A Comparison of the mismatch negativity and a differential waveform response

References

• Ahveninen J., Escera C., Polo M.D., Grau C., Jaaskelainen I.P. Acute and chronic effects of alcohol on preattentive auditory processing as reflected by mismatch negativity. Audiol Neurotol 2000; 5: 303–311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alho K., Paavilainen P., Reinikainen K., Sams M., Näätänen R. Separability of different negative components of the event-related potential associated with auditory stimulus processing. Psychophysiology 1986; 23: 613–623
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alho K., Woods D., Algazi A., Knight R., Näätänen R. Lesions of frontal cortex diminish the auditory mismatch negativity. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994; 9: 353–362
   Google Scholar
• Allison T. Recovery functions of somatosensory evoked responses in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1962; 14: 331–343
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• American National Standards Institute 1996. Specifications for audiometers. (ANSI S3.6–1996). New York: ANSI.
   Google Scholar
• American National Standards Institute 1999. American National Standard: Maximum Permissible Ambient Noise Levels for Audiometric Test Rooms. (ANSI S3.1–1999). New York ANSI.
   Google Scholar
• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association: Panel on Audiologic Assessment 1997. Guidelines for Audiologic Screening. Rockville PikeMD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
   Google Scholar
• Brand A., Urban R., Grothe B. Duration tuning in the mouse auditory midbrain. J Neurophysiol 2000; 84: 1790–1799
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budd T.W., Barry R.J., Gordon E., Rennie C., Michie P.T. Decrement of the N1 auditory event-related potential with stimulus repetition: habituation vs. refractoriness. Int J Psychophysiol 1998; 31: 51–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler R.A. Effect of changes in stimulus frequency and intensity on habituation of the human vertex potential. J Acoust Soc Am 1968; 44: 945–950
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler R.A. Frequency specificity of the auditory evoked response to simultaneously and successively presented stimuli. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1972; 33: 277–282
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Butler R.A. The cumulative effects of different stimulus repetition rates on the auditory evoked response in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1973; 35: 337–345
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Butler R.A., Spreng M., Keidel W.D. Stimulus repetition rate factors which influence the auditory evoked potential in man. Psychophysiology 1969; 5: 665–672
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casseday J.H., Ehrlich D., Covey E. Neural measurement of sound duration: control by excitatory-inhibitory interactions in the inferior colliculus. J Neurophysiol 2000; 84: 1475–1487s
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheour M., Haapanen M.L., Hukki J., Ceponiene R., Kurjenluoma S., et al. The first neurophysiological evidence for cognitive brain dysfunctions in children with CATCH. Neuroreport 1997; 8: 1785–1787
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covey E. Neural population coding and auditory temporal pattern analysis. Physiol Behav 2000; 69: 211–220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan N. Sensory memory and its role in information processing. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995; 44(Suppl)21–31
   Google Scholar
• Cranford J.L., Walker L.J., Stuart A., Elangovan S., Pravica D. Potential contamination effects of neuronal refractoriness on the speech-evoked mismatch negativity response. J Am Acad Audiol 2003; 14: 251–259
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Csépe V. On the origin and development of the mismatch negativity. Ear Hear 1995; 16: 91–104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czigler I., Balázs L., Winkler I. Memory-based detection of task irrelevant visual changes. Psychophysiology 2002; 39: 869–873
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis H., Mast T., Yoshie N., Zerlin S. The slow response of the human cortex to auditory stimuli: recovery process. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1966; 21: 105–113
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deacon D., Gomes H., Nousak J.M., Ritter W., Javitt D. Effect of frequency separation and stimulus rate on the mismatch negativity: an examination of the issue of refractoriness in humans. Neurosci Lett 2000; 287: 167–170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrlich D., Casseday J.H., Covey E. Neural tuning to sound duration in the inferior colliculus of the big brown bat, eptesicus fuscus. J Neurophysiol 1997; 77: 2360–2372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaeta H., Friedman D., Ritter W., Cheng J. An event-related potential study of age-related changes in sensitivity to stimulus deviance. Neurobiol Aging 1998; 19: 447–459
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giard M.H., Lavikainen J., Reinikainen K., Perrin F., Bertrand O., et al. Separate representations of stimulus frequency, intensity, and duration in auditory sensory memory: An event-related potential and dipole model analysis. J Cog Neurosc 1995; 7: 133–143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giard M.H., Pernier J., Perrin F., Peronnet F. Topographic study of auditory attention-related waveforms: a preliminary report. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1987; 40(Suppl)92–98
   Google Scholar
• Grau C., Polo M.D., Yago E., Gual A., Escera C. Auditory sensory memory as indicated by mismatch negativity in chronic alcoholism. Clin Neurophysiol 2001; 112: 728–731
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groenen P., Snik A., van den Broek P. On the clinical relevance of mismatch negativity: results from subjects with normal hearing and cochlear implant users. Audiol Neurootol 1996; 1: 112–124
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guang–Di C., Chen A. Effects of stimulus duration on responses of neurons in the chinchilla inferior colliculus. Hear Res 1998; 122: 142–150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He J., Hashikawa T., Ojima H., Kinouchi Y. Temporal integration and duration tuning in the dorsal zone of cat auditory cortex. J Neurosci 1997; 17: 2615–2625
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson T., Schroger E. Is there pre-attentive memory-based comparison of pitch?. Psychophysiology 2001; 38: 723–727
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasper H. Report of the committee on methods of clinical examination in Electroencephalography. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1958; 10: 305–375
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kane N.M., Curry S.H., Butler S.R., Cummins B.H. Electrophysiological indicator of awakening from coma. Lancet 1993; 341: 688–696
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazmerski V.A., Friedman D., Ritter W. Mismatch negativity during attend and ignore conditions in Alzheimer's disease. Biol Psychol 1997; 42: 382–402
   Google Scholar
• Kraus N., McGee T.J., Carrell T.D., Zecker S.G, Nicol T.G., et al. Auditory neurophysiologic responses and discrimination deficits in children with learning problems. Science 1996; 273: 971–973
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mantysalo S., Näätänen R. The duration of a neuronal trace of an auditory stimulus as indicated by event-related potentials. Biol Psychol 1987; 24: 183–195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May P., Tiitinen H., Ilmoniemi R.J., Nyman G., Taylor J.G., et al. Frequency change detection in human auditory cortex. J Comput Neurosci 1999; 6: 99–120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Näätänen R. The mismatch negativity: a powerful tool for cognitive neuroscience. Ear Hear 1995; 16: 6–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Näätänen R., Gaillard A.W.K., Mantysalo S. Early selective attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. Acta Psychologica 1978; 42: 313–329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Näätänen R., Paavilainen P., Alho K., Reinikainen K., Sams M. The mismatch negativity to intensity changes in an auditory stimulus sequence. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1987; 40(Suppl)125–131
   Google Scholar
• Näätänen R., Paavilainen P., Alho K., Reinikainen K., Sams M. Do event-related potentials reveal the mechanism of the auditory sensory memory in the human brain?. Neurosci Lett 1989a; 98: 217–221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Näätänen R., Paavilainen P., Alho K., Reinikainen K., Sams M. Event-related potentials to infrequent decrements in duration of auditory stimuli demonstrate a memory trace in man. Neurosci Lett 1989b; 107: 347–352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Näätänen R., Paavilainen P., Tiitinen H., Jiang D., Alho K. Attention and mismatch negativity. Psychophysiology 1993; 30: 436–450
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Näätänen R., Pakarinen S., Rinne T., Takegata R. The mismatch negativity (MMN): towards the optimal paradigm. Clin Neurophysiol 2004; 115: 140–144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Näätänen R., Sams M., Alho K., Paavilainen P., Reinikainen K., et al. Frequency and location specificity of the human vertex N1 wave. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1988; 69: 523–531
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Näätänen R., Teder W., Alho K., Lavikainen J. Auditory attention and selective input modulation: a topographical ERP study. Neuroreport 1992; 3: 493–496
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson D.A., Lassman F.M. Effects of intersignal interval on the human auditory evoked response. J Acoust Soc Am 1968; 44: 1529–1532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson D.A., Lassman F.M. Combined effects of recovery period and stimulus intensity on the human auditory-evoked vertex response. J Speech Hear Res 1973; 16: 297–308
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nelson D.A., Lassman F.M. Re-examination of the effects of periodic and aperiodic stimulation on the auditory-evoked vertex response. Audiology 1977; 16: 409–418
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Novak, G.P., Ritter, W., Vaughan, H.G., Jr., & Wiznitzer, M.L. 1990. Differentiation of negative event-related potentials in an auditory discrimination task. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 75, 255–275.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ornitz E.M., Tanguay P.E., Forsythe A.B., De La Pena A., Ghahremani J. The recovery cycle of the averaged auditory evoked response during sleep in normal children. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1974; 37: 113–122
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paavilainen, P., Alho, K., Reinikainen, K., Sams, M. & Näätänen, R. 1991. Right hemisphere dominance of different mismatch negativity's. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 466–479.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Papanicolaou A.C., Loring D.W., Eisenberg H.M. Age-related differences in recovery cycle of auditory evoked potentials. Neurobiol Aging 1984; 5: 291–295
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekkonen E., Jousmaki V., Kalevi R., Juhani P. Automatic auditory discrimination is impaired in Parkinson's disease. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994; 95: 47–52
   Google Scholar
• Pekkonen E., Rinne T., Näätänen R. Variability and replicability of the mismatch negativity. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995; 96: 546–554
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pekkonen E., Rinne T., Reinikainen T., Kujala K., Alho K., et al. Aging effects on auditory processing: an event-related potential study. Exp Aging Res 1996; 22: 171–184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfingst B.E., O'Conner T.A. Characteristics of neurons in auditory cortex of monkeys performing a simple auditory task. J Neurophysiol 1981; 45: 16–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips D.P., Orman S.S. Responses of single neurons in posterior field of cat auditory cortex to tonal stimulation. J Neurophysiol 1984; 51: 147–163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips D.P., Orman S.S., Musicant A.D., Wilson G.F. Neurons in the cat's primary auditory cortex distinguished by their responses to tones and wide-spectrum noise. Hear Res 1985; 18: 73–86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips D.P., Semple M.N., Kitzes L.M. Factors shaping the tone level sensitivity of single neurons in posterior field of cat auditory cortex. J Neurophysiol 1995; 73: 674–686
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picton T.W., Alain C., Otten L., Ritter W., Achim A. Mismatch negativity: different water in the same river. Audiol Neurotol 2000; 5: 111–139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picton T.W., Woods D.L., Baribeau–Braun J., Healey T.M. Evoked potential audiometry. J Otolaryngol 1976; 6: 90–119
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Picton T.W., Woods D.L., Proulx G.B. Human auditory sustained potentials. II. Stimulus relationships. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1978; 45: 198–210
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sabri M., Campbell K.B. Effects of sequential and temporal probability of deviant occurrence on mismatch negativity. Cogn Brain Res 2001; 12: 171–180
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sams M., Kaukoranta E., Hamalainen M., Näätänen R. Cortical activity elicited by changes in auditory stimuli: different sources for the magnetic N100m and mismatch responses. Psychophysiology 1991; 28: 21–29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasaki T., Campbell K.B., Gordon Bazana P., Stelmack R.M. Individual differences in mismatch negativity measures of involuntary attention shift. Clin Neurophysiol 2000; 111: 1553–1560
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherg M., Vajsar J., Picton T.W. A source analysis of the human auditory evoked potentials. J Cogn Neurosci 1989; 1: 336–354
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schroger E., Winkler I. Presentation rate and magnitude of stimulus deviance effects on human pre-attentive change detection. Neurosci Lett 1995; 193: 185–188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroger E., Wolff C. Mismatch response of the human brain to changes in sound location. Neuroreport 1996; 7: 3005–3008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semlitsch H.V., Anderer R., Schuster P., Presslich O. A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts applied to the P300 ERP. Psychophysiology 1986; 23: 695–703
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shagrass, C.D.A., Overton, A., & Straumanis, J.J., Jr. 1971. Evoked response findings in psychiatric illness related to drug abuse. Biol Psych, 3, 259–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shucard D.W., Cummins K.R., Thomas D.G., Shucard J.L. Evoked potentials to auditory probes as indices of cerebral specialization of function – replication and extension. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1984; 52: 389–393
   Google Scholar
• Suga N., Manabe T. Neural basis of amplitude-spectrum representation in auditory cortex of the mustached bat. J Neurophysiol 1982; 4: 225–255
   Google Scholar
• Takegata R., Morotomi T. Integrated neural representation of sound and temporal features in human auditory sensory memory: an event-related potential study. Neurosci Lett 1999; 274: 207–210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiitinen H., Alho K., Huotilainen M., Ilmoniemi R.J., Simola J., et al. Tonotopic auditory cortex and the magnetoencephalographic (MEG) equivalent of the mismatch negativity. Psychophysiology 1993; 30: 537–540
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulanovsky N., Las L., Nelken I. Processing of low-probability sounds by cortical neurons. Nature Neurosci 2003; 6: 391–398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker L.J., Carpenter M., Downs C.R., Cranford J.L., Stuart A., et al. Possible neuronal refractory or recovery artifacts associated with recording the mismatch negativity response. J Am Acad Audiol 2001; 2: 348–356
   Google Scholar
• Winkler J., Karmos G., Näätänen R. Adaptive modeling of the unattended acoustic environment reflected in the mismatch negativity event-related potential. Brain Res 1996; 742: 239–252
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woldorff M.G., Hackley S.A., Hillyard S.A. The effects of channel-selective attention on the mismatch negativity wave elicited by deviant tones. Psychophysiology 1991; 28: 30–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods D.L. Auditory selective attention in middle-aged and elderly subjects: an event related brain potential study. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1992; 84: 456–468
   PubMedGoogle Scholar