Differential parameters uncertainty estimation via a PCA-based monte carlo sampling approach: IRT-4M fuel type as a case study

References

• Smith RC Uncertainty quantification: theory, implementation, and applications. Siam; 2013 Dec 2.
   Google Scholar
• Cacuci DG. Second-order adjoint sensitivity analysis of a general ratio of functionals of the forward and adjoint fluxes in a multiplying nuclear system with source. Ann Nucl Energy. 2020 1;Jan(135):106956. .
   Google Scholar
• Abdel-Khalik HS, Bang Y, Wang C. Overview of hybrid subspace methods for uncertainty quantification, sensitivity analysis. Ann Nucl Energy. 2013 Feb;1(52):28–46.
   Google Scholar
• Yamamoto A, Kinoshita K, Watanabe T, et al. Uncertainty quantification of LWR core characteristics using random sampling method. Nucl Sci Eng. 2015 Oct 1;181(2):160–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giles M. “Monte Carlo Methods for Uncertainty Quantification.” Lecture from the KU Leuven Summer School on Uncertainty Quantification (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Avramova MN, Ivanov KN. Verification, validation and uncertainty quantification in multi-physics modeling for nuclear reactor design and safety analysis. Prog Nucl Energy. 2010 Sep 1;52(7):601–614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metwally WA, Alawad AS, Khuwaileh BA. On the over-conservatism of the 5% depletion uncertainty rule in spent fuel criticality analyses. Ann Nucl Energy. 2019 Mar 1;125:1. .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbanas G, Williams ML, Leal LC, et al. Advancing inverse sensitivity/uncertainty methods for nuclear fuel cycle applications. Nucl Data Sheets. 2015 1;Jan(123):51–56. .
   Google Scholar
• Abdel-Khalik HS, Turinsky PJ, Jessee MA. Efficient subspace methods-based algorithms for performing sensitivity, uncertainty, and adaptive simulation of large-scale computational models. Nucl Sci Eng. 2008 Jul 1;159(3):256–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constantine PG, Dow E, Wang Q. Active subspace methods in theory and practice: applications to kriging surfaces. SIAM J Sci Comput. 2014;36(4):A1500–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foad B, Yamamoto A, Endo T. Efficient uncertainty quantification for PWR during LOCA using unscented transform with singular value decomposition. Ann Nucl Energy. 2020 Jun;15(141):107341.
   Google Scholar
• Satnoianu RA, Maini PK, Menzinger M. Parameter space analysis, pattern sensitivity and model comparison for Turing and stationary flow-distributed waves (FDS). Phys D. 2001;160(1):79–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turinsky P, Khuwaileh B. Methods development and application of uncertainty quantification & data assimilation for multi-physics simulations. Consortium for Advanced Simulation of LWRs, Raleigh, NC, Report No. CASL-U-2016-1087-000.
   Google Scholar
• Khuwaileh BA, Turinsky PJ. Surrogate based model calibration for pressurized water reactor physics calculations. Nucl Eng Technol. 2017 Sep 1;49(6):1219–1225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rearden BT, Mueller DE. Uncertainty quantification techniques of SCALE/TSUNAMI. Transactions of the American Nuclear Society. 2011 1;Jan(104):371.
   Google Scholar
• Rearden BTSAMS: Sensitivity analysis module for SCALE, SCALE 6.1 manual. ORNL/TM-2005/39, Oak Ridge National Laboratory. 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Oak Ridge National Laboratory. SCALE: a comprehensive modeling and simulation suite for nuclear safety analysis and design. ORNL/TM‐2005/39 Available from Radiation Safety Information Computational Center at Oak Ridge National Laboratory as CCC‐785. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Khuwaileh B, Williams B, Turinsky P, et al. Verification of reduced order modeling based uncertainty/sensitivity estimator (ROMUSE). Nucl Eng Technol. 2019 Jul 1;51(4):968–976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dambrosio A, Ruščák M, Mazzini G, et al. Neutronic analysis of the LVR-15 research reactor using the PARCS code. Ann Nucl Energy. 2018 Jul 1;117:145–154. .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryazantsev EP, Egorenkov PM, Nassonov VA, et al. Testing of the IRT-4M type FA with LEU UO 2-Al fuel in WWR-CM reactor. 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Baytelesov S, Kungurov F, Safarov A, et al. 6-and 8-tube IRT-4M fuel assemblies in WWR-SM research reactor core. 2010 Jul 15;12(4–6) :422–428. Uzbek Journal of Physics.
   Google Scholar
• Markova L, Havluj F, Marek M. Inventory prediction and BUC calculations related to MEU/LEU IRT Fuels of LVR-15 research facility. International Workshop on Advances in Applications of Burnup Credit for Spent Fuel Storage, Transport, Reprocessing, and Disposition Cordoba, Spain; 2009. Available from: https://www.oecd-nea.org/science/wpncs/buc/workshop-2009/presentations/3.4.Markova_slides.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Halko N, Martinsson PG, Tropp JA. Finding structure with randomness: probabilistic algorithms for constructing approximate matrix decompositions. SIAM Rev. 2011;53(2):217–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar