Exact Monte Carlo calculation method for K-eigenvalue change using perturbation source method

References

• Kiedrowski BC. Review of early 21st-century Monte Carlo perturbation and sensitivity techniques for k-eigenvalue radiation transport calculations. Nucl Sci Eng. 2017;185(3):426–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi H. Monte Carlo method for geometrical perturbation and its application to the pulsed fast reactor. Nucl Sci Eng. 1970;41(2):259–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthes W. Calculation of reactivity perturbations with the Monte Carlo method. Nucl Sci Eng. 1972;47:234–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman TJ, Petrie LM, Landers NF, et al. Carlo perturbation source method for reactivity calculations. Nucl Sci Eng. 1978;66:60–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakagawa M, Asaoka T. Improvement of correlated sampling Monte Carlo methods for reactivity calculations. J Nucl Sci Technol. 1978;15;400−410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preeg WE, Tsang JSK. Comparison of correlated Monte Carlo techniques. Trans Am Nucl Soc. 1982;43:628–629.
   Google Scholar
• Rief H. Generalized Monte Carlo perturbation algorithms for correlated sampling and a second-order taylor series approach. Ann Nucl Energy. 1984;9:455–476.
   Google Scholar
• Lux I, Koblinger L. Monte Carlo particle transport methods: neutron and photon calculations. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• McKinney GW, Iverson JL Verification of the Monte Carlo differential operator technique for MCNP, Los Alamos National Laboratory, LA-13098, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Kitada T, Yamane A, Takeda T Improvements of correlated sampling method in Monte Carlo perturbation theory, Proc Int Conf on the Physics of Reactors PHYSOR96, Mito, Ibaraki, Japan, Sep. 16-20, 1996, A-212–A-219, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Favorite JA. An alternative implementation of the differential operator (Taylor series) perturbation method for Monte Carlo criticality problems. Nucl Sci Eng. 2002;142:327–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagaya Y, Mori T. Impact of perturbed fission source on the effective multiplication factor in Monte Carlo perturbation calculations. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2005;42:428–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiedrowski BC, Brown FB, Wilson PPH. Adjoint-weighted tallies for k-eigenvalue calculations with continuous-energy Monte Carlo. Nucl Sci Eng. 2011;168:226–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terranova N, Mancusi D, Zoia A. New perturbation and sensitivity capabilities in TRIPOLI-4®. Ann Nucl Energy. 2018;121:335–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SH, Yamanaka M, Pyeon CH. Improvement of fission source distribution by correlated sampling method in Monte Carlo perturbation calculations. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2018;55:945–954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nauchi Y, Kameyama T. Development of calculation technique for iterated fission probability and reactor kinetic parameters using continuous-energy Monte Carlo method. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2010;47:977–990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shim HJ, Kim CH. Adjoint sensitivity and uncertainty analyses in Monte Carlo forward calculations. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2011;48:1453–1461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi SH, Shim HJ. Memory-efficient calculations of adjoint-weighted tallies by the Monte Carlo Wielandt method. Ann Nucl Energy. 2016;96:287–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu Y, Shang X, Tang X, et al. Computing eigenvalue sensitivity coefficients to nuclear data by adjoint superhistory method and adjoint Wielandt method implemented in RMC code. Ann Nucl Energy. 2016;87:228–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakamoto H, Yamamoto T. Improvement and performance evaluation of the perturbation source method for an exact Monte Carlo perturbation calculation in fixed source problems. J Compt Phys. 2017;345:245–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto T, Sakamoto H. Monte Carlo perturbation calculation for geometry change in fixed source problems with the perturbation source method. Prog Nucl Energy. 2021;132:103611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagaya Y, Mori T. Estimation of sample reactivity worth with differential operator sampling method. Prog Nucl Sci Technol. 2011;2:842–850.
   Google Scholar
• Favorite JA, Parsons DK Second-order cross terms in Monte Carlo differential operator perturbation estimates, Proc M&C 2001, Salt Lake City, Utah, September 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Bell GI, Glasstone S. Nuclear reactor theory. New York: Van Norstrand Reinhold; 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Truchet G Continuous-energy adjoint flux and perturbation calculation using the iterated fission probability method in Monte Carlo code TRIPOLI-4 and underlying applications. Proc Joint Int Conf on Supercomputing in Nuclear Applications and Monte Carlo 2013 (SNA + MC 2013), Paris, France, October 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Truchet G, Leconte P, Palau JM, et al. Sodium void reactivity effect analysis using the newly developed exact perturbation theory in Monte-Carlo code TRIPOLI-4®. Proc PHYSOR 2014 - The Role of Reactor Physics toward a Sustainable Future, Kyoto, Japan, September 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Alcouffe RE, Baker RS, Brinkley FW, et al. DANTSYS: a diffusion accelerated neutral particle transport code system. LA-12969-M. 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Okumura K, Kugo T, Kaneno K, et al. SRAC2006: a comprehensive neutronics calculation code system. JAEA-Data/Code 2007-004. 2007.
   Google Scholar