684
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Tsunami flooding analysis graded-approach framework for tsunami probabilistic risk assessment

, , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 1454-1480 | Received 27 Dec 2021, Accepted 29 May 2023, Published online: 17 Jul 2023

References

  • Japan Association for Earthquake Engineering (JAEE). Tsunami resistant engineering for nuclear safety, association for earthquake engineering (JAEE. Tsunami Resistant Engineering For Nuclear Safety – Toward On Integrated Framework For Earthquake-Tsunami Protection. 2015;283: in Japanese.
  • International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), 2012. IAEA report on protection against extreme earthquakes and tsunamis in the light of the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, IAEA. Available from: https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/IEM-3_web.pdf.
  • Miller C, Cubbage A, Dorman D et al., July 12, 2011. Recommendations for enhancing reactor safety in the 21st century: the near-term task force review of insights from the fukushima dai-ichi accident, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Available from: http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1118/ML111861807.pdf.
  • Bensi M, Ferrante F, Philip J Assessment of flood fragility for nuclear power plants: Challenges and next steps. Proceedings of 23rd Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology. Manchester, UK; 2015; paper ID 533.
  • Bensi M, Kanney F Development of a framework for probabilistic storm surge hazard assessment for United States nuclear power plants. Proceedings of 23rd Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology. Manchester, UK; 2015; paper ID 534.
  • Sugino H, Iwabuchi Y, Nishio M et al. Development of probabilistic methodology for evaluating tsunami risk on nuclear power plants, The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Beijing, China; 2008.
  • Ebisawa K, Sugino H, Iwabuchi Y et al. Usability of tsunami PRA based on accidents of Fukushima Dai-ichi NPP under 2011 Tohoku tsunami, The 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Lisbon, Portugal; 2012.
  • American Society of Mechanical Engineers/American Nuclear Society. Addenda to ASME/ANS RA-S-2008 standard for level 1/large early release frequency probabilistic risk assessment for nuclear power plant applications, standard ASME/ANS RA-Sb–2013. Washington DC: American National Standards Institute (ANSI); 2013.
  • Atomic Energy Society of Japan (AESJ). Implementation standard concerning the tsunami probabilistic risk assessment of nuclear power plants. Tokyo: AESJ; 2013.
  • Atomic Energy Society of Japan (AESJ). AESJ-SC-RK004:2016. Implementation standard concerning the tsunami probabilistic risk assessment of nuclear power plants. Tokyo: AESJ; 2019. in Japanese.
  • Rebour V, Georgescu G, Leteinturier D et al. Guidance document on practices to model and implement external flooding hazards in extended PSA, IRSN-PSN-RES-SAG-PSN-RES-SAG. ASAMPSA_E. 2017;22, 111.
  • EPRI. December 2003. Seismic probabilistic risk assessment implementation guide, epri tr. electric power research institute (EPRI), Palo Alto, California, p. 1002989.
  • EPRI. December 2009. Seismic fragility applications guide update, epri. electric power research institute (EPRI), Palo Alto, California, p. 1019200.
  • American Society of Mechanical Engineers/American Nuclear Society. External-Events PRA Methodology, Standard ANSI/ANS-58.21-2007. Washington DC: American National Standards Institute (ANSI); 2007.
  • Bensi M, Cook C, Chokshi N Integrated assessment of flooding hazards at us nuclear power plants. Proceedings of 22nd Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology. San Francisco, USA; 2013; paper ID 694.
  • Kim MK, Choi IK. A tsunami PSA methodology and application for NPP site in Korea. Nucl Eng Des. 2012;244:92–99. doi: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2011.12.001
  • Smith C, Mandelli D, Prescott S et al. Analysis of pressurized water reactor station blackout caused by external flooding using the RISMC toolkit. Idaho, USA: Idaho National Laboratory; 2014. pp. INL/EXT-14–32906.
  • Smith C, Bhandari B, Muchmore C et al. Flooding fragility experiments and prediction. Idaho, USA: Idaho National Laboratory; 2016. pp. INL/EXT-16–39963.
  • Smith C, Rabiti C, Martineau R et al. Risk-informed safety margins characterization (RISMC) pathway technical program plan. Idaho National Lab. 2016;INL/EXT-11–22977.
  • Prescott SDM, Sampth R, Smith C. 3D simulation of external flooding events for the RISMC pathway. Idaho National Lab. Idaho, USA. 2015;INL/EXT-15–36773, 38.
  • Bodda SS, Gupta A, Dinh N. Risk informed validation framework for external flooding scenario. Nucl Eng Des. 2020;356:110377. doi: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2019.110377
  • Geist EL, Parsons T. Probabilistic analysis of tsunami hazards. Nat Hazards. 2006; 37(3):277–314. DOI:10.1007/s11069-005-4646-z.
  • Annaka T, Satake K, Sakakiyama T et al. Logic-tree approach for probabilistic tsunami hazard analysis and its applications to the Japanese coasts. Pure Appl Geophys. 2007;164(2–3):577–592. doi: 10.1007/s00024-006-0174-3
  • Japan Society of Civil Engineers (JSCE); 2016. Tsunami assessment method for nuclear power plants in Japan 2016. Available from: http://committees.jsce.or.jp/ceofnp/system/files/NPP_TNMT_2016_main_20170814.pdf. [in Japanese]
  • Mori N, Muhammad A, Goda K et al. Probabilistic tsunami hazard analysis of the Pacific coast of Mexico: Case study based on the 1995 Colima earthquake tsunami. Frontiers In Built Env. 2017;3:34. doi: 10.3389/fbuil.2017.00034
  • Cornell CA. Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am. 1968;58(5):1583–1606. doi: 10.1785/BSSA0580051583
  • Basu PC, Ravindra MK, Mihara Y. Component fragility for use in PSA of nuclear power plant. Nucl Eng Des. 2017;323:209–227. doi: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2016.10.018
  • Haraguchi R, Togashi T, Kunimasa T et al. Development of a fragility evaluation methodology for the Tsunami PRA. ASRAM. Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan; 2017;ASRAM2017–1051.
  • Kennedy RP, Campbell RD, Hardy G et al. Subsystem Fragility: seismic safety margins research program (Phase I). NUREG/CR-2405. CA, USA: Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (LLNL), Livermore. 1981:pp. UCRL–15407.
  • Kaida H, Miyagawa Y, Kihara N Methodology for fragility evaluation of a seawall against tsunami effects - part 1: overflow and physical damage associated with tsunami wave pressure, Proceeding of 24th International Conference of Nuclear Engineering (ICONE24), North Carolina, USA, ICONE24–60927; 2016.
  • Atomic Energy Society of Japan (AESJ). A standard for procedure of seismic probabilistic risk assessment for nuclear power plants, AESJ-SC-P006E. Tokyo, Japan: AESJ: 2015.
  • Kihara N, Kimura T, Kaida H et al. A methodology of determination of scenario tsunami for fragility assessment based on hazard deaggregation - Determination method of tsunami conditions arriving at a site with a specific scale. in Japanese J JAEE. 2016;18(1):_1_35–_1_58. doi: 10.5610/jaee.18.1_35
  • Kihara N, Kaida H, Kimura T et al. A tsunami scenario determination methodology for risk assessment of coastal industrial facilities. The. Proc. 29th International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference. Honolulu, Hawaii, USA; 2019; pp. 3292–3296.
  • McGuire RK. Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis and design earthquakes: closing the loop. Bull Seismol Soc Am. 1995;85(5):1275–1284. doi: 10.1785/BSSA0850051275
  • Bazzuro P, Cornell C. Disaggregation of seismic hazard. Bull Seismol Soc Am. 1999;89(2):501–520. doi: 10.1785/BSSA0890020501
  • Ishikawa Y, Kameda H Hazard-consistent magnitude and distance for extended seismic risk analysis, Proceedings of the 9th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo-Kyoto, Japan; 1988; 11, pp. 89–94.
  • US Nuclear Regulatory Commission; November 2012; ADAMS Accession No. ML12311A214. (U.S.NRC), JLD-ISG-2012-05. guidance for performing the integrated assessment for external flooding 2012.
  • Budnitz RJ. Current status of methodologies for seismic probabilistic safety analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 1998;62(1–2):71–88. doi: 10.1016/S0951-8320(97)00158-0
  • Kameda H Engineering agenda on nuclear safety from the 2011 Tohoku-Pacific earthquake. Proceedings of International Symposium Engineering Lessons Learned from the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake, Mar 1–4, 2012, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 102–121.
  • Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT). Guide to Determining the Potential Tsunami Inundation, 2.00 version. Seacoast Office, Water And Disaster Management Bureau, Ministry Of Land, Infrastructure, Ministry Of Land, Infrastructure, Transport And Tourism. 2012.
  • Montanari N, Sampath R, Weglian JE et al. Coupling smoothed-particle hydrodynamics and torricelli’s law-based hydraulic models for flooding risk analysis. Proceedings of International Topical Meeting on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Analysis. Pennsylvania, USA; 2017; pp. 146–155.
  • U.S.NRC, Updated Implementation Guidelines for SSHAC Hazard Studies. 2018. (NUREG-2213), NUREG-2213, https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1828/ML18282A082.pdf.
  • Takahashi Y, Mihara Y, Kaida H et al. Uncertainty quantification of tsunami parameters for tsunami fragility assessment based on tsunami hazard assessment and inundation simulation. Proceedings of 15th International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM); 2020; doi: 10.3850/981-973-0000-00-0 esrel2020psam15–paper.
  • Kennedy RP, Cornell CA, Campbell RD, et al. Probabilistic seismic safety study of an existing nuclear power plant. Nucl Eng Des. 1980;59(2):315–338. doi: 10.1016/0029-5493(80)90203-4
  • Asakura R, Iwase K, Ikeya T et al. Experimental study on wave force acting on on-shore structures due to overflowing tsunamis. Proceedings of Coastal Engineering, JSCE. Kobe, Hyogo, Japan. 2020; 47, pp. 911–915 [in Japanese]
  • Koshimura S, Oie T, Yanagisawa H et al. Developing fragility functions for tsunami damage estimation using numerical model and post-tsunami data from Banda Aceh, Indonesia. Coast Eng J. 2009;51(3):243–273. doi: 10.1142/S0578563409002004
  • Ando K, Itoi T, Takada T. Collapse mode-based fragility curves against tsunami for low- and medium- rise reinforced concrete buildings. J Struct Constr Eng. 2013;78(693):1851–1857. doi: 10.3130/aijs.78.1851 in Japanese.
  • Suppasri A, Mas E, Koshimura S et al. Developing tsunami fragility curves from the surveyed data of the 2011 Great East Japan tsunami in Sendai and Ishinomaki plains. Coast Eng J. 2012;54(1):1250008–1250016. doi: 10.1142/S0578563412500088
  • Cabinet Office of Japan. On the tsunami source model of the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku earthquake. Report of 12th meeting on the source model of the giant earthquake along the Nankai Trough. 2012. [in Japanese]