Development of safety injection flow map associated with target depressurization for effective severe accident management of OPR1000

References

• International Atomic Energy Agency. Operational limits and conditions and operating procedures for nuclear power plants. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2000. (Report no. NS-G-2.2).
   Google Scholar
• International Atomic Energy Agency. Format and content of the safety analysis report for nuclear power plants. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2004. (Report no. GS-G-4.1).
   Google Scholar
• Kim HC. Evaluation of the status of the accident management guidelines in Korea and foreign countries. Daejeon: Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Vierow K, Liao Y, Johnson J, et al. Severe accident analysis of a PWR station blackout with the MELCOR, MAAP4 and SCDAP/RELAP5 codes. Nucl Eng Des. 2004;234:129–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang TC, Wang SJ, Teng JT. Comparison of severe accident results among SCDAP/RELAP5, MAAP, and MELCOR codes. Nucl Technol. 2005;150:145–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park R-J, Hong S-W. Effect of SAMG entry condition on operator action time for severe accident mitigation. Nucl Eng Des. 2011;241:1807–1812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park R-J, Kim S-B, Hong S-W, et al. Detailed evaluation of coolant injection into the reactor vessel with RCS depressurization for high pressure sequences. Nucl Eng Des. 2009;239:2484–2490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park R-J, Kim S-B, Kim H-D. Evaluation of the RCS depressurization strategy for the high pressure sequences by using SCDAP/RELAP5. Ann Nucl Energy. 2008;35:150–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang IM, Ferng YM, Wang SJ. Validation of RCS bleed-and-feed strategy for the SAMG of the Kuosheng nuclear power plant. Nucl Technol. 2007;160:294–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin-Fuertes F, Martin-Valdepenas JM, Mira J, et al. A MELCOR application to two light water reactor nuclear power plant core melt scenarios with assumed cavity flooding action. Nucl Technol. 2003;144:34–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song J, Huh C, Sun N. Improvement of molten core cooling strategy in a severe accident management guideline. Nucl Technol. 2012;178:258–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S, Ha KS, Kim H-Y, et al. Validation of RCS depressurization strategy and core coolability map for independent scenarios of SBLOCA, SBO, and TLOFW. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2014;51:181–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo S, Lee Y, Lee S, et al. Effectiveness and adverse effects of reactor coolant system depressurization strategy with various severe accident management guidance entry conditions for OPR1000. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2015;52:695–708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefanova AE, Gencheva RV, Groudev PP. Analytical validation of operator actions based on SAMG for VVER 1000 with ASTECv2r3 computer code. Nucl Eng Des. 2015;281:131–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee B, Mukhopadhyay D, Lele HG, et al. Severe accident management strategy verification for VVER-1000 (V320) reactor. Nucl Eng Des. 2011;241:3977–3984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atanasova BP, Stefanova AE, Groudev PP. VVER 1000 SBO calculations with pressuriser relief valve stuck open with ASTEC computer code. Ann Nucl Energy. 2012;46:121–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauntt RO, Cole R, Hodge S, et al. MELCOR computer code manuals version 1.8.6. Washington (DC): US Nuclear Regulatory Commission; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Boyack BE, Dhir VK, Gieseke JA, et al. MELCOR peer review (Report no. LA--12240). Los Alamos (NM): Los Alamos National Lab; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Huh C, Suh N, Park G-C. Optimum RCS depressurization strategy for effective severe accident management of station black out accident. Nucl Eng Des. 2009;239:2521–2529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang T-C, Wang S-J, Teng J-T. Simulation of a PWR reactor vessel level indicating system during station blackout with MELCOR 1.8.5. Nucl Technol. 2006;156:133–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haste TJ, Birchley J, Richner M. Accident management following loss-of-coolant accidents during cooldown in a Westinghouse two-loop PWR. Nucl Eng Des. 2010;240:1599–1605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonelli A, Mazzantini O, Sonnenkalb M, et al. Station black-out analysis with MELCOR 1.8.6 code for Atucha 2 nuclear power plant. Sci Technol Nucl Install. 2012;2012:1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birchley J, Haste TJ, Richner M. Accident management following loss of residual heat removal during mid-loop operation in a Westinghouse two-loop PWR. Nucl Eng Des. 2008;238:2173–2181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung G, Park J, Choi J. Development of the application scheme for the severe accident diagnosis/assessment code. Daejeon: Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Ahn K-I, Park S-Y. Development of a risk-informed accident diagnosis and prognosis system to support severe accident management. Nucl Eng Des. 2009;239:2119–2133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park R-J, Kang K-H, Ha K-S, et al. Detailed analysis of a severe accident progression for an evaluation of in-vessel corium retention estimation in KSNP. Daejon: Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute; 2005. (Report no. KERI/TR/2959/2005).
   Google Scholar
• Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power. Shin Kori 1&2 final safety analysis report. Daejeon: Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• International Atomic Energy Agency. Approaches and tools for severe accident analysis for nuclear power plants. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• OECD/NEA. Core exit temperature effectiveness in accident management of nuclear power reactor. Paris: OECD/NEA; 2010.
   Google Scholar