Application of Bayesian machine learning for estimation of uncertainty in forecasted plume directions by atmospheric dispersion simulations

References

• Imai K, Chino M, Ishikawa H. SPEEDI: A computer code system for the real-time prediction of radiation dose to the public due to an accidental release. JAERI–1297. Japan: Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute; 1985. p. 93.
   Google Scholar
• Nagai H, Chino M, Yamazawa H. Development of scheme for predicting atmospheric dispersion of radionuclides during nuclear emergency by using atmospheric dynamic model. J At Energy Soc Jpn. 1999;41(7):777–785. in Japanese.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Headquarters NER report of Japanese government to the IAEA ministerial conference on nuclear safety – The accident at TEPCO’s Fukushima Nuclear Power Stations. Tokyo: Government of Japan; 2011. [cited 2022 Oct 25] Available from: https://japan.kantei.go.jp/kan/topics/201106/iaea_houkokusho_e.html
   Google Scholar
• Galmarini S, Bianconi R, Klug W, et al. Ensemble dispersion forecasting—Part I: concept, approach and indicators. Atmos Environ. 2004;38(28):4607–4617. DOI:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.05.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galmarini S, Bianconi R, Addis R, et al. Ensemble dispersion forecasting—part II: Application and evaluation. Atmos Environ. 2004;38(28):4619–4632. DOI:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.05.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Draxler R, Arnold D, Chino M, et al. World Meteorological Organization’s model simulations of the radionuclide dispersion and deposition from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident. J Environ Radioact. 2015;139:172–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitayama K, Morino Y, Takigawa M, et al. Atmospheric modeling of 137Cs plumes from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant—Evaluation of the model intercomparison data of the science council of Japan. J Geophys Res Atmos. 2018;123:7754–7770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato Y, Takigawa M, Sekiyama TT, et al. Model intercomparison of atmospheric 137Cs from the FUkushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident: simulations based on identical input data. J Geophys Res Atmos. 2018;123(20):11–748. DOI:10.1029/2018JD029144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato Y, Sekiyama TT, Fang S, et al. A model inter- comparison of atmospheric 137Cs concentrations from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident, phase III: simulation with an identical source term and meteorological field at 1-km resolution. Atmos Environ X. 2020;7(100):086. DOI:10.1016/j.aeaoa.2020.100086
   Google Scholar
• Kajino M, Sekiyama TT, Igarashi Y, et al. Deposition and dispersion of radio-cesium released due to the Fukushima nuclear accident: sensitivity to meteorological models and physical modules. J Geophys Res Atmos. 2019;124(3):1823–1845. DOI:10.1029/2018JD028998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kajino M, Sekiyama TT, Mathieu A, et al. Lessons learned from atmospheric modeling studies after the Fukushima nuclear accident: ensemble simulations, data assimilation, elemental process modeling, and inverse modeling. Geochem J. 2018;52(2):85–101. DOI:10.2343/geochemj.2.0503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwasaki T, Sekiyama TT, Nakajima T, et al. Intercomparison of numerical atmospheric dispersion prediction models for emergency response to emissions of radionuclides with limited source information in the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant accident. Atmos Environ. 2019;214:116,830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korsakissok I, Périllat R, Andronopoulos S, et al. Uncertainty propagation in atmospheric dispersion models for radiological emergencies in the pre- and early release phase: summary of case studies. Radioprot. 2020;55:S57–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshida T, Nagai H, Terada H, et al. Evaluation of uncertainties derived from meteorological forecast inputs in plume directions predicted by atmospheric dispersion simulations. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2022;59(1):55–66. DOI:10.1080/00223131.2021.1951862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terada H, Nagai H, Tanaka A, et al. Atmospheric-dispersion database system that can immediately provide calculation results for various source term and meteorological conditions. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2020;57(6):745–754. DOI:10.1080/00223131.2019.1709994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JY, Lee SH, Park TJ. A Methodology for Estimating the Uncertainty in Model Parameters Applying the Robust Bayesian Inferences. J. Radiat Prot Res. 2016;41(2):149–154.
   Google Scholar
• Smith J, French S. Bayesian Updating of Atmospheric Dispersion Models for Use After an Accidental Release of Radioactivity. J R Stat Soc. 1993;42(5):501–511.
   Google Scholar
• Terada H, Nagai H, Tsuduki K, et al. Refinement of source term and atmospheric dispersion simulations of radionuclides during the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station accident. J Environ Radioact. 2020;213:106104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JY, Jan HK, Lee JK. The Robust Bayesian Analysis Due to a Variation of Effective Height in the Atmospheric Dispersion. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2008;45(5):710–713.
   Google Scholar
• Gunawardena N, Pollotta G, Simpson M, et al. Machine Learning Emulation of Spatial Deposition from a Multi-physics Ensemble of Weather and Atmospheric Transport Models. Atmosphere. 2021;12(8):953. DOI:10.3390/atmos12080953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skamarock WC, Klemp JB, Dudhia J, et al. A description of the advanced research WRF version 3. USA: National Center for Atmospheric Research; 2008. (NCAR/TN-475STR).
   Google Scholar
• Terada H, Chino M. Development of an atmospheric dispersion model for accidental discharge of radio nuclides with the function of simultaneous prediction for multiple domains and its evaluation by application to the Chernobyl nuclear accident. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2008;45(9):920–931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison H, Thompson G, Tatarskii V. Impact of cloud microphysics on the development of trailing stratiform precipitation in a simulated squall line: Comparison of one-and two-moment schemes. Mon Wea Rev. 2009;137(3):991–1007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janjić ZI. The step-mountain eta coordinate model: Further developments of the convection, viscous sublayer, and turbulence closure schemes. Mon Wea Rev. 1994;122(5):927–945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakanishi M, Niino H. An improved Mellor–Yamada level-3 model with condensation physics: Its design and verification. Bound-Lay Meteorol. 2004;112(1):1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mlawer EJ, Taubman SJ, Brown PD, et al. Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the longwave. J Geophys Res Atmos. 1997;102(D14):16663–16682. DOI:10.1029/97JD00237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudhia J. Numerical study of convection observed during the winter monsoon experiment using a mesoscale two-dimensional model. J Atmos Sci. 1989;46(20):3077–3107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery DC, Peck EA. Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis. New York: Wiley; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Nakayama H, Satoh D, Nagai H, et al. Development of local-scale high-resolution atmospheric dispersion model using large-eddy simulation part 6: introduction of detailed dose calculation method. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2021;58(9):949–969. DOI:10.1080/00223131.2021.1894256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakayama H, Onodera N, Satoh D, et al. Development of local-scale high-resolution atmospheric dispersion and dose assessment system. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2022;59(10):1314–1329. DOI:10.1080/00223131.2022.2038302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar