Nest survival of black-backed water tyrant Fluvicola albiventer in relation to nest morphometry and nest site features

References

• Álvarez E, Barba E. 2008. Nest quality in relation to adult bird condition and its impact on reproduction in Great Tits Parus major. Acta Ornithol. 43:3–9. doi:10.3161/000164508X345275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barocas A, Tobler MW, Valladares NA, Pardo AA, Macdonald DW, Swaisgood RR. 2023. Protected areas maintain neotropical freshwater bird biodiversity in the face of human activity. Ecol Indic. 150:110256. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beltzer AH. 1985. Ecología alimentaria de Fluvicola pica albiventer Spix, 1825 viudita blanca (Aves: tyrannidae) en el valle aluvial del río Paraná medio, Argentina. Rev Historia Natural. 5(9):61–66.
   Google Scholar
• Beltzer AH, Neiff JJ. 1992. Distribución de las aves en el valle del río Paraná. Relación con el régimen pulsátil y la vegetación. Ambiente Subtrop. 2:77–102.
   Google Scholar
• Berkunsky I, Kacoliris FP, Faegre SI, Ruggera RA, Carrera JD, Aramburu RM. 2011. Nest predation by arboreal snakes on cavity nesting-birds in dry Chaco woodlands. Ornitol Neotrop. 22:459–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biancucci L, Martin TE. 2010. Can selection on nest size from nest predation explain the latitudinal gradient in clutch size? J Anim Ecol. 79(5):1086–1092. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01720.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burhans DE, Dearborn D, Thompson FR III, Faaborg J. 2002. Factors affecting predation at songbird nests in old fields. J Wildl Manag. 66:240–249. doi:10.2307/3802890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnham KP, Anderson DR. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference. A practical information theorict approach. 2 ed. New York (USA): Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chalfoun AD, Schmidt KA. 2012. Adaptive breeding-habitat selection: is it for the birds? Auk. 129(4):589–599. doi:10.1525/auk.2012.129.4.589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cristaldi MA, Sarquis JA, Arzamendia V, Bellini GP, Giraudo AR. 2022. Human activity and climate change as determinants of spatial prioritization for the conservation of globally threatened birds in the southern Neotropic (Santa Fe, Argentina). Biodivers Conserv. 28(10):2531–2553. doi:10.1007/s10531-019-01774-z.
   Google Scholar
• Cruz A, Andrews RW. 1997. The breeding biology of the pied water-tyrant and its interactions with the shiny cowbird in Venezuela. J Field Ornithol. 68:91–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Silva TL, Cabral RBG, Andrade LDAS, Nogueira NF, Oliveira MDS, Ferreira I. 2018. Comparison of breeding biology aspects of Fluvicola nengeta (Aves: tyrannidae) between two nesting sites. J Nat Hist. 52(3–4):225–235. doi:10.1080/00222933.2017.1414897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De la Peña MR. 2015. Aves Argentinas: huevos y nidos. Buenos Aires (Argentina): Eudeba-Ediciones UNL.
   Google Scholar
• Di Giacomo AG. 2005. Aves de la Reserva El Bagual. In: Di Giacomo AG, Krapovickas SF editors Temas de Naturaleza y Conservación 4. Historia natural y paisaje de la Reserva El Bagual, provincia de Formosa, Argentina. Inventario de la fauna de vertebrados y de la flora vascular de un área del Chaco Húmedo. Buenos Aires (Argentina): Aves Argentinas & Asociación Ornitológica del Plata, 202–578.
   Google Scholar
• Dinsmore SJ, White GC, Knopf FL. 2002. Advanced techniques for modeling avian nest survival. Ecology. 83(12):3476–3488. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[3476:ATFMAN]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farnsworth A, Langham G. 2020. Black-backed Water-Tyrant (Fluvicola albiventer). In: Del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sargatal Christie DA, De Juana E, editors. Birds of the World. Ithaca (USA): Cornell Lab of Ornithology. doi:10.2173/bow.bbwtyr1.01.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández GJ, Mermoz ME. 2000. Effect of predation and cowbird parasitism on the nesting success of two sympatric Neotropical marshbirds. Wilson J Ornithol. 112(3):354–364. doi:10.1676/0043-5643(2000)112[0354:EOPACP]2.0.CO;2.
   Google Scholar
• Ferretti V, Llambías PE, Martin TE. 2005. Life-history variation of a neotropical thrush challenges food limitation theory. Proc Royal Soc B-Biol Sci. 272(1564):769–773.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogarty DT, Elmore RD, Fuhlendorf SD, Loss SR. 2017. Influence of olfactory and visual cover on nest site selection and nest success for grassland-nesting birds. Ecol Evol. 7:6247–6258. doi:10.1002/ece3.3195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giraudo AR, Povedano H, Belgrano MJ, Krauczuk E, Pardiñas U, Miquelarena A, Ligier D, Baldo D, Castelino M. 2003. Biodiversity status of the interior Atlantic Forest of Argentina. In: Galindo-Le C, Gusmào Câmara I, editors. The Atlantic forest of South America: biodiversity status, threats, and outlook. Washington: Island Press; p. 160–180.
   Google Scholar
• Hansell M, Overhill R. 2000. Bird nests and construction behaviour. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Healy SD, Tello-Ramos MC, Hébert M. 2023. Bird nest building: visions for the future. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 378(1884):20220157. doi:10.1098/rstb.2022.0157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyt DF. 1979. Practical methods of estimating volume and fresh weight of bird eggs. Auk. 96(1):73–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iriondo MH, Paggi JC, Parma MJ. 2007. The Middle Paraná River: limnology of a subtropical wetland. Berlín: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang Y, Han J, Zhang Z, Chen X, Yang C. 2022. Parent-offspring and inter-offspring responses to conspecific versus heterospecific distress calls in 2 sympatric birds. Curr Zool. 68(6):700–707. doi:10.1093/cz/zoab103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King DI, Degraaf RM, Griffin CR. 1998. Edge‐Related Nest Predation in Clearcut and Groupcut Stands. Conserv Biol. 12(6):1412–1415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleindorfer S, Hoi H, Fessl B. 1996. Alarm calls and chick reactions in the moustached warbler, Acrocephalus melanopogon. Anim Behav. 51(6):1199–1206. doi:10.1006/anbe.1996.0125.
   Google Scholar
• Laake JL 2013. RMark: an R interface for analysis of capture-recapture data with MARK. AFSC Processed Report 2013-01. Seattle: Alaska Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service.
   Google Scholar
• Liu J, Yan H, Li G, Li S. 2021. Nest concealment is associated with reproductive traits across sympatric bird species. Ecol Evol. 11(20):14079–14087. doi:10.1002/ece3.8117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzón RE, Ronchi‐Virgolini AL, Blake JG. 2020. Wetland dependency drives temporal turnover of bird species between high‐and low‐water years in floodplain wetlands of the Paraná River. Ecohydrology. 13(1):e2179. doi:10.1002/eco.2179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mainwaring MC, Barber I, Deeming DC, Pike DA, Roznik EA, Hartley IR. 2017. Climate change and nesting behaviour in vertebrates: a review of the ecological threats and potential for adaptive responses. Biol Rev. 92(4):1991–2002. doi:10.1111/brv.12317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mainwaring MC, Hartley IR. 2013. The energetic costs of nest building in birds. Avian Biol Res. 6(1):12–17. doi:10.3184/175815512X13528994072997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mainwaring MC, Hartley IR, Lambrechts MM, Deeming DC. 2014. The design and function of birds’ nests. Ecol Evol. 4(20):3909–3928. doi:10.1002/ece3.1054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning TH. 1979. Density and volume corrections of eggs of seven passerine birds. Auk. 96(1):207–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin TE. 1993a. Nest predation among vegetation layers and habitat types: revising the dogmas. Am Nat. 141(6):897–913. doi:10.1086/285515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin TE. 1993b. Nest predation and nest sites: new perspectives on old patterns. BioScience. 43:523–532. doi:10.2307/1311947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin TE. 1996. Life history evolution in tropical and south temperate birds: what do we really know? J Avian Biol. 27(4):263–272. doi:10.2307/3677257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin TE, Briskie JV. 2009. Predation on dependent offspring: a review of the consequences for mean expression and phenotypic plasticity in avian life history traits. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1168(1):201–217. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04577.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martin TE, Geupel GR. 1993. Nest-monitoring plots: methods for locating nests and monitoring success. J Field Ornithol. 64:507–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin TE, Roper JJ. 1988. Nest predation and nest-site selection of a western population of the Hermit Thrush. Condor. 90(1):51–57. doi:10.2307/1368432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin TE, Scott J, Menge C. 2000. Nest predation increases with parental activity: separating nest site and parental activity effects. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci. 267:2287–2293. doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masello JF, Quillfeldt P. 2002. Chick growth and breeding success of the Burrowing Parrot. Condor. 104(3):574–586. doi:10.1093/condor/104.3.574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matysioková B, Remeš V. 2022. Stronger negative species interactions in the tropics supported by a global analysis of nest predation in songbirds. J Biogeogr. 49(3):511–522. doi:10.1111/jbi.14321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menezes JC, Marini MÂ. 2017. Predators of bird nests in the Neotropics: a review. J Field Ornithol. 88(2):99–114. doi:10.1111/jofo.12203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mezquida ET. 2004. Nest site selection and nesting success of five species of passerines in a South American open Prosopis woodland. J Ornithol. 145(1):16–22. doi:10.1007/s10336-003-0002-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Møller AP. 1982. Clutch size in relation to nest size in the swallow Hirundo rustica. Ibis. 124(3):339–343. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.1982.tb03780.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Møller AP, Adriaensen F, Artemyev A, Bańbura J, Barba E, Biard C, Blondel J, Bouslama Z, Bouvier JC, Camprodón J, et al. 2014. Variation in clutch size in relation to nest size in birds. Ecol Evol. 4(18):359–3583. doi:10.1002/ece3.1189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montalti D, Graña Grilli M. 2014. Relación entre la estructura y ubicación del nido del Varillero Ala Amarilla Agelasticus thilius. Hornero. 29(1):37–40. doi:10.56178/eh.v29i1.623.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno J, Soler M, Møller AP, Linden M. 1994. The function of stone carrying in the black wheatear, Oenanthe leucura. Anim Behav. 47(6):1297–1309. doi:10.1006/anbe.1994.1178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrone JJ 2001. Biogeografía de América Latina y el Caribe. Zaragoza (España): Manuales y tesis SEA 3.
   Google Scholar
• Neve L, Soler JJ. 2002. Nest-building activity and laying date influence female reproductive investment in magpies: an experimental study. Anim Behav. 63(5):975–980. doi:10.1006/anbe.2001.1989.
   Google Scholar
• Olguín PF 2017. Biología reproductiva de especies de aves del río Paraná Medio, Argentina. Tesis doctoral, Universidad Nacional del Litoral.
   Google Scholar
• Oswald KN, Diener E, Diener JP, Cunningham SJ, Smit B, Lee AT. 2020. Increasing temperatures increase the risk of reproductive failure in a near threatened alpine ground‐nesting bird, the Cape Rockjumper Chaetops frenatus. Ibis. 162(4):1363–1369. doi:10.1111/ibi.12846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palomino JJ, Martin-Vivaldi M, Soler M, Soler JJ. 1998. Functional significance of nest size variation in the Rufous Bush Robin Cercotrichas galactotes. Ardea. 86:177–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pretelli MG, Isacch JP. 2013. Breeding biology of Spectacled Tyrant (Hymenops perspicillatus) in the southeastern Pampas region, Argentina. Wilson J Ornithol. 125(2):275–279. doi:10.1676/12-143.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team, 2022. R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [accessed 2022 October]. https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Read JL, Reid N, Venables WN. 2000. Environmental auditing: which birds are useful bioindicators of mining and grazing impacts in arid South Australia? Environ Manag. 26:215–232. doi:10.1007/s002670010083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remeš V. 2005. Birds and rodents destroy different nests: a study of Blackcap Sylvia atricapilla using the removal of nest concealment. Ibis. 147(1):213–216. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.2004.00339.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva-Júnior EL, Melo C. 2009. Parental investment and foraging in the Masked Water-Tyrant (Fluvicola nengeta). Ornitol Neotrop. 20:339–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slagsvold T. 1982. Clutch size variation in passerine birds: the nest predation hypothesis. Oecologia. 54(2):159–169. doi:10.1007/BF00378388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slagsvold T. 1989. On the evolution of clutch size and nest size in passerine birds. Oecologia. 79(3):300–305. doi:10.1007/BF00384308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith JT, Tack JD, Doherty KE, Allred BW, Maestas JD, Berkeley LI, Dettenmaier SJ, Messmer TA, Naugle DE. 2018. Phenology largely explains taller grass at successful nests in greater sage-grouse. Ecol Evol. 8(1):356–364. doi:10.1002/ece3.3679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soler JJ, Møller AP, Soler M. 1998. Nest building, sexual selection and parental investment. Evol Ecol. 12:427–441. doi:10.1023/A:1006520821219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sovrano LV, León EJ, Lorenzón RE, Olguín PF, Beltzer AH, Giraudo AR. 2023. Impacts of brood parasitism by shiny cowbird Molothrus bonariensis on the breeding success of a small host, the black-backed water tyrant Fluvicola albiventer. Cur Zool. zoad037. doi:10.1093/cz/zoad037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suárez F, Morales MB, Mínguez I, Herranz J. 2005. Seasonal variation in nest mass and dimensions in an open-cup ground-nesting shrub-steppe passerine: the tawny pipit Anthus campestris. Ardeola. 52(1):43–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanadzina K, Street SE, Healy SD, Laland KN, Sheard C. 2022. Global drivers of variation in cup nest size in passerine birds. J Anim Ecol. 92(2):338–351. doi:10.1111/1365-2656.13815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Zhang ZW, Zheng GM, Li JQ, Xu ZL, Ma ZJ, Biancucci AL. 2012. Ornithological research: past twenty years and future perspectives in China. Biodiv Sci. 20:119–137.
   Google Scholar
• Webb EB, Smith LM, Vrtiska MP, Lagrange TG. 2010. Effects of local and landscape variables on wetland bird habitat use during migration through the Rainwater Basin. J Wildl Manag. 74(1):109–119. doi:10.2193/2008-577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White GC, Burnham KP. 1999. Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study. 46:S120–S139. doi:10.1080/00063659909477239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiebe KL, Swift TL. 2001. Clutch size relative to tree cavity size in Northern Flickers. J Avian Biol. 32(2):167–173. doi:10.1034/j.1600-048X.2001.320210.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler DW, Billerman SM, Lovette IJ. 2020. Tyrant Flycatchers (Tyrannidae). In: Billerman SM, Keeney BK, Rodewald PG, Schulenberg TS, editors. Birds of the World. Ithaca (USA): Cornell Lab of Ornithology. doi:10.2173/bow.tyrann2.01.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao H, Hu Y, Lang Z, Fang B, Guo W, Zhang Q, Lu X. 2017. How much do we know about the breeding biology of bird species in the world? J Avian Biol. 48(4):513–518. doi:10.1111/jav.00934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao JM, Yang C, Lou YQ, Shi M, Fang Y, Sun YH. 2020. Nesting season, nest age, and disturbance, but not habitat characteristics, affect nest survival of Chinese grouse. Curr Zool. 66(1):29–37. doi:10.1093/cz/zoz024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zurita GA, Peer G, Bellocq MI. 2017. Bird responses to forest loss are influence by habitat specialization. Divers Distrib. 23(6):650–655. doi:10.1111/ddi.12559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar