Composition and habitat use of small mammals in old-growth mountain forests

References

• Arnan X, Bosch J, Comas L, Gracia M, Retana J. 2011. Habitat determinants of abundance, structure and composition of flying Hymenoptera communities in mountain old-growth forests. Insect Conserv Diver. 4:200–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnan X, Gracia M, Comas L, Retana J. 2009. Forest management conditioning ground ant community structure and composition in temperate conifer forests in the Pyrenees Mountains. Forest Ecol Manage. 258:51–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertolino S. 2007. Microhabitat use by garden dormice during nocturnal activity. J Zool. 272:176–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertolino S, Viano C, Currado I. 2001. Population dynamics, breeding patterns and spatial utilisation of the garden dormouse (Eliomys quercinus) in an Alpine habitat. J Zool. 253:513–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanco JC. 1998. Mamíferos de España. Barcelona: GeoPlaneta; p. 457.
   Google Scholar
• Bowman JC, Sleep D, Forbes GJ, Edwards M. 2000. The association of small mammals with coarse woody debris at log and stand scales. Forest Ecol Manage. 129:119–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broncano MJ, Rodrigo A, Retana J. 2008. Post-dispersal seed predation in Pinus halepensis and consequences on seedling establishment after fire. Int J Wildland Fire. 17:407–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cagnin M, Moreno S, Aloise G, Garofalo G, Villafuerte R, Gaona P, Cristaldi M. 1998. Comparative study of Spanish and Italian terrestrial small mammal coenoses from different biotopes in Mediterranean peninsular tip regions. J Biogeogr. 25:1105–1113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canut J. 2002. Parque Nacional de Aigüestortes i Estany de Sant Maurici. Talavera de la Reina: Canseco Editores. Avifauna; 187–222.
   Google Scholar
• Carey AB, Johnson ML. 1995. Small mammals in managed, naturally young, and old-growth forests. Ecol Appl. 5:336–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalmagro AD, Vieira EM. 2005. Patterns of habitat utilization of small rodents in an area of Araucaria forest in Southern Brazil. Austral Ecol. 30:353–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz M. 1992. Rodent seed predation in cereal crop of Central Spain: effects of physiognomy, food availability, and predation risk. Ecography. 15:77–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz M, Asensio B, Tellería JL. 1996. Aves Ibéricas. I. No paseriformes. Madrid: JM Reyero; p. 303.
   Google Scholar
• Ding TS, Liao HC, Yuan HW. 2008. Breeding bird community composition in different successional vegetation in the montane coniferous forests zone on Taiwan. Forest Ecol Manage. 255:2038–2048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkinton JS, Healy WM, Buonaccorsi JP, Boettner GH, Hazzard AM, Smith HR, Liebhold AM. 1996. Interactions among gypsy moths, white-footed mice, and acorns. Ecology. 77:2332–2342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falkenberg JC, Clarke JA. 1998. Microhabitat use of deer mice: effects of interspecific interaction risks. J Mammal. 79:558–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller AK, Harrison DJ, Lachowski HJ. 2004. Stand scale effects of partial harvesting and clearcutting on small mammals and forest structure. Forest Ecol Manage. 191:373–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godbout G, Ouellet JP. 2008. Habitat selection of American marten in a logged landscape at the southern fringe of the boreal forest. Ecoscience. 15:332–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosálbez J. 2002. Parque Nacional de Aigüestortes i Estany de Sant Maurici. Talavera de la Reina: Canseco Editores. Mamíferos; 223–256.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg CH. 2002. Response of white-footed mice Peromyscus leucopus to coarse woody debris and microsite use in southern Appalachian treefall gaps. Forest Ecol Manage. 164:57–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansson L. 1985. Clethrionomys food: generic, specific and regional characteristics. Ann Zool Fenn. 22:315–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King CM. 1985. Woodland rodents and their predators. The ecology of woodland rodents. Bank voles and Wood mice. Symp Zool Soc Lond. 55:219–247.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkland G, Findley JS. 1999. A transcontinental comparison of small-mammal assemblages: northern New Mexico and southern Pennsylvania compared. Oikos. 85:335–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagos VO, Contreras LC, Meserve PL, Gutiérrez JR, Jaksic JM. 1995. Effects of predation risk on space use by small mammals, a field experiment with a neotropical rodent. Oikos. 74:259–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert TD, Malcolm JR, Zimmerman BL. 2006. Amazonian small mammal abundances in relation to habitat structure and resource abundance. J Mammal. 87:766–776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassau SA, Hochuli DF. 2004. Effects of habitat complexity on ant assemblages. Ecography. 27:157–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassau SA, Hochuli DF. 2007. Associations between wasp communities and forest structure: Do strong local patterns hold across landscapes?. Austral Ecol. 32:656–662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee EJ, Lee WS, Rhim SJ. 2008. Characteristics of small rodent populations in post-fire silvicultural management stands within pine forest. Forest Ecol Manage. 255:1418–1422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindenmayer DB, Franklin JF. 2003. Conserving forest biodiversity. Washington DC: Island; p. 231.
   Google Scholar
• Luque-Larena JJ, Gosálbez J. 2008. Atlas de los mamíferos terrestres de España. Madrid: Dirección General de Conservación de la Naturaleza-SECEM-SECEMU. Myodes glareolus (Schreber, 1780); p. 398–400.
   Google Scholar
• Malo AF, Godsall B, Prebble C, Grange Z, McCandless S, Taylor A, Coulson T. Positive effects of an invasive shrub on aggregation and abundance of a native small rodent. Behav. Ecol. in press. DOI: 10.1093/beheco/ars202
   Google Scholar
• Manning JA, Edge WD. 2008. Small mammal responses to fine woody debris and forest fuel reduction in Southwest Oregon. J Wildlife Manage. 72:625–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh ACW, Harris S. 2000. Partitioning of woodland habitat resources by two sympatric species of Apodemus: lessons for the conservation of the yellow-necked mouse (A. flavicollis) in Britain. Biol Conserv. 92:275–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín Vide J. 2002. Parque Nacional de Aigüestortes i Estany de Sant Maurici. Talavera de la Reina: Canseco Editores. Clima; 55–74.
   Google Scholar
• Martins EG, Bonato V, Pinheiro HP, Dos Reis SF. 2006. Diet of the gracile mouse opossum (Gacilinanus microtarsus) (Didelphimorphia: Didelphidae) in a Brazilian cerrado: patterns of food consumption and intrapopulation variation. J Zool. 269:21–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCain CM. 2005. Elevational gradients in diversity of small mammals. Ecology. 86:366–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meri T, Halonen M, Mappes T, Suhonen J. 2008. Younger bank voles are more vulnerable to avian predation. Can J Zool. 86:1074–1078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michel N, Burel F, Legendre P, Butet A. 2007. Role of habitat and landscape in structuring small mammal assemblages in hedgerow networks of contrasted farming landscapes in Brittany, France. Landscape Ecol. 22:1241–1253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller DA, Thill RE, Melchiors MA, Wigley TB, Tappe PA. 2004. Small mammal communities of streamside management zones in intensively managed pine forests of Arkansas. Forest Ecol Manage. 203:381–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery WI, Dowie M. 1993. The distribution and population regulation of the wood mouse Apodemus sylvaticus on field boundaries of pastoral land. J Appl Ecol. 30:783–791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno S. 2008. Atlas de los mamíferos terrestres de España. Madrid: Dirección General de Conservación de la Naturaleza-SECEM-SECEMU. Eliomys quercinus (Linnaeus, 1766); 392–394.
   Google Scholar
• Naxara L, Pinotti BT, Pardini R. 2009. Seasonal microhabitat selection by terrestrial rodents in an old-growth atlantic forest. J Mammal. 90:404–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordyke KA, Buskirk SW. 1991. Southern redbacked vole, Clethrionomys gapperi, populations in relation to stand succession and old growth character in the central Rocky Mountains. Can Field Nat. 105:330–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Farrell PJ, Donaldson JS, Hoffman MT, Mader AD. 2008. Small mammal diversity and density on the Bokkeveld escarpment, South Africa – implications for conservation and livestock predation. Afr Zool. 43:117–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ordóñez JL, Retana J. 2004. Early reduction of post-fire recruitment of Pinus nigra by post-dispersal seed predation in different time-since-fire habitats. Ecography. 27:449–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paletto A, Tosi V. 2009. Forest canopy cover and canopy closure: comparison of assessment techniques. Eur J Forest Res. 128:265–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palomo LJ, Gisbert J. 2002. Atlas de los mamíferos terrestres de España. Madrid: Dirección General de Conservación de la Naturaleza-SECEM-SECEMU; p. 564.
   Google Scholar
• Paquin P. 2008. Carabid beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) diversity in the black spruce succession of eastern Canada. Biol Conserv. 141:261–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardini R, Marques de Souza S, Braga-Neto R, Metzger JP. 2005. The role of forest structure, fragment size and corridors in maintaining small mammal abundance and diversity in an Atlantic forest landscape. Biol Conserv. 124:253–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piqué J, Gracia M. 2002. Parque Nacional de Aigüestortes i Estany de Sant Maurici. Talavera de la Reina: Canseco Editores. Paisaje forestal; 153–164.
   Google Scholar
• Pornon A, Escaravage N, Hill-Bottraud I, Doche B. 1997. Variation of reproductive traits in Rhododendron ferrugineum L. (Ericaceae) populations along a successional gradient. Vegetatio. 130:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. 2010. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org
   Google Scholar
• Raspall A, Comas L, Boet O. 2007. Fauna salvatge del Parc Nacional. Mamífers. Madrid: Organismo Autónomo de Parques Nacionales; p. 64.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers LM, Gorman ML. 1995. The population dynamics of small mammals living in set-aside and surrounding semi-natural and crop land. J Zool. 236:451–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selas V. 2000. Seed production of a masting dwarf shrub, Vaccinium myrtillus, in relation to previous reproduction and weather. Can J Bot. 78:423–429.
   Google Scholar
• Slade NA, Blair SM. 2000. An empirical test of using counts of individuals captured as indices of population size. J Mammal. 81:1035–1045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapp P. 1997. Habitat selection by an insectivorous rodent: patterns and mechanisms across multiple scales. J Mammal. 78:1128–1143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan TP, Sullivan DS, Lindgren PM. 2001. Stand structure and small mammals in young lodgepole pine forest: 10-year results after thinning. Ecol Appl. 11:1151–1173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tews J, Brose U, Grimm V, Tielbölger K, Wichmann MC, Schwager M, Jeltsch F. 2004. Animal species driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures. J Biogeogr. 31:79–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torre I, Arrizabalaga A. 2008. Habitat preferences of the bank vole Myodes glareolus in a Mediterranean mountain range. Acta Theriol. 53:241–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torre I, Arrizabalaga A, Díaz M. 2002. Ratón de campo (Apodemus sylvaticus Linnaeus, 1758). Galemys. 14:1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Torre I, Díaz M. 2004. Small mammal abundance in Mediterranean post-fire habitats: a role for predators?. Acta Oecol. 25:137–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tufto J, Andersen R, Linnell J. 1996. Habitat use and ecological correlates of home range size in a small cervid: the roe deer. J Anim Ecol. 65:715–724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler G. 2008. The ground beetle fauna (Coleoptera: Carabidae) of abandoned fields, as related to plant cover, previous management and succession stage. Biodivers Conserv. 17:155–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells K, Pfeiffer M, Lakim MB, Kalko EKV. 2006. Movement trajectories and habitat partitioning of small mammals in logged and unlogged rain forests on Borneo. J Anim Ecol. 75:1212–1223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells K, Pfeiffer M, Lakim MB, Linsenmair KE. 2004. Use of arboreal and terrestrial space by a small mammal community in a tropical rain forest in Borneo, Malaysia. J Biogeogr. 31:641–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson DE, Reeder DEM. 2005. Mammal species of the world. A taxonomic and geographic reference. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; p. 2142.
   Google Scholar