Evaluation of neutron nuclear data on xenon isotopes

References

• Katakura J. JENDL FP decay data file 2011 and fission yields data file, JAEA-Data/Code 2011-025. Tokai: Japan Atomic Energy Agency; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Kikuchi Y, Nakagawa T, Asami T, et al. Second version of Japanese evaluated nuclear data library (JENDL-2). J Nucl Sci Technol. 1985;22:593–603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Igarasi S, Fukahori T. Program CASTHY – statistical model calculation for neutron cross sections and gamma ray spectrum - (JAERI 1321). Tokai: Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Asami T, Iijima S, Igarasi S, et al. [Japanese evaluated nuclear data library version 3, JENDL-3]. J At Energy Soc Jpn. 1989;31:1190–1217. Japanese.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakagawa T, Iijima S, Sugi T, et al. PEGASUS: a preequilibrium and multi-step evaporation code for neutron cross section calculation (JAERI-Data/Code 99-031). Tokai: Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Nakagawa T, Shibata K, Chiba S, et al. Japanese evaluated nuclear data library version 3 revision-2: JENDL-3.2. J Nucl Sci Technol. 1995;32:1259–1271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shibata K, Kawano T, Nakagawa T, et al. Japanese evaluated nuclear data library version 3 revision-3: JENDL-3.3. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2002;39:1125–1136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shibata K, Iwamoto O, Nakagawa T, et al. JENDL-4.0: a new library for nuclear science and engineering. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2011;48:1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ichihara A, Iwamoto O, Chiba S, et al. Program POD; a computer code to calculate cross sections for neutron-induced nuclear reactions (JAEA-Data/Code 2007-012). Tokai: Japan Atomic Energy Agency; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Soukhovitski E, Chiba S, Iwamoto O, et al. Programs of OPTMAN and SHEMMAN version 8 (2004) (JAERI-Data/Code 2005-002). Tokai: Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Aoyama T, Ito C. Integral test on activation cross-section of tag gas nuclides using fast neutron spectrum fields. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2002;Suppl. 2:1025–1028.
   Google Scholar
• Gando A, Gando Y, Hanakago H, et al. Measurement of the double-β decay half-life of 136Xe with the KamLAND-Zen experiment. Phys Rev. 2012;C 85:045504.
   Google Scholar
• Auger M, Auty DJ, Barbeau PS, et al. Search for neutrinoless double-β decay in 136Xe with EXO-200. Phys Rev Lett. 2012;109:032505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwamoto N. Neutron nuclear data evaluation of cesium isotopes for JENDL-4.0. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2011;48:1238–1249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwamoto N. Evaluation of neutron nuclear data for technetium-99. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2012;49:244–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minato F. Evaluation of neutron nuclear data of praseodymium-141 and 143. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2013;50:873–882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shibata K. Evaluation of neutron nuclear data on tellurium isotopes. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2015;52:490–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwamoto O. Development of a comprehensive code for nuclear data evaluation, CCONE, and validation using neutron induced cross sections for uranium isotopes. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2007;44(5):687–697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamura T. Analyses of the scattering of nuclear particles by collective nuclei in terms of the coupled-channel calculation. Rev Mod Phys. 1965;37:679–708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauser W, Feshbach H. The inelastic scattering of neutrons, Phys Rev. 1952;87:366–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalbach C. Two-component exciton model: basic formalism away from shell closures. Phys Rev. 1986;C33:818–833.
   Google Scholar
• Tamura T. Analyses of the scattering of nuclear particles by collective nuclei in terms of the coupled-channel calculation. Rev Mod Phys. 1965;37:679–708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwamoto O. Program CCOM – coupled-channels optical model calculation with automatic parameter search –. JAERI-Data/Code 2003-020. Tokai: Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Kunieda S, Chiba S, Shibata K, et al. Coupled-channels optical model analyses of nucleon-induced reactions for medium and heavy nuclei in the energy region from 1 keV to 200 MeV. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2007;44(6):838–852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raman S, Nestor Jr CW, Tikkanen P. Transition probability from the ground to the first-excited 2+ state of even-even nuclides. At Data Nucl Data Tables. 2001;78:1–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koning AJ, Delaroche JP. Local and global nucleon optical models from 1 keV to 200 MeV. Nucl Phys A. 2003;713:231–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohr JM, Haeberli W. Elastic scattering of 9-13 MeV vector polarized deuterons. Nucl Phys A. 1974;232:381–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becchetti FD Jr, Greenlees GW. A general set of 3He and triton optical-model potentials for A>40, E<40 MeV. In Barshall HH, Haeberli W, editors. Polarization phenomena in nuclear reactions. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press; 1971. p. 682–683.
   Google Scholar
• Avrigeanu M, Avrigeanu V. α-particle nuclear surface absorption below the Coulomb barrier in heavy nuclei. Phys Rev C. 2010;82:014606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn FJ, Imhof WL, Johnson RG, et al. Total neutron cross sections of helium, neon, argon, krypton and xenon. Phys Rev. 1960;118:683–686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadwick MB, Herman M, Obložinský P, et al. ENDF/B-VII.1 nuclear data for science and technology: cross sections, covariances, fission product yields and decay data. Nucl Data Sheets. 2011;112;2887–2996.
   Google Scholar
• Koning AJ, Duijvestijn MC. A global pre-equilibrium analysis from 7 to 200 MeV based on the optical model potential. Nucl Phys A. 2004;744:15–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalbach C. The Griffin model, complex particles and direct nuclear reactions. Z Phys. 1977;A283:401–411.
   Google Scholar
• Capote R, Herman M, Obložinský P, et al. RIPL – input parameter library for calculation of nuclear reactions and nuclear data evaluations. Nucl Data Sheets. 110;2009:3107–3214.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert A, Cameron AGW. A composite nuclear level density formula with shell corrections. Can J Phys. 1965;43:1446–1496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers WD, Swiatecki WJ. Nuclear masses and deformations. Nucl Phys. 1966;81:1–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audi G, Wapstra AH, Thibault C. The AME2003 atomic mass evaluation (II). Nucl Phys A. 2003;729:337–676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mengoni A, Nakajima Y. Fermi-gas model parametrization of nuclear level density. J Nucl Sci Technol. 1994;31:151–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopecky J, Uhl M. Test of gamma-ray strength functions in nuclear reaction model calculations, Phys Rev. 1990;C41:1941–1955.
   Google Scholar
• Belgya T, Bersillon O, Capote Noy R, et al. Handbook for calculations of nuclear reaction data, RIPL-2, International Atomic Energy Agency, IAEA-TECDOC-1506. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Otuka N, Dupont E, Semkova V, et al. Towards a more complete and accurate experimental nuclear reaction data library (EXFOR): international collaboration between nuclear reaction data centres (NRDC). Nucl Data Sheets. 2014;120:272–276.
   Google Scholar
• OECD Nuclear Energy Agency Data Bank. Available from http://www.oecd-nea.org/dbforms/data/eva/ evatapes/jeff_32/
   Google Scholar
• Bhike M, Fallin B, Gooden ME, et al. Comprehensive sets of 124Xe(n, γ)125Xe and 124Xe(n, 2n)123Xe cross-section data for assessment of inertial-confinement deuterium-tritium fusion plasma. Phys Rev. 2015;C 91:011601(R).
   Google Scholar
• Reifarth R, Heil M, Kaeppeler F, et al. Stellar neutron capture cross sections of 128, 129, 130Xe. Phys Rev. 2002;C 66:064603.
   Google Scholar
• Bhike M, Tornow W. Neutron-capture cross-section measurements of 136Xe between 0.4 and 14.8 MeV. Phys Rev. 2014;C 89:031602(R).
   Google Scholar
• Sigg RA, Kuroda PK. 14.6-MeV neutron activation cross sections for the Xenon isotopes. Nucl Sci Eng. 1976;60:235–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kondaiah E, Ranakumar N, Fink RW. Neutron activation cross sections at 14.4 MeV for Kr and Xe isotopes. Nucl Phys A. 1968;120(2):337–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazan F. (n,2n) cross-section measurements of Krypton and Xenon isotopes. UCRL-53929. Berkeley and Livermore: U.C. Lawrence Radiation Laboratory; 1989. p. 162.
   Google Scholar
• Reggoug A, Paic G, Berrada M. Measurement of (n,2n) reaction cross sections by X-ray spectroscopy. Rabat: Mohammed V; 1982. ( Annual Report No. 5: 14).
   Google Scholar
• Bhatia C, Finch SW, Gooden ME, et al. 136Xe(n,2n)135Xe cross section between 9 and 15 MeV. Phys Rev. 2013;C 87:011601.
   Google Scholar
• Mack G, Tornow W. Die Reaktion 54Xe(n, α)52Te mit Neutronen der Energie 12,5 bis 18,0 MeV [The Reaction 54Xe(n, α)52Te at neutron energies from 12.5 to 18.0 MeV]. Z Phys. 1967;207:359–374.
   Google Scholar