1,440
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Development of an objective mental workload assessment tool based on Rasmussen's skill–rule–knowledge framework

, , , &
Pages 123-128 | Received 30 Sep 2014, Accepted 03 Mar 2015, Published online: 07 Apr 2015

References

  • Rouse WB, Geddes ND, Curry RE. An architecture for intelligent interfaces: outline of an approach to supporting operators of complex systems. Humcomput Interaction. 1987;3:87–122.
  • Xie B, Salvendy G. Review and reappraisal of modeling and predicting mental workload in single- and multi-task environments. Work Stress. 2000;14:74–99.
  • Rubio S, Díaz E, Martín J, Puente JM. Evaluation of subjective mental workload: a comparison of SWAT, NASA-TLX, and workload profile methods. Appl Psychol. 2004;53:61–86.
  • Wilson GF, Russell CA. Real-time assessment of mental workload using psychophysiological measures and artificial neural networks. Hum Factors. 2003;45:635–43. Epub 2004
  • Miyake S. Multivariate workload evaluation combining physiological and subjective measures. Int J Psychophysiol. 2001;40:233–238.
  • Farmer E, Brownson A. Review of workload measurement, analysis and interpretation methods. Brussels: European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation; 2003. (no. CARE-Integra-TRS-130-02-WP2).
  • Turner JR. Cardiovascular reactivity and stress: patterns of physiological response. New York (NY): Plenum, Modeling Stress and Assessing Reactivity in the Laboratory; 1994. p. 51–53.
  • Rasmussen J. Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernetics. 1983;SMC-13:257–266.
  • Hart SG, Staveland LE. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. Hum Ment Workload. 1988;1:139–183.
  • Reason J. Human error. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990. p. 255–260.
  • Samuels RJ. 3.11: disaster and change in Japan. Ithaca (NY): Cornell University Press; 2013. p. 7–10.
  • Nygren TE. Psychometric properties of subjective workload measurement techniques: implications for their use in the assessment of perceived mental workload. Hum Factors. 1991;33:17–33.
  • Huey FM, Wickens CD. Workload transition: implications for individual and team performance. Washington (DC): National Academy Press; 1993. p. 32–54.
  • Mannan S. Human factors and human error: Lees' process safety essentials. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2014. p. 143–154.
  • DOE Standard. Chapter 2, Human performance improvement handbook volume 1: concepts and principles. Washington (DC): US Department of Energy AREA HFAC; 2009. p. 22–25.
  • Woods DD. Modeling and predicting human error. Human performance models for computer-aided engineering. San Diego (CA): Academic Press; 1990. p. 248–274

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.