Generation of nuclear data using Gaussian process regression

References

• Iwamoto O. Development of a comprehensive code for nuclear data evaluation, CCONE, and validation using neutron-induced cross sections for uranium isotopes. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2007;44(5):687–697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman M, Capote R, Carlson BV, et al. EMPIRE: nuclear reaction model code system for data evaluation. Nucl Data Sheets. 2007;108(12):2655–2715.
   Google Scholar
• Koning AJ, Rochman D. Modern nuclear data evaluation with the TALYS code system. Nucl Data Sheets. 2012;113(12):2841–2934.
   Google Scholar
• Watanabe Y, Kosako K, Kunieda S, et al. Status of JENDL high energy file. J Korean Phys Soc. 2011;59(2):1040–1045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming M, Eastwood J, Stainer T, et al. HEIR: A high-energy intra-nuclear cascade Liège-based residual nuclear data library for simulation with FISPACT-II. Nucl Instrum Meth A. 2018;908:291–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titarenko Y, Batyaev VF, Butko MA, et al. Verification of high-energy transport codes on the basis of activation data. Phys Rev C. 2011 Dec;84:064612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwamoto Y, Sato T, Hashimoto S, et al. Benchmark study of the recent version of the PHITS code. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2017;54(5):617–635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stankovskiy A, Iwamoto H, Çelik Y, et al. High-energy nuclear data uncertainties propagated to MYRRHA safety parameters. Ann Nucl Energy. 2018;120:207–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwamoto H, Meigo SI, Matsuda H. A comprehensive study of spallation models for proton-induced spallation product yields utilized in transport calculation. Proceedings of International Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and technology (ND2019). 2019 May 19–24; Beijing, (China).
   Google Scholar
• Poenitz WP, Aumeier SE. The simultaneous evaluation of the standards and other cross sections of importance for technology. USA: Argonne National Laboratory; 1997. ANL/NDM-139
   Google Scholar
• Kawano T, Matsunobu H, Murata T, et al. Simultaneous evaluation of fission cross sections of uranium and plutonium isotopes for JENDL-3.3. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2000;37(4):327–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen CF, Williams CKI. Gaussian process for machine learning. Cambridge: The MIT Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop CM. Pattern recognition and machine learning. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson A, Nickisch H. Kernel interpolation for scalable structured Gaussian processes (KISS-GP). Proceedings the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML2015); 2015 Jul 6–11; Lille, (France).
   Google Scholar
• Lee J, Bahri Y, Novak R, et al. Deep neural networks as Gaussian processes. Proceedings the Eighth International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR2018); 2018 Apr 26–30; Addis Ababa, (Ethiopia).
   Google Scholar
• Chilenski MA, Greenwald M, Marzouk Y, et al. Improved profile fitting and quantification of uncertainty in experimental measurements of impurity transport coefficients using Gaussian process regression. Nucl Fusion. 2015;55:023012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnabel G. Estimating model bias over the complete nuclide chart with sparse Gaussian processes at the example of INCL/ABLA and double-differential neutron spectra. EPJ Nucl Sci Technol. 2018;4:33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otuka N, Dupont E, Semkova V, et al. Towards a more complete and accurate experimental nuclear reaction data library (EXFOR): international collaboration between nuclear reaction data centres (NRDC). Nucl Data Sheets. 2014;120:272–276.
   Google Scholar
• Titarenko Y, Batyaev VF, Titarenko A, et al. Measurement and simulation of the cross sections for nuclide production in 93Nb and natNi targets irradiated with 0.04- to 2.6-GeV protons. Phys At Nuclei. 2011;74(4):537–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budzanowski A, Fidelus M, Filges D, et al. Comparison of nonequilibrium processes in p + Ni and p + Au collisions at GeV energies. Phys Rev C. 2010 Sep;82:034605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann S. Activation experiments with medium-energy neutrons and the production of cosmogenic nuclides in extraterrestrial matter. Thesis, Univ Hannover; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Michel R, Bodemann R, Busemann H, et al. Cross sections for the production of residual nuclides by low- and medium-energy protons from the target elements C, N, O, Mg, Al, Si, Ca, Ti, V, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Sr, Y, Zr, Nb, Ba and Au. Nucl Instr and Meth in Phys Res B. 1997;129(2):153–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiekel T, Sudbrock F, Herpers U, et al. Nuclide production by proton-induced reactions on elements (6≤Z≤29) in the energy range from 200 MeV to 400 MeV. Nucl Instr Methods Phys Res B. 1996;114:91–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayudu GVS. Formation cross sections of various radionuclides from Ni, Fe, Si, Mg, O, and C for protons of energies between 130 and 400 MeV. Can J Chem. 1964;42(5):1149–1154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeshita H, Meigo SI, Matsuda H, et al. Nuclide production cross sections of Ni and Zr irradiated with 0.4-, 1.3-, 2.2-, and 3.0-GeV protons. Proceedings the 3rd J-PARC Symposium (J-PARC2019); 2019 Sep 23–26; Tsukuba, (Japan).
   Google Scholar
• Meigo SI, Matsuda H, Iwamoto H Cross section measurement in J-PARC for neutronics of the ADS. Proceedings 13th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Applications of Accelerators (AccApp’17); 2017 Jul 13–Aug 4; Quebec, (Canada).
   Google Scholar
• Boudard A, Cugnon J, David J-C, et al. New potentialities of the Liège intranuclear cascade model for reactions induced by nucleons and light charged particles. Phys Rev C. 2013 Jan;87:014606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furihata S. Statistical analysis of light fragment production from medium energy proton-induced reactions. Nucl Instrum Meth. 2000;B171:251–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar