Peninsular patterns in biological diversity: historical arrangement, methodological approaches and causal processes

References

• Andrén H. 1994. Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos. 71:355–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrianjakarivelo V, Razafimahatratra E, Razafindrakoto Y, Goodman SM. 2005. The terrestrial small mammals of the Parc National de Masoala, northeastern Madagascar. Acta Theriol. 50:537–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrigoni Jr JF 2003. Structural variation in Maya Forest anuran communities [Internet]. [cited 2007 Jul]. Available from: http www.mayamon.org/downloads/struct_var.arrigoni2003b.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Australian Heritage Commission Act. 1999. Areas of conservation significance on Cape York [Internet]. [cited 2007 Jul]. Available from: http://www.environment.gov.au/states/cyp_on_line/reports/lup/cons_ch1.html
   Google Scholar
• Auth DL. 1989. Amphibians and reptilian density in Florida counties. Gainesville Herpetol Soc Newsl. 5:7–14.
   Google Scholar
• Baquero RA, Tellería JL. 2001. Species richness. rarity and endemicity of European mammals: a biogeographical approach. Biodiv Conserv. 10:29–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbosa A, Benzal J. 1996. Diversity and abundance of small mammals in Iberia: peninsular effect or habitat suitability? Z Saugetierkd. 61:236–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardi A, Fraticelli F, Petrella S, editors. 1996. Ecosistema Italia. Attenzione WWF. 3:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Battisti C. 2003. Habitat fragmentation, fauna and ecological network planning: toward a theoretical conceptual framework. Ital J Zool. 70:241–247.
   Google Scholar
• Battisti C, Cignini B, Contoli L. 1997. Geographical peninsular effects on the trophic system “Tyto alba-micromammals” in Salento (Italy). Hystrix. 9:13–22.
   Google Scholar
• Battisti C, Contoli L. 1995. La componente di ricchezza della diversità avifaunistica in Italia: una sintesi cartografica. Ric Biol Selvaggina. 96:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Battisti C, Contoli L. 1997. Sulla componente di ricchezza della diversità avifaunistica in Italia: peninsularità ed insularità. Riv Ital Ornitol. 67:113–126.
   Google Scholar
• Battisti C, Contoli L. 1999. Mean range of the species, bird richness and ecogeographical factors: data from Italian peninsula and islands. Avocetta. 23:48–57.
   Google Scholar
• Battisti C, Testi A. 2001. Peninsular patterns of breeding landbird richness in Italy: on the role of climatic, orographic and vegetational factors. Avocetta. 25:289–297.
   Google Scholar
• Battisti C, Testi A. 2003. Patterns of landbird species composition in Italy: a chorological approach focusing on trends and contra-trends along the peninsula. J Medit Ecol. 4:5–21.
   Google Scholar
• Baz A, Garcia-Boyero A. 1995. The effects of forest fragmentation on butterfly communities in central Spain. J Biogeogr. 22:129–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett AF 1999. Linkages in the landscapes – The role of corridors and connectivity in wildlife conservation Gland and Cambridge (MA): IUCN.
   Google Scholar
• Blondel J. 1979. Biogéographie et écologie. Collection d’Ecologie 15. Masson ed. Paris: Masson.
   Google Scholar
• Bolger DT, Scott TA, Rotenberry JT. 2001. Use of corridor-like landscape structures by bird and small mammal species. Biol Conserv. 102:213–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonsdorff E. 2006. Zoobenthic diversity-gradients in the Baltic Sea: continuous post-glacial succession in a stressed ecosystem. J Exp Mar Biol. 330:383–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown JH. 1984. On the relationship between abundance and distribution of species. Am Nat. 124:255–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown JH. 1988. Species diversity In: Myers AA and Giller PS editors. Analytical biogeography an integrated approach to the study of animal and plant distributions. London and New York (NY): Chapman and Hall; p. 57–89.
   Google Scholar
• Brown JW. 1987. The peninsular effect in Baja California: an entomological assessment. J Biogeogr. 14:359–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown JW, Donahae JP. 1989. The Sphingidae (Lepidoptera) of Baja California, Mexico. J Lepid Soc. 43:184–209.
   Google Scholar
• Brown JW, Opler PA. 1990. Patterns of butterfly species density in peninsular Florida. J Biogeogr. 17:615–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkey TV. 1989. Extinction in nature reserves: the effect of fragmentation and the importance of migration between reserve fragments. Ecography. 55:75–81.
   Google Scholar
• Busack SD, Hedges SB. 1984. Is the peninsular effect a red herring? Am Nat. 123:266–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cagnin M, Moreno S, Aloise G, Garofalo G, Villafuerte R, Gaona P, Cristaldi M. 1998. Comparative study of Spanish and Italianterrestrial small mammal coenoses from different biotopes in Mediterranean peninsular tip regions. J Biogeogr. 25:1105–1113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrascal LM, Díaz L. 2003. Asociación entre distribución continental y regional. Análisis con la avifauna forestal y de medios arbolados de la península Ibérica. Graellsia. 59:179–207.
   Google Scholar
• Cho K-H, Cho D-S, Hong S-K 2001. Landscape ecological functions of mountain ridges between a bioreserve and its neighboring forest in the Kwangnung area, Korea. International Association of Landscape Ecology 2001 Congress [cited 2007 Jul]. Available from http://leml.asu.edu/iale2001/iale2001_program.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Choi S-W. 2004. Trends in butterfly species richness in response to the peninsular effect in South Korea. J Biogeogr. 31:587–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Contoli L. 2000. Rodents of Italy: species richness maps and Formae Italiae. Hystrix. 11:39–46.
   Google Scholar
• Contoli L, Battisti C. 2012. Devolution and evolution in the policy of biodiversity conservation in Italy: central or local approach? Rendiconti Lincei. 23:321–326.
   Google Scholar
• Contoli L, Battisti C, Buscemi A. 2000. On the morphology of Suncus etruscus (Mammalia, Soricidae): a negative relation between size and temperature. Ital J Zool. 67:329–332.
   Google Scholar
• Contoli L, Penko D. 1996. Sulla componente di ricchezza specifica nella diversità dei roditori del territorio italiano. Ric Biol Selvaggina. 99:1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Contoli L, Salucci MP, Vigna Taglianti A. 1985. Per una biogeografia dei sistemi trofici: il sistema “micromammiferi terragnoli-Tyto alba” nell’Italia peninsulare e nelle isole maggiori. Biogeographia. 11:211–231.
   Google Scholar
• Cook RE. 1969. Variation in species density of North American birds. Syst Zool. 18:63–84.
   Google Scholar
• Covas R, Blondel J. 1998. Biogeography and history of the Mediterranean bird fauna. Ibis. 140:395–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crooks KR, Sanjayan M. 2006. Connectivity conservation. Conservation Biology Series 14, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Debinski DM, Holt RD. 2000. A survey and overview of habitat fragmentation experiments. Conserv Biol. 14:342–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Defeo O, McLachlan A. 2013. Global patterns in sandy beach macrofauna: species richness, abundance, biomass and body size. Geomorphology. 199:106–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• di Caporiacco L. 1950. Le specie e sottospecie del genere Euscorpius viventi in Italia ed in alcune zone confinanti. Mem Soc Lin. 8:159–230.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond JM. 1975. The island dilemma: lessons of modern biogeographic studies for the design of natural reserves. Am Nat. 7:129–145.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond JM, May RM. 1976. Island biogeography and the design of natural reserves. In: May RM editors. Theoretical ecology principles and applications. Philadelphia (PA): Saunders Co; p. 163–186.
   Google Scholar
• Dornelas M, Soykan CU, Ugland KI. 2011. Biodiversity and disturbance. In: Magurran A, McGill BJ editors. Biological diversity. Frontiers in measurements and assessments. Oxford: Oxford University press; p. 237–251.
   Google Scholar
• Due AD, Polis GA. 1986. Trends in scorpion diversity along the Baja California peninsula. Am Nat. 128:460–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duellman WE, Schwartz A. 1958. Amphibians and reptiles of southern Florida. Bull Fla State Mus Biol Sci. 3:181–324.
   Google Scholar
• Enge KM 1997. Habitat occurrence of Florida’s native amphibians and reptiles. Florida Game and Fresh Water Commission technical report. 16:1–44.
   Google Scholar
• Engstrom RT 1993. Avian community in Florida habitats: analysis and review. Nongame Wildlife Program Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, Tallahassee, Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Fahrig L. 1997. Relative effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on population extinction. J Wildl Manag. 61:603–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fautin DG, Malarky L, Sobeòn J. 2013. Latitudinal diversity of sea anemones (Cnidaria: Actinaria). Biol Bull. 224:89–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feoli E, Lagonegro M. 1982. Syntaxonomical analysis of beech woods in the Apennines (Italy) using the program package IAHOPA. Vegetatio. 50:129–173.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer AG. 1960. Latitudinal variations in organic diversity. Evolution. 14:64–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• France R. 1992. The North American latitudinal gradient in species richness and geographical range of freshwater crayfish and amphipods. Am Nat. 139:342–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frelich LE, Reich PB. 1999. Minireviews: neighborhood effects, disturbance severity, and community stability in forests. Ecosystems. 2:151–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galarza A, Tellería JL. 2003. Linking processes: effects of migratory routes on the distribution of abundance of wintering passerines. Anim Biodiv Conserv. 26:19–27.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia-Ocejo A, Gurrea P. 1995. Los crisomelidos (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) de la Sierra de Guadarrama (Espana Central). Analisi biogeografica. Bol Asoc Espaň Entomol. 19:51–68.
   Google Scholar
• Gilpin ME. 1981. Peninsular diversity patterns. Am Nat. 118:291–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haila Y, Järvinen O, Raivio S. 1987. Quantitative versus qualitative distribution patterns of birds in the western Palearctic taiga. Ann Zool Fenn. 24:179–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris LD, Silva-Lopez G. 1992. Forest fragmentation and the conservation of biological diversity. In: Fiedler PL, Jain SK editors. Conservation biology. New York (NY): Chapman and Hall; p. 197–237.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison S, Hohn C, Ratay S. 2002. Distribution of exotic plants along roads in a peninsular nature reserve. Biol Invas. 4:425–430.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins BA. 2008. Recent progress toward understanding the global diversity gradient. IBS Newsletter. 6:5–8.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs RJ, Huenneke LF. 1992. Disturbance, diversity and invasion: implications for conservation. Conserv Biol. 6:324–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hundertmark KJ, Johns PE, Smith MH. 1992. Genetic diversity of Moose from the Kenai Peninsula Alaska. Alces. 28:15–20.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins DG, Rinne D. 2008. Red herring or low illumination? The peninsula effect revisited. J Biogeogr. 35:2128–2137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson RA, Ward PS. 2002. Biogeography and endemism of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Baja California, Mexico: a first overview. J Biogeogr. 29:1009–1026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiester AR. 1971. Species density of North American amphibians and reptiles. Syst Zool. 20:127–137.
   Google Scholar
• Kocher SD, Williams EM. 2000. The diversity and abundance of North American butterflies vary with habitat disturbance and geography. J Biogeogr. 27:785–794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koleff P, Lennon JJ, Gaston KJ. 2003. Are there latitudinal gradients in species turnover? Global Ecol Biogeogr. 12:483–498.
   Google Scholar
• Kremen C, Razafimahatratra V, Guillery RP, Rakotomalala J, Weiss A, Ratsisompatrarivo J-S. 1999. Designing the Masoala National Park in Madagascar based on biological and socioeconomic data. Conserv Biol. 13:1055–1068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon T-S, Kim S-S, Choi S-W. 2013. Testing of divergent patterns of butterfly niche breadth in a peninsula. Entomol Res. 43:108–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambshoad PJD 2002. Seafloor meiofauna in potential mining areas: current state of knowledge, possible impact of exploitation, data parameters to be standardised and gaps in knowledge [Internet]. [cited 2007 Jul]. Avilable from: http://www.isa.org.jm/en/seabedarea/standWShop/Book/chapter16.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Laurance WF, Yensen E. 1991. Predicting the impacts of edge effects in fragmented habitats. Biol Conserv. 55:77–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawlor TE. 1983. The peninsular effect on mammalian species diversity in Baja California. Am Nat. 121:432–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Layne JN. 1984. The land mammals of South Florida In: Gleason PJ, editors. Environments of South Florida, present and past. Coral Gables (FL): Miami Geol. Survey; p. 269–296.
   Google Scholar
• Lebreton P, Ledant J-P. 1980. Remarques d’ordre biogéographique et écologique sur l’avifauna méditerranéenne. Vie Milieu (Life and Environment). 30:195–208.
   Google Scholar
• Lee JC 1980. An ecogeographic analysis of the herpetofauna of the Yucatàn peninsula. Misc. Publ. Univ. Kansas Mus Nat Hist. 67.
   Google Scholar
• Lee JC 1993. Geographic variation in size and shape of neotropical frogs: a precipitation gradient analysis. Occasional papers Mus Nat Hist, Kansas Univ, Lawrence, Kansas. 163:1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Lindenmayer DB, Fisher J. 2006. Habitat fragmentation and landscape change. An ecological and conservation synthesis. Washington (DC): Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lobinske RJ, Ali A, Stout IJ. 1996. Qualitative and quantitative studies on Chironomidae (Diptera) and selected physico-chemical parameters in two tributaries of the Wekiva River, Central Florida. FLA Entomol. 79:531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacArthur RH. 1964. Environmental factors affecting bird species diversity. Am Nat. 98:387–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacArthur RH, Wilson EO. 1967. The theory of island biogeography. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Machtans CS, Villard M-A, Hannon SJ. 1996. Use of riparian buffer strips as movement corridors by forest birds. Conserv Biol. 10:1366–1379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magurran A. 2004. Measuring biological diversity. Malden (MA): Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Maher DS. 1992. Florida panther (Felis concolor coryi) In: Humphrey SR, editors. Rare and endangered biota of Florida, Vol. I Mammals (ed. by S.R.). Gainesville (FL): University Press of Florida; p. 176–189.
   Google Scholar
• Maiorano L, Falcucci A, Boitani L. 2006. Gap analysis of terrestrial vertebrates in Italy: Priorities for conservation planning in a human dominated landscape. Biol Conserv. 133:455–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margules CR, Pressey RL. 2000. Systematic conservation planning. Nature. 405:243–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin J, Gurrea P. 1990. The peninsular effect in iberian butterflies (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea and Hesperioidea). J Biogeogr. 17:85–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massa B. 1982. Il gradiente faunistico nella penisola italiana e nelle isole. Atti Soc ital Sci Nat, Mus civ Stor Nat, Milano. 123:353–374.
   Google Scholar
• Massa B. 1993. Gli uccelli della fauna italiana. Atti Conv Lincei. 86:79–86.
   Google Scholar
• McCain CM. 2003. North American desert rodents: a test of the mid-domain effect in species richness. J Mammal. 84:967–980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Means DB, Simberloff D. 1987. The peninsula effect: habitat-correlated species decline in Florida’s herpetofauna. J Biogeogr. 14:551–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meerow AW, Gideon M, Kuhn DN, Motamayor JC, Nakamura K. 2007. Genetic structure and gene flow among South Florida populations of Iris hexagona walt. (Iridaceae) assessed with 19 microsatellite DNA loci. Int J Plant Sci. 168:1291–1309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milne BT, Forman RTT. 1986. Peninsulas in Maine: woody plant diversity, distance, and environmental patterns. Ecology. 67:967–974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miloslavich P, Cruz-Motta JJ, Klein E, Iken K, Weinberger V, Konar B, Trott T, Pohle G, Bigatti G, Benedetti-Cecchi L, et al. 2013. Large-scale spatial distribution patters on gastropod assemblages in rocky shores. Plos One. 8:e71396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittelbach GG, Schemske DW, Cornell HV, Allen AP, Brown JM, Bush MB, Harrison SP, Hurlbert AH, Knowlton N, Lessios HA, et al. 2007. Evolution and the latitudinal diversity gradient: speciation, extinction and biogeography. Ecol Lett. 10:315–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy RW. 1983. Paleobiogeography and genetic differentiation of the Baja California herpetofauna. Occas Pap Calif Acad Sci. 137:1–48.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy RW. 1990. Plat tectonics, peninsular effects, and the borderlands: herpetofauna of Western North America [Internet]. In: Ganster P, Walter H editors. Environmental hazards and bioresource management in the United States-Mexico borderlands. Los Angeles (CA): UCLA Latin American Center Publications, University of California; [cited 2007 Jul]. Available from: http://www.200.utoronto.ca/drbob/PDFs/%20of%20papers/
   Google Scholar
• Muss BJ, Dahlstrőm P. 1971. Guia de los peces de mar del Atlàntico y del Mediterràneo. Barcelona: Ediciones Omega.
   Google Scholar
• Neves RAF, Echeverria CA, Pessoa LA, Paiva PC, Paranhos R, Valentin JL. 2013. Factors influencing spatial patterns of molluscs in a eutrophic tropical bay. J Mar Biol Ass UK. 93:577–589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton I, Dale LC. 1996. Bird migration at different latitudes in Eastern North America. Auk. 113:626–635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberdorff T, Hugueny B, Guegan J-F. 1997. Is there an influence of historical events on contemporary fish species richness in rivers? Comparisons between Western Europe and North America. J Biogeogr. 24:461–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck SB, Larivee M, Browne J. 2005. Biogeography of ground beetles of Florida (Coleoptera: Carabidae): the peninsula effect and beyond. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 98:951–959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petraitis PS, Latham RE, Niesenbaum RA. 1989. The maintenance of species diversity by disturbance. Quart Rev Biol. 64:393–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pianka ER. 1966. Latitudinal gradients in species diversity: a review of concepts. Am Nat. 100:33–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickett STA, Kolasa J, Armesto JJ, Collins SL. 1989. The ecological concept of disturbance and its expression at various hierarchical levels. Oikos. 54:129–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickett STA, White PS editors. 1984. The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics. New York (NY): Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pressey RL, Bottrill MC. 2009. Approaches to landscape- and seascape-scale conservation planning: convergence, contrasts, and challenges. Oryx. 43:464–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pressey RL, Cabeza M, Watts ME, Cowling RM, Wilson KA. 2007. Conservation planning in a changing world. Trends Ecol Evol. 22:583–592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston FW. 1962. The canonical distribution of commonness and rarity: Part I. Ecology. 43:185–215; 410–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pullin AS, Stewart GB. 2006. Guidelines for systematic review in conservation and environmental management. Conserv Biol. 20:1647–1656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purroy FJ. 1988. A report about wintering birds in the Iberian Peninsula. Sitta. 2:59–69.
   Google Scholar
• Racheli T, Zilli A. 1985. Modelli di distribuzione dei Lepidotteri nell’Italia meridionale. Biogeographia. 11:165–194.
   Google Scholar
• Raivio S. 1988. The peninsular effect and habitat structure: bird communities in coniferous forests of the Hanko Peninsula, southern Finland. Ornis Fennica. 65:129–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapoport EH. 1982. Areography – geographical strategies of species. New York (NY): Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Rapoport EH. 1994. Remarks on marine and continental biogeography: an areographical viewpoint. Philos T Roy Soc B: Biol Sci. 343:71–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riddle BR, Hafner DJ, Alexander LF, Jaeger JR, Jaeger JR. 2000. Cryptic vicariance in the historical assembly of a Baja California Peninsular Desert biota. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 97:14438–14443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riffell S, Keas B, Burton T. 2011. Peninsula effects on birds in a coastal landscape: are coves more species rich than lobes? Landscape Online. 29:1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson Jr WB 1955. An analysis of breeding bird populations of tropical Florida in relation to the vegetation [PhD dissertation]. Urbana (IL): University of Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson Jr WB, Kushlan JA. 1974. The southern Florida avifauna. Miami Geol Soc Mem. 2:414–452.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson WD, Brawn JD, Robinson SK. 2000. Forest bird community structure in Central Panama: influence of spatial scale and biogeography. Ecol Monogr. 70:209–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohwer SA, Woolfenden GE. 1969. Breeding birds of two Florida woodlands: comparisons with areas north of Florida. Condor. 71:38–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenzweig ML. 1992. Species diversity gradients: we know more and less than we thought. J Mammal. 73:715–730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau D-D, Keen DH. 2008. Malacological records from the Upper Pleistocene at Portelet (Jersey, Channel Islands): comparisons with western and central Europe. Boreas. 18:61–66.
   Google Scholar
• Ruffo S, Stoch F, editors. 2005. Check-list e distribuzione della fauna Italiana. 10.000 specie terrestri e delle acque interne. Mem Mus civ St Nat Verona, serie 2, Sez. Scienze della Vita. 16:1–307.
   Google Scholar
• Sagarin RD, Gaines SD. 2002. The ‘abundant centre’ distribution: to what extent is it a biogeographic rule? Ecol Lett. 5:137–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders DA, Hobbs RJ, Margules CR. 1991. Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Conserv Biol. 5:18–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schall JJ, Pianka ER. 1977. Species density of reptiles and amphibians of the Iberian Peninsula. Doňana Acta Vert. 4:27–34.
   Google Scholar
• Schall JJ, Pianka ER. 1978. Geographical trends in numbers of species. Science. 201:679–686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrödl M, Bohn JM, Brenke N, Rolán E, Schwabe E. 2011. Abundance, diversity and latitudinal gradients of southeastern Atlantic and Antarctic abyssal gastropods. Deep-Sea Res II: Topic Stud Oceanogr. 58:49–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz MW. 1988. Species diversity patterns in woody flora on three North American peninsulas. J Biogeogr. 15:759–774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz MK, Scott Mills L, McKelvey KS, Ruggiero LF, Allendorf FW. 2002. DNA reveals high dispersal synchronizing the population dynamics of Canada lynx. Nature. 415:520–522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seib RL. 1980. Baja California: a Peninsula for rodents but not for reptiles. Am Nat. 115:613–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva JMC. 1996. Distribution of Amazonian and Atlantic birds in gallery forests of the Cerrado region, South America. Ornitol Neotrop. 7:1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Simberloff DS. 1988. The contribution of population and community biology to conservation science. Ann Rev Ecol Syst. 19:473–511.
   Google Scholar
• Simberloff DS, Abele LG. 1976. Island biogeography theory and conservation practice. Science. 191:285–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simberloff DS, Abele LG. 1982. Refuge design and island biogeographic theory: effects of fragmentation. Am Nat. 120:41–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson GG. 1964. Species density of North American recent mammals. Syst Zool. 13:57–73.
   Google Scholar
• Slud P. 1976. Geographic and climatic relationship of avifaunas with special reference to comparative distribution in the neotropics. Smithson Contrib Zool. 122:1–149.
   Google Scholar
• Sosa-Escalante J, Sánchez-Cordero V, Hernández Betancourt S. 1997. Diversity and distribution of terrestrial mammals at the N-E region of the Yucatan peninsula, Mexico. Abstract VII Int. Ther. Congr., Acapulco. 6–11.IX.1997: 333.
   Google Scholar
• Soulé ME, Orians GH. 2001. Conservation biology research: its challenges and contexts In: Soulé ME, Orians GH, editors. Conservation biology. Research priorities for the next decade. Society for Conservation Biology. Washington (DC): Island Press; p. 271–285.
   Google Scholar
• Sousa WP. 1984. The role of disturbance in natural communities. Ann Rev Ecol Syst. 15:353–391.
   Google Scholar
• Spellerberg IF, Sawyer JW. 1999. An introduction to applied biogeography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stoch F, Vigna Taglianti A. 2005. I corotipi della fauna italiana. In: Ruffo S, Stoch F, editors. Checklist e distribuzione della fauna italiana Mem. Mus. civico St. Nat. Verona, 2 serie, Sez Scienze della Vita. 16:77–78.
   Google Scholar
• Tackaberry R, Kellman M. 1996. Patterns of tree species richness along peninsular extensions of tropical forests. Glob Ecol Biogeogr Lett. 5:85–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor RJ. 1987. The geometry of colonization: 2. Peninsulas. Oikos. 48:232–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor RJ, Pfannmuller LA. 1981. A test of the peninsular effect on species diversity. Canad Field-Nat. 95:144–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor RJ, Regal PJ. 1978. The peninsular effect on species diversity and the biogeography of Baja California. Am Nat. 112:583–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor RJ, Regal PJ. 1980. Reply to seib. Am Nat. 115:621–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telleria JL, Santos T. 1993. Distributional patterns of insectivorous passerines in the Iberian Forests: does abundance decrease near the border? J Biogeogr. 20:235–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tellería JL, Santos T. 1994. Factors involved in the distribution of forest birds in the Iberian Peninsula. Bird Study. 41:161–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tews J, Brose U, Grimm V, Tielbörger K, Wichmann MC, Schwager M, Jeltsch F. 2004. Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures. J Biogeogr. 31:79–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiollay J-M. 1998. Distribution patterns and insular biogeography of South Asian raptor communities. J Biogeogr. 25:57–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tramer EJ. 1974. On latitudinal gradients in avian diversity. Condor. 76:123–130. 10.2307/1366721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tubelis D. 2005a. Patch-matrix interactions and bird species conservation in a plantation-dominated landscape in Australia [Ph D thesis]. Canberra (ACT): Australian National University.
   Google Scholar
• Tubelis D. 2005b. The peninsula effect on bird species in native eucalypt forests in a wood production landscape in Australia Abstract 19th meeting Soc. Conserv. Biol., July 15–19; Brasilia.
   Google Scholar
• UCL – Univ. Catholique de Lavain 1999. Biogeography of birds in France. Birds species richness – Ecophysiographical factors determining bird species distributions [Internet]. Facultè de Sciences, Dep. De Biologie, Unitè d’ecologie et biogeographie, Lauvain-la-Neuve, Belgie-Belgique [cited 2007 Jul]. Available from: http://www.biol.ucl.ac.be/ecol/bof/CA3.HTM,CA5.HTMandP59.HTM
   Google Scholar
• Van Riper III C. 1982. Censuses and breeding observations of the birds on Kohala mountain Hawaii. Wilson Bull. 94:463–476.
   Google Scholar
• Vargas JM, Real R, Guerrero JC. 1998. Biogeographical regions of the Iberian peninsula based on freshwater fish and amphibian distributions. Ecography. 21:371–382. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.1998.tb00402.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace AR. 1876. The geographical distribution of animals. London: Macmilliam.
   Google Scholar
• Wamer WA 1978. Avian diversity and habitat in Florida: analysis of a peninsular diversity gradient’ [Master’s thesis]. Tallahassee (FL): Florida State University.
   Google Scholar
• Watling JI, Donnelly MA. 2006. Fragments as islands: a synthesis of faunal responses to habitat patchiness. Conserv Biol. 20:1016–1025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittaker RH. 1977. Evolution of species diversity in land communities In: Hecht MK, Steere WC and Wallace B editors. Evolutionary biology. New York (NY): Plenum Press; 10:1–67.
   Google Scholar
• Wiens JJ, Donoghue MJ. 2004. Historical biogeography, ecology and species richness. Trend Ecol Evol. 19:639–644. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.09.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins DA. 1999. The peninsula effect on species diversity: a reassessment of the avifauna of Baja California. Ecography. 22:542–547. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.1999.tb01284.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willig MR, Kaufman DM, Stevens RD. 2003. Latitudinal gradients of Biodiversity: pattern, process, scale, and synthesis. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 34:273–309. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.012103.144032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winemiller KO. 1983. An introduction to the freshwater fish communities of Corcovado national park, Costa Rica. Brenesia. 21:47–66.
   Google Scholar
• Zangheri S 1968. Attuali conoscenze della Lepidotterofauna italiana Atti VII Congr Naz Entomol Verona:62–112.
   Google Scholar