Simulation using representative data selection for transboundary radiation effect evaluation by Nuclear Accident Consequence Analysis Code (NACAC)

References

• Long P, Hien P, Quang N. Atmospheric transport of 131I and 137Cs from Fukushima by the East Asian northeast monsoon. J Environ Radioact. 2019;197:74–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2018.12.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giaiotti D, Oshurok D, Skrynyk O. The Chernobyl nuclear accident 137Cs cumulative depositions simulated by means of the CALMET/CALPUFF modelling system. Atmos Pollut Res. 2018;9(3):502–512. doi: 10.1016/j.apr.2017.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grambow B, Nitta A, Shibata A, et al. Ten Years after the NPP accident at Fukushima: review on fuel debris behavior in contact with water. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2022;59(1):1–24. doi: 10.1080/00223131.2021.1966347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubo K, Jang S, Takata T, et al. Dynamic probabilistic risk assessment of seismic-induced flooding in pressurized water reactor by seismic, flooding, and thermal-hydraulics simulations. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2022;60(4):1–15. doi: 10.1080/00223131.2022.2100837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagai H, Furuta Y, Nakayama H, et al. Quantitative visualization of a radioactive plume with harmonizing gamma-ray imaging spectrometry and real-time atmospheric dispersion simulation based on 3D wind observation. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2023;1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadowaki M, Nagai H, Yoshida T, et al. Application of Bayesian machine learning for estimation of uncertainty in forecasted plume directions by atmospheric dispersion simulations. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2023;1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidaka A, Kawashima S, Kajino M. Radio-tellurium released into the environment during the complete oxidation of fuel cladding, containment venting and reactor building failure of the Fukushima accident. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2023;60(7):1–16. doi: 10.1080/00223131.2022.2142311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato Y, Terasaka Y. Radiation imaging using an integrated radiation imaging system based on a compact Compton camera under unit 1/2 exhaust stack of Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2022;59(6):677–687. doi: 10.1080/00223131.2021.2001391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamasaki S, Utsunomiya S. A review of efforts for volume reduction of contaminated soil in the ten years after the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2022;59(2):135–147. doi: 10.1080/00223131.2021.1974596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamashita S, Ohto H, Abe M, et al. Comprehensive health risk management after the Fukushima nuclear power plant accident. J Clin Oncol. 2016;28(4):255–262. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2016.01.001
   Google Scholar
• Mohammed Saeed IM, Mohammed Saleh MA, Hashim S, et al. Atmospheric dispersion modeling and radiological safety assessment for expected operation of Baiji nuclear power plant potential site. Ann Nucl Energy. 2019;127:156–164. doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2018.11.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alrammah I, Mohammed Saeed IM, Mhareb MHA, et al. Atmospheric dispersion modeling and radiological environmental impact assessment for normal operation of a proposed pressurized water reactor in the eastern coast of Saudi Arabia. Prog Nucl Energy. 2022;145:104121. doi: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2022.104121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins HE, Grimes BK, Galpin F. Planning basis for the development of state and local government radiological emergency response plans in support of light water nuclear power plants. Washington, DC (USA): Nuclear Regulatory Commission; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• European C, Directorate-General for Employment SA, Inclusion. Methods for assessing the off-site radiological consequences of nuclear accidents. Luxembourg: Commission of the European communities; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Jones J, Bixler N, Burns S, et al. Review of NUREG-0654, Supplement 3 ‘Criteria for Protective Action Recommendations for Severe Accidents’. NM: Citeseer; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Hummel DW, Chouhan S, Lebel L, et al. Radiation dose consequences of postulated limiting accidents in small modular reactors to inform emergency planning zone size requirements. Ann Nucl Energy. 2020;137:107062. doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2019.107062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández-Ceballos MA, Sangiorgi M, García-Puerta B, et al. Dispersion and ground deposition of radioactive material according to airflow patterns for enhancing the preparedness to N/R emergencies. J Environ Radioact. 2020;216:106178. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2020.106178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu J, Yang Y-M, Chen I-J, et al. Reevaluation of the emergency planning zone for nuclear power plants in Taiwan using MACCS2 code. Appl Radiat Isot. 2006;64(4):448–454. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2005.11.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim N-H, Hwang W-T, Kim C-L. A study on annual atmospheric dispersion factors between continuous and purge releases of gaseous radioactive effluents. J Nucl Fuel Cycle Waste Technol (JNFCWT). 2021;19(2):177–186. doi: 10.7733/jnfcwt.2021.19.2.177
   Google Scholar
• Zhu Y, Guo J, Nie C, et al. Simulation and dose analysis of a hypothetical accident in Sanmen nuclear power plant. Ann Nucl Energy. 2014;65:207–213. doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2013.11.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park S-U, Lee I-H, Joo SJ, et al. Emergency preparedness for the accidental release of radionuclides from the Uljin nuclear power plant in Korea. J Environ Radioact. 2017;180:90–105. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2017.09.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bi S, Kiaghadi A, Schulze BC, et al. Simulation of potential formation of atmospheric pollution from aboveground storage tank leakage after severe storms. Atmos Environ. 2021;248:118225. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein H, Bartnicki J, Brown JE, et al. Consequences for Norway from a hypothetical accident at the Sellafield reprocessing plant: Atmospheric transport of radionuclides. J Environ Radioact. 2021;237:106703. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2021.106703
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung WH, Ma WM, Chan PKY. Nuclear accident consequence assessment in Hong Kong using JRODOS. J Environ Radioact. 2018;183:27–36. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2017.12.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitoi M. Investigating the recurrence of meteorological hazards. Prog Nucl Energy. 2016;89:39–45. doi: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2016.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudas C, Pázmándi T. Consequences of selecting different subsets of meteorological data to utilize in deterministic safety analysis. J Environ Radioact. 2020;225:106428. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2020.106428
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahara S, Homma T, editors Analysis for relocation strategy using the method of probabilistic accident consequence assessment. Proceedings of IRPA12: 12. Congress of the International Radiation Protection Association: Strengthening Radiation Protection Worldwide-Highlights, Global Perspective and Future Trends Buenos Aires, Argentina; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Silva K, Vechgama W. Consideration of change over time in nuclear accident consequence assessment to support optimization of long-term remediation strategy. Nucl Eng Des. 2021;373:111022. doi: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2020.111022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khunsrimek N, Krisanungkura P, Vechgama W, et al. Verification of the NACAC atmospheric dispersion calculation using a hypothetical accident in a neighboring nuclear power plant. Prog Nucl Energy. 2023;156:104532. doi: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2022.104532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IAEA. Generic procedures for monitoring in a nuclear or radiological emergency. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• de la Rosa Blul JC. Determination of emergency planning zones distances and scaling-based comparison criteria for downsized Nuclear Power Plants. Nucl Eng Des. 2021;382:111367. doi: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2021.111367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless TS, Talabi SM, Fischbeck PS. Risk and regulatory considerations for small modular reactor emergency planning zones based on passive decontamination potential. Energy. 2019;167:740–756. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.10.173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min JS, Kim HR. Environmental impact on the Korean peninsula due to hypothetical accidental scenarios at the Haiyang nuclear power plant in China. Prog Nucl Energy. 2018;105:254–262. doi: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2018.01.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshikane T, Yoshimura K. Dispersion characteristics of radioactive materials estimated by wind patterns. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):9926. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27955-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leadbetter SJ, Hort MC, Jones AR, et al. Sensitivity of the modelled deposition of Caesium-137 from the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant to the wet deposition parameterisation in NAME. J Environ Radioact. 2015;139:200–211. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2014.03.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivas CV, Hari Prasad KBRR, Naidu CV, et al. Sensitivity analysis of atmospheric dispersion simulations by FLEXPART to the WRF-Simulated meteorological predictions in a coastal environment. Pure Appl Geophys. 2016;173(2):675–700. doi: 10.1007/s00024-015-1104-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leelőssy Á, Lagzi I, Kovács A, et al. A review of numerical models to predict the atmospheric dispersion of radionuclides. J Environ Radioact. 2018;182:20–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2017.11.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talerko N. Mesoscale modelling of radioactive contamination formation in Ukraine caused by the Chernobyl accident. J Environ Radioact. 2005;78(3):311–329. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2004.04.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stohl A, Seibert P, Wotawa G, et al. Xenon-133 and caesium-137 releases into the atmosphere from the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant: determination of the source term, atmospheric dispersion, and deposition. Atmos Chem Phys. 2012;12(5):2313–2343. doi: 10.5194/acp-12-2313-2012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baró R, Maurer C, Brioude J, et al. The environmental effects of the April 2020 wildfires and the Cs-137 re-suspension in the Chernobyl exclusion zone: a multi-hazard threat. Atmos. 2021;12(4):467. doi: 10.3390/atmos12040467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muswema JL, Darko EO, Gbadago JK, et al. Atmospheric dispersion modeling and radiological safety analysis for a hypothetical accident of Ghana Research Reactor-1 (GHARR-1). Ann Nucl Energy. 2014;68:239–246. doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2014.01.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veigele WJ, Head JH. Derivation of the gaussian plume model. J Air Pollut Control Assoc. 1978;28(11):1139–1140. doi: 10.1080/00022470.1978.10470720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arya SP. Air pollution meteorology and dispersion. Vol. 310. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Thykier-Nielsen S, Deme S, Mikkelsen T. Description of the atmospheric dispersion module RIMPUFF. Denmark: Riso National Laboratory, 1999. 49.
   Google Scholar
• Stohl A, Forster C, Frank A, et al. Technical note: The Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART version 6.2. Atmos Chem Phys. 2005;5(9):2461–2474. doi: 10.5194/acp-5-2461-2005
   Google Scholar
• IAEA. Generic models for use in assessing the impact of discharges of radioactive substances to the environment. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Kimura M, Takahara S, Homma T. Evaluation of the precautionary action zone using a probabilistic consequence analysis. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2013;50(3):296–303. doi: 10.1080/00223131.2013.772725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dvorzhak A, Mora JC, Robles B. Probabilistic risk assessment from potential exposures to the public applied for innovative nuclear installations. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2016;152:176–186. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2016.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi G-S, Lim J-M, Lim K-S, et al. Characteristics of regional scale atmospheric dispersion around Ki-Jang research reactor using the Lagrangian Gaussian puff dispersion model. Nucl Eng Technol. 2018;50(1):68–79. doi: 10.1016/j.net.2017.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaviani F, Memarian MH, Eslami-Kalantari M. Radioactive impact on Iran and the world from a postulated accident at Bushehr nuclear power plant. Prog Nucl Energy. 2021;142:103991. doi: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2021.103991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva K, Ishiwatari Y, Takahara S. Cost per severe accident as an index for severe accident consequence assessment and its applications. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2014;123:110–122. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2013.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wonderen E, Van der Steen I, Hasemann I. COSYMA: Users Intercomparison Exercise. EUR 15108, European Communities; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Panitz H-J, Matzerath C, Päsler-Sauer J. UFOMOD-atmospheric dispersion and deposition. Kernforschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH in Germany. 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Liu X, Homma T. Variation of Radiological Consequences under Various Weather Conditions JAERI-Tech 2001-054. Tokai-mura, Naka-gun, Ibaraki-ken: Japan Atomic Energy Research Inst; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly GN. Cosyma a new programme package for accident consequence assessment. EUR 13028: Luxembourg: Commission of the European Communities; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Homma T, Tomita K, Hato S. Uncertainty and sensitivity studies with the probabilistic accident consequence assessment code OSCAAR. Nucl Eng Technol. 2005;37(3):245–258.
   Google Scholar
• Homma T, Ishikawa J, Tomita K, et al. Radiological consequence assessments of degraded core accident scenarios derived from a generic Level 2 PSA of a BWR JAERI-RESEARCH--2000-060 Japan: Japan Atomic Energy Research Inst; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Thiessen K, Napier B, Filistovic V, et al. Model testing using data on 131I released from Hanford. J Environ Radioact. 2005;84(2):211–224. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2004.01.043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiessen K, Sazykina T, Apostoaei A, et al. Model testing using data on 137Cs from Chernobyl fallout in the Iput River catchment area of Russia. J Environ Radioact. 2005;84(2):225–244. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2004.10.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro B. 1990 recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection: ICRP publication 60, Pergamon press, 1991. Eur J Radiol. 1992;15(1):93.
   Google Scholar
• Evans J. S, Abrahamson, S, Bender, MA et al. Health Fffects Models for Nuclear Power Plant Accident Consequence Analysis NUREG/CR-4214 . NM: Inhalation Ibxicology Research Institute Lovelace Biomedical and Environmental Research Institute; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Kocher D. Dose-rate conversion factors for external exposure to photon and electron radiation from radionuclides occurring in routine releases from nuclear fuel cycle facilities NUREG/CR-0494 . Oak Ridge, TN, United States: Oak Ridge National Lab; 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Silva K, Krisanungkura P, Khunsrimek N, et al. Inter-comparison of transboundary atmospheric dispersion calculations: A summary of outputs from the ASEAN NPSR benchmark exercise. Prog Nuclear Energy. 2021;135:103718. doi: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2021.103718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzhou thermal research institute. Fangchenggang nuclear power plant phase II (2 × HL1000-1) project environmental impact report for units 3 and 4 (site selection stage). 2014. 436–445.https://www.mee.gov.cn/ywgz/hjyxpj/jsxmhjyxpj/xmslqk/201605/W020160522145040477354.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Saha S, Moorthi S, Wu X, et al. NCEP Climate Forecast System Version 2 (CFSv2) 6-hourly Products. Boulder, CO: Research Data Archive at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, Computational and Information Systems Laboratory; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Bijlholt J, Constantinou C, Janssens A, et al. HERCA-WENRA Approach for a better cross-border coordination of protective actions during the early phase of a nuclear accident. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Leute J, Walton F, Mitchell R, et al. MACCS (MELCOR Accident Consequence Code System) User Guide–Version 4.0. 2021.
   Google Scholar
• MANOBS. Manual of surface weather observation standards. Meteorological Service Of Canada: Meteorological Service Of Canada; 2021. Available from: https://publications.gc.ca/site/eng/9.907779/publication.html.
   Google Scholar
• IAEA. Actions to Protect the Public in an Emergency due to Severe Conditions at a Light Water Reactor. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Protection R. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007;37(2.4):2.
   Google Scholar
• IAEA. Criteria for use in preparedness and response for a nuclear or radiological emergency. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2011.
   Google Scholar