Breeding biology of the Ochre-breasted pipit (Anthus nattereri), with notes on its conservation in the Upper Rio Grande Grasslands, south-eastern Brazil

References

• Andors AV, Vuilleumier F. 1995. Breeding of Anthus furcatus (Aves: Motacillidae) in northern Patagonia, with a review of the breeding biology of the species. Ornitol Neotrop. 6:37–52.
   Google Scholar
• Azevedo LG. 1962. Tipos de vegetação do sul de Minas e campos da Mantiqueira (Brasil). An Acad Bras Ciên. 34:225–234.
   Google Scholar
• Azpiroz AB, Blake JG. 2009. Avian assemblages in altered and natural grasslands in the northern campos of Uruguay. Condor. 111:21–35. doi:10.1525/cond.2009.080111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azpiroz AB, Isacch JP, Dias RA, Di Giacomo A, Fontana CS, Palarea CM. 2012. Ecology and conservation of grassland birds in southeastern South America: a review. J Field Ornithol. 83:217–246. doi:10.1111/j.1557-9263.2012.00372.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baicich PJ, Harrison CJO. 1997. A guide to the nests, eggs, and nestlings of North American birds. 2nd ed. San Diego (USA): Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barkman JJ. 1988. A new method to determine some characters of vegetation structure. Vegetatio. 78:81–90. doi:10.1007/BF00045642.
   Google Scholar
• Beal‑Neves M, Chiarani E, Ferreira PMA, Fontana CS. 2020. The role of fire disturbance on habitat structure and bird communities in South Brazilian Highland Grasslands. Sci Rep. 10:19708. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-76758-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belton W. 1985. Birds of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, part 2: Formicariidae through Corvidae. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist. 180:1–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bencke GA, Dias RA, Rupp AE, Straube FC, Maurício GN. 2013. Anthus nattereri. In: Plano de Ação Nacional para a conservação dos Passeriformes ameaçados dos Campos Sulinos e Espinilho. Brasília (Brazil): Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade; p. 77–80.
   Google Scholar
• Beyer HL, Haydon DT, Morales JM, Frair JL, Hebblewhite M, Mitchell M, Matthiopoulos J. 2010. The interpretation of habitat preference metrics under use–availability designs. Philos Trans Roy Soc London Ser B. 365:2245–2254. doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BirdLife International. 2022. IUCN Red List for birds. [accessed 2022 Nov 18]. http://www.birdlife.org.
   Google Scholar
• Block WM, Brennan LA. 1993. The habitat concept in ornithology: theory and applications. Curr Ornithol. 11:35–91.
   Google Scholar
• Bond WJ, Parr CL. 2010. Beyond the forest edge: ecology, diversity and conservation of the grassy biomes. Biol Conserv. 143:2395–2404. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2009.12.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth DT, Cox SE, Berryman RD. 2006. Point sampling digital imagery with ‘SamplePoint’. Environ Monit Assess. 123:97–108. doi:10.1007/s10661-005-9164-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgmann KL, Conway CJ. 2015. The nest-concealment hypothesis: new insights from a comparative analysis. Wilson J Ornithol. 127:646–660. doi:10.1676/14-162.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cagney J, Cox SE, Booth DT. 2011. Comparison of point intercept and image analysis for monitoring rangeland transects. Rangel Ecol Manag. 64:309–315. doi:10.2111/REM-D-10-00090.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chebez JC, Casañas H, Di Giacomo AS, Azpiroz AB. 2008. Cachirla Dorada: Anthus nattereri Sclater, 1878. In: Chebez JC, editor. Los que se van: fauna Argentina amenazada. Vol. 2. Buenos Aires (Argentina): Editorial Albatros; p. 360–362.
   Google Scholar
• Chiarani E, Bettio M, Fontana CS. 2020. Temporal changes in bird communities in areas with different histories of fire disturbance in highland grasslands of Brazil. PLoS One. 15:e0243070. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0243070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiarani E, Fontana CS. 2019. Birds of Parque Estadual do Tainhas, an important protected area of the highland grasslands of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Pap Avulsos Zool. 59(e20195934):e20195934. doi: 10.11606/1807-0205/2019.59.34.
   Google Scholar
• Cody ML. 1968. On the methods of resource division in grassland bird communities. Am Nat. 102:107–147. doi:10.1086/282531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cody ML. 1985. Habitat selection in grassland and open-country birds. In: Cody ML, editor. Habitat selection in birds. San Diego (USA): Academic Press; p. 191–226.
   Google Scholar
• Cornelissen JHC, Lavorel S, Garnier E, Diaz S, Buchmann N, Gurvich DE, Reich PB, ter Steege H, Morgan HD, van der Heijden MGA, et al. 2003. A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Aust J Bot. 51:335–380. doi:10.1071/BT02124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis CA, Churchwell RT, Fuhlendorf SD, Engle DM, Hovick TJ. 2016. Effect of pyric herbivory on source-sink dynamics in grassland birds. J Appl Ecol. 53:1004–1012. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Peña M. 2019. Aves Argentinas: descripción, comportamiento, reproducción y distribución, Mimidae, Sturnidae, Motacillidae, Thraupidae (Actualización). Comun Museo Provinc Cienc Natur “Florentino Ameghino”. Nueva Serie. 11:1–342.
   Google Scholar
• Dieni JS, Jones SL. 2003. Grassland songbird nest site selection patterns in northcentral Montana. Wilson Bull. 115:388–396. doi:10.1676/03-055.
   Google Scholar
• Di Giacomo AG, Di Giacomo AS, Reboreda JC. 2011. Effects of grassland burning on reproductive success of globally threatened Strange-tailed Tyrants Alectrurus risora. Bird Conserv Int. 21:411–422. doi:10.1017/S0959270910000584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon P. 2003. VEGAN, a package of R functions for community ecology. J Veg Sci. 14:927–930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durigan G, Ratter JA. 2006. Successional changes in cerrado and cerrado/forest ecotonal vegetation in western São Paulo state, Brazil, 1962–2000. Edinb J Bot. 63:119–130. doi:10.1017/S0960428606000357.
   Google Scholar
• Durigan G, Ratter JA. 2016. The need for a consistent fire policy for Cerrado conservation. J Appl Ecol. 53:11–15. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eiten G. 1982. Brazilian “Savannas. In: Huntley BJ, Walker BH, editors. Ecology of tropical savannas. Berlin (Germany): Springer-Verlag; p. 25–47.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher RJ, Davis SK. 2011. Habitat use by Sprague’s pipits (Anthus spragueii) in native pastures and planted, non-native hay fields. Auk. 128:273–282. doi:10.1525/auk.2011.10148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freitas MS, Francisco MR. 2012. Reproductive life history traits of the Yellowish Pipit (Anthus lutescens). Wilson J Ornithol. 124:119–126. doi:10.1676/11-038.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansell M. 2000. Bird nests and construction behaviour. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• INAES - Instituto Antônio Ernesto de Salvo. 2015. Estado da Arte das Pastagens em Minas Gerais. Belo Horizonte: Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. http://www.sistemafaemg.org.br/. 13/01/2016.
   Google Scholar
• Jones J. 2001. Habitat selection studies in avian ecology: a critical review. Auk. 118:557–562. doi:10.1093/auk/118.2.557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones CG. 2004. Conservation management of endangered birds. In: Sutherland WJ, Newton I, Green RE, editors. Bird ecology and conservation: a handbook of techniques. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press; p. 269–301.
   Google Scholar
• Jongsomjit D, Jones SL, Gardali T, Geupel GR, Gouse PJ. 2007. A guide to nestling development and aging in altricial passerines. Washington (D.C): US Fish and Wildlife Service, Biological Technical Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Klug PE, Jackrel SL. 2010. Linking snake habitat use to nest predation risk in grassland birds: the dangers of shrub cover. Oecologia. 162:801–803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legendre P, Legendre LL. 2012. Numerical Ecology. 3rd ed. New York (USA): Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Lima SL. 2009. Predators and the breeding bird: behavioral and reproductive flexibility under the risk of predation. Biol Rev. 84:485–513. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00085.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little IT, Hockey PA, Jansen R. 2015. Predation drives nesting success in moist highland grasslands: the importance of maintaining vegetation cover for bird conservation. Ostrich. 86:97–111. doi:10.2989/00306525.2015.1005557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombardi VT. 2017. Vivendo na linha de fogo: história natural de Anthus nattereri (Aves: motacillidade) nos Campos do Alto Rio Grande, sul de Minas Gerais, Brasil MSc Dissertation. Florestal (Brazil): Universidade Federal de Viçosa.
   Google Scholar
• Lombardi VT, Faetti RG, D’Angelo Neto S, Vasconcelos MF, Gussoni COA. 2010. Notas sobre a nidificação de aves brasileiras raras e/ou pouco conhecidas. Cotinga. 32:131–136.
   Google Scholar
• Lopes LE, Malacco GB, Alteff EF, Vasconcelos MF, Hoffmann D, Silveira LF. 2010. Range extensions and conservation of some threatened and little known Brazilian grassland birds. Bird Conserv Int. 20:84–94. doi:10.1017/S0959270909990190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopes LE, Meireles RC, Peixoto HJC, Teixeira JPG, Machado TLSS, Lombardi VT. 2023. Movement ecology of the threatened Campo Miner Geositta poeciloptera and its implications for conservation of tropical open grassland birds. Bird Conserv Int. 33:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luza AL, Carlucci MB, Hartz SM, Duarte LDS. 2014. Moving from forest vs. grassland perspectives to an integrated view towards the conservation of forest-grassland mosaics. Nat Conserv. 12:166–169. doi:10.1016/j.ncon.2014.09.005.
   Google Scholar
• Machado TLSS, Lombardi VT, Meireles RC, Teixeira JPG, Solar R, Lopes LE. 2017. Breeding biology of the threatened Campo Miner Geositta poeciloptera (Aves: Scleruridae), a Neotropical grassland specialist. J Nat Hist. Vol. 51. 2551–2563.
   Google Scholar
• Mainwaring MC, Hartley IR, Lambrechts MM, Deeming DC. 2014. The design and function of birds’ nests. Ecol Evol. 4:3909–3928. doi:10.1002/ece3.1054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamani ARA, Van Els P, Catacora YDF, Norambuena HV. 2020. First description of the nest and eggs of the Peruvian Pipit (Anthus peruvianus, Aves: motacillidae). Ornitol Neotrop. 31:5–8. doi:10.58843/ornneo.v31i1.565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MapBiomas. 2022. Collection 6 of the annual land use and land cover maps of Brazil. MapBiomas Project. [accessed 2022 Aug 16]. http://mapbiomas.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Maphisa DH, Smit-Robinson H, Underhill LG, Altwegg R. 2016. Drivers of bird species richness within moist high-altitude grasslands in eastern South Africa. PLoS One. 11:e0162609. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0162609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marini MÂ, Borges FJA, Lopes LE, Sousa NOM, Gressler DT, Santos LR, Paiva LV, Duca CG, Manica LT, Rodrigues SS, et al. 2012. Breeding biology of birds in the Cerrado of central Brazil. Ornitol Neotrop. 23:385–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marini MÂ, Durães RD. 2001. Annual patterns of molt and reproductive activity of Passerines in south-central Brazil. Condor. 115:767–775. doi:10.1093/condor/103.4.767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques-Neto R. 2017. Campos da Zona da Mata: fatores zonais e azonais na composição fitogeográfica do município de Lima Duarte - MG. Geousp. 21:198–216.
   Google Scholar
• Martin TE. 1993a. Nest predation among vegetation layers and habitat types: revising the dogmas. Am Nat. 141:897–913. doi:10.1086/285515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin TE. 1993b. Nest predation and nest sites: new perspectives on old patterns. BioScience. 43:523–531. doi:10.2307/1311947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurício GN, Bencke GA, Repenning M, Machado DB, Dias RA, Bugoni L. 2013. Review of the breeding status of birds in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Iheringia SerZool. 103:163–184. doi:10.1590/S0073-47212013000200012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meireles RC, Lopes LE, Pichorim M, Machado TLSS, Duca C, Solar R. 2021. Nest survival of the threatened Campo Miner Geositta poeciloptera: a tropical cavity-nesting grassland bird. Austral Ecol. 46:1236–1245. doi:10.1111/aec.13079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motta-Júnior JC, Granzinolli MAM, Develey PF. 2008. Aves da Estação Ecológica de Itirapina, Estado de São Paulo, Brasil. Biota Neotr. 8:207–227. doi:10.1590/S1676-06032008000300019.
   Google Scholar
• Nehrkorn A. 1899. Katalog der Eiersammlung nebst Beschreibungeh der aussereuropäischen Eier Braünschweig. Germany: Harald Bruhn.
   Google Scholar
• Norambuena HV, Areta JI, Medrano F, Ortiz P, Victorian PF. 2017. Aportes a la historia natural del bailarín chico o cachirla común (Anthus correndera chilensis). Ornitol Neotrop. 28:243–252. doi:10.58843/ornneo.v28i0.207.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira-Filho AT, Fluminhan-Filho M. 1999. Ecologia da vegetação do Parque Florestal Quedas do Rio Bonito. Cerne. 5:51–64.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira-Filho AT, Vilela EA, Gavilanes ML, Carvalho DA. 1994. Comparison of the woody flora and soils of six areas of montane semideciduous forest in southern Minas Gerais, Brazil. Edinb J Bot. 51:355–389. doi:10.1017/S0960428600001839.
   Google Scholar
• Overbeck GE, Vélez-Martin E, Menezes LS, Anand M, Baeza S, Carlucci MB, D MS, Durigan G, Fidelis A, Guido A, et al. 2022. Placing Brazil’s grasslands and savannas on the map of science and conservation. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst. 56:125687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker TA III, Willis EO. 1997. Notes on three tiny grassland flycatchers, with comments on the disappearance of South American fire-diversified savannas. Ornithol Monogr. 48:549–555. doi:10.2307/40157552.
   Google Scholar
• Parr CL, Andersen AN. 2006. Patch mosaic burning for biodiversity conservation: a critique of the pyrodiversity paradigm. Conserv Biol. 20:1610–1619. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00492.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira JAA, Oliveira-Filho AT, Lemos-Filho JP. 2000. Environmental heterogeneity and disturbance by humans control much of the tree species diversity of Atlantic montane forest fragments in SE Brazil. Plant Conserv Biodiv. 16:1761–1784. doi:10.1007/s10531-006-9063-4.
   Google Scholar
• Pillar VD, Vélez E. 2010. Extinção dos Campos Sulinos em unidades de conservação: um fenômeno natural ou um problema ético? NatConserv. 8:84–88. doi:10.4322/natcon.00801014.
   Google Scholar
• Repenning M, Fontana CS. 2011. Seasonality of breeding, moult and fat deposition of birds in subtropical lowlands of southern Brazil. Emu. 111:268–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricklefs RE. 1969. An analysis of nesting mortality in birds. Smith Contrib Zool. 9:1–48. doi:10.5479/si.00810282.9.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues CC, Mariano RF, Slveira Junior WJ, Leite LH, Carvalho VC, Souza FJ, Moura AS, Rocha LF, Fontes MAL. 2022. Histórico de incêndios em campos rupestres disjuntos: um estudo de caso em Carrancas, Minas Gerais. Biodiv Brasileira. 12:1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Sá Júnior A, Carvalho LG, Silva FF, Alves MC. 2012. Application of the Köppen classification for climatic zoning in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Theor Appl Climatol. 108:1–7. doi:10.1007/s00704-011-0507-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos HG, Jacomine PKT, Anjos LHC, Oliveira VA, Lumbreras JF, Coelho MR, Almeida JA, Araújo-Filho JC, Oliveira JB, Cunha TJF, et al. 2018. Sistema Brasileiro de Classificação de Solos. 5th ed. Brasília (Brazil): EMBRAPA Solos.
   Google Scholar
• Schönwetter M. 1970. Handbuch der Oologie, number 17. Berlin (Germany): Akademie Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Short LL, Jr. 1971. Aves nuevas o poco comunes de Corrientes. Rev Museo Argentino Cienc Natural Bernardino Rivadavia, Zool. 9:283–309.
   Google Scholar
• Silveira LF. 2009. Anthus nattereri Sclater 1878. In: Bressan PM, Kierulff MCM, Sugieda AM, editors. Fauna ameaçada de extinção no Estado de São Paulo: vertebrados. São Paulo: Fundação Parque Zoológico de São Paulo e Secretaria do Meio Ambiente; p. 272.
   Google Scholar
• Simon JE, Pacheco S. 2005. On the standardization of nest descriptions of neotropical birds. Rev Bras Ornitol. 13:143–154.
   Google Scholar
• Sodhi N, Şekercioğlu ÇH, Barlow J, Robinson SK. 2011. Conservation of tropical birds West-Sussex. UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sutter GC. 1997. Nest-site selection and nest-entrance orientation in Sprague’s Pipit. Wilson Bull. 109:462–469.
   Google Scholar
• Teixeira JPG 2016. Do macro ao micro: o papel do fogo e da testosterona na ecologia de Geositta poeciloptera, ave ameaçada do Cerrado brasileiro. MSc Dissertation. Viçosa (Brazil): Universidade Federal de Viçosa.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler SJ. 2004. Family Motacillidae (Pipits and Wagtails). In: Del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Christie D, editors. Handbook of the birds of the World, vol 9, Cotingas to Pipits and Wagtails. Barcelona (Spain): Lynx Edicions; p. 686–786.
   Google Scholar
• Van Els P, Norambuena HV. 2018. A revision of species limits in Neotropical pipits Anthus based on multilocus genetic and vocal data. Ibis. 160:158–172. doi:10.1111/ibi.12511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickery PD, Herkert JR. 2001. Recent advances in grassland bird research: where do we go from here? Auk. 118:11–15. doi:10.1093/auk/118.1.11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickery PD, Tubaro PL, Silva JMC, Peterjohn BG, Herkert JR, Cavalcanti RB. 1999. Conservation of grassland birds in the western hemisphere. Stud Avian Biol. 19:2–26.
   Google Scholar
• Voelker G. 1999. Dispersal, vicariance, and clocks: historical biogeography and speciation in a cosmopolitan passerine genus (Anthus: motacillidae). Evolution. 53:1536–1552. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb05417.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Ihering H. 1900. Catalogo critico-comparativo dos ninhos e ovos das aves do Brasil. Rev Mus Paulista. 4:191–300.
   Google Scholar
• Wiens JJ, Graham CH. 2005. Niche conservatism: integrating evolution, ecology, and conservation biology. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 36:519–539. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102803.095431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis EO. 2004. Birds of a habitat spectrum in the Itirapina savanna, São Paulo, Brazil. Braz J Biol. 64:901–910. doi:10.1590/S1519-69842004000500022.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson JD, Whittingham MJ, Bradbury RB. 2005. The management of crop structure: a general approach to reversing the impacts of agricultural intensification on birds? Ibis. 147:453–463. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919x.2005.00440.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler DW, Billerman SM, Lovette IJ. 2020. Wagtails and Pipits (Motacillidae), version 1.0. In: Billerman SM, Keeney BK, Rodewald PG, Schulenberg TS, editors. Birds of the World. https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.motaci1.01.
   Google Scholar
• Zalba SM, Rocio S, Cozzani NC. 2008. Priorities for the conservation of an endangered grassland bird: clues from its nesting biology. Ornitol Neotrop. 20:35–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zehm A, Nobis M, Schwabe A. 2003. Multiparameter analysis of vertical vegetation structure based on digital image processing. Flora. 198:142–160. doi:10.1078/0367-2530-00086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar