Seismic performance evaluation of base-isolated nuclear power plant reactor building considering aging effect of isolation device

References

• Datta TK. Seismic analysis of structures. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons (Asia) Pte Ltd; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Ivan Skinner WHR R, McVerry GH. An introduction to seismic isolation. Chichester West Sussex England: John Wiley & Sons; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Makris N. Seismic isolation: early history. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn. 2019;48(2):269–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choun Y-S. Seismic isolation studies and applications for nuclear facilities. Transactions of the Korean Nuclear Society Autumn Meeting; 2005 Oct 27–28; Busan, Rep. of Korea: Korean Nuclear Society.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn DH, Kim YJ, Kim YG, et al. . KALIMER preliminary conceptual design report. Taejon, Rep. of Korea: Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute. 2000. ( no. KAERI/TR-1636/2000).
   Google Scholar
• Itoh Y, Gu H, Satoh K, et al. Long-term deterioration of high damping rubber bridge bearing. Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshuu A. 2006;62(3):595–607.
   Google Scholar
• Park J, Choun Y-S, Kim MK, et al. Revaluation of the aging property modification factor of lead rubber bearings based on accelerated aging tests and finite element analysis. Nucl Eng Des. 2019;347:59–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar M, Whittaker AS, Constantinou MC. Seismic isolation of nuclear power plants using elastomeric bearings. Buffalo NY: Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (MCEER), State University of New York; 2019. p. 433.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. Elastomeric seismic-protection isolators- Part 3: applications for buildings- specifications. Geneva Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization; 2010. p. 60.
   Google Scholar
• Mazza F. Effects of the long-term behaviour of isolation devices on the seismic response of base-isolated buildings. Struct Control Health Monit. 2019;26(4):e2331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrera-Vargas CA, Díaz IM, Soria JM, et al. Enhancing friction pendulum isolation systems using passive and semi-active dampers. Appl Sci. 2020;10(16):5621.
   Google Scholar
• Lee GC, Y-c O, Niu T, et al. Characterization of a roller seismic isolation bearing with supplemental energy dissipation for highway bridges. J Struct Eng. 2010;136(5):502–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin EJ, Lee KT, Winterflood J, et al. Techniques for reducing the resonant frequency of Euler spring vibration isolators. Class Quantum Grav. 2004;21(5):S959–S963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner RI, Kelly JM, Heine AJ. Hysteretic dampers for earthquake-resistant structures. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 1974;3(3):287–296.
   Google Scholar
• Ismail M. Seismic isolation of structures. Part I: concept, review and a recent development. Hormigón y Acero. 2018;69(285):147–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park J, Choun Y-S, Kim MK. Evaluation of long-term behavior by the size of lead rubber bearings. ASME 2016 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference; 2016 Jul 17-21; Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. V008T08A040: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Itoh Y, Gu HS. Prediction of aging characteristics in natural rubber bearings used in bridges. J Bridge Eng. 2009;14(2):122–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paramashanti, Kitane Y, Itoh Y, et al. Experimental investigation of aging effect on damping ratio of high damping rubber bearing. J Struct Eng. 2011;57A:769–779.
   Google Scholar
• Blackman EJ, McCall EB. Relationships between the structures of natural rubber vulcanizates and their thermal and oxidative aging. Rubber Chem Technol. 1970;43(3):651–663.
   Google Scholar
• Muramatsu Y, Nishikawa I. A study for the prediction of the long-term durability of seismic isolators. Showa Electr Wire Rev. 1995;45(1):44–49.
   Google Scholar
• Siciliano A. Ageing effects on seismic isolation devices. Rome Italy: Sapienza University of Rome; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Gu HS, Itoh Y. Aging behaviors of natural rubber in isolation bearings. Adv Mater Res. 2011;163-167:3343–3347.
   Google Scholar
• ASCE.ASCE/SEI 4-16: seismic analysis of safety-related nuclear structures.Reston Virginia:American Society of Civil Engineers.2017. Seismic Analysis of Safety-Related Nuclear Structures.
   Google Scholar
• KEPCO KHNP. APR1400: design Control Document Tier 1. Korea Electric Power Corporation and Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co., Ltd.; 2018. ( no. APR1400-K-X-IT-14001-NP).
   Google Scholar
• KEPCO KHNP Status report – APR1400. Korea electric power corporation and Korea hydro & Nuclear Power Co., Ltd.; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen -D-D, Thusa B, Han T-S, et al. Identifying significant earthquake intensity measures for evaluating seismic damage and fragility of nuclear power plant structures. Nucl Eng Technol. 2020;52(1):192–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Nguyen D, Kim D, Duy Nguyen D. Nonlinear seismic soil-structure interaction analysis of nuclear reactor building considering the effect of earthquake frequency content. Structures. 2020;26:901–914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed K, Kim D. A windowed adjustment function based NRC compliant ground motions for fragility analysis of base-isolated nuclear power plant. KSCE J Civil Eng. 2018;22(5):1900–1910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Y-N, Whittaker AS, Constantinou MC, et al. Seismic demands on secondary systems in base-isolated nuclear power plants. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2007;36(12):1741–1761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen -D-D, Thusa B, Park H, et al. Efficiency of various structural modeling schemes on evaluating seismic performance and fragility of APR1400 containment building. Nucl Eng Technol. 2021;53(8):2696–2707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CSI. Getting started with SAP2000 (integrated solution for structural analysis and design). Berkeley CA: Computers and Structures, Inc.; 2018. p. 75.
   Google Scholar
• Sayed M, Go S, Cho SG, et al. Seismic responses of base-isolated nuclear power plant structures considering spatially varying ground motions. Struct Eng Mech. 2015;54(1):169–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhandari M, Bharti SD, Shrimali MK, et al. Seismic fragility analysis of base-isolated building frames excited by near- and far-field earthquakes. J Perform Constr Facil. 2019;33(3):04019029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uniform Building CodeTM. Uniform building code: structural engineering design provisions. Vol. 2. Whittier CA: International Conference of Building Officials; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Naeim F, Kelly JM. Design of seismic isolated structures: from theory to practice. Hoboken NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Mayes RL, Naeim F. Design of structures with seismic isolation. In: Naeim F, editor. The seismic design handbook. Boston MA: Springer US; 2001. p. 723–755.
   Google Scholar
• Usta O, Altıntaş G. Parametric design and investigation of base isolators using the script developed on SAP2000 OAPI. Manisa Turkey: Manisa Celal Bayar University; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. NRC. Regulatory guide 1.60: design response spectra for seismic design of nuclear power plants. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC); 2014. ( no. 301-415-7000).
   Google Scholar
• Constantinou MC, Whittaker AS, Kalpakidis Y, et al. Performance of seismic isolation hardware under service and seismic loading. Buffalo NY: The State University of New York; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman MM, Nahar TT, Kim D. Effect of frequency characteristics of ground motion on response of tuned mass damper controlled inelastic concrete frame. Buildings. 2021;11(2):74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Huy M, Evrard G. Methodologies for lifetime predictions of rubber using arrhenius and WLF models. Die Angew Makromol Chemie. 1998;261-262(1):135–142.
   Google Scholar
• Korea Meteorological Administration. The national climate data center: Korea meteorological administration; [2021 cited 2021 Feb 01]. Available from: https://data.kma.go.kr/stcs/grnd/grndTaList.do?pgmNo=70
   Google Scholar
• Iervolino I, Manfredi G. A review of ground motion record selection strategies for dynamic structural analysis. In: Bursi OS, Wagg D, editors. Modern testing techniques for structural systems: dynamics and control. Vienna: Springer Vienna; 2008. p. 131–163.
   Google Scholar
• Haj Najafi L, Tehranizadeh M. Ground motion selection and scaling in practice. Period Polytech: Civ Eng. 2015;59(2):233–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittaker A, Atkinson G, Baker J, et al. Selecting and scaling earthquake ground motions for performing response-history analyses. Gaithersburg MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology; 2011. p. 256.
   Google Scholar
• PEER. PEER ground motion database 2020 [2020 Jan 01]. Available from: https://ngawest2.berkeley.edu/
   Google Scholar
• CESMD. Center for Engineering Strong Motion Data. 2021 [cited 2021 Jan 10]. Available from: https://www.strongmotioncenter.org/
   Google Scholar
• ASCE. ASCE/SEI 43-05: seismic design criteria for structures, systems, and components in nuclear facilities. Reston VA: American Society of Civil Engineers; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• FEMA. FEMA P-58-1: seismic performance assessment of buildings. second ed. Vol. 1, Washington DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• ASCE. ASCE/SEI 7-16: minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures. Reston VA: American Society of Civil Engineers; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Shome N. Probabilistic seismic demand analysis of nonlinear structures. Stanford CA: Stanford University; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Nau JM, Hall WJ. Scaling methods for earthquake response spectra. J Struct Eng. 1984;110(7):1533–1548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira F, Moutinho C, Cunha Á, et al. An artificial accelerogram generator code written in matlab. Engineering Reports. 2020;2(3):e12129.
   Google Scholar
• Nahar TT, Rahman MM, Kim D. Seismic capacity evaluation of fire-damaged cabinet facility in a nuclear power plant. Nucl Eng Technol. 2021;53(4):1331–1344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy R, Ravindra M. Seismic fragilities for nuclear power plant risk studies. Nucl Eng Des. 1984;79(1):47–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker JW. Efficient analytical fragility function fitting using dynamic structural analysis. Earthq Spectra. 2015;31(1):579–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandal TK, Ghosh S, Pujari NN. Seismic fragility analysis of a typical Indian PHWR containment: comparison of fragility models. Struct Saf. 2016;58:11–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahar TT, Rahman MM, Kim D. Effective safety assessment of aged concrete gravity dam based on the reliability index in a seismically induced site. Appl Sci. 2021;11(5):1987.
   Google Scholar
• Bommer JJ, Martínez-pereira A. The effective duration of earthquake strong motion. J Earthq Eng. 1999;3(2):127–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackie K, Stojadinovic B. Seismic demands for performance-based design of bridges. Berkeley CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center Berkeley; 2003. p. 166.
   Google Scholar
• Park Y-J, Ang AH-S, Wen YK. Seismic damage analysis of reinforced concrete buildings. J Struct Eng. 1985;111(4):740–757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Housner GW Spectrum intensities of strong-motion earthquakes. Proceedings of the Symposium on Earthquake and Blast Effects on Structures. Los Angeles, CA, USA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute; 1952. p. 20–36.
   Google Scholar
• Fajfar P, Vidic T, Fischinger M. A measure of earthquake motion capacity to damage medium-period structures. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 1990;9(5):236–242.
   Google Scholar
• Nielson BG, DesRoches R. Seismic fragility methodology for highway bridges using a component level approach. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2007;36(6):823–839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padgett JE, Nielson BG, DesRoches R. Selection of optimal intensity measures in probabilistic seismic demand models of highway bridge portfolios. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2008;37(5):711–725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castaldo P, Palazzo B, Ferrentino T, et al. Influence of the strength reduction factor on the seismic reliability of structures with FPS considering intermediate PGA/PGV ratios. Compos B Eng. 2017;115:308–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedayati Dezfuli F, Alam MS. Effect of different steel-reinforced elastomeric isolators on the seismic fragility of a highway bridge. Struct Control Health Monit. 2017;24(2):e1866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Huo Y. Evaluating effectiveness and optimum design of isolation devices for highway bridges using the fragility function method. Eng Struct. 2009;31(8):1648–1660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali A, Hayah NA, Kim D, et al. Probabilistic seismic assessment of base-isolated NPPs subjected to strong ground motions of Tohoku earthquake. Nucl Eng Technol. 2014;46(5):699–706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang HHM. Seismic probabilistic risk assessment and seismic margins studies for nuclear power plants. Buffalo NY: National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research; 1987. p. 38.
   Google Scholar
• Prassinos PG, Murray RC, Cummings GE. Seismic margin review of the maine yankee atomic power station. Washington DC: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission; 1987.
   Google Scholar