Effectiveness and adverse effects of reactor coolant system depressurization strategy with various severe accident management guidance entry conditions for OPR1000

References

• Korea Electric Company. Korea nuclear units 7 & 8 preliminary safety analysis report. Seoul: Korean Electric Company; 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Korea Electric Company. Korea nuclear units 9 & 10 final safety analysis report. Seoul: Korean Electric Company; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Korea Electric Power Corporation. Yonggwang nuclear units 3 & 4 preliminary safety analysis report. Seoul: Korean Electric Company; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Korea Hydro and Nuclear Power. Shin Kori 1 & 2 final safety analysis report. Seoul: Korea Hydro and Nuclear Power; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Lee S, Ha KS, Kim H-Y, Kim SJ. Validation of RCS depressurization strategy and core coolability map for independent scenarios of SBLOCA, SBO, and TLOFW. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2013;51:181–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD/NEA. Core Exit Temperature (CET) effectiveness in accident management of nuclear power reactor. Paris: OECD/NEA; 2010. (Report no. NEA/CSNI/R(2010)9).
   Google Scholar
• Carbajo JJ. MELCOR sensitivity studies for a low-pressure, short-term station blackout at the Peach Bottom plant. Nucl Eng Des. 1994;152:287–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park JH, Kim H, Lee C. Regulatory research of the PWR severe accident. Daejeon: Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Wang T-C, Wang S-J, Teng J-T. Comparison of severe accident results among SCDAP/RELAP5, MAAP, and MELCOR codes. Nucl Technol. 2005;150:145–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vierow K, Liao Y, Johnson J, Kenton M, Gauntt R. Severe accident analysis of a PWR station blackout with the MELCOR, MAAP4 and SCDAP/RELAP5 codes. Nucl Eng Des. 2004;234:129–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahn K-I, Park S-Y, Cho S-W. MELCOR 1.8.4 sensitivity analysis of the severe accident evolution during the APR 1400 LOCA. Ann Nucl Energy. 2006;33:71–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee BC, Jeong JH, Na MG. Effects of accident management strategy on the severe accident environmental conditions. Ann Nucl Energy. 2006;33:13–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang IM, Ferng YM, Wang SJ. Validation of RCS Bleed-And-Feed strategy for the SAMG of the Kuosheng nuclear power plant. Nucl Technol. 2007;160:294–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birchley J, Haste T, Richner M. Accident management following loss of residual heat removal during mid-loop operation in a Westinghouse two-loop PWR. Nucl Eng Des. 2008;238:2173–2181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park R-J, Kim S-B, Kim H-D. Evaluation of the RCS depressurization strategy for the high pressure sequences by using SCDAP/RELAP5. Ann Nucl Energy. 2008;35:150–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park R-J, Kim S-B, Hong S-W, Kim H-D. Detailed evaluation of coolant injection into the reactor vessel with RCS depressurization for high pressure sequences. Nucl Eng Des. 2009;239:2484–2490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park R-J, Hong S-W. Detailed evaluation of RCS boundary rupture during high-pressure severe accident sequences. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2011;48:1396–1402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huh C, Suh N, Park G-C. Optimum RCS depressurization strategy for effective severe accident management of station black out accident. Nucl Eng Des. 2009;239:2521–2529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haste T, Birchley J, Richner M. Accident management following loss-of-coolant accidents during cooldown in a Westinghouse two-loop PWR. Nucl Eng Des. 2010;240:1599–1605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park R-J, Hong S-W. Effect of SAMG entry condition on operator action time for severe accident mitigation. Nucl Eng Des. 2011;241:1807–1812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park R-J, Kang K-H, Ha K-S, Cho Y-R, Koo K-M, Kim S-B, Kim H-D. Detailed analysis of a severe accident progression for an evaluation of in-vessel corium retention estimation in KSNP (Report no. KAERI/TR-2959/2005). Daejeon: Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Gauntt RO, Cole R, Hodge S, Rodriguez S, Sanders R, Smith R, Stuart D, Summers R, Young M. MELCOR computer code manuals (Report no. NUREG/CR-6119). Washington (DC): Division of Systems Technology, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Kmetyk L. MELCOR 1.8.1 assessment: ACRR source term experiments ST-1/ST-2. Albuquerque (NM): Sandia National Laboratory; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Carbajo JJ. Severe accident source term characteristics for selected Peach Bottom sequences predicted by the MELCOR Code. Washington (DC): Nuclear Regulatory Commission; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Ahn K-I, Park S-Y. Development of a risk-informed accident diagnosis and prognosis system to support severe accident management. Nucl Eng Des. 2009;239:2119–2133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park S-Y, Ahn K-I. SAMEX: a severe accident management support expert. Ann Nucl Energy. 2010;37:1067–1075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IAEA. Severe accident management programmes for nuclear power plants. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Kim HC. Development of regulatory assessment technology for the response capability of NPPs against accidents due to extreme natural hazards. Daejeon: Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Ha JJ, Jin YH. Development of accident management guidance for Korean standard nuclear power plant (Report no. KAERI/RR-1939). Daejeon: Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• IAEA. Development and review of plant specific emergency operating procedures. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• OECD/NEA. In-vessel and ex-vessel hydrogen sources (Report no. NEA/CSNI/R(2001)15). Paris: OECD/NEA; 2001.
   Google Scholar