The development of Petri net-based continuous Markov chain Monte Carlo methodology applying to dynamic probability risk assessment for multi-state resilience systems with repairable multi-component interdependency under longtermly thereat

References

• Yamano H, Nishino H, Kurisaka K. Development of probabilistic risk assessment methodology against extreme snow for sodium-cooled fast reactor. Nucl Eng Des. 2016;308:86–95. doi: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2016.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishino H, Kurisaka K, Yamano H Development of extreme rainfall PRA methodology for sodium-cooled fast reactor. Proceedings of the 10th Japan-Korea symposium on nuclear thermal hydraulics and safety (NTHAS10); 2016 Nov 27-30; Kyoto, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Nishino H, Kurisaka K, Yamano H Development of margin assessment methodology of decay heat removal function against external hazards. (2) tornado PRA methodology. Proceedings of the 10th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermal Hydraulics, Operation and Safety (NUTHOS-10); 2014 Dec 14-18; Okinawa, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Nishino H, Yamano H, Kurisaka K. Development of probabilistic risk assessment methodology against strong wind for sodium-cooled fast reactors. Mech Eng J. 2023;10(4):22–00387. doi: 10.1299/mej.22-00387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okano Y, Yamano H. Hazard curve evaluation method development for a forest fire as an external hazard on nuclear power plants. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2016;53(8):1224–1234. doi: 10.1080/00223131.2015.1102662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamano H, Nishino H, Kurisaka K et al. Development of probabilistic risk assessment methodology against volcanic eruption for sodium-cooled fast reactors. ASCE-ASME J Risk Uncertain Eng Syst B: Mech Eng. 2018;4(3):030902. doi: 10.1115/1.4037877
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen NC. Reactor safety study: an assessment of accident risks in U.S. commercial nuclear power plants (WASH-1400). Washington (DC): U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission; 1975. pp. NUREG–75/014.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Severe accident risks: an assessment for five US nuclear power plants. Washington (DC): U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission; 1990. NUREG-1150.
   Google Scholar
• Devooght J, Smidts C. Probabilistic reactor dynamics—I: the theory of continuous event trees. Nucl Sci Eng. 1992;111(3):229–240. doi: 10.13182/NSE92-A23937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devooght J. Dynamic reliability in advances in nuclear science and technology. Boston (MA): Springer; 2002. doi: 10.1007/0-306-47812-9_7.
   Google Scholar
• Mandelli D, Wang C, Parisi C, et al. Linking classical PRA models to a dynamic PRA. Ann Nucl Energy. 2020;149:107746. doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2020.107746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acosta C, Siu N. Dynamic event trees in accident sequence analysis: application to steam generator tube rupture. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 1993;41(2):135–154. doi: 10.1016/0951-8320(93)90027-V
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldemir T. A survey of dynamic methodologies for probabilistic safety assessment of nuclear power plants. Ann Nucl Energy. 2013;52:113–124. doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2012.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu A, Zhang Z, Zhang M, et al. Research on time-dependent failure modeling method of integrating discrete dynamic event tree with fault tree. Front Energy Res. 2019;7:74. doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2019.00074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakobyan A, Aldemir T, Denning R, et al. Dynamic generation of accident progression event trees. Nucl Eng Des. 2008;238(12):3457–3467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catalyurek U, Rutt B, Metzroth K, et al. Development of a code-agnostic computational infrastructure for the dynamic generation of accident progression event trees. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2010;95(3):278–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfonsi A, Rabiti C, Mandelli D et al. Dynamic event tree analysis through RAVEN. Idaho Falls (ID): Idaho National Laboratory; 2013. INL/CON-13-29344.
   Google Scholar
• Alfonsi A, Rabiti C, Mandelli D et al. RAVEN and dynamic probabilistic risk assessment: software overview. Idaho Falls (ID): Idaho National Laboratory; 2014. INL/CON-14-31785.
   Google Scholar
• Hofer E, Kloos M, Krzykacz-Hausmann B, et al. An approximate epistemic uncertainty analysis approach in the presence of epistemic and aleatory uncertainties. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2002;77(3):229–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kloos M, Peschke J. MCDET: a probabilistic dynamics method combining Monte Carlo simulation with the discrete dynamic event tree approach. Nucl Sci Eng. 2006;153(2):137–156. doi: 10.13182/NSE06-A2601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yabuchi S, Takata T, Yamaguchi A Quantification of event sequence chronology using a continuous MCMC method for level 2 PSA of a nuclear power plant. Proceedings of the 9th International Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management Conference (PSAM9); 2008 May 18-23; Hong Kong. ( PSAM9-0141).
   Google Scholar
• Shinzaki S, Yamaguchi A, Takata T Quantification of severe accident scenarios in level 2 PSA of nuclear power plant with continuous Markov chain model and Monte Carlo method. Proceedings of the 10th International Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management Conference (PSAM10); 2010 Jun 7-11; Seattle, WA. ( PSAM10-0131).
   Google Scholar
• Shinzaki S, Yamaguchi A, Takata T et al. Dynamic scenario quantification based on continuous Markov Monte Carlo method with meta-model of thermal hydraulics for level 2 PSA. Proceedings of the 14th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermal Hydraulics (NURETH-14); 2011 Sept 25-30; Toronto, Canada. ( NURETH14-390).
   Google Scholar
• Takata T, Azuma E. Event sequence assessment of deep snow in sodium-cooled fast reactor based on continuous Markov chain Monte Carlo method with plant dynamics analysis. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2016;53(11):1749–1757. doi: 10.1080/00223131.2016.1155508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakashima R, Koike A, Sakai T et al. Quantitative risk assessment with CMMC method on abnormal snowfall incident for a sodium-cooled fast reactor. Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering (ICONE29); 2022 Aug 8-12; Shenzhen, China. DOI:10.1115/ICONE29-93039.
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki M, Sakai T, Takata T et al. Quantitative risk assessment of accident managements against volcano ash hazard in a sodium-cooled fast reactor. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering (ICONE27); 2019 May 19-24; Tsukuba, Japan. DOI: 10.1299/jsmeicone.2019.27.1982.
   Google Scholar
• Uchibori A, Sonehara M, Aoyagi M et al. Development of integrated severe accident analysis code, SPECTRA for sodium-cooled fast reactor. Proceedings of International Conference on Fast Reactors and Related Fuel Cycles; Sustainable Clean Energy for the Future (FR22); 2022 Apr 19-22; Vienna, Austria. Available from: https://conferences.iaea.org/event/218/papers/18857/files/8357-Final_CN291-21.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Buchacker K Modeling with extended fault trees. Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Symposium on High Assurance Systems Engineering (HASE 2000); 2000 Nov 17; Albuquerque, NM. DOI: 10.1109/HASE.2000.895468.
   Google Scholar
• Leveson NG, Stolzy JL. Safety analysis using Petri nets. IEEE Trans Softw Eng. 1987;SE-13(3):386–397. doi: 10.1109/TSE.1987.233170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murata T. Petri nets: properties, analysis and applications. Proc IEEE. 1989;77(4):541–580. doi: 10.1109/5.24143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulin J, Juan AA, Martorell S et al. Simulation methods for reliability and availability of complex systems. London (UK): Springer; 2010. doi: 10.1007/978-1-84882-213-9.
   Google Scholar
• Atomic Energy Society of Japan. A standard for procedures of probabilistic safety assessment of nuclear power plants during power operation 2008 (level 1 PSA). Tokyo (Japan): Atomic Energy Society of Japan; 2008. AESJ-SC-P008:2008in Japanese.
   Google Scholar
• Yamamoto T, Furukawa R, Okuyama K Dust-loading tests for air filters with volcanic ash. Tsukuba (Japan): geological survey of Japan, AIST; 2016. (Report No. 629) [in Japanese].
   Google Scholar
• Yamamoto T Numerical simulation for the Daisen-Kurayoshi tephra. Tsukuba (Japan): Geological Survey of Japan, AIST; 2016. (Report No. 635) [in Japanese].
   Google Scholar
• Morikawa Y. Fluid-solid two-phase flow: aerodyanamic and hydraulic transport. Tokyo (Japan): Nikkan Kogyo Simbun Ltd; 1979. in Japanese.
   Google Scholar
• Japan Atomic Energy Agency. Development of margin assessment methodology of decay heat removal function against external hazards. O-arai (Japan): Japan Atomic Energy Agency; 2016. Available from: https://www.nsystemkoubo.jp/result/achv_report/h26-h30/h272report.pdf [in Japanese].
   Google Scholar
• Soga T, Aoyama T, Soju S Improvement of irradiation capability in the experimental fast reactor Joyo. Proceedings of the IAEA Technical Meeting; 2008 Nov 17-21; Vienna, Austria. ( TM-34779).
   Google Scholar
• Yamamoto T, Ishizuka Y, Geshi N et al. Research and development of margin assessment methodology of decay heat removal function against external hazards (2) Development of external hazard assessment methodology for volcanic eruption. Proceedings of Fall Meeting 2013 of Atomic Energy Society of Japan; 2013 Sep 3-5; Aoimori, Japan [in Japanese].
   Google Scholar
• Advisory Committee on Monju Safety Requirements. Safety requirements expected to the prototype fast breeder reactor ‘monju’. O-arai (Japan): Japan Atomic Energy Agency; 2014. JAEA-Evaluation 2014-005in Japanese.
   Google Scholar