Extrafloral nectaries mediate the arboreal beetle community (Coleoptera) in a Neotropical rainforest

References

• Adams CL, Selander RB. 1979. The biology of blister beetles of the vittata-group of the genus Epicauta (Coleoptera, Meloidae). Bull Am Mus Nat Hist. 162(4):137–266.
   Google Scholar
• Adis J, Erwin TL, Battirola LD, Ketelhut SM. 2010. The importance of floodplain forests for animal biodiversity: beetles in canopies of floodplain and upland forests. In: Junk WJ, Fernandez Piedade MT, Wittmann F, Schöngart J, Parolin P, editors. Amazonian floodplain forests. Ecophysiology, biodiversity and sustainable management. Dordrecht: Springer; p. 313–328.
   Google Scholar
• Adjei-Maafo IK, Wilson LT. 1983. Factors affecting the relative abundance of arthropods on nectaried and nectariless cotton. Environ Entomol. 12:349–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal VM, Rastogi N. 2010. Ants as dominant insect visitors of the extrafloral nectaries of sponge gourd plant, Luffa cylindrica (L.) (Cucurbitaceae). Myrmecology. 3:45–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alm J, Ohnmeiss TE, Lanza J, Vriesenga L. 1990. Preference of cabbage white butterflies and honey bees for nectar that contains amino acids. Oecologia. 84:53–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alves-Silva E, Bächtold A, Barônio GJ, Torezan-Silingardi HM, Del-Claro K. 2014. Ant–herbivore interactions in an extrafloral nectaried plant: are ants good plant guards against curculionid beetles? J Nat Hist. 49:13–14, 841–851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alves-Silva E, Barônio GJ, Torezan-Silingardi HM, Del-Claro K. 2013. Foraging behavior of Brachygastra lecheguana (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) on Banisteriopsis malifolia (Malpighiaceae): extrafloral nectar consumption and herbivore predation in a tending ant system. Entomol Sci. 16:162–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anhuf D, Motzer T, Rollenbeck R, Schröder B, Scarzynski J. 1999. Water budget of the Surumoni crane site (Venezuela). Selbyana. 20(1):179–185.
   Google Scholar
• Anhuf D, Winkler H. 1999. Geographical and ecological settings of the Surumoni-Crane-Project (Upper Orinoco, Estado Amazonas, Venezuela). Anz Akad Wiss Wien, Math.-Naturwiss. Kl. I. 135:3–23.
   Google Scholar
• Antoń S, Denisow B, Komoń-Janczara E, Targonski Z. 2017a. Nectary and gender-biased nectar production in dichogamous Chamaenerion angustifolium (L.) Scop. (Onagraceae). Plant Species Biol. doi:10.1111/1442-1984.12169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antoń S, Komoń-Janczara E, Denisow B. 2017b. Floral nectary, nectar production dynamics and chemical composition in five nocturnal Oenothera species (Onagraceae) in relation to floral visitors. Planta. doi:10.1007/s00425-017-2748-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antoniazzi R, Garro RNSL, Dáttilo W, Ribeiro SP, Neves FS. 2019. Ant species richness and interactions in canopies of two distinct successional stages in a tropical dry forest. Sci Nat. 106:20. doi:10.1007/s00114-019-1614-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aranda-Rickert A, Rothen C, Diez P, Gonzalez AM, Marazzi B. 2017. Sugary secretions of wasp galls: a want-to-be extrafloral nectar? Ann Bot. 1–10. doi:10.1093/aob/mcx075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arndt E, Kirmse S, Erwin TL. 2001. Arboreal beetles of Neotropical forests: Agra Fabricius, larval description with notes on natural history and behaviour (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Lebiini, Agrina). Coleop Bull. 55:297–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assunção MA, Torezan-Silingardi HM, Del-Claro K. 2014. Do ant visitors to extrafloral nectaries of plants repel pollinators and cause an indirect cost of mutualism? Flora. 2:244–249.
   Google Scholar
• Baker HG, Baker I. 1975. Studies of nectar-constitution and pollinator-plant coevolution. In: Gilbert LE, Raven PH, editors. Coevolution of animals and plants. Austin: University of Texas Press; p. 100–140.
   Google Scholar
• Baker HG, Baker I. 1983. A brief historical review of the chemistry of floral nectar. In: Bentley B, Elias T, editors. The biology of nectaries. New York: Columbia University Press; p. 126–152.
   Google Scholar
• Baker HG, Opler PA, Baker I. 1978. A comparison of the amino acid complement of floral and extra floral nectars. Bot Gaz. 139:322–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrios H. 2003. Insect herbivores feeding on conspecific seedlings and trees. In: Basset Y, Novotny V, Miller SE, Kitching RL, editors. Arthropods of tropical forests. Spatio-temporal dynamics and resource use in the canopy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; p. 282–290.
   Google Scholar
• Basset Y. 1991. Influence of leaf traits on the spatial distribution of insect herbivores associated with an overstory rainforest tree. Oecologia. 87:388–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basset Y, Springate ND, Aberlenc H-P, Delvare G. 1997. A review of methods for sampling arthropods in tree canopies. In: Stork NE, Adis JA, Didham RK, editors. Canopy arthropods. London: Chapman & Hall; p. 27–52.
   Google Scholar
• Bates DM, Maèchler M, Bolker BM, Walker SC. 2014. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw. 67:1–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bawa KS. 1990. Plant-pollinator interactions in tropical rain forests. Ann Rev Ecol Syst. 21:399–422.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett B, Breed MD. 1985. The association between Pentaclethra macroloba (Mimosaceae) and Paraponera clavata (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) colonies. Biotropica. 17:253–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentley BL. 1976. Plants bearing extrafloral nectaries and the associated ant community: interhabitat differences in the reduction of herbivore damage. Ecology. 57:815–820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentley BL. 1977. Extrafloral nectaries and protection by pugnacious bodyguards. Ann Rev Ecol Syst. 8:407–428.
   Google Scholar
• Bigger M. 1976. Oscillation of tropical insect populations. Nature. 259:207–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bixenmann RJ, Coley PD, Kursar TA. 2011. Is extrafloral nectar production induced by herbivores or ants in a tropical facultative ant–plant mutualism? Oecologia. 165(2):417–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blüthgen N, Fiedler K. 2003. Preferences for sugars and amino acids and their conditionality in a diverse nectar-feeding ant community. J Anim Ecol. 73:155–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blüthgen N, Gottsberger G, Fiedler K. 2004. Sugar and amino acid composition of ant-attended nectar and honeydew sources from an Australian rainforest. Austral Ecol. 29:418–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blüthgen N, Reifenrath K. 2003. Extrafloral nectaries in an Australien rainforest. Structure and distribution. Aust J Bot. 53:515–527.
   Google Scholar
• Blüthgen N, Verhaagh M, Goitia W, Jaffe K, Morawetz W, Barthlott W. 2000. How plants shape the ant community in the Amazonian rainforest canopy: the key role of extrafloral nectaries and homopteran honeydew. Oecologia. 125:229–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boecklen WJ. 1984. The role of extrafloral nectaries in the herbivore defence of Cassia fasiculata. Ecol Entomol. 9:243–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouchard P, Bousquet Y, Davies AE, Alonso-Zarazaga MA, Lawrence JF, Lyal CHC, Newton AF, Reid CAM, Schmitt M, Ślipiński SA, et al. 2011. Family-group names in Coleoptera (Insecta). Zookeys. 88:1–972.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronstein JL, Alarcón R, Geber M. 2006. The evolution of plant–insect mutualism. New Phytol. 172:412–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bugg RL, Ellis RT, Carlson RW. 1989. Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera) using extrafloral nectar of faba bean (Vicia faba L, Fabaceae) in Massachusetts. Biol Agric Hortic. 6:107–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byk J, Del-Claro K. 2010. Nectar- and pollen-gathering Cephalotes ants provide no protection against herbivory: a new manipulative experiment to test ant protective capabilities. Acta Ethol. 13:33–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calixto ES, Lange D, Del-Claro K. 2018. Protection mutualism: an overview of ant-plant interactions mediated by extrafloral nectaries. Oecol Aust. 22(4):410–425.
   Google Scholar
• Camarota F, Powell S, Vasconcelos HL, Priest G, Marquis RJ. 2015. Extrafloral nectaries have a limited effect on the structure of arboreal ant communities in a Neotropical savanna. Ecology. 96:231–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardoso-Gustavson P, Andreazza NL, Sawaya ACHF, de Moraes Castro M. 2013. Only attract ants? The versatility of petiolar extrafloral nectaries in Passiflora. Am J Plant Sci. 4:460–469.
   Google Scholar
• Carter C, Shafir S, Yehonatan L, Palmer RG, Thornburg R. 2006. A novel role for proline in plant floral nectars. Naturwissenschaften. 93:72–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamberlain SA, Holland JN. 2009. Quantitative synthesis of context dependency in ant–plant protection mutualisms. Ecology. 90:2384–2392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman RF. 1974. The chemical inhibition of feeding by phytophagous insects: a review. Bull Entomol Res. 64:339–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coley PD. 1983. Herbivory and defensive characteristics of tree species in a lowland tropical forest. Ecol Monogr. 53:209–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coley PD, Aide TM. 1991. Comparison of herbivory and plant defenses in temperate and tropical broad-leaved forests. In: Price PW, Lewinsohn TM, Fernandes GW, Benson BB, editors. Plant animal interactions: evolutionary ecology in tropical and temperate region. New York: Wiley; p. 25–49.
   Google Scholar
• Colwell RK. 2013. EstimateS: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 9. User’s Guide and application. http://purl.oclc.org/estimates.
   Google Scholar
• Costa FMCB, Oliveira-Filho AT, Oliveira PS. 1992. The role of extrafloral nectaries in Qualea grandiflora (Vochysiaceae) in limiting herbivory: an experiment of ant protection in cerrado vegetation. Ecol Entomol. 17:363–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowson RA. 1981. The biology of coleoptera. London: Academic Press; p. 802.
   Google Scholar
• Cuautle M, Rico-Gray V. 2003. The effect of wasps and ants on the reproductive success of the extrafloral nectaried plant Turnera ulmifolia (Turneraceae). Funct Ecol. 17:417–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dafni A, Kevan PG, Husband BC, editors. 2005. Practical pollination biology. Cambridge (ON): Enviroquest; p. 590.
   Google Scholar
• Davis SR. 2007. Nectarivory in a weevil, Smicronyx squalidus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Curculioninae), on Desmanthus (Fabaceae). Pol J Entomol. 76:221–224.
   Google Scholar
• de la Fuente MAS, Marquis RJ. 1999. The role of ant-tended extrafloral nectaries in the protection and benefit of a Neotropical rainforest. Oecologia. 118:192–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Giusto B, Anstett MC, Dounias E, McKey D. 2001. Variation in the effectiveness of biotic defence: the case of an opportunistic ant-plant protection mutualism. Oecologia. 129:367–375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz-Castelazo C, Rico-Gray V, Ortega F, Ángeles G. 2005. Morphological and secretory characterization of extrafloral nectaries in plants of coastal Veracruz, Mexico. Ann Bot. 96:1175–1189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elias TS. 1983. Extrafloral nectaries: their structure and distribution. In: Bentley B, Elias T, editors. The biology of nectaries. New York: Columbia University Press; p. 174–203.
   Google Scholar
• Endara M-J, Weinhold A, Cox JE, Wiggins NL, Coley PD, Kursar TA. 2015. Divergent evolution in antiherbivore defences within species complexes at a single Amazonian site. J Ecol. 103:1107–1118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erhardt A, Rusterholz HP. 1998. Do peacock butterflies (Inachis io L.) detect and prefer nectar amino acids and other nitrogenous compounds? Oecologia. 117:536–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernest KA. 1989. Insect herbivory on a tropical understorey tree: effects of leaf age and habitat. Biotropica. 21:194–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erwin TL. 1990. Natural history of the carabid beetles at the BIOLAT biological station, Rio Manu, Pakitza, Peru. Rev Peru Entomol. 33:1–85.
   Google Scholar
• Erwin TL. 1996. Arboreal beetles of neotropical forests: Agra Fabricius, the cayennensis complex (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Lebiini: Calleidina). Ann Zool Fennici. 33:17–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escalante-Pérez M, Heil M. 2012. Nectar secretion: its ecological context and physiological regulation. In: Vivanco J, Baluska F, editors. Secretions and exudates in biological systems. Berlin: Springer; p. 187–220.
   Google Scholar
• Escalante-Pérez M, Jaborsky M, Lautner S, Fromm J, Müller T, Dittrich M, Kunert M, Boland W, Hedrich R, Ache P. 2012. Poplar extrafloral nectaries: two types, two strategies of indirect defenses against herbivores. Plant Physiol. 159:1176–1191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell BD. 1998. “Inordinate fondness” explained: why are there so many beetles? Science. 281:555–559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell BD, Sequeira AS. 2004. Evolutionary rates in the adaptive radiation of beetles on plants. Evolution. 58(9):1984–2001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiala B, Linsenmair KE. 1995. Distribution and abundance of plants with extrafloral nectaries in the woody flora of a lowland primary forest in Malaysia. Biodiversity Conserv. 4:165–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiala B, Maschwitz U. 1992. Domatia as most important adaptations in the evolution of myrmecophytes in the paleotropical tree genus Macaranga (Euphorbiaceae). Plant Syst Evol. 180:53–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores-Flores RV, Aguirre A, Anjos DV, Neves FS, Campos RI, Dáttilo W. 2018. Food source quality and ant dominance hierarchy influence the outcomes of ant-plant interactions in an arid environment. Acta Oecol. 87:13–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankie GW, Baker HG, Opler PA. 1974. Comparative phenological studies of trees in tropical wet and dry forests in the lowlands of Costa Rica. J Ecol. 62:881–919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey-Wyssling A. 1955. The phloem supply to the nectaries. Acta Bot Neerl. 4:358–369.
   Google Scholar
• Galetto L, Bernardello LM. 1992. Extrafloral nectaries that attract ants in Bromeliaceae: structure and nectar composition. Can J Bot. 70:1101–1105.
   Google Scholar
• Garibaldi LA, Muchhala N, Motzke I, Bravo-Monroy L, Olschewski R, Klein AM. 2011. Services from plant-pollinator interactions in the Neotropics. In: Rapidel B, DeClerck F, Le Coq JF, Beer J, editors. Ecosystem services from agriculture and agroforestry - measurement and payment. London: Earthscan; p. 119–139.
   Google Scholar
• The Global Biodiversity Information Facility. 2019. Classification coleoptera. GBIF Backbone Taxonomy. [accessed 2019 Jul 22]. www.gbif.org/species/.
   Google Scholar
• Goncalves-Alvim SJ, Korndorf G, Fernades GW. 2006. Sclerophylly in Qualea parviflora (Vochysiaceae): influence of herbivory, mineral nutrients, and water status. Plant Ecol. 187:153–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Teuber M, Heil M. 2009A. Nectar chemistry is tailored for both attraction of mutualists and protection from exploiters. Plant Signal Behav. 4:809–813.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• González-Teuber M, Heil M. 2009B. The role of extrafloral nectar amino acids for the preferences of facultative and obligate ant mutualists. J Chem Ecol. 35:459–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Teuber M, Heil M. 2015. Comparative anatomy and physiology of myrmecophytes: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Res Rep Biodivers Stud. 4:21–32.
   Google Scholar
• Grove SJ, Stork NE. 2000. An inordinate fondness for beetles. Invertebr Taxon. 14:733–739.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen DM, Olesen JM, Mione T, Johnson SD, Müller CB. 2007. Coloured nectar: distribution, ecology, and evolution of an enigmatic floral trait. Biol Rev. 82:83–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heil M. 2011. Nectar: generation, regulation and ecological functions. Trends Plant Sci. 16:191–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heil M. 2015. Extrafloral nectar at the plant-insect interface: a spotlight on chemical ecology, phenotypic plasticity, and food webs. Ann Rev Ent. 60:213–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heil M, Fiala B, Baumann B, Linsenmair KE. 2000. Temporal, spatial and biotic variations in extrafloral nectar secretion by Macaranga tanarius. Funct Ecol. 14:749–757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heil M, González-Teuber M, Clement LW, Kautz S, Verhaagh M, Silva Bueno JC. 2009. Divergent investment strategies of Acacia myrmecophytes and the coexistence of mutualists and exploiters. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 106:18091–18096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heil M, Hilpert A, Krüger R, Linsenmair KE. 2004. Competition among visitors to extrafloral nectaries as a source of ecological costs of an indirect defence. J Trop Ecol. 20:201–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heil M, Koch T, Hilpert A, Fiala B, Boland W, Linsenmair KE. 2001. Extrafloral nectar production of the ant-associated plant, Macaranga tanarius, is an induced, indirect, defensive response elicited by jasmonic acid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 98(3):1083–1088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heil M, McKey D. 2003. Protective ant-plant interactions as model systems in ecological and evolutionary research. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 34:425–453.
   Google Scholar
• Heil M, Rattke J, Boland W. 2005. Postsecretory hydrolysis of nectar sucrose and specialization in ant/plant mutualism. Science. 308:560–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrera CM, Pérez R, Alonso C. 2006. Extreme intraplant variation in nectar sugar composition in an insect-pollinated perennial herb. Am J Bot. 93:575–581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hespenheide HA. 1985. Insect visitors to extrafloral nectaries of Byttneria aculeata (Sterculiaceae): relative importance and roles. Ecol Entomol. 10:91–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe HF, Westley LC. 1988. Ecological relationships of plants and animals. New York: Oxford University Press; p. 273.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt T, Bergsten J, Levkanicova Z, Papadopoulou A, John OS, Wild R, Hammond PM, Ahrens D, Balke M, Caterino MS, et al. 2007. A comprehensive phylogeny of beetles reveals the evolutionary origins of a superradiation. Science. 318:1913–1916.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin RE, Adler LS, Brody AK. 2005. The dual role of floral traits: pollinator attraction and plant defense. Ecology. 85(6):1503–1511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janzen DH. 1966. Coevolution of mutualism between ants and acacias in Central America. Evolution. 20(3):249–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janzen DH. 1980. When is it coevolution? Evolution. 34:611–612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolivet P. 1988. Food habits and food selection of Chrysomelidae. Bionomic and evolutionary perspectives. In: Jolivet P, Petitpierre E, Hsiao TH, editors. Biology of Chrysomelidae. Dordrecht: Kluwer; p. 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Katayama N, Suzuki N. 2011. Anti-herbivory defense of two Vicia species with and without extrafloral nectaries. Plant Ecol. 212:743–752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeler KH. 1977. The extrafloral nectaries of Ipomoea carnea (Convolvulaceae). Am J Bot. 64(10):1282–1288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeler KH. 1978. Insects feeding at extrafloral nectaries of Ipomoea carnea (Convolvulaceae). Entomol News. 89:163–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerner A. 1879. Die Schutzmittel der Blüten gegen unberufene Gäste [The protective agents of flowers against unbidden visitors]. Innsbruck: Wagner. German.
   Google Scholar
• Kessler D, Baldwin IT. 2007. Making sense of nectar scents: the effects of nectar secondary metabolites on floral visitors of Nicotiana attenuata. Plant J. 49:840–854.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirmse S, Adis J, Morawetz W. 2003. Flowering events and beetle diversity in Venezuela. In: Basset Y, Novotny V, Miller SE, Kitching RL, editors. Arthropods of tropical forests: spatio-temporal dynamics and resource use in the canopy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; p. 256–265.
   Google Scholar
• Kirmse S, Chaboo CS. 2018. Polyphagy and florivory prevail in a leaf-beetle community (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) inhabiting the canopy of a tropical lowland rainforest in southern Venezuela. J Nat Hist. 52(41–42):2677–2721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirmse S, Ratcliffe BC. 2019. Composition and host-use patterns of a scarab community (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) inhabiting the canopy of a lowland tropical rainforest in southern Venezuela. Coleop Bull. 73(1):149–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knox RB, Bernhardt P, Marginson R, Beresford G, Baker I, Baker HG. 1985. Extrafloral nectaries as adaptations for bird pollination in Acacia terminalis. Ameri J Bot. 72:8. doi:10.2307/2443398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koptur S. 1985. Alternative defenses against herbivores in Inga (Fabaceae: Mimosoideae) over an elevational gradient. Ecology. 66:1639–1650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koptur S. 1989. Is extrafloral nectar production an inducible defense? In: Bock J, Linhart Y, editors. Evolutionary ecology of plants. Boulder (CO): Westview Press; p. 323–339.
   Google Scholar
• Koptur S. 1992. Extrafloral nectary-mediated interactions between insects and plants. In: Bernays E, editor. Insect–plant interactions. Vol. IV. Florida: CRC Press, Boca Raton; p. 82–129.
   Google Scholar
• Koptur S. 1994. Floral and extrafloral nectaries of Costa Rican Inga trees: a comparison of their constituents and composition. Biotropica. 26(3):276–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koptur S, Dillon P, Foster C, Chaverri A, Chu K. 1977. A comparison of ant activity and extrafloral nectaries at various sites in Costa Rica. O.T.S. Tropical Biology Coursebook. 77–3:299.
   Google Scholar
• Koptur S, Lawton JH. 1988. Interactions among vetches bearing extrafloral nectaries, their biotic protective agents, and herbivores. Ecology. 69:278–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koptur S, Truong N. 1998. Facultative ant/plant interactions: nectar sugar preferences of introduced pest ant species in South Florida. Biotropica. 30:179–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanza J. 1988. Ant preferences for Passiflora nectar mimics that contain amino acids. Biotropica. 20:341–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanza J. 1991. Response of fire ants (Formicidae: Solenopsis invicta and S. geminata) to artificial nectars with amino acids. Ecol Entomol. 16:203–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanza J, Krauss BR. 1984. Detection of amino acids in artificial nectars by two tropical ants, Leptothorax and Monomorium. Oecologia. 63:423–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanza J, Vargo EL, Pulim S, Chang YZ. 1993. Preferences of the fire ants Solenopsis invicta and S. geminate (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) for amino acid and sugar components of extrafloral nectars. Environ Entomol. 22:411–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limburg DD, Rosenheim JA. 2001. Extrafloral nectar consumption and its influence on survival and development of an omnivorous predator, larval Chrysoperla plorabunda (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Environ Entomol. 30:595–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindroth CH. 1969. The ground-beetles (Carabidae, Excl. Cicindelinae) of Canada and Alaska. Part 6. Opusc Entomol Suppl. 34:945–1192.
   Google Scholar
• Loveless AR. 1961. A nutritional interpretation of sclerophylly based on differences in the chemical composition of sclerophyllous and mesophytic leaves. Ann Bot. 25:168–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowman MD. 1992. Leaf growth dynamics and herbivory in five species of Australian rain forest canopy trees. J Ecol. 80:433–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukefahr MJ, Martin DF, Meyer JR. 1965. Plant resistance to five Lepidoptera attacking cotton. J Econ Entomol. 58:516–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundgren JG, Seagraves MP. 2011. Physiological benefits of nectar feeding by a predatory beetle. Biol J Linn Soc. 104:661–669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magalhães AFP, Maruyama PK, Tavares LAF, Martins RL. 2018. The relative importance of hummingbirds as pollinators in two bromeliads with contrasting floral specializations and breeding systems. Bot J Linn Soc. 188(3):316–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marazzi B, Bronstein JL, Koptur S. 2013. The diversity, ecology and evolution of extrafloral nectaries: current perspectives and future challenges. Ann Bot. 111:1243–1250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marazzi B, Sanderson MJ. 2010. Large-scale patterns of diversification in the widespread legume genus Senna and the evolutionary role of extrafloral nectaries. Evolution. 64:3570–3592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez Del Rio C. 1990. Dietary, phylogenetic, and ecological correlates of intestinal sucrase and maltase activity in birds. Physiol Zool. 63:987–1011.
   Google Scholar
• Marvaldi AE, Sequeira AS, O’Brien CW, Farrell BD. 2002. Molecular and morphological phylogenetics of weevils (Coleoptera, Curculionoidea): do niche shifts accompany diversification? Syst Biol. 51:761–785.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathews CR, Brown MW, Bottrell DG. 2007. Leaf extrafloral nectaries enhance biological control of a key economic pest, Grapholita molesta (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), in Peach (Rosales: Rosaceae). Environ Entomol. 36(2):383–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer C, Adler L, Armbruster WS, Dafni A, Eardley C, Huang S-Q, Kevan PG, Ollerton J, Packer L, Ssymank A, et al. 2011. Pollination ecology in the 21st century: key questions for future research. J Poll Ecol. 3(2):8–23.
   Google Scholar
• McKey D. 1984. Interaction of the ant-plant Leonardoxa africana (Caesalpiniaceae) with its obligate inhabitants in a rainforest in Cameroon. Biotropica. 16:81–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKey D. 1989. Interactions between ants and leguminous plants. In: Stirton CH, Zarucchi JLeditors. Advances in legume biology. Monogr Syst Bot Mo Bot Gard. 29:673–718.
   Google Scholar
• Melati BG, Leal LC. 2018. Aggressive bodyguards are not always the best: preferential interaction with more aggressive ant species reduces reproductive success of plant bearing extrafloral nectaries. PLoS ONE. 13(6):e0199764. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0199764
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitter C, Farrell BD. 1991. Macroevolutionary aspects of insect/plant relationships. In: Bernays E, editor. Insect/plant interactions. Vol. 3. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; p. 35–78.
   Google Scholar
• Mitter C, Farrell BD, Wiegmann BM. 1988. The phylogenetic study of adaptive zones: has phytophagy promoted insect diversification. Am Nat. 132:107–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morawetz W. 1998. The Surumoni project: the botanical approach toward gaining an interdisciplinary understanding of the functions of the rain forest canopy. In: Barthlott W, Winiger MN, editors. Biodiversity: a challenge for development research and policy. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; p. 71–80.
   Google Scholar
• Morellato P, Oliveira P. 1991. Distribution of extrafloral nectaries in different vegetation types of Amazonian Brazil. Flora. 185:33–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muehleisen A. 2013. Incidence of extra-floral nectaries and their effect on the growth and survival of lowland tropical rain forest trees [Honors Research Thesis]. Ohio State University.
   Google Scholar
• Naganuma K, Hespenheide HA. 1988. Behavior of visitors of insect-produced analogues of extrafloral nectaries of Baccharis sarothroides Gray. Southwest Nat. 33:275–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahas L, Gonzaga MO, Del-Claro K. 2017. Wandering and web spiders feeding on the nectar from extrafloral nectaries in neotropical savanna. J Zool. 301:125–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neto FC, Pilon AC, Da Silva Bolzani V, Castro-Gamboa I. 2013. Chrysobalanaceae: secondary metabolites, ethnopharmacology and pharmacological potential. Phytochem Rev. 12(1):121–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolson SW, Nepi M, Pacini E, editors. 2007. Nectaries and nectar. Dordrecht: Springer; p. 396.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolson SW, Thornburg RW. 2007. Nectar chemistry. In: Nicolson SW, Nepi M, Pacini E, editors. Nectaries and nectar. Dordrecht: Springer; p. 215–264.
   Google Scholar
• Nieder J, Engwald S, Klawun M, Barthlott W. 2000. Spatial distribution of vascular epiphytes (including Hemiepiphytes) in a lowland Amazonian rain forest (Surumoni crane plot) of southern Venezuela. Biotropica. 32(3):385–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novotny V, Basset Y, Miller SE, Kitching R, Laidlaw M, Drozd P, Cizek L. 2004. Local species richness of leaf-chewing insects feeding on woody plants from one hectare of a lowland rainforest? Conserv Biol. 18:227–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Dowd DJ. 1979. Foliar nectar production and ant activity on a Neotropical tree. Ochroma pyramidale. Oecologia. 43:233–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ødegaard F, Frame D. 2007. Generalist flowers and phytophagous beetles in two tropical canopy trees: resources for multitudes. Taxon. 56(3):696–706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira PS, Leitao-Filho HF. 1987. Extrafloral nectaries: their taxonomic distribution and abundance in the woody flora of cerrado vegetation in southeast Brazil. Biotropica. 19:140–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacini E, Nepi M. 2007. Nectar production and presentation. In: Nicolson SW, Nepi M, Pacini E, editors. Nectaries and nectar. Dordrecht: Springer; p. 167–214.
   Google Scholar
• Peeters PJ. 2002. Correlations between leaf structural traits and the densities of herbivorous insect guilds. Biol J Linn Soc. 77:43–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pemberton RW. 1992. Fossil extrafloral nectaries, evidence for the ant–guard antiherbivore defense in an Oligocene Populus. Am J Bot. 79:1242–1246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pemberton RW, Vandenberg NJ. 1993. Extrafloral nectar feeding by ladybird beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Proc Entomol Soc Wash. 95(2):139–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petanidou T. 2005. Sugars in Mediterranean floral nectars: an ecological and evolutionary approach. J Chem Ecol. 31:1065–1088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petanidou T, van Laere A, Ellis WN, Smets E. 2006. What shapes amino acid and sugar composition in Mediterranean floral nectars? Oikos. 115:155–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prance GT. 1979. Notes on the vegetation of Amazonia III. The terminology of Amazonian forest types subject to inundation. Brittonia. 31(1):26–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prance GT. 1989. Chrysobalanaceae. Flora neotropica. Monographs. 9S:1–267.
   Google Scholar
• Prance GT. 2004. Chrysobalanaceae. In: Smith N, Mori SA, Henderson A, Stevenson DW, Heald SV, editors. Flowering plants of the neotropics. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press; p. 100–102.
   Google Scholar
• Pulice CE, Packer AA. 2008. Simulated herbivory induces extrafloral nectary production in Prunus avium. Funct Ecol. 22:801–807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putman WL. 1963. Nectar of peach leaf glands as insect food. Can Entomol. 95:108–109.
   Google Scholar
• Quintero C, Barton KE, Boege K. 2013. The ontogeny of plant indirect defenses. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst. 15:245–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raguso RA. 2004. Why are some floral nectars scented. Ecology. 85(6):1486–1494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raine NE, Willmer P, Stone GN. 2002. Spatial structuring and floral avoidance behavior prevent ant-pollinator conflict in a Mexican ant-acacia. Ecology. 83:3086–3096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauscher MD, Fowler NL. 1979. Intersexual aggression and nectar defense in Chauliognathus distinguendus (Coleoptera: Cantharidae). Biotropica. 11:88–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read J, Sanson GD. 2003. Characterizing sclerophylly: the mechanical properties of a diverse range of leaf types. New Phytol. 160:81–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricci C, Ponti L, Pires A. 2005. Migratory flight and prediapause feeding of Coccinella septempunctata (Coleoptera) adults in agricultural and mountain ecosystems of Central Italy. Eur J Entomol. 102:531–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricks BL, Vinson SB. 1970. Feeding acceptibility of certain insects and various water soluble compounds to two varieties of the imported fire ant. J Econ Entomol. 63:145–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rico Acre MDL, Gale SL, Maxted N. 2008. A taxonomic study of Albizia (Leguminosae: Mimosoideae: Ingeae) in Mexico and Central America. An Jardín Bot Madrid. 65(2):255–305.
   Google Scholar
• Rico-Gray V, Oliveira P. 2007. The ecology and evolution of ant–plant interactions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; p. 320.
   Google Scholar
• Röse USR, Lewis J, Tumlinson JH. 2006. Extrafloral nectar from cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) as a food source for parasitic wasps. Func Ecol. 20:67–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roubik DW, Buchmann SL. 1984. Nectar selection by Melipona and Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) and the ecology of nectar intake by bee colonies in a tropical forest. Oecologia. 61:1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roubik DW, Yanega D, Aluja M, Buchmann SL, Inouye DW. 1995. On optimal nectar foraging by some tropical bees (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Apidologie. 26:197–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudgers JA. 2002. Evolutionary ecology of ant–wild cotton associations [dissertation]. Davis: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Rudgers JA, Gardener MC. 2004. Extrafloral nectar as a resource mediating multispecies interactions. Ecology. 85(6):1495–1502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudgers JA, Savage AM, Rúa MA. 2010. Geographic variation in a facultative mutualism: consequences for local arthropod composition and diversity. Oecologia. 163(4):985–996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruffner GA, Clark WD. 1986. Extrafloral nectar of Ferocactus acanthodes (Cactaceae): composition and its importance to ants. Am J Bot. 73:185–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruhren S, Handel SN. 1999. Jumping spiders (Salticidae) enhance the seed production of a plant with extrafloral nectaries. Oecologia. 119:227–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rusterholz HP, Erhardt A. 1997. Preferences for nectar sugars in the peacock butterfly, Inachis io. Ecol Entomol. 22:220–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rusterholz HP, Erhardt A. 2000. Can nectar properties explain sex-specific flower preferences in the Adonis Blue butterfly Lysandra bellargus? Ecol Entomol. 25:81–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schemske DW. 1983. Limits to specialization and coevolution in plant–animal mutualisms. In: Nitecki MH, editor. Coevolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; p. 67–109.
   Google Scholar
• Schoereder JH, Sobrinho TG, Madureira MS, Ribas CR, Oliveira PS. 2010. The arboreal ant community visiting extrafloral nectaries in the Neotropical cerrado savanna. Terr Arthropod Rev. 3:3–27.
   Google Scholar
• Schupp EW, Feener DH. 1991. Phylogeny, lifeform and habitat dependence of ant-defended plants in a Panamanian forest. In: Huxley CR, Cutler DF, editors. Ant-plant interactions. Oxford: Oxford University Press; p. 175–197.
   Google Scholar
• Seagraves MP, Kajita Y, Weber DC, Obrycki JJ, Lundgren JG. 2011. Sugar feeding by coccinellids under field conditions: the effects of sugar sprays in soybean. BioControl. 56:305–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith LL, Lanza J, Smith GC. 1990. Amino acid concentrations in extrafloral nectar of Impatiens sultani increase after simulated herbivory. Ecology. 71:107–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sothers CA, Prance GT, Chase MW. 2016. Towards a monophyletic Licania: a new generic classification of the polyphyletic Neotropical genus Licania. Kew Bull. 71:58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southwood TRE. 1973. The insect-plant relationship-an evolutionary perspective. In: van Emden HF, editor. Insect-plant relationships. London. Symp R Entomol Soc. vol. 6:3–30.
   Google Scholar
• Staab M, Methorst J, Peters J, Blüthgen N, Klein A-M. 2017. Tree diversity and nectar composition affect arthropod visitors on extrafloral nectaries in a diversity experiment. J Plant Ecol. 10(1):201–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanton ML. 2003. Interacting guilds: moving beyond the pairwise perspective on mutualisms. Am Nat. 162:10–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapel JO, Cortesero AM, DeMoraes CM, Tumlinson JH, Lewis WJ. 1997. Extrafloral nectar honeydew, and sucrose effects on searching behavior and efficiency of Microplitis croceipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in cotton. Environ Entomol. 26:617–623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steidle JLM, van Loon JJA. 2003. Dietary specialization and infochemical use in carnivorous arthropods: testing a concept. Entomol Exp Appl. 108:133–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens PF. 2001 onwards. Angiosperm phylogeny website. Version 14. July 2017; [accessed 2018 Dec 27]. http://www.mobot.org/MOBOT/Research/APweb/.
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson AG. 1982. The role of the extrafloral nectaries of Catalpa speciosa in limiting herbivory and increasing fruit production. Ecology. 63:663–669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens JA. 1990. Response of Campsis radicans (Bignoniaceae) to simulated herbivory and ant visitation [M.S. thesis]. St. Louis: University of Missouri.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart AB, Dudash MR. 2018. Foraging strategies of generalist and specialist old world nectar bats in response to temporally variable floral resources. Biotropica. 50(1):98–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strong DR, Lawton JH, Southwood R. 1984. Insects on plants: community patterns und mechanisms. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; p. 313.
   Google Scholar
• Sudd JH, Sudd ME. 1985. Seasonal changes in the response of wood-ants (Formica lugubris) to sucrose baits. Ecol Entomol. 10:89–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tautz J, Markl H. 1978. Caterpillars detect flying wasps by hairs sensitive to airborne vibration. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 4:101–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tautz J, Rostas M. 2008. Honeybee buzz attenuates plant damage by caterpillars. Curr Biol. 18:1125–1126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres-Hernandez L, Rico-Gray V, Castillo-Guevara C, Vergara JA. 2000. Effect of nectar-foraging and wasps on the reproductive fitness of Turnera ulmifolia (Turnerceae) in a coastal sand dune in Mexico. Acta Zool Mex. 81:13–21.
   Google Scholar
• Trautgott M. 2003. The prey spectrum of larval and adult Cantharis species in arable land: an electrophoretic approach. Pedobiologia. 47(2):161–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tropicos.org. 2019. Missouri botanical garden. [accessed 2019 Jul 22]. www.tropicos.org.
   Google Scholar
• Turner IM. 1994. Sclerophylly: primarily protective. Func Ecol. 8:669–675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vazquez DP, Morris WF, Jordano P. 2005. Interaction frequency as a surrogate for the total effect of animal mutualists on plants. Ecol Lett. 8:1088–1094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidal MC, Sendoya SF, Oliveira PS. 2016. Mutualism exploitation: predatory drosophilid larvae sugar-trap ants and jeopardize facultative ant-plant mutualism. Ecology. 97(7):1650–1657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wäckers FL, Bonifay C. 2004. How to be sweet? Extrafloral nectar allocation by Gossypium hirsutum fits optimal defense theory predictions. Ecology. 85(6):1512–1518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wäckers FL, Romeis J, van Rijn P. 2007. Nectar and pollen feeding by insect herbivores and implications for multitrophic interactions. Ann Rev Ent. 52:301–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wäckers FL, Wunderlin R. 1999. Induction of cotton extrafloral nectar production in response to herbivory does not require a herbivore-specific elicitor. Entomol Exp Appl. 91:149–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wäckers FL, Zuber D, Wunderlin R, Keller F. 2001. The effect of herbivory on temporal and spatial dynamics of foliar nectar production in cotton and castor. Ann Bot. 87:365–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wada A, Isobe Y, Yamaguchi S, Yamaoka R, Ozaki M. 2001. Taste-enhancing effects of glycine on the sweetness of glucose: a gustatory aspect of symbiosis between the ant, Camponotus japonicus, and the larvae of the lycaenid butterfly, Niphanda fusca. Chem Senses. 26:983–992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner D, Kay A. 2002. Do extrafloral nectaries distract ants from visiting flowers? An experimental test of an overlooked hypothesis. Evol Ecol Res. 4:293–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber DC, Saska P, Chaboo CS. 2008. Carabid Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) as Parasitoids. In: Capinera J, editor. Encyclopedia of entomology. 2nd ed. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academuic Publishers; p. 35–36.
   Google Scholar
• Weber MG, Keeler KH. 2013. The phylogenetic distribution of extrafloral nectaries in plants. Ann Bot. 111:1251–1261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber MG, Porturas LD, Keeler KH. 2015. World list of plants with extrafloral nectaries. [accessed 2019 Jul 15]. www.extrafloralnectaries.org.
   Google Scholar
• Wesenberg J. 2004. Blühphänologie im Kronenraum eines tropischen Tieflandregenwaldes am Oberen Orinoco, Amazonas, Venezuela [Flower phenology in the canopy of a tropical lowland rainforest at the upper Orinoco, Amazonas, Venezuela] [dissertation]. Fakultät für Biowissenschaften, Pharmazie und Psychologie, Universität Leipzig. German.
   Google Scholar
• Wickers S. 1997. Study of nectariferous secretion in a pioneer plant, Inga thibaudiana, in relation with ants. Acta Bot Gallica. 144:315–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilf P, Labandeira CC, Kress WJ, Staines CL, Windsor DM, Allen AL, Johnson KR. 2000. Timing the radiations of leaf beetles: hispines on gingers from latest Cretaceous to recent. Science. 289:291–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams G, Adam P. 1994. A review of rainforest pollination and plant-pollinator interactions with particular reference to Australian subtropical rainforests. Aust Zool. 29(34):177–212.
   Google Scholar
• Winkler H, Listabarth C. 2003. Surumoni project, Venezuela. In: Basset Y, Horlyck V, Wright SJ, editors. Studying forest canopies from above: the international canopy crane network. Panama: Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute and UNEP; p. 126–136.
   Google Scholar
• Wint GR. 1983. Leaf damage in tropical rain forest canopies. In: Sutton SL, Whitmore TC, Chadwick AC, editors. Tropical rain forest: ecology and management. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications; p. 229–240.
   Google Scholar
• Wright SJ, Carrasco C, Calderón O, Paton S. 1999. The El Niño Southern Oscillation, variable fruit production and famine in a tropical forest. Ecology. 80:1632–1647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zachariades C, Midgley JJ. 1999. Extrafloral nectaries of South African Proteaceae attract insects but do not reduce herbivory. African Entomol. 7:67–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang S-Q, Che L-H, Li Y, Liang D, Pang H, Ślipiński A, Zhang P. 2018. Evolutionary history of Coleoptera revealed by extensive sampling of genes and species. Nature. 9(205):1–11. doi:10.1038/s41467-017-02644-4
   Google Scholar
• Zimmermann J. 1932. Über die extrafloralen Nektarien der Angiospermen [About the extrafloral nectaries of angiosperms]. Bot Zentralblatt Beih. 49:99–196. German.
   Google Scholar