Sarcosaprophagous flesh flies (Diptera: Sarcophagidae) are less diverse in Amazon Forest than mangroves in Northeast Brazil: preliminary insights about environmental heterogeneity

References

• Alvares CA, Stape JL, Sentelhas PC, Gonçalves JLM, Sparovek G. 2013. Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorol Z. 22(6):711–728. doi:10.1127/0941-2948/2013/0507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson MJ. 2001. A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol. 26:32–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asner GP, Knapp DE, Balaji A, Páez-Acosta G. 2009. Automated mapping of tropical deforestation and forest degradation: cLASlite. J Appl Remote Sens. 3(1):1–24. doi:10.1117/1.3223675.
   Google Scholar
• Atauri JA, Lucio JV. 2001. The role of landscape structure in species richness distribution of birds, amphibians, reptiles and lepidopterans in Mediterranean landscapes. Landscape Ecol. 16(2):147–159. doi:10.1023/A:1011115921050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbosa TM, Carmo RFR, Silva LP, Sales RG, Vasconcelos SD. 2017. Diversity of sarcosaprophagous Calyptratae (Diptera) on sandy beaches exposed to increasing levels of urbanization in Brazil. Environ Entomol. 46(3):463–469. doi:10.1093/ee/nvx059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbosa TM, Mello-Patiu CA, Vasconcelos SD. 2015. Flesh fly (Diptera: Sarcophagidae) survey on coastal environments in northeastern Brazil: new records and notes on the expanded geographical distribution. Entomotropica. 30:112–117.
   Google Scholar
• Bazzaz FA. 1975. Plant species diversity in old-field successional ecosystems in southern Illinois. Ecology. 56(2):485–488. doi:10.2307/1934981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bestelmeyer BT, Wiens JA. 2001. Ant biodiversity in semiarid landscape mosaics: the consequences of grazing vs. natural heterogeneity. Ecol Appl 11(4):1123–1140. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[1123:ABISLM]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brose U. 2003. Bottom-up control of carabid beetle communities in early successional wetlands mediated: by vegetation structure or plant diversity? Oecologia. 135(3):407–413. doi:10.1007/s00442-003-1222-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardoso P, Rigal F, Carvalho JC 2016. BAT: biodiversity assessment tools. R package version 1.5.6. [ cited 2017 Sep 15]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=BAT.
   Google Scholar
• Cardoso P, Rigal F, Carvalho JC, Fortelius M, Borges PAV, Podani J, Schmera D. 2014. Partitioning taxon, phylogenetic and functional beta diversity into replacement and richness difference componentes. J Biogeogr. 41(4):749–761. doi:10.1111/jbi.12239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmo RFR, Vasconcelos SD. 2016. Assemblage of necrophagous Diptera in Atlantic insular environments and response to different levels of human presence. Neotrop Entomol. 45(5):471–481. doi:10.1007/s13744-016-0394-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho CJB, Mello-Patiu CA. 2008. Key to the adults of the most common forensic species of Diptera in South America. Rev Bras Entomol. 52(3):390–406. doi:10.1590/S0085-56262008000300012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J 2012. GUniFrac: generalized UniFrac distances. Versão 1.0. [ cited 2016 Nov 13]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=GUniFrac.
   Google Scholar
• Colwell RK 2013. EstimateS: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Versão 9, [ cited 2017 Mar 21]. http://purl.oclc.org/estimates2013.
   Google Scholar
• Colwell RK, Chao A, Gotelli NJ, Lin SY, Mao CX, Chazdon RL, Longino JT. 2012. Models and estimators linking individual-based and sample-based rarefaction, extrapolation, and comparison of assemblages. J Plant Ecol. 5(1):1–21. doi:10.1093/jpe/rtr044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couri MS, Barros P, Orsini MP. 2008. Dipterofauna do Arquipélago de Fernando de Noronha (Pernambuco, Brasil). Rev Bras Entomol. 52(4):588–590. doi:10.1590/S0085-56262008000400007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Mata RA, Tidon R. 2013. The relative roles of habitat heterogeneity and disturbance in drosophilid assemblages (Diptera, Drosophilidae) in the Cerrado. Insect Conserv Divers. 6(6):663–670. doi:10.1111/icad.12020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Cáceres M, Legendre P 2009. Associations between species and groups of sites: indices and statistical inference. [ accessed 2017 Oct 25]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=indicspecies.
   Google Scholar
• de Cáceres M, Legendre P, Moretti M. 2010. Improving indicator species analysis by combining groups of sites. Oikos. 119(10):1674–1684. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18334.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Faria LS, Paseto ML, Couri MS, Mello-Patiu CA, Mendes J. 2017. Insects associated with pig carrion in two environments of the Brazilian Savanna. Neotrop Entomol. 46:13–18.
   Google Scholar
• Delettre YR. 2005. Short-range spatial patterning of terrestrial Chironomidae (Insecta: Diptera) and farmland heterogeneity. Pedobiologia. 49(1):15–27. doi:10.1016/j.pedobi.2004.06.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delettre R, Morvan N, Tréhen P, Grootaert P. 1998. Local biodiversity and multihabitat use by Empididae (Diptera). Biodivers Conserv. 7(1):9–25. doi:10.1023/A:1008851511301.
   Google Scholar
• Dias ES, Neves DP, Lopes HS. 1984. Estudos sobre a fauna de Sarcophagidae (Diptera) de Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais. I. Levantamento taxonômico e sinantrópico. Memórias Do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. 79(1):83–91. doi:10.1590/S0074-02761984000100010.
   Google Scholar
• Dias GDS, Oliveira-Costa J, Mello-Patiu CA. 2015. New records of Sarcophagidae species (Diptera) with forensic potential in Rio de Janeiro. Rev Bras Entomol. 59(3):255–256. doi:10.1016/j.rbe.2015.03.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duarte LFD. 2019. O Museu Nacional: ciência e educação numa história institucional brasileira. Horizontes Antropológicos. 25(53):359–384. doi:10.1590/s0104-71832019000100013.
   Google Scholar
• Dufek MI, Damborsky MP, Mulieri PR. 2020a. Seasonal fluctuations in Sarcophagidae (Diptera: Calyptratae) assemblages in the Humid Chaco Ecoregion, Argentina. J Med Entomol. 58(1):320–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dufek MI, Larrea DD, Damborsky MP, Mulieri PR, Byrd J. 2020b. The effect of anthropization on Sarcophagidae (Diptera: Calyptratae) community structure: an assessment on different types of habitats in the Humid Chaco ecoregion of Argentina. J Med Entomol. 57(5):1468–1479. doi:10.1093/jme/tjaa071.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dufek MI, Oscherov B, Damborsky MP, Mulieri PR. 2016. Assessment of the abundance and diversity of Calliphoridae and Sarcophagidae (Diptera) in sites with different degrees of human impact in the Iberá Wetlands (Argentina). J Med Entomol. 53(4):827–835. doi:10.1093/jme/tjw045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dufrêne M, Legendre P. 1997. Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymetrical approach. Ecol Monogr. 67:345–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira MJM. 1978. Sinantropia de dípteros muscoides de Curitiba, Paraná. I. Calliphoridae. Rev Bras Biol. 38:445–454.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen RA. 2000. Effects of habitat complexity and composition on a diverse litter microarthropod assemblage. Ecology. 81(4):1120–1132. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[1120:EOHCAC]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen MC, Potapov PV, Moore R, Hancher M, Turubanova SA, Tyukavina A, Thau D, Stehman SV, Goetz SJ, Loveland TR, et al. 2013. High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science. 342(6160):850–853. doi:10.1126/science.1244693.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill MO. 1973. Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology. 54(2):427–432. doi:10.2307/1934352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBGE, Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. 2012. Manual técnico da vegetação brasileira: sistema fitogeográfico, inventário das formações florestais e campestres, técnicas e manejo de coleções botânicas, procedimentos para mapeamentos. Rio de Janeiro (Brasil): Gráfica do Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística.
   Google Scholar
• Jost L. 2007. Partitioning diversity into independent alpha and beta components. Ecology. 88(10):2427–2439. doi:10.1890/06-1736.1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassau SA, Hochuli DF. 2004. Effects of habitat complexity on ant assemblages. Ecography. 27(2):157–164. doi:10.1111/j.0906-7590.2004.03675.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leandro MJF, D’Almeida JM. 2005. Levantamento de Calliphoridae, Fanniidae, Muscidae e Sarcophagidae em um fragmento de mata na Ilha do Governador, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Iheringia, Série Zoologia. 95(4):377–381. doi:10.1590/S0073-47212005000400006.
   Google Scholar
• Legendre P. 2014. Interpreting the replacement and richness difference components ofbeta diversity. Glob Ecol Biogeogr Lett. 23(11):1324–1334. doi:10.1111/geb.12207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennon JJ, Koleff P, Greenwood JJD, Gaston KJ. 2001. The geographical structure of British bird distributions: diversity, spatial turnover and scale. J Anim Ecol. 70(6):966–979. doi:10.1046/j.0021-8790.2001.00563.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leprieur F, Tedesco PA, Hugueny B, Beauchard O, Dürr HH, Brosse S, Oberdorff T. 2011. Partitioning global patterns of freshwater fish beta diversity reveals contrasting signatures of past climate changes. Ecol Lett. 14(4):325–334. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01589.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linhares AX. 1981. Synanthropy of Calliphoridae and Sarcophagidae (Diptera) in the city of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil. Rev Bras Entomol. 25:189–215.
   Google Scholar
• Li H, Reynolds JF. 1995. On definition and quantification of heterogeneity. Oikos. 73(2):280–284. doi:10.2307/3545921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu C, Whittaker RJ, Ma K, Malcolm JR. 2007. Unifying and distinguishing diversity ordering methods for comparing communities. Popul Ecol. 49(2):89–100. doi:10.1007/s10144-006-0026-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mantel NA. 1967. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res. 27(2):209–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maranhão. 2002. Atlas do Maranhão. 2nd. São Luís (Brasil): Governo do Estado do Maranhão, GEPLAN, LABGEO/ UEMA.
   Google Scholar
• Mariluis JC, Schnack A, Mulieri PR, Torretta JP. 2007. The Sarcophagidae of the coastline of Buenos Aires city, Argentina. J. Kans. Entomol Soc 80(3):243–251. doi:10.2317/0022-8567(2007)80[243:TSDOTC]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoy ED, Bell SS. 1991. Habitat structure: the evolution and diversification of a complex topic. In: Bell SS, McCoy ED, Mushinsky HR, editors. Habitat structure: the physical arrangement of objects in space. London: Chapman & Hall; p. 3–27.
   Google Scholar
• McGeoch MA, Van Rensburg BJ, Botes A. 2002. The verification and application of bioindicators: a case study of dung beetles in a savanna ecosystem. J Appl Ecol. 39(4):661–672. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2664.2002.00743.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mello-Patiu CA. 2020. Sarcophagidae in Catálogo Taxonômico da Fauna do Brasil. PNUD. [ cited 2020 Apr 24]. Available from: http://fauna.jbrj.gov.br/fauna/faunadobrasil/1151.
   Google Scholar
• Mello-Patiu CA, Paseto ML, Faria LS, Mendes J, Linhares AX. 2014. Sarchophagid flies (Insecta, Diptera) from pig carcasses in Minas Gerais, Brazil, with nine new records from the Cerrado, a threatened Neotropical biome. Rev Bras Entomol. 58(2):142–146. doi:10.1590/S0085-56262014000200005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mello-Patiu CA, Soares WF, Silva PK. 2009. Espécies de Sarcophagidae (Insecta: Diptera) registradas no estado do Rio de Janeiro. Arquivos do Museu Nacional do Rio de Janeiro. 67:173–188.
   Google Scholar
• Mendes J, Linhares AX. 2002. Cattle Dung Breeding Diptera in Pastures in Southeastern Brazil: diversity, Abundance and Seasonallity. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 97(1):37–41. doi:10.1590/S0074-02762002000100004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Méndez J, Mello-Patiu CA, Pape T. 2008. New flesh flies (Diptera: Sarcophagidae) from coastal mangroves of Panama with taxonomic notes and keys. J Nat Hist. 42(3–4):249–257. doi:10.1080/00222930701850216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulieri PR, Patitucci D, Schnack JA, Mariluis JC. 2011. Diversity and seasonal dynamics of an assemblage of sarcophagid Diptera in a gradient of urbanization. J Insect Sci. 11(91):91. doi:10.1673/031.011.9101.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mulieri PR, Schnack JA, Mariluis JC, Torretta JP. 2008. Flesh flies species (Diptera: Sarcophagidae) from a grassland and a woodland in a nature reserve of Buenos Aires, Argentina. Rev Biol Trop. 56(3):1287–1294. doi:10.15517/rbt.v56i3.5710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neider JA, Wedderburn RWM. 1972. Generalised linear models. J Roy Statist Soc, Ser. A. 135(3):370–384. doi:10.2307/2344614.
   Google Scholar
• Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, et al. 2017. Vegan: community Ecology Package. R package version 2.4-2. [ cited 2017 Apr 15]. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira-Costa J. 2011. Entomologia forense: quando os insetos são vestígios. 3rd ed. Campinas (SP): Millennium Editora.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira-Costa J, Lamego CMD, Couri MS, Mello-Patiu CA. 2014. Differential Diptera succession patterns onto partially burned and unburned pig carrion in southeastern Brazil. Braz J Biol. 74(4):870–876. doi:10.1590/1519-6984.06113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pape T. 1996. Catalogue of the Sarcophagidae of the World (Insecta: Diptera). Mem Entomol Int. 8:1–558.
   Google Scholar
• Pape T, Blagoderov V, Mostovski MB. 2011. Order Diptera Linnaeus, 1758, and Zhang ZQ, editor. Animal biodiversity: an outline of high-level classification and survey of taxonomic richness, Vol. 3148. Zootaxa; p. 222–229.
   Google Scholar
• Pape T, Dahlem GA. 2010. Sarcophagidae. In: Brown BV, Borkent A, Cumming JM, Wood DM, Woodley NE, Zumbado M, editors. A manual of Central American Diptera (Vol. 2). Canada: NRC Research Press; p. 1313–1335.
   Google Scholar
• Pape T, Méndez J. 2002. A new species of Sarcofahrtiopsis (Hall, 1933) from Panama (Diptera: Sarcophagidae). Anna Zool. 52:339–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pape T, Méndez J. 2004. Two new species of Sarcofahrtiopsis (Diptera: Sarcophagidae). Zootaxa. 485(1):1–7. doi:10.11646/zootaxa.485.1.1.
   Google Scholar
• Peel MC, Finlayson BL, McMahon TA. 2007. Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 4:439–473.
   Google Scholar
• Pianka ER. 1995. Evolution of body size: varanid lizards as a model system. Am Nat. 146(3):398–414. doi:10.1086/285806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulsen BO. 2002. Avian richness and abundance in temperate Danish forests: tree variables important to birds and their conservation. Biodivers Conserv. 11(9):1551–1566. doi:10.1023/A:1016839518172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2019. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna (Austria). [ cited 2019 Sep 15]. Available from: https://www.Rproject.org.
   Google Scholar
• Rebelo-Mochel F. 2011. Manguezais amazônicos: status para conservação e a sustentabilidade na zona costeira maranhense. In: Martins MB, Oliveira TG, editors. Amazônia Maranhense: diversidade e Conservação. Belém (Brasil): Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi-MPEG; p. 93–117.
   Google Scholar
• Ricotta C, Bacaro G, Marignani M, Godefroid S, Mazzoleni S. 2012. Computing diversity from dated phylogenies and taxonomic hierarchies: does it make a difference to the conclusions? Oecologia. 170(2):501–506. doi:10.1007/s00442-012-2318-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero-Alcaraz E, Avila JM. 2000. Landscape heterogeneity in relation to variation in epigaeic beetle diversity of a Mediterranean ecosystem. Implications for Conservation. Biodivers Conserv 9(7):985–1005. doi:10.1023/A:1008958720008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos JR, Mello-Patiu CA. 2018. Review of the Brazilian species of Udamopyga Hall, 1938 (Diptera: Sarcophagidae), with the description of a new species and a key to males and females. Zootaxa. 4508(1):1–27. doi:10.11646/zootaxa.4508.1.1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SEMA, Secretaria de Estado do Meio Ambiente e Recursos Naturais. 2011. Plano de ação para prevenção e controle do desmatamento e das queimadas no estado do Maranhão. Brasil: São Luís.
   Google Scholar
• Sherman RA. 2000. Wound myiasis in urban United States. Arch Intern Med. 160(13):2004–2014. doi:10.1001/archinte.160.13.2004.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sousa JRP, Carvalho-Filho FS, Esposito MC. 2015. Distribution and abundance of necrophagous flies (Diptera: Calliphoridae and Sarcophagidae) in Maranhão, Northeastern Brazil. J Insect Sci. 15:1–9. doi:10.1093/jisesa/ieu165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa JRP, Carvalho-Filho FS, Juen L, Esposito MC. 2016. Evaluating the effects of different vegetation types on necrophagous fly communities (Diptera: Calliphoridae; Sarcophagidae): implications for conservation. PLoS One. 11:1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa JRP, Esposito MC, Carvalho-Filho FS. 2011. Composition, abundance and richness of Sarcophagidae (Diptera: Oestroidea) in forests and forest gaps with different vegetation cover. Neotrop Entomol. 40(1):20–27. doi:10.1590/S1519-566X2011000100003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa JRP, Esposito MC, Carvalho-Filho FS, Juen L. 2014. The potential use of sarcosaprophagous flesh flies and blowflies for the evaluation ofthe regeneration and conservation of forest clearings: a case study in the Amazon forest. J Insect Sci. 14(1):1–5. doi:10.1093/jisesa/ieu077.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spitzer K, Jaros L, Havelka J, Leps J. 1997. Effect of small-scale disturbance on butterfly communities of an Indo-Chinese montane rainforest. Biol Conserv. 80(1):9–15. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(96)00079-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein A, Gerstner K, Kreft H. 2014. Environmental heterogeneity as a universal driver of species richness across taxa, biomes and spatial scales. Ecol Lett. 17(7):866–880. doi:10.1111/ele.12277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sukontason KL, Bunchu N, Methanitikorn R, Chaiwong T, Kuntalue B, Sukontason K. 2006. Ultrastructure of adhesive device in fly in families Calliphoridae, Muscidae and Sarcophagidae, and their implication as mechanical carriers of pathogens. Parasitol Res. 98(5):477–481. doi:10.1007/s00436-005-0100-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svenning J. 2001. On the role of microenvironmental heterogeneity in the ecology and diversification of Neotropical rain-forest palms (Arecaceae). Bot Rev. 67:1–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanabe SI, Masanori JT, Vinokurova AV. 2001. Tree shape, forest structure and diversity of drosophilid community: comparison between boreal and temperate birch forests. Ecol Res. 16(3):369–385. doi:10.1046/j.1440-1703.2001.00402.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tews J, Brose U, Grimm V, Tielbörger K, Wichmann MC, Schwager M, Jeltsch F. 2004. Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures. J Biogeogr. 31:79–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tidon R. 2006. Relationships between drosophilids (Diptera, Drosophilidae) and the environment in two contrasting tropical vegetations. Biol J Linn Soc. 87(2):233–247. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2006.00570.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tóthmérész B. 1995. Comparison of different methods for diversity ordering. J Veg Sci. 6(2):283–290. doi:10.2307/3236223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vairo KP, Mello-Patiu CA, Carvalho CJB. 2011. Pictorial identification key for species of Sarcophagidae (Diptera) of potential forensic importance in southern Brazil. Rev Bras Entomol. 55(3):333–347. doi:10.1590/S0085-56262011005000033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vairo KP, Moura MO, Mello-Patiu CA. 2015. Comparative morphology and identification key for females of nine Sarcophagidae species (Diptera) with forensic importance in Southern Brazil. Rev Bras Entomol. 59(3):177–187. doi:10.1016/j.rbe.2015.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Rensburg BJ, McGeoch MA, Chown SL, van Jaarsveld AS. 1999. Conservation of heterogeneity among dung beetles in the Maputaland Centre of Endemism, South Africa. Biol Conserv. 88(2):145–153. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(98)00109-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasconcelos SD, Barbosa M, Oliveira TPB. 2015. Diversity of forensically-important dipteran species in different environments in Northeastern Brazil, with notes on the attractiveness of animal baits. Fla Entomol. 98(2):770–775. doi:10.1653/024.098.0256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittaker RH. 1972. Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon. 21(2–3):213–251. doi:10.2307/1218190.
   Google Scholar
• Williams PH. 1996. Mapping variations in the strength and breadth of biogeographic transition zones using species turnover. Philos Trans R Soc London, Ser. B. 263:579–588.
   Google Scholar
• Williams SE, Marsh H, Winter J. 2002. Spatial scale, species diversity, and habitat structure: small mammals in Australian tropical rain forest. Ecology. 83(5):1317–1329. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1317:SSSDAH]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willmer PG. 1982. Thermoregulatory Mechanisms in Sarcophaga. Oecologia. 53:382–385. doi:10.1007/BF00389018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yepes-Gaurisas D, Sanchez-Rodriguez JD, Mello-Patiu CA, Wolff EM. 2013. Synanthropy of Sarcophagidae (Diptera) in La Pintada, Antioquia-Colombia. Rev Biol Trop. 61(3):1275–1287. doi:10.15517/rbt.v61i3.11955.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar