JENDL-5 benchmarking for fission reactor applications

References

• Iwamoto O, Iwamoto N, Kunieda S, et al. Japanese evaluated nuclear data library version 5: jENDL-5. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2023;60(1):1–60. DOI:10.1080/00223131.2022.2141903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shibata K, Iwamoto O, Nakagawa T, et al. JENDL-4.0: a new library for nuclear science and engineering. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2011;48(1):1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yokoyama K, Ishikawa M. Use and impact of covariance data in the Japanese latest adjusted library ADJ2010 based on JENDL-4.0. Nucl Data Sheets. 2015;123:97–103.
   Google Scholar
• Chiba G, Tsuji M, Narabayashi T. Uncertainty quantification of neutronic parameters of light water reactor fuel cells with JENDL-4.0 covariance data. J. Nucl. Sci. and Technol. 2013;50(7):751–760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujita T, Sakai T. Uncertainty analysis of the OECD/NEA LWR UAM benchmark phase I using CASMO5 with JENDL-4.0 and ENDF/B-VII.1. J. Nucl. Sci. and Technol. 2020;57(7):858–873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujita T. A comparative study on k-infinity uncertainty due to cross-section covariance data in nuclear data libraries. J. Nucl. Sci. and Technol. 2023;1–11. DOI:10.1080/00223131.2023.2169380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwamoto H, Nishihara K, Sugawara T, et al. Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis for an accelerator-driven system with JENDL-4.0. J. Nucl. Sci. and Technol. 2013;50(8):856–862. DOI:10.1080/00223131.2013.811954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwamoto H, Nishihara K, Iwamoto Y, et al. Impact of PHITS spallation models on the neutronics design of an accelerator-driven system. J. Nucl. Sci. and Technol. 2016;53(10):1585–1594. DOI:10.1080/00223131.2016.1140598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuwagaki K, Nishiyama J, Obara T. Concept of breed and burn reactor with spiral fuel shuffling. Ann Nucl Energy. 2019;127:130–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukaya Y, Mizuta N, Goto M, et al. Conceptual design study of a high performance commercial HTGR for early introduction. Nucl Eng Des. 2020;361:110577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiba G, Okumura K, Sugino K, et al. JENDL-4.0 benchmarking for fission reactor applications. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2011;48(2):172–187. DOI:10.1080/18811248.2011.9711692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyeon CH, Fujimoto A, Sugawara T, et al. Validation of Pb nuclear data by monte carlo analyses of sample reactivity experiments at Kyoto University critical assembly. J. Nucl. Sci. and Technol. 2016;53(4):602–612. DOI:10.1080/00223131.2015.1068716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukushima M, Tsujimoto K, Okajima S. Analyses with latest major nuclear data libraries of the fission rate ratios for several TRU nuclides in the FCA-IX experiments. J. Nucl. Sci. and Technol. 2017;54(7):795–805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tada K, Kikuchi T, Sakino T, et al. Analyses of used BWR fuel assay data with the integrated burnup code system SWAT4.0. J. Nucl. Sci. and Technol. 2018;55(2):138–150. DOI:10.1080/00223131.2017.1384705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto T, Sakai T, Iwahashi D. Analysis of measured isotopic compositions by CASMO5 coupled with a JENDL-4.0 base library for irradiated fuel of light water reactors. J. Nucl. Sci. and Technol. 2017;1–13. DOI:10.1080/00223131.2016.1273802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujita T, Sakai T. Analysis of the SPERT-III E-Core experiment using CASMO5/TRACE/PARCS based on JENDL-4.0 and ENDF/B-VII.1. J. Nucl. Sci. and Technol. 2019;56(6):553–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yokoyama K, Maruyama S, Numata K et al. Development of a fast reactor for minor actinides transmutation –improvement of prediction accuracy for MA-related integral parameters based on cross-section adjustment techniques-. Proceedings of PHYSOR2016; 2016 May 1–5; Sun Valley, Idaho. [CD-ROM].2016.
   Google Scholar
• JENDL committee reactor integral test working group. Compilation of the data book on light water reactor benchmark to develop the next version of JENDL -Utilization of criticality data in ICSBEP and IRPhEP open databases-. JAEA-Data/Code 2017-006, May 2017, Japan Atomic Energy Agency. [in Japanese]
   Google Scholar
• OECD/NEA. International co-operation in nuclear data evaluation, an extended summary of the Collaborative International Evaluated Library Organization (CIELO) Pilot Project. In: NEA No. 7498. France: OECD/NEA; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Igashira M, Kiyanagi Y, Oshima M. Nuclear data study at J-PARC BL04. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A. 2009;600(1):332–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahler AC, MacFarlane RE, Mosteller RD, et al. ENDF/B-VII.1 neutron cross section data testing with critical assembly benchmarks and reactor experiments. Nucl Data Sheets. 2011;112:2997–3036.
   Google Scholar
• Brown DA, Chadwick MB, Capote R, et al. ENDF/B-VIII.0: the 8th major release of the nuclear reaction data library with CIELO-project cross sections, new standards and thermal scattering data. Nucl Data Sheets. 2018 Feb;148:1–142.
   Google Scholar
• Park HJ, Kang H, Lee HC, et al. Comparison of ENDF/B-VIII.0 and ENDF/B-VII.1 in criticality, depletion benchmark, and uncertainty analyses by McCARD. Ann Nucl Energy. 2019;131:443–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bostelmann F, Celik C, Williams ML, et al. SCALE capabilities for high temperature gas-cooled reactor analysis. Ann Nucl Energy. 2020;147:107673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochman D, Leray O, Hursin M, et al. Nuclear data uncertainties for typical LWR fuel assemblies and a simple reactor core. Nucl Data Sheets. 2017;139:1–76.
   Google Scholar
• Hartanto D, Liem PH. Analysis of the first core of the Indonesian multipurpose research reactor RSG-GAS using the serpent monte carlo code and the ENDF/B-VIII.0 nuclear data library. Nucl Eng Technol. 2020;52(12):2725–2732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovecký M, Gincelová K, Haroková P, et al. Performance of ENDF/B-VIII.0 library for VVER reactors criticality safety, fuel depletion and reactor dosimetry applications. Ann Nucl Energy. 2020;148:107736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD/NEA. International handbook of evaluated criticality safety benchmark experiments. France: OECD/NEA; 2014. NEA/NSC/DOC(95)03.
   Google Scholar
• OECD/NEA. International handbook of evaluated reactor physics benchmark experiments. France:OECD/NEA;2009. NEA/NSC/DOC(2006)1
   Google Scholar
• Nagaya Y, Okumura K, Sakurai T et al. MVP/GMVP version 3: general purpose monte carlo codes for neutron and photon transport calculations based on continuous energy and multigroup methods. JAEA-Data/Code 2016-018. Japan: Japan Atomic Energy Agency, March 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Yokoyama K, Hazama T, Numata K et al. Development of comprehensive and versatile framework for reactor analysis, MARBLE. Ann Nucl Energy. 2014;66:51–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner CJ, editor. MCNP user’s manual code version 6.2. LA. LAURUR1729981.1729981. Los Alamos (NM): Los Alamos National Laboratory; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Sugino K, Takino K . Development of neutron transport calculation codes for 3-Dhexagonal geometry, 2; improvement and enhancement of the MINISTRI code. Japan: Japan Atomic Energy Agency; 2020. ( JAEA-Data/Code 2019-011).
   Google Scholar
• Marck SC. Benchmarking ENDF/B-VII.0. Nucl Data Sheets. 2006;107(12):3061–3118.
   Google Scholar
• Plompen AJM, Cabellos O, De Saint Jean C, et al. The joint evaluated fission and fusion nuclear data library, JEFF-3.3. Eur Phys J A. 2020 Jul;56(7):181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohkawachi Y, Maeda S, Nagasaki H et al. JOYO MK-II core characteristics database -update to JFS-3-J3.2R-. JNC TN9400 2003-029. Japan: Japan Nuclear Cycle Development Institute; 2003 Apr.
   Google Scholar
• Yamane T, Yasuda H, Akino F Temperature effect on reactivity in VHTRC-1 core. International Reactor Physics Experiment Evaluation (IRPhEP), NEA/NSC/DOC(2006)1. 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Bess JD, Fujimoto N, Dolphin BH, et al. Evaluation of the start-up core physics tests at Japan’s high temperature engineering test reactor (fully-loaded core). International Reactor Physics Experiment Evaluation (IRPhEP), NEA/NSC/DOC(2006)2. 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Hazama T, Shono A, Sugino K. Verification of a nuclear analysis system for fast reactors using BFS-62 critical experiment. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2004;41(12):1145–1154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukushima M, Kitamura Y, Kugo T, et al. Benchmark calculations of sodium-void experiments with uranium fuels at the Fast Critical Assembly FCA. Prog in Nucl Sci and Technol. 2011;2(0):306–311. DOI:10.15669/pnst.2.306
   Google Scholar
• Hazama T, Numata K Analyses of SEFOR Experiments –Isothermal Temperature Coefficient (Core II) and Power Coefficient-. Japan: Japan Atomic Energy Agency; 2006. in Japanese. ( JAEA-Research 2006-059).
   Google Scholar
• Fukushima M, Goda J, Oizumi A, et al. Systematic measurements and analyses for lead void reactivity worth in a plutonium core and two uranium cores with different enrichments. Nuclear Sci. Eng. 2020;194(2):138–153. DOI:10.1080/00295639.2019.1663089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koyama S, Mitsugashira T. Chemical analysis of americium samples irradiated under fast neutron spectra. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2008;5(sup6):55–64. Supplement. 10.1080/00223131.2008.10875977.
   Google Scholar
• Sugino K, Takeda T Development of a fast reactor for Minor Actinides (MAs) transmutation (3) -evaluation of measurement data with MA transmutation-. Proceedings of GLOBAL 2015. 2015: Sep. 21-24; Paris, France. 573–581.
   Google Scholar
• Shinohara N, Kohno N, Nakahara Y, et al. Validation of minor actinide cross sections by studying samples irradiated for 492 days at the dounreay prototype fast reactor—I: radiochemical analysis. Nucl Sci Eng. 2003;144(2):115–128. DOI:10.13182/NSE03-A2347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsujimoto K, Kohno N, Shinohara N, et al. Validation of minor actinide cross sections by studying samples irradiated for 492 days at the dounreay prototype fast reactor—II: burnup calculations. Nucl Sci Eng. 2003;144(2):129–141. DOI:10.13182/NSE03-A2348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tada K, Nagaya Y, Kunieda S, et al. Development and verification of a new nuclear data processing system FRENDY. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2017;54(7):806–817. DOI:10.1080/00223131.2017.1309306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori T, Nakagawa M, Kaneko K Neutron cross section library production code system for continuous energy monte carlo code MVP LICEM. JAERI. JAERIData/Code 96018, /Code 96018, May 1996, Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute [in Japanese].
   Google Scholar
• Goto M, Shimakawa S, Nakao Y. Impact of revised thermal neutron capture cross section of carbon stored in JENDL-4.0 on HTTR criticality calculation. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2011;48(7):965–969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishikawa M Consistency evaluation of Jupiter experiment and analysis for large FBR Cores. Proceedings of PHYSOR96. 1996: Sep. 16–20; Mito, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Hazama T, Chiba G, Sugino K. Development of a fine and ultra-fine group cell calculation code SLAROM-UF for fast reactor analyses. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2006;43(8):908–918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahler AC, editor. The NJOY nuclear data processing system, version 2016. LA. LAURUR1720093.1720093. Los Alamos (USA): Los Alamos National Laboratory; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Takano H, Ishiguro Y, Matsui Y TIMS-1: a processing code for production of group constants of heavy resonant nuclei. JAERI 1267, Sep. 1980, Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute [in Japanese].
   Google Scholar
• Jensen SE, Olgaard PL Description of the prototype fast reactor at dounreay. Denmark: Rise National Laboratory; 1995. ( NKS/RAK-2(95)TR-C1).
   Google Scholar
• Ball SJ, Adams RK. MATEXP, a general purpose digital computer program for solving ordinary differential equations by the matrix exponential method. ORNL-TM-1933. Oak Ridge (USA): Oak Ridge National Laboratory; 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Lapidus L, Luus R. Optimal control of engineering processes. Waltham MA: Blaisdell; 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Katakura J, Kataoka M, Suyama K et al. A Set of ORIGEN2 cross section libraries based on JENDL-3.3 library. Japan: Japan Atomic Energy Agency; 2004. ( JAERI-Data/Code 2004-015).
   Google Scholar
• Horiguchi T, Tachibana T, Koura H et al. Chart of the nuclides 2004. Japanese nuclear data committee and nuclear data center. Japan: Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick MB, Herman M, Oblozinsky P, et al. ENDF/B-VII.1 nuclear data for science and technology: cross sections, covariances, fission product yields and decay data. Nucl Data Sheets. 2011 Dec;112(12):2887–2996.
   Google Scholar
• Kimura A, Nakamura S, Endo S, et al. Neutron total and capture cross-section measurements of 155 Gd and 157 Gd in the thermal energy region with the Li-glass detectors and NaI(Tl) spectrometer installed in J-PARC·mlf·annri. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2022;1–19. DOI:10.1080/00223131.2022.2134224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nouri A, Nagel P, Briggs JB et al. DICE: database for the international criticality safety benchmark evaluation program handbook. Nucl Sci Eng. 2003;145(1):11–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okita S, Nagaya Y, Fukaya Y. A pseudo-material method for graphite with arbitrary porosities in Monte Carlo criticality calculations. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2021;58(9):992–998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IAEA. Evaluation of high temperature gas cooled reactor performance: benchmark analysis related to initial testing of the HTTR and HTR-10. Vienna: IAEA; 2003. ( IAEA-TECDOC-1382).
   Google Scholar