Evaluation of neutron nuclear data on mercury isotopes

References

• Shibata K, Fukahori T, Chiba S, et al. Evaluation of neutron nuclear data for mercury. J Nucl Sci Technol. 1997;34:1171–1177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shibata K, Kawano T, Nakagawa T, et al. Japanese evaluated nuclear data library version 3 revision-3: JENDL-3.3. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2002;39:1125–1136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• http://j-parc.jp/MatLife/en/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Shibata K, Iwamoto O, Nakagawa T, et al. JENDL-4.0: a new library for nuclear science and engineering. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2011;48:1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IAEA Safety Standards Series. Application of the concepts of exclusion, exemption and clearance (No. RS-G-1.7). Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Wang M, Audi G, Wapstra AH, et al. The AME2012 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references. Chinese Phys C. 2012;36:1603–2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berglund M, Wieser ME. Isotopic compositions of the elements 2009. Pure Appl Chem. 2011;83:397–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuli JK. Nuclear wallet cards. 8th ed. Upton, NY: Brookhaven National Laboratory; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Mughabghab SF. Neutron cross sections. Vol 1. Neutron resonance parameters and thermal cross sections, Part B: Z=61–100. Orlando: Academic Press; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Beer H, Macklin RL. 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 204Hg(n, γ) cross sections and the termination of s-process nucleosynthesis. Phys Rev C. 1985;32:738–755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mughabghab SF. Atlas of neutron resonances, resonance parameters and thermal cross sections Z = 1–100. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Shibata K. Evaluation of neutron nuclear data on antimony isotopes. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2014;51:425–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kikuchi Y, Nakagawa T, Nakajima Y. ASREP: a computer program for automatic search of unresolved resonance parameters. Tokai: Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute; 1999. JAERI-Data/Code 99-025, Japanese.
   Google Scholar
• Iwamoto O. Development of a comprehensive code for nuclear data evaluation, CCONE, and validation using neutron-induced cross sections for uranium isotopes. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2007;44:687–697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwamoto O, Iwamoto N, Kunieda S, et al. The CCONE code system and its application to nuclear data evaluation for fission and other reactions. Nucl Data Sheets. 2016;131:259–288.
   Google Scholar
• Akkermans JM, Gruppelaar H. Analysis of continuum gamma-ray emission in precompound-decay reactions. Phys Lett B. 1985;157:95–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koning A, Hilaire S, Goriely S. TALYS-1.6: a nuclear reaction program. Petten: Nuclear Research and Consultancy Group; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Herman M, Capote R, Carlson BV, et al. EMPIRE: nuclear reaction model code system for data evaluation. Nucl Data Sheets. 2007;108:2655–2715.
   Google Scholar
• Kunieda S, Chiba S, Shibata K, et al. Coupled-channels optical model analyses of nucleon-induced reactions for medium and heavy nuclei in the energy region from 1 keV to 200 MeV. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2007;44:838–852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamura T. Analyses of the scattering of nuclear particles by collective nuclei in terms of the coupled-channel calculation. Rev Mod Phys. 1965;37:679–708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogenbirk A, Blok HP, Harakeh MN. Inelastic proton scattering from 198Hg, 200Hg, 202Hg and 204Hg at Ep = 28 MeV. Nucl Phys A. 1991;524:251–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möller P, Nix JR, Myers WD, et al. Nuclear ground-state masses and deformations. Atom Data Nucl Data Tables. 1995;59:185–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson PE. Nuclear reactions and nuclear structure. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1971. p. 386–392.
   Google Scholar
• Koning AJ, Delaroche JP. Local and global nucleon optical models from 1 keV to 200 MeV. Nucl Phys A. 2003;713:231–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohr JM, Haeberli W. Elastic scattering of 9–13 MeV vector polarized deuterons. Nucl Phys A. 1974;232:381–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becchetti FD, Greenlees GW. A general set of 3He and triton optical-model potentials for A > 40, E < 40 MeV. In: Barshall HH, Haeberli W, editors. Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Polarization Phenomena in Nuclear Reactions; 1970 August 31-September 4; Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press; 1971. p. 682–683.
   Google Scholar
• Avrigeanu V, Hodgson PE, Avrigeanu M. Global optical potentials for emitted alpha particles. Phys Rev C. 1994;49:2136–2141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capote R, Herman M, Obložinský P, et al. RIPL–reference input parameter library for calculations of nuclear reactions and nuclear data evaluations. Nucl Data Sheets. 2009;110:3107–3214.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert A, Cameron AGW. A composite nuclear-level density formula with shell corrections. Can J Phys. 1965;43:1446–1496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mengoni A, Nakajima Y. Fermi-gas model para-metrization of nuclear level density. J Nucl Sci Technol. 1994;31:151–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers WD, Swiatecki WJ. Nuclear masses and deformations. Nucl Phys. 1966;81:1–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plujko VA, Ezhov SN, Kavatsyuk MO, et al. Testing and improvements of gamma-ray strength functions for nuclear model calculations. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2002;Supplement 2:811–814.
   Google Scholar
• Kopecky J. Gamma-ray strength functions (IAEA-TECDOC-1034). Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 1998. p. 97–111.
   Google Scholar
• Kopecky J, Uhl M. Test of gamma-ray strength functions in nuclear model calculations. Phys Rev C. 1990;41:1941–1955.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koning AJ, Duijvestijn MC. A global pre-equilibrium analysis from 7 to 200 MeV based on the optical model potential. Nucl Phys A. 2004;744:15–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalbach C. The Griffin model, complex particles and direct reactions. Z Phys A. 1977;283:401–411.
   Google Scholar
• Otuka N, Dupont E, Semkova V, et al. Towards a more complete and accurate experimental nuclear reaction data library (EXFOR): international collaboration between nuclear reaction data centres (NRDC). Nucl Data Sheets. 2014;120:272–276.
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick MB, Herman M, Obložinský P, et al. ENDF/B-VII.1 nuclear data for science and technology: cross sections, covariances, fission product yields and decay data. Nucl Data Sheets. 2011;112:2887–2996.
   Google Scholar
• OECD Nuclear Energy Agency Data Bank. Available from http://www.oecd-nea.org/dbforms/data/eva/evatapes/jeff_32/
   Google Scholar
• Nakajima Y. JENDL activation cross section file. In: Igashira M, Nakagawa T, editors. Proceedings of the 1990 Symposium on Nuclear Data; 1990 November 29–30; Tokai, Japan: Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute; 1991. p. 43–57 ( JAERI-M 91-032).
   Google Scholar
• Koning A, Forrest R, Kellet M, et al., editors. The JEFF-3.1 nuclear data library. Paris: OECD Nuclear Energy Agency; 2006. ( JEFF Report 21).
   Google Scholar
• Zsolnay EM, Capote R, Nolthenius HJ, et al. Summary description of the new international reactor dosimetry and fusion file (IRDFF release 1.0). Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2012, INDC(NDS)-0616.
   Google Scholar
• Marganiec J, Dillmann I, Domingo Pardo C, et al. Stellar (n, γ) cross sections of p-process isotopes. II. ¹⁶⁸Yb, ¹⁸⁰W, ¹⁸⁴Os, ¹⁹⁰Pt, and ¹⁹⁶Hg. Phys Rev C. 2010;82:035806.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt HW, Cook CW. Absolute neutron absorption cross sections for Sb-Be photoneutrons. Nucl Phys. 1960;20:202–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grudzevich OT, Kagalenko AB, Kornilov NV, et al. 199mHg isomer yield in the reactions 199Hg(n, n′) and 200Hg(n, 2n). Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Neutron Physics; 1987, Sep 14–16. Kiev, USSR. 349–353, Russian.
   Google Scholar
• Sakurai K, Gotoh H, Yamamoto S, et al. Cross section measurement for 199Hg(n, n′)199mHg reaction from 0.78 to 6.3 MeV. J Nucl Sci Technol. 1982;19:775–780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swann CP, Metzger FR. Production of Y89m, Ba137m and Hg199m by inelastic neutron scattering. Phys Rev. 1955;100:1329–1333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadhead KG, Shanks DE. Application of 2.8-MeV (D,d) neutrons to activation analysis. Int J Radiat Isotopes. 1967;18:279–283.
   Google Scholar
• Bornemisza-Pauspertl P, Karolyi J, Peto G. Measurements of the excitation cross sections of isomeric states by scattering of 2.8 MeV neutrons. Atomki Koezlemenyek. 1968;10:112–114.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Abyad M, Sudár S, Comsan MNH, et al. Cross sections and isomeric cross-section ratios in the interactions of fast neutrons with isotopes of mercury. Phys Rev C. 2006;73:064608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasugai Y, Maekawa F, Ikeda Y, et al. Measurement of activation cross sections for mercury isotopes in the neutron energy range between 13.4 and 14.9 MeV. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2001;38:1048–1056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temperley JK. Neutron activation cross sections for mercury isotopes at 14.1 MeV. Phys Rev. 1969;178:1904–1910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman RF, Hawker BE, O’connor LP, et al. Cross sections for (n, p) and (n, α) reactions with 14.5 MeV neutrons. Proc Phys Soc (Lond). 1959;73:215–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maekawa F, Meigo S, Kasugai Y, et al. Experimental study on cross section data of mercury with D-T and 252Cf neutron sources. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2002;Supplement 2:986–989.
   Google Scholar
• Kalbach C. Systematics of continuum angular distributions: extensions to higher energies. Phys Rev C. 1988;37:2350–2370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar