Screening of critical parameters influencing thermal-hydraulic reliability of simple passive system

References

• Zio E, Cantarella M, Cammi A. The analytic hierarchy process as a systematic approach to the identification of important parameters for the reliability assessment of passive systems. Nucl Eng Des. 2003;226:311–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juhn PE, Kupitz J, Cleveland J, et al. IAEA activities on passive safety systems and overview of international development. Nucl Eng Des. 2000;201:41–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgazzi L. Open issues associated with passive safety systems reliability assessment. International Conference on Opportunities and Challenges for Water Cooled Reactors in the 21st Century; 2009, 27-30 October; Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• Zio E, Pedroni N. Building confidence in the reliability assessment of thermal-hydraulic passive systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2009a;94:268–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh J, Golay M. Methods for comparative assessment of active and passive safety systems with respect to reliability, uncertainty, economy and flexibility. Proc. 9th International Probabilistic, Safety Assessment and Management Conference (PSAM9); 2008 May; Hong Kong (China).
   Google Scholar
• Zio E, Pedroni N. Estimation of the functional failure probability of a thermal-hydraulic passive system by Subset Simulation. Nucl Eng Des. 2009b;239:580–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgazzi L. Evaluation of the dependencies related to passive system failure. Nucl Eng Des. 2009a;239:3048–3053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olatubosun SA, Zhang Z. Conditional subjective probability density approach to dependency consideration in passive system reliability. Nucl Eng Des. 2018;337:108–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgazzi L, Fiorini GL, De Magistris F, et al. Reliability assessment of passive safety systems. Proc. of 6th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, ICONE-6340; 1998 May 10–14; San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Burgazzi L. Incorporation of passive system reliability models in PSA studies. Int J Eng Pract Res. 2013;2(4):119–128.
   Google Scholar
• Olatubosun SA, Zhang Z. Effects of dependent critical parameters on reliability of natural circulation-based passive system. Int J Nucl Saf Simul. 2017;8(3):239–246.
   Google Scholar
• Ricotti ME, Bianchi F, Burgazzi L, et al. The REPAS Study: reliability evaluation of passive safety systems. Proc. of the 10th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering (ICONE10); 2002 April 14-18; Arlington, VA.
   Google Scholar
• Brissaud F, Charpentier D, Fouladirad M, et al. Safety Instrumented System reliability evaluation with Influencing Factors. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 2010;23:187–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olatubosun SA, Zhang Z. Multivariate analysis of critical parameters influencing the reliability of thermalhydraulic passive safety system. Nucl Eng Tech. 2019;51(1):45–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques M, Pignatel JF, Saignes P, et al. Methodology for the reliability evaluation of a passive system and its integration into a probabilistic safety assessment. Nucl Eng Des. 2005;235:2612–2631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’connor PDT, Newton D, Bromley R. Practical reliability engineering. Fourth ed. England: John Wiley and Sons; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Burgazzi L. Reliability prediction of passive systems based on multiple failure measures modelling, ANS PSA 2011 International topical meeting on probabilistic safety assessment and analysis; Wilmington, NC; 2011 March 13 –17.
   Google Scholar
• International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Passive safety systems and natural circulation in water cooled nuclear power plants. Vienna: IAEA, IAEA-TECDOC-1624; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Burgazzi L. Addressing the uncertainties related to passive system reliability. Prog Nucl Energy. 2007a;49:93–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Olatubosun SA. Uncertainties Associated with the Reliability of Thermal-hydraulic Nuclear Passive Systems. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2019;56(1):17–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar