Elucidating the diel and seasonal calling behaviour of Elachistocleis matogrosso (Anura: Microhylidae)

References

• Akmentins MS, Pereyra LC, Sanabria EA, Vaira M. 2015. Patterns of daily and seasonal calling activity of a direct-developing frog of the subtropical Andean forests of Argentina. Bioacoustics. 24(2):89‒99. doi:10.1080/09524622.2014.965217.
   Google Scholar
• Arzabe C. 1999. Reproductive activity patterns of anurans in two different altitudinal sites within the Brazilian Caatinga. Rev Bras Zoologia. 16(3):851‒864. doi:10.1590/S0101-81751999000300022.
   Google Scholar
• Bridges AS, Dorcas ME, Montgomery WL. 2000. Temporal variation in anuran calling behavior: implications for surveys and monitoring programs. Copeia. 2000(2):587‒592. doi:10.1643/0045-8511(2000)000[0587:TVIACB]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouard JP, Manders R, Smith P. 2015. Elachistocleis matogrosso Caramaschi 2010 (Amphibia: Anura: Microhylidae) first records for Paraguay. Cuadernos Herpetología. 29(1):97‒98.
   Google Scholar
• Browning E, Gibb R, Glover-Kapfer P, Jones KE. 2017. Passive acoustic monitoring in ecology and conservation. World Wildlife Fund Conservation Technology Series. 1(2):1–75, Technical report.
   Google Scholar
• Caramaschi U. 2010. Notes on the taxonomic status of Elachistocleis ovalis (Schneider, 1799) and description of five new species of Elachistocleis Parker, 1927 (Amphibia, Anura, Microhylidae). Bol Mus Nacional. 527:1‒30.
   Google Scholar
• Carrillo JFC. 2017. Predation of Thamnodynastes chaquensis (Serpentes, Colubridae) upon Elachistocleis matogrosso (Anura, Microhylidae) in the Brazilian Pantanal. Herpetol Notes. 10:355‒357.
   Google Scholar
• De Oliveira AG, Ventura TM, Ganchev TD, de Figueiredo JM, Jahn O, Marques MI, Schuchmann KL. 2015. Bird acoustic activity detection based on morphological filtering of the spectrogram. Appl Acoust. 98:34‒42. doi:10.1016/j.apacoust.2015.04.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorado-Rodrigues TF, Pansonato A, Strüssmann C. 2018. Anfíbios e répteis da bacia do rio Cuiabá. In: Figueiredo DM, Dores EFGC, Lima ZM (orgs), editors. Bacia do rio Cuiabá: uma abordagem socio-ambiental. 1st ed. Cuiabá: EdUFMT; p. 461‒496.
   Google Scholar
• Forest LE. 2007. Digital recorders increase detection of Eleutherodactylus frogs. Herpetol Rev. 38(1):59‒63.
   Google Scholar
• Frost DR. 2019. Amphibian species of the world: an online reference. Version 6.0. Electronic Database. New York (USA): American Museum of Natural History. [Accessed 2019 Mar 2]. http://research. amnh.org/vz/herpetol ogy/amphibia.
   Google Scholar
• Hilje B, Aide TM. 2012. Calling activity of the common tink frog (Diasporus diastema) (Eleutherodactylidae) in secondary forests of the Caribbean of Costa Rica. Trop Conserv Sci. 5(1):25‒37. doi:10.1177/194008291200500104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hödl W. 1977. Call differences and calling site segregation in anuran species from Central Amazonian floating meadows. Oecologia. 28(4):351‒363. doi:10.1007/BF00345990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IUCN Amphibian Specialist Group. 2013. Elachistocleis matogrosso. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2013: e.T18435497A19816588. [Accessed 2019 Mar 30].
   Google Scholar
• Junk WJ, Nunes da Cunha C, Wantzen KM, Petermann P, Strüssmann C, Marques MI, Adis J. 2006. Biodiversity and its conservation in the Pantanal of Mato Grosso, Brazil. Aquat Sci. 68:278‒309. doi:10.1007/s00027-006-0851-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemckert F, Mahony MJ. 2008. Core calling period of the frogs of temperate New South Wales, Australia. Herpetological Conser Biol. 3:71‒76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llusia D, Márquez R, Beltrán JF, Benítez M, do Amaral JP. 2013. Calling behaviour under climate change: geographical and seasonal variation of calling temperatures in ectotherms. Glob Chang Biol. 19(9):2655‒2674. doi:10.1111/gcb.2013.19.issue-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marinho P, De TC, Bang DL, Teixeira BFDV, Azarak PA, Campos CEC, Giaretta AA. 2018. Advertisement calls, intraspecific variation and species diagnosis of six Brazilian species of Elachistocleis (Anura: Microhylidae: Gastrophryninae). Zootaxa. 4521(3):357‒375. doi:10.11646/zootaxa.4521.3.3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martori R, Aun L, Birri A, Giménez CR, Heredia E. 2005. Reproducción comparada de tres especies de Anuros sintópicos de una localidad del sudeste de Córdoba. Cuaderno Herpetológico. 18:43‒59.
   Google Scholar
• Moreira G, Barreto L. 1997. Seasonal variation in nocturnal calling activity of a savanna anuran community in central Brazil. Amphibia-Reptilia. 18(1):49‒57. doi:10.1163/156853897X00305.
   Google Scholar
• Nunes-de-Almeida CHL, Toledo LF. 2012. A new species of Elachistocleis Parker (Anura, Microhylidae) from the State of Acre, Northern Brazil. Zootaxa. 3424:4‒50. doi:10.11646/zootaxa.3424.1.
   Google Scholar
• Ospina OE, Villanueva-Rivera LJ, Corrada-Bravo CJ, Aide TM. 2013. Variable response of anuran calling activity to daily precipitation and temperature: implications for climate change. Ecosphere. 4(4):1–12. doi:10.1890/ES12-00258.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pansonato A, Mott T, Strüssmann C. 2011. Anuran amphibians’ diversity in a northwestern area of the Brazilian Pantanal. Biota Neotropica. 11(4):77‒86. doi:10.1590/S1676-06032011000400008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pansonato A, Mudrek JR, Nunes CA, Strüssmann C. 2018. Advertisement calls of topotypes of Elachistocleis matogrosso (Anura: Microhylidae). Salamandra. 54:92‒96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pechmann JH, Semlitsch RD. 1986. Diel activity patterns in the breeding migrations of winter-breeding anurans. Can J Zool. 64(5):1116‒1120. doi:10.1139/z86-167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Granados C, Schuchmann KL, Ramoni-Perazzi P, Marques MI. 2019. Calling behaviour of Elachistocleis matogrosso (Anura, Microhylidae) is associated with habitat temperature and rainfall. Bioacoustics. 1–14. doi:10.1080/09524622.2019.1658642.
   Google Scholar
• Pijanowski BC, Farina A, Gage SH, Dumyahn SL, Krause BL. 2011. What is soundscape ecology? An introduction and overview of an emerging new science. Landsc Ecol. 26:1213–1232. doi:10.1007/s10980-011-9600-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prado CA, Uetanabaro M, Haddad CFB. 2005. Breeding activity patterns, reproductive modes, and habitat use by anurans (Amphibia) in a seasonal environment in the Pantanal, Brazil. Amphibia-Reptilia. 26:211‒221. doi:10.1163/1568538054253375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prado CPA. 2003. Estratégias reprodutivas em uma comunidade de anuros no Pantanal, Estado de Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil [PhD Dissertation]. Campo Grande (MS): Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso do Sul.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2016. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues DJ, Lopes FS, Uetanabaro M. 2003. Padrão reprodutivo de Elachistocleis bicolor (Anura, Microhylidae) na Serra da Bodoquena, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil. Iheringia Sér Zoologia. 93(4):365‒371. doi:10.1590/S0073-47212003000400003.
   Google Scholar
• Royle JA. 2004. Modeling abundance index data from anuran calling surveys. Conserv Biol. 18:1378–1385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos RR, Grant T. 2011. Diel pattern of migration in a poisonous toad from Brazil and the evolution of chemical defenses in diurnal amphibians. Evol Ecol. 25(2):249‒258. doi:10.1007/s10682-010-9407-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheele BC, Pasmans, F, Skerratt, LF, Berger, L, Martel, A, Beukema, W, De la Riva, I. 2019. Amphibian fungal panzootic causes catastrophic and ongoing loss of biodiversity. Science. 29(6434):1459‒1463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart SN, Chanson JS, Cox NA, Young BE, Rodrigues AS, Fischman DL, Waller RW. 2004. Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Science. 306(5702):1783‒1786. doi:10.1126/science.1103538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugai LSM, Silva TSF, Ribeiro JW Jr., Llusia D. 2019. Terrestrial passive acoustic monitoring: review and perspectives. BioScience. 69(1):15‒25. doi:10.1093/biosci/biy147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tennessen J, Parks SE, Snow RW, Langkilde TL. 2013. Impacts of acoustic competition between invasive Cuban treefrogs and native treefrogs in southern Florida. Proc Meetings Acoust. 19(1):010057.
   Google Scholar
• Thomé MTC, Brasileiro CA. 2007. Dimorfismo sexual, uso do ambiente e abundância sazonal de Elachistocleis cf. ovalis (Anura: Microhylidae) em um remanescente de Cerrado no estado de São Paulo, sudeste do Brasil. Biota Neotropica. 7(1):27‒33. doi:10.1590/S1676-06032007000100003.
   Google Scholar
• Waddle JH, Thigpen TF, Glorioso BM. 2009. Efficacy of automatic vocalization recognition software for anuran monitoring. Herpetological Conser Biol. 4(3):384‒388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells KD. 1977. The social behaviour of anuran amphibians. Anim Behav. 25:666‒693. doi:10.1016/0003-3472(77)90118-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willacy RJ, Mahony M, Newell DA. 2015. If a frog calls in the forest: bioacoustic monitoring reveals the breeding phenology of the endangered richmond range mountain frog (Philoria richmondensis). Austral Ecol. 40(6):625‒633. doi:10.1111/aec.2015.40.issue-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar