2041. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-021-06109-5
  • Held, R., & Hein, A. V. (1958). Adaptation of Disarranged Hand-Eye Coordination Contingent upon Re-Afferent Stimulation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 8(3), 87–90. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1958.8.3.87
  • Henriques, D. Y. P., & Cressman, E. K. (2012). Visuomotor Adaptation and Proprioceptive Recalibration. Journal of Motor Behavior, 44(6), 435–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2012.659232
  • Hinder, M. R., Riek, S., Tresilian, J. R., De Rugy, A., & Carson, R. G. (2010). Real-time error detection but not error correction drives automatic visuomotor adaptation. Experimental Brain Research, 201(2), 191–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-2025-9
  • Hinder, M. R., Tresilian, J. R., Riek, S., & Carson, R. G. (2008). The contribution of visual feedback to visuomotor adaptation: How much and when? Brain Research, 1197, 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2007.12.067
  • Hinder, M. R., Walk, L., Woolley, D. G., Riek, S., & Carson, R. G. (2007). The interference effects of non-rotated versus counter-rotated trials in visuomotor adaptation. Experimental Brain Research, 180(4), 629–640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-007-0888-1
  • Ingram, H., van Donkelaar, P., Cole, J., Vercher, J.-L., Gauthier, G., & Miall, R. (2000). The role of proprioception and attention in a visuomotor adaptation task. Experimental Brain Research, 132(1), 114–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002219900322
  • Kagerer, F., Contreras-Vidal, J., & Stelmach, G. (1997). Adaptation to gradual as compared with sudden visuo-motor distortions. Experimental Brain Research, 115(3), 557–561. https://doi.org/10.1007/pl00005727
  • Kim, H. E., Parvin, D. E., & Ivry, R. B. (2019). The influence of task outcome on implicit motor learning. eLife, 8, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.39882
  • Klassen, J., Tong, C., & Flanagan, J. (2005). Learning and recall of incremental kinematic and dynamic sensorimotor transformations. Experimental Brain Research, 164(2), 250–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-2247-4
  • Krakauer, J. W., Ghez, C., & Ghilardi, M. F. (2005). Adaptation to visuomotor transformations: Consolidation, interference, and forgetting. Journal of Neuroscience, 25(2), 473–478. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4218-04.2005
  • Larssen, B. C., Ho, D. K., Kraeutner, S. N., & Hodges, N. J. (2021). Combining observation and physical practice : benefits of an interleaved schedule for visuomotor adaptation and motor memory consolidation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 15(February), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.614452
  • Larssen, B. C., Kraeutner, S. N., & Hodges, N. J. (2023). Implicit adaptation processes promoted by immediate offline visual and numeric feedback. Journal of Motor Behavior, 55(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2022.2088678
  • Larssen, B. C., Ong, N. T., & Hodges, N. J. (2012). Watch and learn: seeing is better than doing when acquiring consecutive motor tasks. PLoS One. 7(6), e38938. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038938
  • Lee, K., Oh, Y., Izawa, J., & Schweighofer, N. (2018). Sensory prediction errors, not performance errors, update memories in visuomotor adaptation. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-34598-y
  • Lee, T. D., White, M. A., & Carnahan, H. (1990). On the role of knowledge of results in motor learning: Exploring the guidance hypothesis. Journal of Motor Behavior, 22(2), 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.1990.10735510
  • Leow, L.-A., Marinovic, W., de Rugy, A., & Carroll, T. J. (2018). Task errors contribute to implicit aftereffects in sensorimotor adaptation. The European Journal of Neuroscience, 48(11), 3397–3409. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.14213
  • Magezi, D. A. (2015). Linear mixed-effects models for within-participant psychology experiments: An introductory tutorial and free, graphical user interface (LMMgui). Frontiers in Psychology, 6(JAN), 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00002
  • Mazzoni, P., & Krakauer, J. W. (2006). An implicit plan overrides an explicit strategy during visuomotor adaptation. Journal of Neuroscience, 26(14), 3642–3645. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5317-05.2006
  • McDougle, S. D., Bond, K. M., & Taylor, J. A. (2015). Explicit and implicit processes constitute the fast and slow processes of sensorimotor learning. Journal of Neuroscience, 35(26), 9568–9579. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5061-14.2015
  • McDougle, S. D., Ivry, R. B., & Taylor, J. A. (2016). Taking Aim at the Cognitive Side of Learning in Sensorimotor Adaptation Tasks. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(7), 535–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.05.002
  • Modchalingam, S., Vachon, C. M., ’t Hart, B. M. , & Henriques, D. Y. P. (2019). The effects of awareness of the perturbation during motor adaptation on hand localization. Plos One, 14(8), e0220884. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220884
  • Morehead, J. R., & Orban De Xivry, J. J. (2021). A synthesis of the many errors and learning processes of visuomotor adaptation. BioRxiv, 1–50.
  • Morehead, J. R., Taylor, J. A., Parvin, D. E., & Ivry, R. B. (2017). Characteristics of Implicit Sensorimotor Adaptation Revealed by Task-irrelevant Clamped Feedback. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 29(6), 1061–1074. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01108
  • Neville, K. M., & Cressman, E. K. (2018). The influence of awareness on explicit and implicit contributions to visuomotor adaptation over time. Experimental Brain Research, 236(7), 2047–2059. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-018-5282-7
  • Nikooyan, A. A., & Ahmed, A. A. (2015). Reward feedback accelerates motor learning. Journal of Neurophysiology, 113(2), 633–646. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00032.2014
  • Nimon, K. F. (2012). Statistical assumptions of substantive analyses across the general linear model: A mini-review. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 322. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00322
  • Ong, N. T., Larssen, B. C., & Hodges, N. J. (2012). In the absence of physical practice, observation and imagery do not result in updating of internal models for aiming. Experimental Brain Research, 218(1), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2996-1
  • Patton, J. L., Wei, Y. J., Bajaj, P., & Scheidt, R. A. (2013). Visuomotor Learning Enhanced by Augmenting Instantaneous Trajectory Error Feedback during Reaching. PloS One, 8(1), e46466. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046466
  • R Core Team (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (4.1.0). R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
  • Redding, G. M., & Wallace, B. (1993). Adaptive coordination and alignment of eye and hand. Journal of Motor Behavior, 25(2), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.1993.9941642
  • Ruttle, J. E., Cressman, E. K., ’t Hart, B. M., & Henriques, D. Y. P. (2016). Time course of reach adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration during visuomotor learning. Plos One, 11(10), e0163695. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163695
  • Salmoni, A. W., Schmidt, R. A., & Walter, C. B. (1984). Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 355–386. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.355
  • Sarlegna, F. R., Gauthier, G. M., & Blouin, J. (2007). Influence of feedback modality on sensorimotor adaptation: Contribution of visual, kinesthetic, and verbal cues. Journal of Motor Behavior, 39(4), 247–258. https://doi.org/10.3200/JMBR.39.4.247-258
  • Schielzeth, H., Dingemanse, N. J., Nakagawa, S., Westneat, D. F., Allegue, H., Teplitsky, C., Réale, D., Dochtermann, N. A., Garamszegi, L. Z., & Araya-Ajoy, Y. G. (2020). Robustness of linear mixed-effects models to violations of distributional assumptions. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 11(9), 1141–1152. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13434
  • Schmidt, R. A., Young, D. E., Swinnen, S., & Shapiro, D. C. (1989). Summary knowledge of results for skill acquisition: Support for the guidance hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(2), 352–359. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.15.2.352
  • Shabbott, B. A., & Sainburg, R. L. (2010). Learning a visuomotor rotation: Simultaneous visual and proprioceptive information is crucial for visuomotor remapping. Experimental Brain Research, 203(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2209-3
  • Shadmehr, R., Smith, M. a., & Krakauer, J. W. (2010). Error correction, sensory prediction, and adaptation in motor control. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 33, 89–108. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-060909-153135
  • Shmuelof, L., Huang, V. S., Haith, A. M., Delnicki, R. J., Mazzoni, P., & Krakauer, J. W. (2012). Overcoming motor “forgetting” through reinforcement of learned actions. Journal of Neuroscience, 32(42), 14617–14621. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2184-12.2012
  • Spampinato, D., & Celnik, P. (2021). Multiple Motor Learning Processes in Humans: Defining Their Neurophysiological Bases. The Neuroscientist, 27(3), 246–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858420939552
  • Sülzenbrück, S., & Heuer, H. (2009). Functional independence of explicit and implicit motor adjustments. Consciousness and Cognition, 18(1), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2008.12.001
  • Swinnen, S. P., Schmidt, R. A., Nicholson, D. E., & Shapiro, D. C. (1990). Information feedback for skill acquisition: Instantaneous knowledge of results degrades learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(4), 706–716. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.16.4.706
  • Synofzik, M., Lindner, A., & Thier, P. (2008). The Cerebellum Updates Predictions about the Visual Consequences of One’s Behavior. Current Biology, 18(11), 814–818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2008.04.071
  • Taylor, J. A., & Ivry, R. B. (2011). Flexible cognitive strategies during motor learning. PLoS Computational Biology, 7(3), e1001096. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001096
  • Taylor, J. A., Krakauer, J. W., & Ivry, R. B. (2014). Explicit and Implicit Contributions to Learning in a Sensorimotor Adaptation Task. Journal of Neuroscience, 34(8), 3023–3032. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3619-13.2014
  • Tsay, J. S., Haith, A. M., Ivry, R. B., & Kim, H. E. (2022). Interactions between sensory prediction error and task error during implicit motor learning. PLOS Computational Biology, 18(3), e1010005. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010005
  • Tseng, Y., Diedrichsen, J., Krakauer, J. W., Shadmehr, R., & Bastian, A. J. (2007). Sensory prediction errors drive cerebellum-dependent adaptation of reaching. Journal of Neurophysiology, 98(1), 54–62. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00266.2007
  • Urbán, T., Caballero, C., Barbado, D., & Moreno, F. J. (2019). Do intentionality constraints shape the relationship between motor variability and performance? Plos One, 14(4), e0214237. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214237
  • van der Kooij, K., Wijdenes, L. O., Rigterink, T., Overvliet, K. E., & Smeets, J. B. J. (2018). Reward abundance interferes with error-based learning in a visuomotor adaptation task. Plos One, 13(3), e0193002. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193002
  • Werner, S., van Aken, B. C., Hulst, T., Frens, M. A., van der Geest, J. N., Strüder, H. K., & Donchin, O. (2015). Awareness of sensorimotor adaptation to visual rotations of different size. Plos One, 10(4), e0123321. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123321
  • Wigmore, V., Tong, C., & Flanagan, J. R. (2002). Visuomotor rotations of varying size and direction compete for a single internal model in motor working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 28(2), 447–457. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.28.2.447
  • Winstein, C. J., & Schmidt, R. A. (1990). Reduced Frequency of Knowledge of Results Enhances Motor Skill Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(4), 677–691. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.16.4.677
  • Wolpert, D. M. (1997). Computational approaches to motor control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1(6), 209–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(97)01070-X
  • Wood, J. M., Kim, H. E., French, M. A., Reisman, D. S., & Morton, S. M. (2020). Use-dependent plasticity explains aftereffects in visually guided locomotor learning of a novel step length asymmetry. Journal of Neurophysiology, 124(1), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00083.2020
  • Yin, C., & Wei, K. (2020). Savings in sensorimotor adaptation without an explicit strategy. Journal of Neurophysiology, 123(3), 1180–1192. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00524.2019

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.