Evaluation of fission product yields and associated covariance matrices

References

• Katakura J, J ENDLFP Decay data file 2011 and fission yields data file 2011. Japan Atomic Energy Agency; 2012. JAEA-Data/Code 2011-025.
   Google Scholar
• Dunford CL. Evaluated nuclear data file, ENDF/B-VI. In: Qaim SM, editor. Nuclear data for science and technology. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 1992. p. 788–792.
   Google Scholar
• England TR, Rider BF Evaluation and compilation of fission product yields. Los Alamos National Laboratory; 1994. ENDF-349, LA-UR-94-3106.
   Google Scholar
• Kawano T, Chadwick MB. Estimation of 239Pu independent and cumulative fission product yields from the chain yield data using a Bayesian technique. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2013;50(10):1034–1042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown DA, Chadwick MB, Capote R, et al. ENDF/B-VIII.0: the 8th major release of the nuclear reaction data library with CIELO-project cross sections, new standards and thermal scattering data. Nuclear Data Sheets. 2018;148:1–142. Special Issue on Nuclear Reaction Data.
   Google Scholar
• Katakura J-I, Minato F, Ohgama K. Revision of the JENDL FP fission yield data. EPJ Web Conf. 2016;111:08004.
   Google Scholar
• Schunck N, Robledo LM. Microscopic theory of nuclear fission: a review. Rep Prog Phys. 2016 oct;79(11):116301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt K-H, Jurado B, Amouroux C, et al. General description of fission observables: GEF model code. Nucl Data Sheets. 2016;131:107–221. [ Special Issue on Nuclear Reaction Data].
   Google Scholar
• Ishizuka C, Usang MD, Ivanyuk FA, et al. Four-dimensional Langevin approach to low-energy nuclear fission of 236U. Phys Rev C. 2017;96:064616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sierk AJ. Langevin model of low-energy fission. Phys Rev C. 2017 Sep;96(3):034603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stetcu I, Talou P, Kawano T, et al. Isomer production ratios and the angular momentum distribution of fission fragments. Phys Rev C. 2013 Oct;88(4):044603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okumura S, Kawano T, Jaffke P, et al. 235U(n, f) Independent fission product yield and isomeric ratio calculated with the statistical Hauser-Feshbach theory. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2018;1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahl AC. Nuclear-charge distribution and delayed-neutron yields for thermal-neutron-induced fission of 235U, 233U, and 239Pu and for spontaneous fission of 252Cf. At Data Nucl Data Tables. 1988;39(1):1–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahl AC Systematics of fission-product yields. Los Alamos National Laboratory; 2002. LA-13928.
   Google Scholar
• Madland DG, England TR. The influence of isomeric states on independent fission product yields. Nucl Sci Eng. 1977;64(4):859–865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellett MA, Bersillon O, Mills RW The JEFF-3.1/-3.1.1 radioactive decay data and fission yields sub-libraries. OECD NEA; 2009. JEFF Report 20 OECD NEA.
   Google Scholar
• James MF, Mills RW, Weaver DR. A new evaluation of fission product yields and the production of a new library (UKFY2) of independent and cumulative yields. Prog Nucl Energy. 1991;26(1):1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills RW. Fission product yield evaluation: Appendix 5. to his PhD thesis, University of Birmingham; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Andreyev AN, Nishio K, Schmidt KH. Nuclear fission: a review of experimental advances and phenomenology. Rep Prog Phys. 2017 nov;81(1):016301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koura H, Tachibana T, Uno M, et al. Nuclidic mass formula on a spherical basis with an improved even-odd term. Prog Theor Phys. 2005 02;113(2):305–325. .
   Google Scholar
• Fiorito L, Stankovskiy A, den Eynde GV, et al. Generation of fission yield covariances to correct discrepancies in the nuclear data libraries. Ann Nucl Energy. 2016;88:12–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otuka N, Dupont E, Semkova V, et al. Towards a more complete and accurate experimental nuclear reaction data library (exfor): international collaboration between nuclear reaction data centres (NRDC). Nucl Data Sheets. 2014;120:272–276.
   Google Scholar
• Zerkin VV, Pritychenko B. The experimental nuclear reaction data (EXFOR): extended computer database and Web retrieval system. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A. 2018;888:31–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins BD, Steinberg EP, Chasman RR. Scission-point model of nuclear fission based on deformed-shell effects. Phys Rev C. 1976 Nov;14(5):1832–1863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koning AJ, Rochman D. Modern nuclear data evaluation with the TALYS code system. Nucl Data Sheets. 2012;113(12):2841–2934. Special Issue on Nuclear Reaction Data. .
   Google Scholar
• Mills RW, Plompen A, Hambsch F-J. A new UK fission yield evaluation UKFY3.7. EPJ Web Conf. 2017;146:04008.
   Google Scholar
• Katakura J, Minato F JENDL decay data file 2015. Japan Atomic Energy Agency; 2016. JAEA-Data/Code 2015-030.
   Google Scholar
• Oyamatsu K, Takeuchi H, Sagisaka M, et al. New method for calculating aggregate fission product decay heat with full use of macroscopic-measurement data. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2001;38(7):477–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keepin GR, Wimett TF, Zeigler RK. Delayed neutrons from fissionable isotopes of uranium, plutonium and thorium. J Nucl Energy. 1957;6(1):IN2– 21.
   Google Scholar
• Dickens JK, Love TA, McConnell JW, et al. Fission-product energy release for times following thermal-neutron fission of 235U between 2 and 14 000 s. Nucl Sci Eng. 1980;74(2):106–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couchell GP, Campbell JM, Li S, et al. A study of gamma-ray and beta-particle decay heat following thermal neutron induced fission of 235U. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology, Vol. 2. La Grange park, IL, USA: American Nuclear Society, Inc.; 1994. p. 966–969.
   Google Scholar
• Akiyama M, An S Measurements of fission-product decay heat for fast reactors. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology. Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel Publication; 1982. p. 237–244.
   Google Scholar
• Schreckenbach K, Colvin G, Gelletly W, et al. Determination of the antineutrino spectrum from 235U thermal neutron fission products up to 9.5 MeV. Phys Lett B. 1985;160(4):325–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haag N, Gütlein A, Hofmann M, et al. Experimental determination of the antineutrino spectrum of the fission products of 238U. Phys Rev Lett. 2014 Mar;112:122501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Feilitzsch F, Hahn AA, Schreckenbach K. Experimental beta-spectra from 239Pu and 235U thermal neutron fission products and their correlated antineutrino spectra. Phys Lett B. 1982;118(1):162–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn AA, Schreckenbach K, Gelletly W, et al. Antineutrino spectra from 241Pu and 239Pu thermal neutron fission products. Phys Lett B. 1989;218(3):365–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croff AG. ORIGEN2: a versatile computer code for calculating the nuclide compositions and characteristics of nuclear materials. Nucl Technol. 1983;62(3):335–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okumura K, Sugino K, Kojima K, et al. Set of ORIGEN2 cross section libraries based on JENDL-4.0; ORLIBJ40. JAEA-Data/Code 2012-032. 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Chemistry JAEA Tokai Research Establishment. Dissolution study group in the department of chemistry, Dissolution Studies of Spent Nuclear Fuels; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Nakahara Y, Suyama K, Agency TSJAE. Dissolution study group in the department of chemistry, Dissolution Studies of Spent Nuclear Fuels; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Nakahara Y, Suyama K, Inagawa J, et al. Nuclide composition benchmark data set for verifying burnup codes on spent light water reactor fuels. Nucl Technol. 2002;137(2):111–126. .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michel-Sendis F, Gauld I, Martinez JS, et al. SFCOMPO-2.0: an OECD NEA database of spent nuclear fuel isotopic assays, reactor design specifications, and operating data. Ann Nucl Energy. 2017;110:779–788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy JC, Carraz LC, Jonson B, et al. The essential decay of pandemonium: A demonstration of errors in complex beta-decay schemes. Phys Lett B. 1977;71(2):307–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshida T, Tachibana T, Okumura S, et al. Spectral anomaly of reactor antineutrinos based on theoretical energy spectra. Phys Rev C. 2018 Oct;98(4):041303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller TA, Lhuillier D, Fallot M, et al. Improved predictions of reactor antineutrino spectra. Phys Rev C. 2011 May;83(5):054615. .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshida T, Tachibana T, Hagura N, et al. Composition, decomposition and analysis of reactor antineutrino and electron spectra based on gross theory of beta-decay and summation method. Prog Nucl Energy. 2016;88:175–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usang MD, Ivanyuk FA, Ishizuka C, et al. Correlated transitions in TKE and mass distributions of fission fragments described by 4-D Langevin equation. Sci Rep. 2019 Feb;9(1):1525.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ishizuka C, Zhang X, Usang MD, et al. Effect of the doubly magic shell closures in 132Sn and 208Pb on the mass distribution of fission fragments of superheavy nuclei. Phys Rev C. 2020 Jan;101:011601(R).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman M, Trkov A ENDF-6 formats manual. Brookhaven National Laboratory; 2009. ENDF-102, BNL-90365-2009.
   Google Scholar