Climatic dependence in the daily and seasonal calling activity of anurans from coastal wetlands of southernmost Brazil

References

• Acevedo MA, Villanueva-Rivera LJ. 2006. Using automated digital recording systems as effective tools for the monitoring of birds and amphibians. Wildl Soc Bull. 34:211–214. doi:10.2193/0091-7648(2006)34[211:UADRSA]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akmentins MS, Pereyra LC, Sanabria EA, Vaira M. 2014. Patterns of daily and seasonal calling activity of a direct-developing frog of the subtropical Andean forests of Argentina. Bioacoustics. 24:89–99. doi:10.1080/09524622.2014.965217.
   Google Scholar
• Almeida-Gomes M, Van Sluys M, Rocha CFD. 2007a. Calling activity of Crossodactylus gaudichaudii (Anura: Hylodidae) in an Atlantic Rainforest area at Ilha Grande, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Belgian J Zool. 137:203–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeida-Gomes M, Van Sluys M, Rocha DCF. 2007b. Ecological observations on the leaf-litter frog Adenomera marmorata in an Atlantic rainforest area of southeastern Brazil. Herpetol J. 17:81–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvares CA, Stape JL, Sentelhas PC, De Moraes Gonçalves JL, Sparovek G. 2013. Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorol Zeitschrift. 22:711–728. doi:10.1127/0941-2948/2013/0507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardier C, Canavero A, Maneyro R. 2014. Temporal and spatial activity patterns of three species in the Leptodactylus fuscus Group (Amphibia, Leptodactylidae). South Am J Herpetol. 9:106–113. doi:10.2994/SAJH-D-13-00036.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batschelet E. 1981. Circular statistics in biology. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bernarde PS, Machado RA. 2001. Riqueza de espécies, ambientes de reproduçáo e temporada da vocalizaçao da anurofauna em Três Barras do Paraná, Brasil (Amphibia: Anura). Cuad Herpetol. 14:93–104.
   Google Scholar
• Blanchet FG, Legendre P, Borcard D. 2008. Forward selection of explanatory variables. Ecology. 89:2623–2632.
   Google Scholar
• Blumstein DT, Mennill DJ, Clemins P, Girod L, Yao K, Patricelli G, Deppe JL, Krakauer AH, Clark C, Cortopassi KA, et al. 2011. Acoustic monitoring in terrestrial environments using microphone arrays: applications, technological considerations and prospectus. J Appl Ecol. 48:758–767. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.01993.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boquimpani-Freitas L, Rocha CFD, Van Sluys M. 2002. Ecology of the Horned Leaf-Frog, Proceratophrys appendiculata (Leptodactylidae), in an Insular Atlantic rain-forest area of Southeastern Brazil. J Herpetol. 36:318–322. doi:10.1670/0022-1511(2002)036[0318:EOTHLF]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Both C, Kaefer IL, Santos TG, Cechin STZ. 2008. An austral anuran assemblage in the Neotropics: seasonal occurrence correlated with photoperiod. J Nat Hist. 42:205–222. doi:10.1080/00222930701847923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulenger GA. 1883. Notes on little-known species of frogs. Ann Mag Nat Hist Ser 5. 11:16–19. doi:10.1080/00222938309459087.
   Google Scholar
• Bridges AS, Dorcas ME. 2000. Temporal variation in Anuran calling behavior: implications for surveys and monitoring programs P. Copeia. 2000:587–592. doi:10.1643/0045-8511(2000)000[0587:TVIACB]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canavero A, Arim M, Brazeiro A. 2009. Geographic variations of seasonality and coexistence in communities: the role of diversity and climate. Austral Ecol. 34:741–750. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2009.01980.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conte CE, Rossa-Feres DC. 2006. Diversidade e ocorrência temporal da anurofauna (Amphibia, Anura) em São José dos Pinhais, Paraná, Brasil Carlos. Rev Bras Zool. 23:162–175. doi:10.1590/S0101-81752006000100008.
   Google Scholar
• Cope ED. 1861. Descriptions of new species of the reptilian genera Hyperolius, Liuperus and Tropidodipsas. Proc Acad Nat Sci Philadelphia. 12:517–518.
   Google Scholar
• Crump ML. 1974. Reproductive Strategies in a Tropical Anuran Cominunity. Miscollaneous Publ Museum Nat Hist Kansas [ Internet]. 98:1–68. https://multimedia20stg.blob.core.windows.net/publicaciones/Crump_1974.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly MA, Guyer C. 1994. Patterns of reproduction and habitat use in an Assemblage of Neotropical Hylid Frogs. Oecologia. 98:291–302. doi:10.1007/BF00324217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duarte H, Tejedo M, Katzenberger M, Marangoni F, Baldo D, Beltrán JF, Martí DA, Richter-Boix A, Gonzalez-Voyer A. 2012. Can amphibians take the heat? Vulnerability to climate warming in subtropical and temperate larval amphibian communities. Glob Chang Biol. 18:412–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duméril AMC, Bibron G. 1841. Erpétologie Genérale ou Histoire Naturelle Complète des Reptiles. Vol. 8. Paris: Librarie Enclyclopedique de Roret.
   Google Scholar
• Gotthard K. 2001. Growth strategies of ectothermic animals in temperate environments. In: Atkinson D, Thorndyke M, editors. Environment and animal development. Vol. 32. Oxford: BIOS Scientific Publishers; p. 287–304.
   Google Scholar
• Günther ACLG. 1858. Catalogue of Colubrine snakes of the British Museum. London: Trustees.
   Google Scholar
• Haddad CFB, Prado CPA. 2005. Reproductive modes in frogs and their unexpected diversity in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. Bioscience. 55:207–217. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0207:RMIFAT]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatano FH, Rocha CFD, Van Sluys M. 2002. Environmental factors affecting calling activity of a Tropical Diurnal Frog (Hylodes phyllodes: Leptodactylidae). J Herpetol. 36:314–318. doi:10.1670/0022-1511(2002)036[0314:EFACAO]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensel R. 1867. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Wirbelthiere Südbrasilens. Arch für Naturgeschichte Berlin. 33:162.
   Google Scholar
• Heyer WR. 1973. Ecological interactions of Frog Larvae at a Seasonal Tropical Location in Thailand. J Herpetol. 7:337–361. doi:10.2307/1562868.
   Google Scholar
• Heyer WR, Donnelly MA, McDiarmid RW, Hayek LC, Foster MS. 1994. Measuring and monitoring biological diversity: standard methods for amphibians. Wachington: Smithsonian Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heyer WR, McDiarmid RW, Weigmann DL. 1975. Tadpoles, predation and pond habitats in the tropics. Biotropica. 7:100–111. doi:10.2307/2989753.
   Google Scholar
• Hillman SS, Withers PC, Drewes RC, Hillyard SD. 2009. Ecological and environmental physiology of amphibians. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huckembeck S, Claudino M, Correa F, Bastos R, Loebmann D, Tozetti A, Garcia A. 2012. The activity patterns and microhabitat use of Pseudis minuta Günther, 1858 (Anura, Hylidae) in the Lagoa do Peixe National Park, a biosphere reserve of the brazilian subtropics. Brazilian J Biol. 72:331–336. doi:10.1590/S1519-69842012000200014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janzen DH. 1967. Why mountain passes are higher in the tropics. Am Nat. 101:233–249. doi:10.1086/282487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez de la Espada M. 1875. Vertebrados del Viaje al Pacífico Verificado de 1862 a 1865 por una Comisión de Naturalistas Enviada por el Gobierno Español. Batracios. Madrid: A. Miguel Ginesta.
   Google Scholar
• Katzenberger M, Tejedo M, Duarte H, Marangoni F, Beltrán JF. 2012. Tolerância e sensibilidade térmica em anfíbios. Rev Da Biol. 8:25–32.
   Google Scholar
• Katzenberger MJ. 2009. Thermal tolerance and sensitivity of amphibian Larvae from Paleartic and Neotropical communities. [place unknown]: Universidade de Lisboa.
   Google Scholar
• Kovach Computing Services. 2004. Oriana Version 4 [ Internet]. [accessed 2020 March 15]. https://www.kovcomp.co.uk/oriana/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Lillywhite HB. 1974. How frogs regulate their body temperature. Environ Southwest. 465:3–6.
   Google Scholar
• Lutz A. 1925. Batraciens du Brésil. Comptes Rendus Mémoires Hebd des Séances la Société Biol des ses Fil. 2:211–214.
   Google Scholar
• Madalozzo B, Santos TG, Santos MB, Both C, Cechin S. 2017. Biodiversity assessment: selecting sampling techniques to access anuran diversity in grassland ecosystems. Wildl Res. 44:78–91. doi:10.1071/WR16086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maitland PS. 2013. Biology of fresh waters. London: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Maluf JRT. 2000. Nova classificação climática do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul. Rev Bras Agrometeorol. 8:141–150.
   Google Scholar
• Maneyro R, Carreira S. 2012. Guía de anfibios del Uruguay. 1st ed., de la Fuga. Montevideo: Ediciones de la Fuga.
   Google Scholar
• Maneyro R, Núñez D, Borteiro C, Tedros M, Kolenc F. 2008. Advertisement call and female sexual cycle in Uruguayan populations of Physalaemus henselii (Anura, Leiuperidae). Iheringia - Ser Zool. 98:210–214. doi:10.1590/S0073-47212008000200007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzoni D, Dannenberg R. 2000. Audacity [Software] [ Internet]. [accessed 2015 August 20]. https://www.audacityteam.org/.
   Google Scholar
• McCullagh P, Nelder JA. 1983. Generalized linear models. New York: Chapman and Hall London.
   Google Scholar
• Moreira LFB, Machado IF, Garcia TV, Maltchik L. 2010. Factors influencing anuran distribution in coastal dune wetlands in southern Brazil. J Nat Hist. 44:1493–1507. doi:10.1080/00222931003632690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navas CA, Bevier CR. 2008. Thermal dependency of calling performance in the Eurythermic Frog Colostethus subpunctatus. Herpetologica. 57:384–395.
   Google Scholar
• Nelder JA, Wedderburn RWM. 1972. Generalized linear models. J R Stat Soc. 135:370–384.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira MCLM, Santos MB, Loebmann D, Hartman A, Tozetti AM. 2013. Diversity and associations between coastal habitats and anurans in southernmost Brazil. An Acad Bras Cienc. 85:575–583. doi:10.1590/S0001-37652013005000036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oseen KL, Wassersug RJ. 2002. Environmental factors influencing calling in Sympatric Anurans. Oecologia. 133:616–625. doi:10.1007/s00442-002-1067-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters WCH. 1872. Über die von Spix in Brasilien gesammelten Batrachier des Königl. Naturalienkabinet zu München Monatsberichte der Königlichen Preuss Akad des Wissenschaften zu Berlin:196–227.
   Google Scholar
• Rico M, Rocha CFD, Borges VNT Jr., Van Sluys M. 2004. Breeding ecology of Scinax trapicheiroi (Anura, Hylidae) at a creek of Ilha Grande, southeastern Brazil. Amphibia-Reptilia. 25:277–286. doi:10.1163/1568538041975143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salthe SN, Mecham JS. 1974. Reproductive and courtship patterns. In: Lofts B, editor. Physiology of the amphibia. New York: Academic Press; p. 310–521.
   Google Scholar
• Santos TG, Rossa-Feres DC. 2007. Similarities in calling site and advertisement call among Anuran amphibians in Southeastern Brazil. South Am J Herpetol. 2:17–30. doi:10.2994/1808-9798(2007)2[17:SICSAA]2.0.CO;2.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt KP. 1944. New frogs from Misiones and Uruguay. F Museum Nat Hist Publ Zool Ser. 29:153–160.
   Google Scholar
• Steelman CK, Dorcas ME. 2010. Anuran calling survey optimization: developing and testing predictive models of Anuran calling activity. J Herpetol. 44:61–68. doi:10.1670/08-329.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffen GA. 1815. De Ranis nonnullis Observationes Anatomicae quas Consensu Gratiosae Facultatis Medicae. Berlin: Joannis Friderici Starckii.
   Google Scholar
• Tárano S, Herrera EA. 2003. Female preferences for call traits and male mating success in the Neotropical Frog Physalaemus enesefae. Ethology. 109:121–134. doi:10.1046/j.1439-0310.2003.00848.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tozetti AM, Pontes GMF, Borges-Martins M, Oliveira RB. 2010. Temperature preferences of Xenodon dorbignyi: field and experimental observations. Herpetol J. 20:277–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Gelder JJ, Hoedemaekers HCM. 1971. Sound activity and migration during the breeding period of Rana temporaria L., R. arvalis Nilsson, Pelobates fuscus Laur. and Rana esculenta L. J Anim Ecol. 40:559–568. doi:10.2307/3437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Sluys M, Marra RV, Boquimpani-Freitas L, Rocha CFD. 2012. Environmental Factors affecting calling behavior of sympatric Frog Species at an Atlantic Rain Forest Area, Southeastern Brazil. J Herpetol. 46:41–46. doi:10.1670/10-178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitt LJ, Caldwell JP. 2014. Communication and social behavior. In: Vitt LJ, Caldwell JP, editors. Herpetology: an introductory biology of amphibians and reptiles. London: Academic Press; p. 255–318.
   Google Scholar
• Weir LA, Royle JA, Nanjappa P, Jung RE. 2005. Modeling Anuran detection and site occupancy on North American Amphibian Monitoring Program (NAAMP) routes in Maryland. J Herpetol. 39:627–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells KW, Schwartz JJ. 2007. The behavioral ecology of Anuran communication. In: Narins PM, Feng AS, Fay RR, Popper AN, editors. Hearing and sound communication in amphibians. New York: Springer; p. 44–86.
   Google Scholar
• Willacy RJ, Mahony M, Newell DA. 2015. If a frog calls in the forest: bioacoustic monitoring reveals the breeding phenology of the endangered Richmond Range mountain frog (Philoria richmondensis). Austral Ecol. 40:625–633. doi:10.1111/aec.12228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wollmann CA. 2016. Atlas Climático Do Taim: Contribuição Ao Estudo Do Clima Em Unidades De Conservação. Bol Geográfico do Rio Gd do Sul. 27:30–50.
   Google Scholar
• Ximenez SS, Oliveira M, Santos MB, Tozetti AM. 2014. The influence of habitat configuration on Anuran species composition in subtemperate wetlands of Southernmost Brazil. South Am J Herpetol. 9:235–243. doi:10.2994/SAJH-D-14-00017.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ximenez SS, Tozetti AM. 2015. Seasonality in anuran activity and calling season in a Brazilian subtemperate wetland. Zool Stud. 54:47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zar JH. 1999. Biostatistical Analysis. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar