Recent activities in the field of reactor physics

References

• Endo T, Yamamoto A. Sensitivity analysis of prompt neutron decay constant using perturbation theory. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2018;55:1245–1254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katano R, Endo T, Yamamoto A et al. Estimation of sensitivity coefficient based on lasso-type penalized linear regression. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2018;55:1099–1109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yokoyama K, Yamamoto A and Kitada T. Dimension-reduced cross-section adjustment method based on minimum variance unbiased estimation. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2018;55:319–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawamoto Y, Chiba G. Feasibility study of decay heat uncertainty reduction using nuclear data adjustment method with experimental data. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2017;54:213–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi SH, Shim HJ and Kim CH. Development of generalized perturbation theory algorithms for Monte Carlo eigenvalue calculations. Nucl Sci Eng. 2018;189:171–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwamoto H, Stankovskiy A, Fiorito L et al. Monte Carlo uncertainty quantification of the effective delayed neutron fraction. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2018;55:539–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke TP, Kiedrowski BC. Monte Carlo perturbation theory estimates of sensitivities to system dimensions. Nucl Sci Eng. 2018;189:199–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Favorite JA, Perkó Z, Kiedrowski BC et al. Adjoint-based sensitivity and uncertainty analysis for density and composition: A user’s guide. Nucl Sci Eng. 2017;185:384–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava A, Singh KP and Degweker SB. Monte Carlo methods for reactor kinetic simulations. Nucl Sci Eng. 2018;189:152–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuya D Takezawa H and Obara T. Improved approach to multiregion supercritical transient analysis based on the integral kinetic model and Monte Carlo method. Nucl Sci Eng. 2017;188:33–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okubo T. Endo T and Yamamoto A. An efficient execution of Monte Carlo simulation based on delta-tracking method using GPUs. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2017;54:30–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto A, Giho A, Kato Y, et al. A three-dimensional heterogeneous transport solver based on the Legendre polynomial expansion of angular flux method. Nucl Sci Eng. 2017;186:1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi S, Smith KS, Kim H Tak T and Lee D. On the diffusion coefficient calculation in two-step light water reactor core analysis. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2017;54:705–715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koike H, Kirimura K, Yamaji K. Kosaka S and Yamamoto A. Radially and azimuthally dependent resonance self-shielding treatment for general multi-region geometry based on a unified theory. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2018;55:41–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh I. Degweker SB and Gupta A. A new collision probability approach for solution of the transport equation in the random medium of high-plutonium-content HTR lattice cells. Nucl Sci Eng. 2018;189:101–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiba G. Perturbation theory for nuclear fuel depletion calculations with predictor-corrector method. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2018;55:290–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabuchi M, Yamamoto A. Endo T and Tatsumi M. Reduction of MOC discretization errors through a minimization of source ratio variances. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2016;53:1858–1869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tada K, Nagaya Y, Kunieda S. Suyama K and Fukahori T. Development and verification of a new nuclear data processing system FRENDY. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2017;54:806–817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyeon CH, Fujimoto A, Sugawara T, et al. Validation of Pb nuclear data by Monte Carlo analyses of sample reactivity experiments at Kyoto University Critical Assembly. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2016;53:602–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyeon CH, Yamanaka M, Oizumi A, et al. Experimental analyses of bismuth sample reactivity worth at Kyoto University Critical Assembly. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2018;55:1324–1335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukushima M, Goda J, Bounds J, et al. Lead void reactivity worth in two critical assembly cores with differing uranium enrichments. Nucl Sci Eng. 2018;189:93–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwamoto H, Nishihara K. On-line subcriticality measurement using a pulsed spallation neutron source. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2017;54:432–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamanaka M, Pyeon CH, Kim SH, et al. Effective delayed neutron fraction by Rossi-α method in accelerator-driven system experiments with 100 MeV protons at kyoto university critical assembly. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2017;54:293–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyeon CH, Vu TM, Yamanaka M, et al. Reaction rate analyses of accelerator-driven system experiments with 100 MeV protons at Kyoto University Critical Assembly. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2018;55:190–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyeon CH, Yamanaka M, Oizumi A, et al. First nuclear transmutation of 237Np and 241Am by accelerator-driven system at Kyoto University Critical Assembly. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2019;56:684–689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukushima M. Tsujimoto K and Okajima S. Analyses with latest major nuclear data libraries of the fission rate ratios for several TRU nuclides in the FCA-IX experiments. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2017;54:795–805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakon A, Nakajima K. Tsujimoto K and Okajima S. Experimental study of neutron counting in a zero-power reactor driven by a neutron source inherent in highly enriched uranium fuels. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2019;56:254–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katano R. Estimation method of prompt neutron decay constant reducing higher order mode effect by linear combination. Nucl Sci Eng. 2019;193:431–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitamura Y, Misawa T. Theory of Feynman-alpha technique with masking window for accelerator-driven systems. Ann Nucl Energy. 2017;103:470–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchinson J, Nelson M, Grove T, et al. Validation of statistical uncertainties in subcritical benchmark measurements: part I – theory and simulations. Ann Nucl Energy. 2019;125:50–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchinson J, Bahran R, Cutler T, et al. Validation of statistical uncertainties in subcritical benchmark measurements: part II – measured data. Ann Nucl Energy. 2019;125:342–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar