Uncertainty analysis for fission product inventories based on covariance data of fission product yields in JENDL-4.0 and ENDF/B-VIII.0

References

• Ivanov K, Avramova M, Kamerow S, et al. Benchmarks for Uncertainty Analysis in Modelling (UAM) for the design, operation and safety analysis of LWRs volume I: specification and support data for neutronics cases (Phase I). OECD/NEA/NSC. NEA/NSC/DOC(2013)7; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Bratton RN, Avramova M, Ivanov K. OECD/NEA benchmark for uncertainty analysis in modeling (uam) for LWRs – summary and discussion of neutronics cases (Phase I). Nucl. Eng. Technol. 2014;46(3):313–342. doi: 10.5516/NET.01.2014.710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delipei GK, Hou J, Avramova M, et al. Summary of comparative analysis and conclusions from OECD/NEA LWR-UAM benchmark Phase I. Nucl. Eng. Design. 2021;384:111474. doi: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2021.111474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujita T, Sakai T Uncertainty analysis of OECD/NEA/NSC UAM benchmark Phase I using CASMO5/SIMULATE5 with JENDL-4.0 library and covariance data. Proceedings of BEPU; Lucca, Italy; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Fujita T, Sakai T. Uncertainty analysis of the OECD/NEA LWR UAM benchmark Phase I using CASMO5 with JENDL-4.0 and ENDF/B-VII.1. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 2020;57(7):858–873. doi: 10.1080/00223131.2020.1727373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studsvik Scandpower, Inc. CASMO5 user’s manual. USA: Studsvik Scandpower, Inc.; 2012:pp. SSP–07/431.
   Google Scholar
• Studsvik Scandpower, Inc. SIMULATE5 user’s manual. USA: Studsvik Scandpower, Inc.; 2012:pp. SSP–10/438.
   Google Scholar
• Shibata K, Iwamoto O, Nakagawa T, et al. JENDL-4.0: a new library for nuclear science and engineering. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 2011;48(1):1–30. doi: 10.1080/18811248.2011.9711675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadwick MB, Herman M, Oblozinsky P, et al. ENDF/B-VII.1 nuclear data for science and technology: cross sections, covariances, fission product yields and decay data. Nucl. Data. Sheets. 2011;112(12):2887–2996. doi: 10.1016/j.nds.2011.11.002
   Google Scholar
• Honta K, Chiba G Comparison of methods of generating covariance matrix of fission yield. Proceeding of RPHA19; Osaka, Japan; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Devillers C. The importance of fission product nuclear data in reactor design and operation. Proceedings of the Second Advisory Group Meeting on Fission Product Nuclear Data IAEA-213 Volume 1; 1977; Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Fiorito L, Stankovskiy A, Van den Eynde V, et al. Generation of fission yield covariances to correct discrepancies in the nuclear data libraries. Ann. Nucl. Energy. 2016;88:12–23. doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2015.10.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wieselquist WA, Kim KS, Ilas G, et al. Comparison of burnup credit uncertainty quantification methods. Proceeding of ANS NCSD; Wilmington NC; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Zu T, Lu Z, Han F, et al. Uncertainty analysis of infinite multiplication factor and nuclide number density based on the UAM-PWR benchmark with respect to cross sections, fission yields and decay half-life. Ann. Nucl. Energy. 2022;165:108781. doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2021.108781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terranova N, Serot O, Archier P. A covariance generation methodology for fission product yields. In: Proceeding of WONDER. Aix-en-Provence, France; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Leray O, Fiorito L, Rochman D, et al. Uncertainty propagation of fission product yields to nuclide composition and decay heat for a PWR UO2 fuel assembly. Prog. Nucl. Energy. 2017;101:486–495. doi: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.05.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang J, Kong C, Ebiwonjumi B, et al. Uncertainty quantification in decay heat calculation of spent nuclear fuel by STREAM/RAST-K. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 2021;53(9):2803–2815. doi: 10.1016/j.net.2021.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suyama K, Uchida Y, Kashima T, et al. Burn-up credit criticality safety benchmark Phase III-C. OECD/NEA/NSC, NEA/NSC/R/(2015)6; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor GJ, Liem PH. Burn-up credit criticality benchmark phase IV-B: results and analysis of MOX fuel depletion calculations. OECD/NEA/NSC, NEA/NSC/DOC/(2003)4; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Katakura J. JENDL FP decay data file 2011 and fission yields data file 2011. Japan Atomic Energy Agency, JAEA-Data/Code 2011-025; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Brown DA, Chadwick MB, Capote R, et al. ENDF/B-VIII.0: the 8th major release of the nuclear reaction data library with CIELO-project cross sections, new standards and thermal scattering data. Nucl. Data. Sheets. 2018;148:1–142. doi: 10.1016/j.nds.2018.02.001
   Google Scholar
• Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facility Safety Research Committee. A guide introducing burnup credit, preliminary version (Contract research). Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute (JAERI), JAERI-Tech 2001-055; 2001. in Japanese.
   Google Scholar
• Borowski J, Call M, Dunn D, et al. Standard review plan for transportation packages for spent fuel and radioactive material, Final report. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NUREG-2216; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Chiba G, Honta K. Sensitivity and uncertainty analyses of fission product nuclide inventories for passive gamma spectroscopy. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 2020;57(12):1265–1275. doi: 10.1080/00223131.2020.1780993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwamoto O, Iwamoto N, Kunieda S, et al. Japanese evaluated nuclear data library version 5: JENDL-5. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 2023;60(1):1–60. doi: 10.1080/00223131.2022.2141903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsubakihara K, Okumura S, Ishizuka C, et al. Evaluation of fission product yields and associated covariance matrices. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 2021;58(2):151–165. doi: 10.1080/00223131.2020.1813643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar